Real-world treatment patterns, health care resource utilization, and costs in a US Medicare population with bronchiectasis.

BACKGROUND: Bronchiectasis carries a significant economic burden with high health care expenditures associated with frequent hospitalizations, physician visits, and treatments, including oral and intravenous antibiotics for repeated lung infections, airway-clearance therapy, and oxygen administration. Bronchiectasis exacerbations can contribute to this burden. OBJECTIVE: To estimate US health care resource utilization (HCRU) and costs associated with bronchiectasis and with bronchiectasis exacerbations. METHODS: This retrospective study used the 100% Medicare Fee-for-Service database (January 2014 to December 2020) to compare HCRU and costs among patients with bronchiectasis with those of patients without bronchiectasis (controls). For patients with bronchiectasis, the index date was a randomly selected bronchiectasis claim after more than 1 year of disease history and, for controls, a claim closest to their matched bronchiectasis patient's index date. All patients had continuous enrollment for at least 12 months pre-index (baseline) and at least 12 months post-index. Primary outcomes were all-cause, respiratory-related, and bronchiectasis-related HCRU and health care costs, which were presented by the overall sample and by segmented patient cohorts based on the number of exacerbations during baseline (0, 1, or ≥2). RESULTS: 92,529 patients with bronchiectasis (mean [SD] age, 76.7 [8.8] years; 72.3% female) and 92,529 matched controls qualified for the study. Compared with controls, patients with bronchiectasis presented greater mean (SD) all-cause physician visits (15.4 [10.0] vs 13.2 [9.7]; P < 0.001) and respiratory-related physician visits (5.2 [4.3] vs 1.9 [3.1]), pulmonologist visits (1.9 [2.2] vs 0.3 [1.0]), hospitalizations (0.4 [0.9] vs 0.3 [0.8]), emergency department visits (0.33 [1.0] vs 0.26 [1.0]), and total health care costs ($10,224 [$23,263] vs $6,704 [$19,593]). Respiratory-related HCRU was also greater in patients with more baseline exacerbations, with total health care costs of $8,506, $10,365, and $14,790 for patients with 0, 1, and at least 2 exacerbations, respectively (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This real-world study demonstrates the high disease burden associated with bronchiectasis and with exacerbations, highlighting the need to improve management and reduce exacerbations.

Prognostic Factors in Hormone Receptor-Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative (HR+/HER2-) Advanced Breast Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review.

PURPOSE: Advanced breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease with several well-defined subtypes, among which, hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) is most prevalent. Determination of HR and HER2 status influences prognosis and, thus, disease management. Although literature on these prognostic factors exist, especially in the early breast cancer setting, it remains unclear to what extent these factors can guide clinical decision-making in the advanced disease setting. Therefore, we sought to identify the strength and consistency of evidence for prognostic factors in patients with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer. METHODS: A systematic literature review (SLR) of the major electronic databases was conducted in November 2018 for primary research studies published since 2010. Endpoints of interest were tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS). RESULTS: Seventy-nine studies were included wherein all patients were diagnosed with advanced breast cancer and ≥50% of the population were HR+/HER2-. OS was the most commonly assessed endpoint (n=67) followed by PFS (n=33), BCSS (n=5) and tumor response (n=3). The prognostic factors with strongest evidence of association with worse OS were negative progesterone receptor status, higher tumor grade, higher circulating tumor cell (CTC) count and higher Ki67 level, number of metastatic sites (eg multiple vs single) and sites of metastases (eg presence of liver metastases vs absence), shorter time to recurrence or progression to advanced breast cancer, poor performance status, prior therapy attributes in the early or metastatic setting (type of therapy, treatment line, response of prior therapy), and race (black vs white). The prognostic factors that had strongest evidence of association with PFS included CTC count, number and sites of metastases, and absence of prior therapy or higher lines of therapy in the early or metastatic setting. The directionality of association was consistent for all prognostic factors except between lymph node and OS, and de novo metastatic breast cancer and PFS. CONCLUSION: Multiple disease, treatment, and patient-related prognostic factors impact survival, particularly OS, in patients with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer. Treatment outcomes can vary considerably due to these factors. Understanding poorer prognostic factors for patients can result in improved clinical decision-making.

Medication errors involving intravenous patient-controlled analgesia: results from the 2005-2015 MEDMARX database.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the current magnitude and characteristics of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) errors, and to identify opportunities for improving the PCA modality. METHODS: We conducted a descriptive analysis of IV-PCA medication errors submitted to the MEDMARX database. Events were restricted to those occurring in inpatient hospital settings between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2015. IV-PCA errors were classified by error category, cause of error, error type, level of care rendered, and actions taken. RESULTS: A total of 1948 IV-PCA errors were identified as potential errors (3.9%), nonharmful errors (89.5%), or harmful errors (6.7%) based on the National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention taxonomy for categorizing medication errors. Of these, 19.1% required a clinical intervention to address the deleterious effects of the error, indicating an underestimation of the risks associated with IV-PCA errors. The most frequent types of errors were improper dose/quantity (43.2%) and omission errors (19.9%). While human performance deficit was the leading cause of error (50.2%), other common causes included failure to follow procedure and protocol (42.2%) and improper use of the pump (22.7%). Although remedial actions were often taken to prevent error recurrence, actions were taken to rectify the systemic deficits that led to errors in only a minority of cases (11.8%). CONCLUSION: Preventable errors continue to pose unnecessary risks to patients receiving IV-PCA. Multimodal analgesic regimens and novel PCA systems that reduce human error are needed to prevent errors while preserving the advantages of PCA for the management of acute pain.

The nature, magnitude, and reporting compliance of device-related events for intravenous patient-controlled analgesia in the FDA Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to determine the characteristics, magnitude, and the quality of reporting of mandated events involving intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) devices in the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database; a postmarket surveillance system. METHODS: We utilized a mixed-methods approach to systematically characterize structured data and text narratives associated with IV-PCA events submitted to MAUDE between 1 January 2011 and 12 September 2016. RESULTS: Of 1,430 IV-PCA events reported during the study period, 6.4% were adverse events (AEs) as identified via structured data fields in the MEDWATCH forms. Upon qualitative review of the narrative texts, 11.0% of events were associated with an unfavorable clinical outcome, which was 71% higher than the incidence of the adverse outcomes reported using the structured data fields. Device-related issues, which were mostly preventable, accounted for 86.9% of events. Of 65 reportable events submitted by manufacturers, 18.5% did not comply with reporting requirements as mandated by law. CONCLUSION: Patients on IV-PCA continue to experience serious complications as a result of preventable errors. Multi-modal interventions including educational training and the development and adoption of PCA devices with improved safety features are needed to improve safety.