Post-transplant cyclophosphamide or cell selection in haploidentical allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation?

BACKGROUND: One major limitation for broader applicability of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in the past was the lack of HLA-matched histocompatible donors. Preclinical mouse studies using T-cell depleted haploidentical grafts led to an increased interest in the use of ex vivo T-cell depleted (TCD) haploidentical allo-HCT. TCD grafts through negative (T-cell depletion) or positive (CD34+ cell selection) techniques have been investigated to reduce the risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) given the known implications of alloreactive T cells. A more practical approach to deplete alloreactive T cells in vivo using high doses of cyclophosphamide after allografting has proved to be feasible in overcoming the HLA barrier. Such approach has extended allo-HCT feasibility to patients for whom donors could not be found in the past. Nowadays, haploidentical donors represent a common donor source for patients in need of an allo-HCT. The broad application of haploidentical donors became possible by understanding the importance of depleting alloreactive donor T cells to facilitate engraftment and reduce incidence and severity of GVHD. These techniques involve ex vivo graft manipulation or in vivo utilization of pharmacologic agents, notably post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy). DISCUSSION: While acknowledging that no randomized controlled prospective studies have been yet conducted comparing TCD versus PTCy in haploidentical allo-HCT recipients, there are two advantages that would favor the PTCy, namely ease of application and lower cost. However, emerging data on adverse events associated with PTCy including, but not limited to cardiac associated toxicities or increased incidence of post-allograft infections, and others, are important to recognize.

Efficacy of Autologous and Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Adults with Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia: Results of a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Despite therapeutic advances for acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) with the emergence of all-trans retinoic acid, arsenic trioxide, and gemtuzumab-ozogamycin, approximately 10% of patients still experience disease relapse, typically occurring within 24 to 36 months following completion of front-line treatment. Traditionally, both allogeneic (allo) and autologous (auto) hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) have been considered reasonable treatment options for relapsed APL; however, no randomized controlled studies have been conducted comparing allo-HCT and auto-HCT in patients with relapsed APL. We performed a systematic review/meta-analysis to assess the totality of evidence pertaining to allo-HCT or auto-HCT in relapsed APL. Our search identified 1158 references, of which 23 met our inclusion criteria. While acknowledging the limitations of comparing these 2 treatment modalities indirectly, based on results from separate meta-analyses, it appears that pooled rates of event-free survival (71% versus 54%), progression-free survival (63% versus 43%), and overall survival (82% versus 58%) are higher after auto-HCT. This difference can be explained in part by the higher risk of pooled nonrelapse mortality (NRM) in patients undergoing allo-HCT (29% versus 5%), owing to inherent risks associated with this modality. In the absence of a randomized prospective clinical trial comparing allo-HCT and auto-HCT, our results show that both modalities are acceptable in patients with relapsed APL. The higher pooled NRM rate with allo-HCT is an important consideration when choosing this option. Additionally, the comparable pooled relapse rate for auto-HCT and allo-HCT (24% versus 23%) provides a rationale for evaluating post-HCT consolidative strategies to mitigate this risk.

Applying the EHA/EBMT grading for ICAHT after CAR-T: comparative incidence and association with infections and mortality.

ABSTRACT: Cytopenias represent the most common side effect of CAR T-cell therapy (CAR-T) and can predispose for severe infectious complications. Current grading systems, such as the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), neither reflect the unique quality of post-CAR-T neutrophil recovery, nor do they reflect the inherent risk of infections due to protracted neutropenia. For this reason, a novel EHA/EBMT consensus grading was recently developed for Immune Effector Cell-Associated HematoToxicity (ICAHT). In this multicenter, observational study, we applied the grading system to a large real-world cohort of 549 patients treated with BCMA- or CD19-directed CAR-T for refractory B-cell malignancies (112 multiple myeloma [MM], 334 large B-cell lymphoma [LBCL], 103 mantle cell lymphoma [MCL]) and examined the clinical sequelae of severe (≥3°) ICAHT. The ICAHT grading was strongly associated with the cumulative duration of severe neutropenia (r = 0.92, P < .0001), the presence of multilineage cytopenias, and the use of platelet and red blood cell transfusions. We noted an increased rate of severe ICAHT in patients with MCL vs those with LBCL and MM (28% vs 23% vs 15%). Severe ICAHT was associated with a higher rate of severe infections (49% vs 13%, P < .0001), increased nonrelapse mortality (14% vs 4%, P < .0001), and inferior survival outcomes (1-year progression-free survival: 35% vs 51%, 1-year overall survival: 52% vs 73%, both P < .0001). Importantly, the ICAHT grading demonstrated superior capacity to predict severe infections compared with the CTCAE grading (c-index 0.73 vs 0.55, P < .0001 vs nonsignificant). Taken together, these data highlight the clinical relevance of the novel grading system and support the reporting of ICAHT severity in clinical trials evaluating CAR-T therapies.

Therapeutic options for large B-cell lymphoma relapsing after CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy.

In recent years, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR T) has revolutionized the treatment landscape for large B cell lymphoma (LBCL), demonstrating remarkable efficacy and ushering a new era of therapeutic possibilities. However, a subset of patients may not achieve the desired response with CAR T. This review examines strategies aimed at optimizing outcomes for patients who relapse or progress after CAR T. Available data on utilization of CD19-directed monoclonal antibodies and antibody drug conjugates have shown limited efficacy in this setting. Moreover, bispecific antibodies have also emerged as an alternative therapy in relapsed and or refractory LBCL, but long-term follow up treated cases post-CAR T failure are lacking. Several observational studies have shown efficacy of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation, but attainment of a complete remission prior to allografting is a prerequisite to achieve durable remissions. As we navigate the intricate landscape of treatment of post CAR T failure, it becomes evident that this represents a therapeutic challenge which necessitates a multifaceted approach.

Systemic Mastocytosis: A Mimicker of Reactive Arthritis.

Objectives: Illustration of a case of systemic mastocytosis mimicking reactive arthritis in the absence of an infectious etiology. Methods: Review of the patient's medical records. Results: We report a case of systemic mastocytosis relapse, presenting with pancytopenia accompanied by knee monoarthritis, cystitis, and bilateral conjunctivitis occurring simultaneously at the same time interval within 2-4 days, mimicking reactive arthritis in the absence of an infectious etiology. Conclusion: Our case demonstrated reactive arthritis features (triad of urethritis, conjunctivitis, and arthritis) without an infectious trigger but rather a relapse of mastocytosis. We should think outside the box when faced with such a clinical scenario in the absence of an infectious etiology. Paraneoplastic reactive arthritis is to be considered after excluding an underlying infection.

The CAR-HEMATOTOX score identifies patients at high risk for hematological toxicity, infectious complications, and poor treatment outcomes following brexucabtagene autoleucel for relapsed or refractory MCL.

CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy with brexucabtagene autoleucel (brexu-cel) has substantially improved treatment outcomes for patients with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma (r/r MCL). Prolonged cytopenias and infections represent common and clinically relevant side effects. In this multicenter observational study, we describe cytopenias and infections in 103 r/r MCL patients receiving brexu-cel. Furthermore, we report associations between the baseline CAR-HEMATOTOX (HT) score and toxicity events, non-relapse mortality (NRM), and progression-free/overall survival (PFS/OS). At lymphodepletion, 56 patients were HTlow (score 0-1) while 47 patients were HThigh (score ≥2). The HThigh cohort exhibited prolonged neutropenia (median 14 vs. 6 days, p < .001) and an increased rate of severe infections (30% vs. 5%, p = .001). Overall, 1-year NRM was 10.4%, primarily attributed to infections, and differed by baseline HT score (high vs. low: 17% vs. 4.6%, p = .04). HThigh patients experienced inferior 90-day complete response rate (68% vs. 93%, p = .002), PFS (median 9 months vs. not-reached, p < .0001), and OS (median 26 months vs. not-reached, p < .0001). Multivariable analyses showed that high HT scores were independently associated with severe hematotoxicity, infections, and poor PFS/OS. In conclusion, infections and hematotoxicity are common after brexu-cel and contribute to NRM. The baseline HT score identified patients at increased risk of poor treatment outcomes.

Post-Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Care in the "Home Sweet Home" Setting: A Treatment Paradigm Shift.

BACKGROUND: Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most common hematologic malignancy, with 34,470 estimated new cases in 2022. High-dose therapy followed by autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT) remains a standard treatment for MM even in the era of novel therapies. This is usually performed in hospital-based settings, either in the inpatient or outpatient units. Advanced Care at Home (ACH) represents a virtual hybrid hospital-at-home program that combines a virtual provider-staffed command center with a vendor-mediated supply chain capable of delivering high-acuity care in the comfort of the patients' own homes. In our program, we used the existing ACH platform to deliver post-HCT care for recipients of auto-HCT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four patients (female = 2, 50%) with MM, with a median age of 60 (range, 40-74) years, were admitted to the inpatient Blood and Marrow Transplant (BMT) unit. The conditioning regimen consisted of melphalan 200 mg/m2, administered on day -2. All patients received stem cell infusion (day 0) in the inpatient setting, with a median dose of 3.64 (range, 2.92-8.22) × 106/kg CD34 cells. RESULTS: Patients were discharged to their homes after completing the infusion on day 0 or day +1 at the latest. Post-infusion care was provided by the ACH team in coordination with the BMT team. The median time intervals to absolute neutrophil count and platelet engraftment were 12 (range, 11-13) and 11 (range, 9-16) days, respectively. All patients were successfully discharged from the ACH program at a median of day +14 (range, day +14 to day +15). CONCLUSIONS: Our results highlight the feasibility of delivering post-HCT care for auto-HCT recipients in the home setting and confirm the generalizability of this approach.

Axicabtagene Ciloleucel in the Management of Follicular Lymphoma: Current Perspectives on Clinical Utility, Patient Selection and Reported Outcomes.

Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) is an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) that has shown efficacy in B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. It has shown high efficacy in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma (FL) even in the presence of high risk features (early relapse, heavily pretreated patients and bulky disease). Treatment options for R/R follicular lymphoma do not offer long-term remissions, especially in the third-line setting. Axi-cel was studied in R/R FL in the ZUMA-5 study, which showed high response rates with durable remissions. Axi-cel was associated with anticipated but manageable toxicities. Long-term follow up may be able to inform the potential for cure of FL. Axi-cel should be part of the standard of care options for R/R FL beyond second line.

New drugs before, during, and after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

The treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has evolved over the past few years with the advent of next-generation sequencing. Targeted therapies alone or in combination with low-dose or high-intensity chemotherapy have improved the outcome of patients with AML treated in the frontline and relapsed/refractory settings. Despite these advances, allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remains essential as consolidation therapy following frontline treatment in intermediate-and adverse-risk and relapsed/refractory disease. However, many patients relapse, with limited treatment options, hence the need for post-transplant strategies to mitigate relapse risk. Maintenance therapy following allo-HCT was developed for this specific purpose and can exploit either a direct anti-leukemia effect and/or enhance the bona fide graft-versus-leukemia effect without increasing the risk of graft-versus-host disease. In this paper, we summarize novel therapies for AML before, during, and after allo-HCT and review ongoing studies.

Lisocabtagene maraleucel for relapsed or refractory large B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

INTRODUCTION: Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR T) cell therapy epitomizes the success of T cell engineering. Today, it is an integral component of the treatment algorithm for various types of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) is the most common subtype of NHL accounting for 30-35% of cases. A lack of response to second-line therapy portends a poor prognosis as only 7-15% of patients attain complete remission (CR) with subsequent conventional chemoimmunotherapy. AREAS COVERED: Lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) is an autologous CD-19 directed CAR T-cell product with a 4-1BB co-stimulatory domain administered as a sequential infusion of 2 separately manufactured components: CD8+ and CD4+ CAR T-cells in equal doses. Liso-cel showed an impressive objective response rate of 73% (CR = 53%) in patients who had received a median of 3 prior therapies. Median time-to-first CR or partial response (PR) was 1 month. EXPERT OPINION: When evaluated in the second line setting in LBCL, liso-cel demonstrated superior event-free survival (EFS) versus standard of care. While acknowledging that choice of a particular CAR T-cell is based chiefly on familiarity of the treating physician with a specific product, liso-cel definitely represents an important addition to the treatment armamentarium of R/R LBCL whether in the second-line setting or beyond.

Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell Therapy for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: What is the supporting evidence so far?

While acknowledging that newer therapies have improved survival rates in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), patients with high-risk disease features are at an increased risk of treatment failure. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) was traditionally offered as front-line consolidation in high-risk CLL; however, with the emergence of targeted therapies like Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) and B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) inhibitors, the role of allo-HCT has been relegated to later stages of the disease. Patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) CLL who have failed both BTK and BCL-2 inhibitors represent a therapeutic challenge owing to a poor prognosis. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapies targeting CD19 have improved response rates and overall survival in various types of R/R B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas. For CLL, no approved CAR T-cell therapies are yet available. Emerging data appear to show a therapeutic benefit of CAR T-cell therapy in patients with R/R CLL, even after failing an allo-HCT.

CAR T-cell therapy for follicular lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma.

Patients with relapsed and/or refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) have a poor prognosis with anticipated short progression-free and overall survivals. Two CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapies are approved in the United States for R/R FL, namely, axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) and tisagenlecleucel. The results of ZUMA-5 and ELARA studies led to the approval of axi-cel and tisagenlecleucel, respectively, after demonstrating high overall (ORR) and complete response (CR) rates in this high-risk population of FL patients who had received a median of 3 (range = 2-4) and 4 (range = 2-13) prior lines of therapies, respectively. For instance, the ORR for ZUMA-5 was 94% (CR = 79%), and for ELARA, it was 86% (CR = 69.1%). Pertaining to MCL, brexucabtagene autoleucel is approved for R/R MCL based on results of the ZUMA-2 study. In the latter study, despite the fact that all R/R MCL patients had been exposed to prior Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors, the reported ORR was 91%, with 68% achieving a CR. These results undoubtedly demonstrate a strong efficacy of CAR T therapy in both R/R FL and MCL; yet, one must acknowledge the relatively short follow-up time of all aforementioned studies. Thus, longer follow-up showing durability of responses and long-term safety is definitely needed.

CAR-T cell Therapies for B-cell Lymphoid Malignancies: Identifying Targets Beyond CD19.

Chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) are synthetic engineered receptors with an antigen recognition domain derived from a high-specificity monoclonal antibody that can target surface molecules on tumor cells. T cells are genetically engineered to express CARs, thereby harnessing the antigen-recognition ability of antibodies and effector function of T cells. Target surface molecule selection is crucial for manufacturing CARs. Ideally, a target surface molecule should be restricted to tumor cells and minimally expressed or absent on normal tissues. Different CD19-targeted CAR-T cell therapies have been approved for the treatment of B-cell lymphoid malignancies that are refractory to other therapies, including indolent and aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL) and B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). Despite impressive results, many patients with aggressive and refractory B-cell malignancies do not respond to or relapse after CD19 CAR-T cell therapies. Thus, several additional strategies are currently being evaluated to overcome these limitations. This review discusses studies on other promising CAR-T cell targets, including CD20, CD22, BAFF-R, ROR1, CD70, BCR complex, kappa/lambda light chains, multitargeted CAR-T cells, and combinations of CAR-T cell therapy with different drugs.

Emerging Role of Autologous CD19 CAR T-Cell Therapies in the Second-Line Setting for Large B-cell Lymphoma: A Game Changer?

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapy has been proven effective in the third-line (and beyond) setting in patients with large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Until recently, high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT) was considered the standard of care in the second-line setting in patients demonstrating an objective response before the procedure. The ZUMA-7 and TRANSFORM studies showed the benefit of axicabtagene ciloleucel and lisocabtagene maraleucel, respectively, in patients refractory to or relapsing within 12 months of first-line anthracycline-based chemoimmunotherapy. However, a third trial (BELINDA study) using tisagenlecleucel failed to show a benefit in the same setting compared to standard salvage chemoimmunotherapy followed by auto-HCT. Several differences exist between these trials, including trial designs, patient population, crossover permissibility, bridging therapy, and end-point definitions. In this review, we summarize the current evidence for the treatment of patients with LBCL in the third line and beyond and standard treatment in the second line before CAR T therapy approval and interpret outcomes of the three trials examining the role of CAR T therapy in the second line and their impact in reshaping future practice.

Treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes in the era of precision medicine and immunomodulatory drugs: a focus on higher-risk disease.

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a heterogeneous clonal disease of myeloid neoplasms characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis, variable degree of cytopenias, and an increased risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Molecular and genetic characterization of MDS has led to a better understanding of the disease pathophysiology and is leading to the development of novel therapies. Targeted and immune therapies have shown promising results in different hematologic malignancies. However, their potential use in MDS is yet to be fully defined. Here, we review the most recent advances in therapeutic approaches in MDS, focusing on higher-risk disease. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation is beyond the scope of this article.

Impact of Rituximab and Corticosteroids on Late Cytopenias Post-Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy represents a significant advancement in the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory B cell lymphoid malignancies. Cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity represent the most acute serious adverse events post CAR T cell therapy but the occurrence and persistence of cytopenias post CAR T cell therapy represent a significant adverse event and a management challenge. While most patients typically recover blood counts by 30 days, a significant subset of patients have persistent or late cytopenias beyond 30 days. Patients receiving CAR T cell are heavily pre-treated and the impact of prior therapies on late cytopenias is not well understood. In this study, we found an association between increased number of rituximab infusions and/or cumulative rituximab dose received prior to CAR T cell infusion and persistent anemia and thrombocytopenia at 90 and 180 days afterwards. An overall increased number of prior lines of therapy was also associated with persistent lymphopenia and anemia at 90 days while receiving a prior autologous hematopoietic cell transplant was associated with a greater risk of neutropenia and lymphopenia.

Gender and early-career faculty disparities in hematology and oncology board review lecture series.

Participation of women and early-career faculty in hematology and medical oncology board review lecture series has not been studied previously. We aimed to evaluate gender and early-career faculty disparities in hematology and medical oncology board review lecture series. Speakers at major hematology and/or oncology board review lecture series meetings in the United States were analyzed in this cross-sectional study during a 5-year period from the years 2017 through 2021. Data about the lecture topic, field, speaker's gender, years of experience, and the frequency at which the lecture was given by the speaker were collected. Of 386 speakers participating, 315 (81.6%) were ABIM (American Board of Internal Medicine)-certified. A total of 1,224 board review lectures were given in the studied period, of which 1,016 (83%) were given by an ABIM-certified speaker. Women constituted 37.7% of all speakers, with less than 50% representation in five out of six courses. Lectures discussing malignant hematology topics had the lowest proportion of women presenters (24.8%), followed by solid tumors (38.9%) and benign hematology lectures (44.1%). Faculty with more than 15 years since initial certification presented more than 50% of lectures. The median time from initial hematology or medical oncology certification to lecture presentation was 12.5 years and 14 years, respectively. A positive trend in the participation of women was found at all board review conferences across the studied period. Our data suggest that women and early-career faculty participation in hematology and oncology board review series is inadequate.

Mantle cell lymphoma negative for t(11,14) involving the kidneys: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Mantle cell lymphoma is the rarest subtype of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. It can exhibit diverse extranodal manifestations. However, renal involvement is uncommon, and if it occurs, it usually only gets detected postmortem. There are several mechanisms by which mantle cell lymphoma can damage the kidneys. Renal failure is a potential complication, and prompt evaluation and diagnosis are critical steps to prevent long-term complications. CASE PRESENTATION: We present the case of a 75-year-old non-Hispanic White male with past medical history significant for hypertension and dyslipidemia, presenting with fever, weight loss, and night sweats. Work-up showed markedly elevated white blood cells, multiple enlarged lymph nodes, and a kidney mass. The patient was diagnosed with mantle cell lymphoma with kidney involvement confirmed with a kidney biopsy. His disease was positive for cyclin D1 overexpression despite t(11; 14) absence. The patient received six cycles of alternating vincristine, rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone then dexamethasone, high-dose cytarabine, and oxaliplatin, after which he was maintained on ibrutinib and rituximab, with resolution of symptoms and disease regression. CONCLUSION: We present a case of a rare presentation of Mantle cell lymphoma while describing the clinical presentation and diagnostic and treatment approaches. This case report can assist physicians in the clinical work-up and treatment of patients with similar diagnosis or presentation.