Graft Inflow Modulation by Splenic Artery Ligation for Portal Hyper Perfusion does not Decrease Rates of Early Allograft Dysfunction in Adult Live Donor Liver Transplantation: A Randomized Control Trial.

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to compare the rates of early allograft dysfunction (EAD) in patients undergoing elective adult live donor liver transplantation (ALDLT) with and without graft portal inflow modulation (GIM) for portal hyper-perfusion. The secondary objectives were to compare time to normalization of bilirubin and International Normalized Ratio (INR), day 14 ascitic output more than 1liter, small-for-size syndrome (SFSS), intensive care unit / high dependency unit and total hospital stay, and 90 day morbidity and mortality. BACKGROUND: GIM can prevent EAD in ALDLT patients with portal hyper-perfusion. METHODS: A single-center randomized trial with and without GIM for portal hyper-perfusion by splenic artery ligation (SAL) in ALDLT was performed. After reperfusion, patients with portal venous pressure (PVP)>15 mm Hg with a gradient (PVP - central venous pressure) of ≥ 7 mm Hg and/or portal venous flow (PVF)>250 mL/min/100 grams of liver were randomized into two groups: GIM and No GIM. RESULTS: 75 of 209 patients satisfied the inclusion criteria, and 38 underwent GIM. Baseline PVF and PVP were comparable between the GIM and no GIM groups. SAL significantly reduced the PVF and PVP (P<0.001). There were no differences in the primary and secondary outcomes between the two groups. In the subgroup analysis, with a Graft to Recipient Weight Ratio (GRWR)≤0.8, there were no significant differences in the primary and secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: SAL significantly decreased PVP and PVF, but did not decrease rates of EAD in adult LDLT.

Temporary Portocaval Shunt Provides Superior Intraoperative Hemodynamics and Reduces Blood Loss and Duration of Surgery in Live Donor Liver Transplantation: A Randomized Control Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare intraoperative hemodynamic parameters, blood loss, renal function, and duration of surgery with and without temporary portocaval shunt (TPCS) in live donor liver transplantation (LT) recipients. Secondary objectives were postoperative early graft dysfunction, morbidity, mortality, total intensive care unit, and hospital stay. BACKGROUND: Blood loss during recipient hepatectomy for LT remains a major concern. Routine use of TPCS during LT is not yet elucidated. METHODS: This study is a single-center, open-label, randomized control trial. The sample size was calculated based on intraoperative blood loss. After exclusion, a total of 60 patients, 30 in each arm (TPCS vs no TPCS) were recruited in the trial. RESULTS: The baseline recipient and donor characteristics were comparable between the groups. The median intraoperative blood loss ( P = 0.004) and blood product transfusions ( P < 0.05) were significantly less in the TPCS group. The TPCS group had significantly improved intraoperative hemodynamics in the anhepatic phase as compared with the no TPCS group ( P < 0.0001), requiring significantly less vasopressor support. This led to significantly better renal function as evidenced by higher intraoperative urine output in the TPCS group ( P = 0.002). Because of technical simplicity, the TPCS group had significantly fewer inferior vena cava injuries (3.3 vs 26.7%, P = 0.026) and substantially shorter hepatectomy time and total duration of surgery (529.4 ± 35.54 vs 606.83 ± 48.13 min, P < 0.0001). The time taken for normalization of lactate in the immediate postoperative period was significantly shorter in the TPCS group (median, 6 vs 13 h; P = 0.04). Although postoperative endotoxemia, major morbidity, 90-day mortality, total intensive care unit, and hospital stay were comparable between both groups, tolerance to enteral feed was earlier in the TPCS group. CONCLUSIONS: In live donor LT, TPCS is a simple and effective technique that provides superior intraoperative hemodynamics and reduces blood loss and duration of surgery.

Efficacy of rectal indomethacin in prevention of post-operative hyperamylasemia following pancreatoduodenectomy: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Post-operative hyperamylasemia (POH) following pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) may play a key role in pathogenesis of post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF). Aim of the current study was to evaluate efficacy of perioperative administration of indomethacin in preventing POH. METHODS: Single-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial (RCT) conducted on consecutive patients undergoing PD. Patients received either 100 mg of indomethacin per-rectally at induction of anesthesia or standard care. Primary endpoint was incidence of POH in the two arms. POH was defined as postoperative day (POD) 1 serum amylase (S. amylase) levels greater than the upper limit of normal. RESULTS: After exclusion 44 patients were randomized. The two arms were comparable for preoperative and intraoperative parameters. POH was noted in 20/44 (45.5%) with significantly lower incidence of POH (60.9% vs. 28.6%, p = 0.032) in intervention arm (IA). Median S. amylase, POD 1, 3, and 5 drain amylase, and incidence of clinically relevant POPF (CR-POPF) were lower in IA but failed to reach statistical significance (30.4% vs. 14.3%, p = 0.18). The severity of delayed gastric emptying (DGE) was significantly lower in the IA (grade B/C DGE 23.8% vs. 47.8%, p = 0.023). Evaluation of risk factors for POH showed IA to confer an independent protective effect and increased risk with soft pancreas. CONCLUSION: Perioperative per-rectal indomethacin administration is effective in decreasing the incidence of POH following pancreatoduodenectomy.

e-GLR Score Predicts Early Graft Loss in Adult Live-Donor Liver Transplantation.

Objective: This study aimed to analyze risk factors and develop a predictive model for early allograft loss due to early graft dysfunction (EGD) in adult live-donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Methods: Data of patients who underwent LDLT from 2011 to 2019 were reviewed for EGD, associated factors, and outcomes. A homogeneous group of 387 patients was analyzed: random cohort A (n = 274) for primary analysis and random cohort B (n = 113) for validation. Results: Of 274 recipients, 92 (33.6%) developed EGD. The risk of graft loss within 90 days was 29.3% and 7.1% in those with and without EGD, respectively (P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis determined donor age (P = 0.045), estimated (e) graft weight (P = 0.001), and the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score (0.001) as independent predictors of early graft loss due to EGD. Regression coefficients of these factors were employed to formulate the risk model: Predicted (P) early graft loss risk (e-GLR) score = 10 × [(donor age × 0.052) + (e-Graft weight × 1.681) + (MELD × 0.145)] - 8.606 (e-Graft weight = 0, if e-Graft weight ≥640 g and e-Graft weight = 1, and if e-Graft weight < 640 g). Internal cross-validation revealed a high predictive value (C-statistic = 0.858). Conclusions: Our novel risk score can efficiently predict early allograft loss following graft dysfunction, which enables donor-recipient matching, evaluation, and prognostication simply and reliably in adult LDLT.

Early drain removal after live liver donor hepatectomy is safe - a randomized controlled pilot study.

INTRODUCTION: The current study aimed to assess the safety of early drain removal after live donor hepatectomy (LDH). METHODS: One hundred eight consecutive donors who met the inclusion criteria were randomized to early drain removal (EDR - postoperative day (POD) 3 - if serous and the drain bilirubin level was less than 3 mg/dl - "3 × 3" rule) and routine drain removal (RDR - drain output serous and less than 100 ml). The primary outcome was to compare the safety. The secondary outcome was to compare the postoperative morbidity. RESULTS: Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative parameters except for the timing of drain removal were comparable. EDR was feasible in 46 out of 54 donors (85.14%) and none required re-intervention after EDR. There was significantly better pain relief with EDR (p = 0.00). Overall complications, pulmonary complications, and hospital stay were comparable on intention-to-treat analysis. However, pulmonary complications (EDR - 1.9% vs RDR - 16.3% P = 0.030), overall complications (18.8% vs 36.3%, P = 0.043), and hospital stay (8 vs 9, P = 0.014) were more in the RDR group on per treatment analysis. Bile leaks were seen in three donors (3.7% in the EDR group vs 1.9% in RDR, P = 0.558), and none of them required endo-biliary interventions. Re-exploration for intestinal obstruction was required for 3 donors in RDR (0% vs 5.7%; p = 0.079). CONCLUSION: EDR by the "3 × 3" rule after LDH is safe and associated with better pain relief. On per treatment analysis, EDR was associated with significantly less hospital stay and lower pulmonary and overall complications. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY: Clinical Trials.gov - NCT04504487.

Live donor liver transplantation for pediatric acute liver failure: challenges and outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed at studying the challenges and outcomes of live-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for pediatric acute liver failure (PALF). STUDY DESIGN: A total of 315 patients with PALF were treated over a period of 11 years. 42 underwent LT (41 LDLT and one DDLT), constituting 38% (41/110) of all pediatric transplants during this duration. The outcomes of LDLT for PALF were analyzed. RESULTS: All the 41 children who underwent LT met the Kings College criteria (KCC). The etiology was indeterminate in 46.3% (n = 19) children. 75.6% (n = 31) were on mechanical ventilation for grade 3/4 hepatic encephalopathy. There was presence of cerebral edema on a computed tomography scan of the brain in 50% of the children. One-third of our children required hemodynamic support with vasopressors. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome and sepsis were observed in 46.3% and 41.4% of patients, respectively. Post-LDLT 1- and 5-yr patient and graft survival were 75.6% and 70.9%, respectively. The survival in children satisfying KCC but did not undergo LT was 24% (38/161). Vascular and biliary complication rates were 2.4% and 4.8%, respectively. No graft loss occurred because of acute rejection. In multivariate analysis, pre-LT culture positivity and cerebral edema, persistence of brain edema after transplantation, and resultant pulmonary complications were significantly associated with post-LT death. Thirteen (32%) children who underwent plasmapheresis prior to LT had better post-LT neurological recovery, as evidenced by early extubation. CONCLUSION: LDLT for PALF is lifesaving and provides a unique opportunity to time transplantation. Good long-term survival can be achieved, despite the majority of patients presenting late for transplantation. Early referral and better selection can save more lives through timely transplantation.

Incidence and predictors of alcohol relapse following living donor liver transplantation for alcohol related liver disease.

BACKGROUND: Alcohol relapse after liver transplantation has a negative impact on outcomes. There is limited data on its burden, the predictors, and impact following live donor liver transplantation (LDLT). METHODS: A single-center observational study was carried out between July 2011 and March 2021 for patients undergoing LDLT for alcohol associated liver disease (ALD). The incidence, predictors of alcohol relapse, and post-transplant outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: Altogether 720 LDLT were performed during the study period, 203 (28.19%) for ALD. The overall relapse rate was 9.85% (n = 20) with a median follow-up of 52 months (range, 12-140 months). Sustained harmful alcohol use was seen in 4 (1.97%). On multivariate analysis, pre-LT relapse (P = .001), duration of abstinence period (P = .007), daily intake of alcohol (P = .001), absence of life partner (P = .021), concurrent tobacco abuse before transplant (P = .001), the donation from second-degree relative (P = .003) and poor compliance with medications (P = .001) were identified as predictors for relapse. Alcohol relapse was associated with the risk of graft rejection (HR 4.54, 95% CI: 1.751-11.80, P = .002). CONCLUSION: Our results show that the overall incidence of relapse and rate of harmful drinking following LDLT is low. Donation from spouse and first degree relative was protective. History of daily intake, prior relapse, shorter pretransplant abstinence duration and lack of family support significantly predicted relapse.

Lifestyle Optimization Leads to Superior Liver Regeneration in Live Liver Donors and Decreases Early Allograft Dysfunction in Recipients: A Randomized Control Trial.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the current randomized control trial was to assess the efficacy of donor lifestyle optimization on liver regeneration and outcome following live donor liver transplantation. METHODS: Live liver donors (LLDs) who were fit with no or minimal steatosis were randomized to receive either a customized low-calorie diet with calorie intake equalling their basal requirement along with exercise for 2 weeks before surgery versus to continue their normal routine lifestyle. Primary objectives were the difference in the day of normalization of serum bilirubin and PT-International normalized ratio and the percentage growth of the liver at postoperative day 7 and 14. Secondary objectives were differences in intraoperative liver biopsy, liver-regeneration markers, blood loss, hospital stay, the complication rate in LLDs, and rates of early graft dysfunction (EGD) in recipients. RESULTS: Sixty-two consecutive LLDs were randomized (28 in intervention vs. 34 in control). Baseline parameters and graft parameters were similar in both groups. LLDs in the intervention arm had significantly decreased calorie intake ( P <0.005), abdominal girth ( P <0.005), BMI ( P =0.05), and weight ( P <0.0005). The mean blood loss ( P =0.038), day of normalization of bilirubin ( P =0.005) and International normalized ratio ( P =0.061), postoperative peak aspartate transaminase ( P =0.003), Alanine transaminase ( P =0.025), and steatosis ( P <0.005) were significantly less in the intervention group. There was significantly higher volume regeneration ( P =0.03) in donors in the intervention arm. The levels of TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-10 levels were significantly higher, while the TGF-ß level was lower in donors in the intervention group. The rate of EGD was significantly higher in recipients in the control group ( P =0.043). CONCLUSION: Lifestyle optimization of LLD is simple to comply with, improves liver regeneration in LLDs, and decreases EGD in recipients, thus can enhance donor safety and outcomes in live donor liver transplantation.

Hepatic artery-related complications after live donor liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic artery-related complications (HARC) after live donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is associated with high morbidity and mortality rate. METHODS: Prospectively maintained data from July 2011 to September 2020 was analyzed for etiology, detection, management, and outcome of HARC. RESULTS: Six hundred fifty-seven LDLT (adult 572/pediatrics 85) were performed during the study period. Twenty-one (3.2%) patient developed HARC; 16 (2.4%) hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) and 5 (0.76%) non-thrombotic hepatic artery complication (NTHAC). Ninety percent (19/21) HARC were asymptomatic and detected on protocol Doppler. Median time to detection was day 4 (range - 1 to 35), which included 18 early (within 7 days) vs 3 late incidents. Only one pediatric patient had HAT. Seven patients underwent surgical revascularization, 11 had endovascular intervention and 3 with attenuated flow required only systemic anticoagulation. All NTHAC survived without any sequelae. Revascularization was successful in 81% (13/16) with HAT. Biliary complications were seen in 5 (23.8%); four were managed successfully. Overall mortality was 14.8% (3/21). The 1-year and 5-year survival were similar to those who did not develop HARC (80.9% vs 84.2%, p = 0.27 and 71.4% vs 75.19%, p = 0.36 respectively) but biliary complications were significantly higher (23.8% vs 14.2%, p = 0.03). On multivariate analysis, clockwise technique of arterial reconstruction was associated with decreased risk of HAT (1.7% vs 4.1% (p value - 0.003)). CONCLUSION: Technical refinement, early detection, and revascularization can achieve good outcome in patients with HARC after LDLT.

Impact of covid-19 pandemic on quality of life and psychosocial difficulties among liver transplant recipients.

Background: The first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic affected health in all domains i.e., physical, mental, and social aspects. Liver transplant (LT) recipients faced a multitude of challenges during the first wave of lockdown. The aim was to identify the psychosocial difficulties and quality of life during the first year of the pandemic. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted on LT recipients with a predefined structured questionnaire that included clinical, COVID-19 anxiety scale, and Post-Transplant Quality of life questionnaire (pLTQ). Results: A total of 109 patients were studied; with a mean age of 50.5 ± 11.1 years, with a median post-transplant follow-up of 52.4 months and a live donor transplant in the majority (79.8%). Almost all (99.1%) could come to the hospital for regular follow-up, prior to the pandemic. But during the first wave only 57% could maintain planned hospital visits and about 88% could not pursue their regular activities, and 39% missed their routine exercise because of imposed restrictions. Similarly, financial implications were responsible for 4% defaulting from treatment; while 7.3% managed by curtailing supportive drugs (on their own) leading to deranged liver tests in 4.6%; requiring immediate attention. The psychosocial difficulties raised the stress of pandemic (median score 18), and impacted quality of life (mean total pLTQ score 4.7 ± 0.9). Conclusions: For LT recipients, the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic affected their physical, mental, financial, and social wellbeing; in addition to the disease itself. Awareness, psychosocial support, and comprehensive care are some unmet needs for this special group; especially when it is expected that subsequent waves may continue to occur.

Expanding donor pool for live donor liver transplantation: utilization of donors with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis after optimization.

INTRODUCTION: Potential live liver donors with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) are rejected upfront for donation in live donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Herein, we share our experience of the feasibility of live liver donation in donors with NASH after successful donor optimization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospectively collected data of 410 consecutive donor hepatectomies from June 2011 to January 2018 were analyzed. RESULTS: During the study period, NASH was diagnosed histopathologically in 17 donors. Four donors were rejected in view of grade 2 fibrosis on histology. Out of remaining 13 donors, six became eligible for donation following lifestyle changes, dietary modifications, and target weight reduction of ≥5%. Reversal of NASH was confirmed on repeat liver biopsy in all the 6 donors. Five out of 6 underwent right lobe (without MHV) donor hepatectomies, while one had left lobe donation. These donors had significantly higher peak bilirubin levels in the immediate post-operative period as compared to other non-NASH donors (4.00 ± 0.32 vs. 2.57 ± 1.77 mg/dL, p = 0.043). In addition, post-hepatectomy normalization of hyperbilirubinemia, if any, was slower in donors with NASH (7 ± 1.3 vs. 5 ± 1.7 days, p = 0.016). However, none of these donors had post-hepatectomy liver failure. All these donors were discharged after an average hospital stay of 8 ± 1.7 days. Their respective recipients had uneventful post-operative courses without complications. Both the recipients and donors are having satisfactory liver functions after 46.7 ± 10.2 months of follow-up. CONCLUSION: Scrupulous selection of live liver donors with NASH can open a door for expanding the organ pool in LDLT after a successful donor optimization program.

Early Allograft Dysfunction After Live Donor Liver Transplantation: It's Time to Redefine?

BACKGROUND: An ideal definition of early allograft dysfunction (EAD) after live donor liver transplantation (LDLT) remains elusive. The aim of the present study was to compare the diagnostic accuracies of existing EAD definitions, identify the predictors of early graft loss due to EAD, and formulate a new definition, estimating EAD-related mortality in LDLT recipients. METHODS: Consecutive adult patients undergoing elective LDLT were analyzed. Patients with technical (vascular, biliary) complications and biopsy-proven rejections were excluded. RESULTS: There were 19 deaths due to EAD of a total of 304 patients. On applying the existing definitions of EAD, we revealed their limitations of being either too broad with low specificity or too restrictive with low sensitivity in patients with LDLT. A new definition of EAD-LDLT (total bilirubin >10 mg/dL, international normalized ratio [INR] > 1.6 and serum urea >100 mg/dL, for five consecutive days after day 7) was derived after doing a multivariate analysis. In receiver operator characteristics analysis, an AUC for EAD-LDLT was 0.86. The calibration and internal cross-validation of the new model confirmed its predictability. CONCLUSION: The new model of EAD-LDLT, based on total bilirubin >10 mg/dL, INR >1.6 and serum urea >100 mg/dL, for five consecutive days after day 7, has a better predictive value for mortality due to EAD in LDLT recipients.

Cystic artery pseudoaneurysm-a rare complication of acute cholecystitis: review of literature.

OBJECTIVE: To acquaint with the presentation and management of the cystic artery aneurysm by enriching the reviewed literature with our own experience. BACKGROUND: Cystic artery pseudoaneurysm is an uncommon entity with varied clinical presentation. Inflammation and trauma are associated with most of the cases. Limited experience with the condition challenges the management of individual cases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrieved all the reported cases of cystic artery pseudoaneurysm, published up to December 2019, from the PubMed database and excluded those arising as postoperative complications. A total of 59 cases were analyzed, and we also included our experience of managing a case of cystic artery pseudoaneurysm. RESULTS: Abdominal pain (77.9%) was the most common presentation followed by upper GI bleed (64.4%), while 19 patients (32.2%) had presented with classic Quincke's Triad. Most of the cases were diagnosed following the rupture of the pseudoaneurysm (n = 49, 83.05%). Fifteen patients presented with shock. Hyperbilirubinemia (59.3%) and anemia (55.9%) were the commonest laboratory findings. Although CT angiogram remains the investigation of choice, a conventional angiogram is the gold standard and sufficed as the definitive management in 20 cases. Cholecystectomy formed the definitive management in the rest of the cases. We successfully managed a middle-aged female patient of cystic artery aneurysm with xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis by open cholecystectomy. CONCLUSION: Cystic artery pseudoaneurysms are amenable to successful management with careful evaluation and timely cholecystectomy or angioembolization or a combination of both.

Randomized control trial on perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in live liver donors: Are three doses enough?

INTRODUCTION: The duration of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis following live liver donor hepatectomy (LDH) is not known. METHODS: This is a double-blind equivalence trial. All consecutive LDH were randomized into: group A (three doses) and group B (nine doses) of perioperative antibiotics (piperacillin + tazobactam - 4.5 g intravenous) at fixed 8 hourly intervals. Primary end point was incidence of infective complications as per CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) criteria. Secondary end points were liver function tests, total leukocyte count, international normalized ratio, hospital stay, morbidity, and cost analysis. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-six LDHs were enrolled. A total of 19.8% (n = 25) experienced postoperative complications, 11 (17.7%) in group A and 14 (21.9%) in group B (P = .561). Infective complications were seen in 11 donors (8.1%), five in group A and six in group B (P = .79). A total of 8.1% of donors required continuation/up-gradation of antibiotics in group A and 9.4% in group B. Return to soft diet was delayed in group B (P = .039). Median hospital stay and cost were similar. CONCLUSION: Three doses of perioperative antibiotic are equally effective in preventing infective complications.

A Long-Term Prospective Study of Quality of Life, Abdominal Symptoms, and Cosmesis of Donors After Hepatectomy for Live-Donor Liver Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Comprehensive assessment of quality of life of live liver donors is required for adequate donor outcome reporting, but there is a lack of prospective data. Assessment of all aspects of liver donation over a long period is a necessity to have complete understanding of the donation process. METHODS: Prospectively collected data of liver donors operated between March 2012 to August 2013, examined donors (n = 52) from predonation to five years after the donation. Participants were administered 'World Health Organization quality of life Brief and questionnaires' regarding their attitude predonation, their overall well-being in terms of abdominal symptoms, cosmesis, and satisfaction with donation and consent process at predefined time points till five years after donation. The weight of the donors was recorded at predefined time points. RESULTS: The donors whose recipients died were less likely to continue with the study (8.9% vs. 71.4%; P < 0.001). After surgery, physical domain took 2 years to reach to predonation level while psychological and social relationship domains took 3 months and 1 month, respectively; environmental domain remained stable throughout. Even after recovery and discharge from hospital, donors experienced abdominal symptoms for a long period of time, but as the time increased from donation the reporting of symptoms decreased. Body image scores (12 ± 2.46 at 3 months vs. 14.9 ± 3.16 at five years, P < 0.001) and cosmesis scores (14.6 ± 3.67 at 3 months vs. 18.75 ± 3 at five years, P < 0.001) significantly improved over time. There was significant weight gain in donors (65.2 ± 6.1 kg predonation vs. 70.69 ± 2.4 kg at 2 years P < 0.001). Donors understood the consent process well, but did not use it for decision making. Overall, they showed a high level of satisfaction in the donation process. CONCLUSION: Donors have good quality of life and show steady recovery in all aspects. Recipient death affects attitude towards donation process.

Diaphragmatic Hernia after Pediatric Living Donor Liver Transplantation: An Indian Experience with Review of Literature.

AIM: Although intestinal obstruction following living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is relatively common, diaphragmatic hernia (DH) as the attributing cause is rarely reported. The study aimed to find out the incidence, clinical presentation, and management of DH after liver transplant in pediatric patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of all cases of pediatric liver transplants was performed. Case sheets, operation records, and investigations including radiology were studied. RESULTS: Out of 79 cases of pediatric liver transplants, two cases of posttransplant DH were identified. The first case is a 2-year-old male child who was transplanted for progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis, and the second one is a 4-year-old boy who underwent LDLT for hepatitis A-induced acute liver failure. The first child presented abdominal symptoms and the second one with pulmonary symptoms. The DHs were diagnosed at 132 and 70 days, respectively, posttransplant by chest radiographs and computed tomography scan. The defects were located at the posteromedial aspect of the diaphragm in both the cases and were closed by primary closure with mesh reinforcement. Both the children are doing well with no recurrence. CONCLUSION: High index of clinical suspicion is mandated in pediatric patients after liver transplant and once the diagnosis is confirmed, urgent surgical exploration is mandatory.

Living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma in Indian patients- Is the scenario different?

BACKGROUND: Living donor liver transplant (LDLT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been controversial in terms of selection and outcome. We share our experience of LDLT for HCC in Indian patients. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing LDLT for HCC discovered either preoperatively or incidentally on explant pathology was done. Preoperative characteristics and explant histopathology findings were recorded. Overall, recurrence-free survival and factors predicting recurrence were analyzed. RESULTS: Six hundred and eleven LDLT were performed between June 2011 and October 2019. HCC constituted 6.5% (n = 53) of transplant activity. Forty had preoperative diagnosis, while 13 were detected incidentally. The median model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score was 18 for patients with HCC. Only in 10 patients (19%), HCC was the primary indication for liver transplant (LT), and the rest had undergone transplant for progressive decompensation. Thirty-two patients were within up-to-7, while 21 were outside up-to-7 criteria. Overall 5-year survival was 85.4% and recurrence-free survival was 83.3% after a median follow-up of 35 months (13-59). This was similar to LDLT for other indications (81.2% at 5 years). Risk Estimation of Tumor Recurrence After Transplant (RETREAT) score was best able to predict recurrence (p = 0.03) with odds ratio of 6.8. CONCLUSION: Patients with HCC in India present late for liver transplant. Most patients have some form of decompensation before they undergo LT. In selected patients, overall survival was comparable with other indications for LDLT with acceptable recurrence rates. RETREAT score was best to predict recurrence.

Insights into the Mechanical and Electrical Properties of a Metal-Phosphorene Interface: An Ab Initio Study with a Wide Range of Metals.

Finding a metal contact with higher interface adhesion and lower contact resistivity is a major challenge in realizing 2D material-based field-effect transistors. The commonly used metals in the semiconductor industry have different interface chemistry with phosphorene. Although phosphorene FETs have been fabricated with gold, titanium, and palladium contacts, there are other metals with a better interface. In this work, using DFT, a systematic ab initio study of metal-phosphorene interfaces is carried out for a set of 18 potentially suitable metals with different resistivity, electronegativity, and work-function. The interface between these metals and phosphorene is studied to identify factors responsible for mechanical and electrical behavior of the metal contacts. The work of separation is calculated to measure the adhesion strength of the metal contacts, while the density of states, Schottky barrier height, tunnel barrier height, and the mid-interface charge density calculations are performed to analyze the electrical behavior. Both mechanical and electrical performance of the metal contacts are linked to the interface chemistry. Many important observations which deviate from the general trend are reported and explained.

Strategic approach to minimally invasive necrosectomy for necrotizing pancreatitis: technique, complications and predictors of outcome.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive retroperitoneal necrosectomy has been an integral component of 'step-up' approach for infected pancreatic necrosis. Even though the clinical outcome of nephroscopic necrosectomy has been studied earlier, its predictor and morbidities following surgery have not been extensively evaluated. We aimed to evaluate the clinical outcome and early and late complications after percutaneous nephroscopic necrosectomy (PCNN). METHODS: The pre- and intra-operative as well as post-operative and follow-up data of severe pancreatitis patients undergoing PCNN were collected prospectively. RESULTS: Out of 115 patients requiring intervention, 40 patients (34.78%) improved with percutaneous drain alone and another 40 proceeded for PCNN. After exclusion, 37 patients successfully underwent 48 sessions of PCNN. Median number of PCNN session was 1 (1-4). Early complications were seen in 21 (56.75%) patients and mortality was experienced in eight (21.62%) patients. On median follow-up of 36 months, 12 (32.43%) patients experienced late complications. Persistent post-operative pancreatic fistula was observed in six (16.21%) patients. Of these, three developed late-onset pseudocyst, whereas one patient had disconnected duct syndrome. Seven patients experienced new-onset diabetes. Age, severity of pancreatitis, preoperative organ failure and multiorgan failure were significant predictors of mortality on univariate analysis (P ≤ 0.05 for each). The logistic regression analysis revealed presence of multiorgan failure before surgery as the sole predictor (P = 0.007; odds ratio 10.417; 95% confidence interval 1.759-61.672). CONCLUSION: Preoperative multiorgan failure was the most important predictor of mortality following PCNN. Late complications were seen in nearly one-third of patients emphasizing the need for long-term follow-up.