Apheresis of Deceased Donors as a New Source of Mobilized Peripheral Blood Hematopoietic Stem Cells for Transplant Tolerance.

BACKGROUND: Solid organ transplantation is the therapy of choice for many patients with end-stage organ failure; however, recipients must remain on lifelong immunosuppression, leaving them susceptible to infections and cancer. The study of transplant tolerance to prolong graft survival in the absence of immunosuppression has been restricted to recipients of living donor allografts; however, deceased donors significantly outnumber living donors. Mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) from the bone marrow to peripheral blood (PB) could allow PB-HSCs to be used to induce tolerance in deceased donor kidney recipients; however, a major concern is the well-known concomitant mobilization of immune cells into the liver. METHODS: We mobilized HSCs to the PD using a protocol of 2 doses of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and 1 dose of plerixafor, followed by the collection of mobilized cells via apheresis in 3 deceased donors. The physiological, laboratory, and radiographic parameters were monitored throughout the procedure. Longitudinal biopsies were performed to assess the potential for ectopic liver mobilization. RESULTS: The use of both agents led to the successful mobilization of peripheral blood CD34+ cells, demonstrating the potential for use in transplant tolerance protocols. Increased immune cell trafficking into the liver was not observed, and apheresis of mobilized cells resulted in a uniform decrease in all liver leukocyte subsets. CONCLUSIONS: HSCs can be mobilized and collected from the PB of brain-dead donors. This new approach may facilitate the dissemination of immune tolerance trials beyond living-donor kidney transplantation to deceased-donor transplantation, without sacrificing the transplantability of the liver.

Donating Another Person's Kidney: Avoiding the Discard of Organs by Retransplantation.

BACKGROUND: Procurement and retransplantation of a previously transplanted kidney reclaim a functioning organ that would otherwise have been discarded. METHODS: Case series of 3 retransplantation cases within the course of 1 calendar year. RESULTS: These cases illustrate how to overcome the immunological, logistical, and technical barriers that have thus far limited the potential of this approach. Within this series, we report kidney reuse weeks and years after the original transplantation, as well as the previously undescribed "living donation of a deceased donor kidney". CONCLUSIONS: Retransplantation of previously transplanted kidneys can be performed successfully and should be considered in the face of the current organ shortage.

Outcomes of shipped live donor kidney transplants compared with traditional living donor kidney transplants.

The disparity between kidney transplant candidates and donors necessitates innovations to increase organ availability. Transporting kidneys allows for living donors and recipients to undergo surgery with a familiar transplant team, city, friends, and family. The effect of shipping kidneys and prolonged cold ischemia time (CIT) with living donor transplantation outcomes is not clearly known. This retrospective matched (age, gender, race, and year of procedure) cohort study compared allograft outcomes for shipped live donor kidney transplants and nonshipped living donor kidney transplants. Fifty-seven shipped live donor kidneys were transplanted from 31 institutions in 26 cities. The mean shipping distance was 1634 miles (range 123-2811) with mean CIT of 12.1 ± 2.8 h. The incidence of delayed graft function in the shipped cohort was 1.8% (1/57) compared to 0% (0/57) in the nonshipped cohort. The 1-year allograft survival was 98% in both cohorts. There were no significant differences between the mean serum creatinine values or the rates of serum creatinine decline in the immediate postoperative period even after adjusted for gender and differences in recipient and donor BMI. Despite prolonged CITs, outcomes for shipped live donor kidney transplants were similar when compared to matched nonshipped living donor kidney transplants.

Donor-derived West Nile virus infection in solid organ transplant recipients: report of four additional cases and review of clinical, diagnostic, and therapeutic features.

We describe four solid-organ transplant recipients with donor-derived West Nile virus (WNV) infection (encephalitis 3, asymptomatic 1) from a common donor residing in a region of increased WNV activity. All four transplant recipients had molecular evidence of WNV infection in their serum and/or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing. Serum from the organ donor was positive for WNV IgM but negative for WNV RNA, whereas his lymph node and spleen tissues tested positive for WNV by RT-PCR. Combination therapy included intravenous immunoglobulin (4 cases), interferon (3 cases), fresh frozen plasma with WNV IgG (2 cases), and ribavirin (1 case). Two of the four transplant recipients survived.Review of the 20 published cases of organ-derived WNV infection found that this infection is associated with a high incidence of neuroinvasive disease (70%) and severe morbidity and mortality (30%). Median time to onset of symptomatic WNV infection was 13 days after transplantation (range 5-37 days). Initial unexplained fever unresponsive to antibiotic therapy followed by rapid onset of neurologic deficits was the most common clinical presentation. Confirmation of infection was made by testing serum and CSF for both WNV RNA by RT-PCR and WNV IgM by serological assays. Treatment usually included supportive care, reduction of immunosuppression, and frequent intravenous immunoglobulin. The often negative results for WNV by current RT-PCR and serological assays and the absence of clinical signs of acute infection in donors contribute to the sporadic occurrence of donor-derived WNV infection. Potential organ donors should be assessed for unexplained fever and neurological symptoms, particularly if they reside in areas of increased WNV activity.

High seroprevalence of anti-HTLV-I/II antibodies among solid organ donors necessitates confirmatory testing.

BACKGROUND: Human T-cell lymphotrophic virus (HTLV) type I has been linked to adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATL) and HTLV-I associated myelopathy (HAM). Transmission of HTLV by blood and organ transplantation has been documented, with some infections leading to clinical disease. Organ donors are tested for anti-HTLV antibodies and donor suitability is determined primarily by results from enzyme immunoassays (EIA). Confirmatory testing is not routinely performed, and the number of false positive organ donors is unknown. METHODS: In order to investigate the contemporary seroprevalence of anti-HTLV I/II antibodies among solid organ donors and determine the number of false positive samples, we tested 1,408 specimens from prospective organ donors in 2002 and 2003. All specimens were tested for anti-HTLV antibodies by a commercial EIA. Repeatedly reactive specimens underwent confirmatory testing using a commercial Western blot. RESULTS: There were 22 repeatedly EIA reactive donor specimens (1.56%). Five specimens did not undergo further testing because of case shutdown or insufficient sample quantity. HTLV I/II western blot confirmed six positives, whereas five were negative and six were indeterminate. The majority of confirmed specimens were positive for antibodies to HTLV-II. CONCLUSIONS: Our data shows that 29% of initially reactive specimens were false positives. With the increasing demand for organs, the unnecessary rejection of organs that are falsely positive for HTLV antibodies becomes of tremendous importance and stresses the need for timely confirmatory testing for HTLV.

Prevalence of antibodies to Trypanosoma cruzi among solid organ donors in Southern California: a population at risk.

Trypanosoma cruzi, a parasite that causes Chagas' disease, is endemic in parts of Mexico, South America, and Central America. Transmission of T. cruzi infection by solid organ transplantation has been reported in Latin America and recently in the United States. To determine the prevalence of T. cruzi antibodies in Southern California organ donors, 404 samples from deceased organ donors between May 2002 to April 2004 were screened using a qualitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (EIA) and confirmed with an immunofluorescence assay (IFA) available through the Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Six donors were initially reactive by EIA. Three donors were repeatedly reactive after repeat testing and were sent to the CDC for confirmation. One donor (0.25%) had an IFA-confirmed reactivity to anti-T. cruzi antibodies. In areas where there is a high number of immigrants from T. cruzi endemic countries, screening for anti-T. cruzi donor antibodies may be beneficial.