RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Obesity is highly prevalent and a major risk factor for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and chronic venous disease. It can also technically limit duplex ultrasound evaluations for lower extremity DVT. We compared the rates and results of repeat lower extremity venous duplex ultrasound (LEVDUS) after an initial incomplete and negative (IIN) LEVDUS in overweight (body mass index [BMI] ≤25-30 kg/m2) and obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) patients with those of patients with a BMI <25 kg/m2 to evaluate whether increasing the rate of follow-up examinations in overweight and obese patients might facilitate improved patient care. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 617 patients with an IIN LEVDUS study from December 31, 2017 to December 31, 2020. Demographic and imaging data of the patients with an IIN LEVDUS and the frequency of repeat studies performed within 2 weeks were abstracted from the electronic medical records. The patients were divided into three BMI-based groups: normal (BMI <25 kg/m2), overweight (BMI 25-30 kg/m2), and obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m2). RESULTS: Of the 617 patients with an IIN LEVDUS, 213 (34.5%) were normal weight, 177 (29%) were overweight, and 227 (37%) were obese. The repeat LEVDUS rates were significantly different across the three weight groups (P < .001). After an IIN LEVDUS, the rate of repeat LEVDUS for the normal weight, overweight, and obese groups was 46% (98 of 213), 28% (50 of 227), and 32% (73 of 227), respectively. The overall rates of thrombosis (both DVT and superficial vein thrombosis) in the repeat LEVDUS examinations were not significantly different among the normal weight (14%), overweight (11%), and obese (18%) patients (P = .431). CONCLUSIONS: Overweight and obese patients (BMI ≥25 kg/m2) received fewer follow-up examinations after an IIN LEVDUS. Follow-up LEVDUS examinations of overweight and obese patients after an IIN LEVDUS study have similar rates of venous thrombosis compared with normal weight patients. Targeting improving usage of follow-up LEVDUS studies for all patients, but especially for those who are overweight and obese, with an IIN LEVDUS through quality improvement efforts could help minimize missed diagnoses of venous thrombosis and improve the quality of patient care.
Asunto(s)
Trombosis , Trombosis de la Vena , Humanos , Índice de Masa Corporal , Sobrepeso/complicaciones , Sobrepeso/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios de Seguimiento , Trombosis de la Vena/diagnóstico por imagen , Trombosis de la Vena/terapia , Obesidad/complicaciones , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Objective: Fragments of fibrillin-1 and fibrillin-2 will be detectable in the plasma of patients with aortic dissections and aneurysms. We sought to determine whether the plasma fibrillin fragment levels (PFFLs) differ between patients with thoracic aortic pathology and those presenting with nonaortic chest pain. Methods: PFFLs were measured in patients with thoracic aortic aneurysm (n = 27) or dissection (n = 28). For comparison, patients without aortic pathology who had presented to the emergency department with acute chest pain (n = 281) were categorized into three groups according to the cause of the chest pain: ischemic cardiac chest pain; nonischemic cardiac chest pain; and noncardiac chest pain. The PFFLs were measured using a sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Results: Fibrillin-1 fragments were detectable in all patients and were lowest in the ischemic cardiac chest pain group. Age, sex, and the presence of hypertension were associated with differences in fibrillin-1 fragment levels. Fibrillin-2 fragments were detected more often in the thoracic aneurysm and dissection groups than in the emergency department chest pain group (P < .0001). Patients with aortic dissection demonstrated a trend toward increased detectability (P = .051) and concentrations (P = .06) of fibrillin-2 fragments compared with patients with aortic aneurysms. Analysis of specific antibody pairs identified fibrillin-1 B15-HRP26 and fibrillin-2 B205-HRP143 as the most informative in distinguishing between the emergency department and aortic pathology groups. Conclusions: Patients with thoracic aortic dissections demonstrated elevated plasma fibrillin-2 fragment levels (B205-HRP143) compared with patients presenting with ischemic or nonischemic cardiac chest pain and increased fibrillin-1 levels (B15-HRP26) compared with patients with ischemic cardiac chest pain. Investigation of fibrillin-1 and fibrillin-2 fragment generation might lead to diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic advances for patients with thoracic aortic dissection.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Lifestyle changes and medications are recommended as the first line of treatment for claudication, with revascularization considered for treatment-resistant symptoms, based on patients' preferences. Real-world evidence comparing health status outcomes of early invasive with noninvasive management strategies is lacking. METHODS: In the international multicenter prospective observational PORTRAIT (Patient-Centered Outcomes Related to Treatment Practices in Peripheral Arterial Disease: Investigating Trajectories) registry, disease-specific health status was assessed by the Peripheral Artery Questionnaire in patients with new-onset or worsening claudication at presentation and 3, 6, and 12 months later. One-year health status trajectories were compared by early revascularization versus noninvasive management on a propensity-matched sample using hierarchical generalized linear models for repeated measures adjusted for baseline health status. RESULTS: In a propensity-matched sample of 1000 patients (67.4±9.3 years, 62.8% male, and 82.4% White), 297 (29.7%) underwent early revascularization and 703 (70.3%) were managed noninvasively. Over 1 year of follow-up, patients who underwent early invasive management reported significantly higher health status than patients managed noninvasively (interaction term for time and treatment strategy; P<0.001 for all Peripheral Artery Questionnaire domains). The average 1-year change in Peripheral Artery Questionnaire summary scores was 30.8±25.2 in those undergoing early invasive, compared with 16.7±23.4 in those treated noninvasively (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with claudication undergoing early invasive treatment had greater health status improvements over the course of 1 year than those treated noninvasively. These data can be used to support shared decision-making with patients. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: NCT01419080.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Calidad de Vida , Femenino , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Claudicación Intermitente/diagnóstico , Claudicación Intermitente/terapia , Masculino , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Natural history and duplex ultrasound (DU) findings of pediatric lower extremity arterial thrombosis (PLEAT) are not well-defined. We describe acute and short-term DU findings of PLEAT to aid duplex interpretation and patient management. METHODS: From August 2018 to April 2021 children with suspected PLEAT were identified prospectively. All had DU studies and were divided into group 1 (with DU-confirmed PLEAT) and group 2 (without DU-confirmed PLEAT). Patient demographics and DU findings were compared. Those with PLEAT and follow-up DU studies were also evaluated for recanalization and post recanalization DU findings. RESULTS: We included 76 children (102 limbs) who had suspected PLEAT; 32 in group 1 and 44 group in 2. Fifty-seven percent had congenital heart disease, 26% a history prematurity (87%, 34% group 1; 11%, 14% group 2), with 14% of group 1 premature at PLEAT diagnosis and 68% aged less than 3 years-29 (94%) in group 1 and 23 (52%) in group 2. None had an arterial procedure to restore flow. Limb salvage was 100% with five group 1 mortalities unrelated to PLEAT. In group 1, 12 PLEATs were associated with an arterial line and 15 with cardiac catheterization. Occluded arteries included 7 external iliac, 20 common femoral, and 5 superficial femoral arteries (SFA). Peak systolic velocities (PSVs) distal to occluded segments in group 1 were lower than corresponding group 2 PSVs. SFA 18 ± 21 cm/s vs 84 ± 39 cm/s; popliteal artery (PA) 24 ± 18 cm/s vs 78 ± 38 cm/s; posterior tibial artery (PTA) 10 ± 8 cm/s versus 49 ± 27 cm/s (all P < .001). Twenty-one patients in group 1 had follow-up studies. Twelve (57%) were recanalized: 4 (19%) in less than 1 week and 10 (48%) by 6 months. Eighty-one percent of PLEATs were treated with anticoagulation (AC) and 57% recanalized. Fifty-nine percent of patients on AC recanalized, and 60% not on AC recanalized. Age, primary diagnosis, instrumentation type, and AC were not associated with failure to recanalize. After recanalization, PSVs in the CFA were not different than PSVs found in group 2 in the CFA (109 ± 50 cm/s vs 107 ± 57 cm/s; P = .88), but remained decreased in the SFA, PA, and PTA (SFA 68 ± 32 cm/s vs 83 ± 38 cm/s [P = .04]; PA 33 ± 13 cm/s vs 78 ± 37 [P = .0004]; and PTA 21 ± 8 cm/s vs 43 ± 20 cm/s [P = .0008]). CONCLUSIONS: PLEAT occurs in young children, results in low distal PSVs, and often does not recanalize, but does not lead to short-term limb loss or mortality or necessarily require AC for recanalization. Normalization of CFA PSVs indicates recanalization while PSVs in segments distal to the CFA do not seem to return to normal.
Asunto(s)
Embolia , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Trombosis , Velocidad del Flujo Sanguíneo , Niño , Preescolar , Arteria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Extremidad Inferior/irrigación sanguínea , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Arteria Poplítea/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trombosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Trombosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Ultrasonografía Doppler Dúplex , Grado de Desobstrucción VascularRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Portal venous reconstruction (PVR) is often needed during resection of hepatopancreato-biliary (HPB) malignancies. Primary repair (PR), autologous vein (AV), or cryopreserved cadaveric vein (CCV) are frequently utilized, however relative patency is not well studied. METHODS: All patients undergoing PVR between 2007-2019 at our center were identified. 3-year primary patency (PP), overall survival (OS), and survival-adjusted patency (SAP) were evaluated with Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards modeling. RESULTS: One-hundred-twenty patients were identified with a median follow-up of 11 months. PR, AV, and CCV reconstruction were used in 28 (23%), 35 (29%), and 57 (48%) patients, respectively, with two (7%), four (11%), and 29 (51%) thromboses, respectively. 3-year PP was greater for both primary repair (90%) and AV (83%) compared to CCV (33%, both p<0.001). On multivariable analysis, CCV had worse 3-year PP (HR 7.89, p=0.005) and SAP (HR 2.09, p=0.02) compared to PR; AV reconstruction had equivalent oncologic and patency-related outcomes to PR (p>0.4 for both comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: Primary patency for PR and AV reconstruction is superior to CCV for PVR during resection of HPB malignancies. AV conduit should be the preferred choice of reconstruction when PR is not achievable. Surgeons should only use CCV when factors preclude PR/AV reconstruction.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Cadáver , Humanos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Vena Porta/patología , Vena Porta/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Grado de Desobstrucción VascularRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Tobacco smoke exposure is a major risk factor for aortic aneurysm development. However, the initial aortic response to tobacco smoke, preceding aneurysm formation, is not well understood. We sought to create a model to determine the effect of solubilized tobacco smoke (STS) on the thoracic and abdominal aorta of mice as well as on cultured human aortic smooth muscle cells (HASMCs). METHODS: Tobacco smoke was solubilized and delivered to mice via implanted osmotic minipumps. Twenty male C57BL/6 mice received STS or vehicle infusion. The descending thoracic, suprarenal abdominal, and infrarenal abdominal segments of the aorta were assessed for elastic lamellar damage, smooth muscle cell phenotype, and infiltration of inflammatory cells. Cultured HASMCs grown in media containing STS were compared to cells grown in standard media in order to verify our in vivo findings. RESULTS: Tobacco smoke solution caused significantly more breaks in the elastic lamellae of the thoracic and abdominal aorta compared to control solution (P< .0001) without inciting an inflammatory infiltrate. Elastin breaks occurred more frequently in the abdominal aorta than the thoracic aorta (P < .01). Exposure to STS-induced aortic microdissections and downregulation of α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) by vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs). Treatment of cultured HASMCs with STS confirmed the decrease in α-SMA expression. CONCLUSION: Delivery of STS via osmotic minipumps appears to be a promising model for investigating the early aortic response to tobacco smoke exposure. The initial effect of tobacco smoke exposure on the aorta is elastic lamellar damage and downregulation of (α-SMA) expression by VSMCs. Elastic lamellar damage occurs more frequently in the abdominal aorta than the thoracic aorta and does not seem to be mediated by the presence of macrophages or other inflammatory cells.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal , Contaminación por Humo de Tabaco , Animales , Aorta Abdominal , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/inducido químicamente , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Masculino , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL , Músculo Liso Vascular , Miocitos del Músculo Liso/metabolismo , Nicotiana , Contaminación por Humo de Tabaco/efectos adversos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: A lower extremity venous duplex ultrasound (LEVDUS) examination is the standard diagnostic test to evaluate patients for lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT). However, some studies will be incomplete for a variety of reasons, including patient-related factors such as pain, edema, a large leg circumference, or the presence of overlying bandages or orthopedic devices. We previously reported that the frequency of obtaining a follow-up examination after an incomplete and negative (I/N) LEVDUS examination was low but that the rates of DVT found on the follow-up studies of initially I/N LEVDUS studies were similar to the rates of DVT found with initially complete LEVDUS examinations. Therefore, we recommended process improvements to increase follow-up LEVDUS studies after an I/N LEVDUS examination. In the present study, we have described the results of appending a recommendation to obtain a follow-up LEVDUS study to preliminary and final reports of I/N LEVDUS. METHODS: Starting in January 2019 through December 2019, a recommendation to obtain a repeat LEVDUS examination after an I/N study was appended to the preliminary and final reports of all I/N LEVDUS examination of patients who did not, otherwise, have an indication for anticoagulation (group 2). The patients were identified on an ongoing basis through the study period and entered into an Excel database (Microsoft Corp, Redmond, Wash). Group 2 was compared with a previously reported historic control cohort of patients identified from January 2017 to December 2017 (group 1). We compared groups 1 and 2 with respect to the frequency of the repeat studies performed within 4 weeks after an I/N LEVDUS examination and the DVT rates found from the follow-up LEVDUS examinations after an I/N LEVDUS study. RESULTS: Of the patients in groups 1 and 2, 187 and 229 had had I/N LEVDUS examinations, with 28% and 40.2% of group 1 and 2 studies having follow-up LEVDUS examinations (P < .01). Previously unidentified lower extremity thrombi were discovered in 21% of the group 2 follow-up examinations. Also, the rate of new thrombi detected was not different between groups 2 and 1 (historic controls; DVT, 14.3% vs 18.5% [P = .25]; SVT, 6.3% vs 3.3% [P = .15]). A definitive finding of either positive or negative for DVT and SVT with a complete examination in 50% of the group 2 patients with follow-up examinations. CONCLUSIONS: A recommendation to obtain a follow-up examination appended to the preliminary and final I/N LEVDUS reports was associated with an increased rate of follow-up examinations, which revealed many previously undetected DVTs and SVTs or had allowed for definitive exclusion of DVT.
Asunto(s)
Extremidad Inferior/irrigación sanguínea , Ultrasonografía Doppler Dúplex , Trombosis de la Vena/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
Physiologic assessment of lower limb peripheral artery occlusive disease is based on indirect physiologic measurement of ankle-brachial systolic pressure index (ABI) and recording ultrasound tibial artery waveforms. Duplex ultrasound testing affords direct tibial artery imaging and assessment of pulsed-Doppler tibial artery waveforms, which is more accurate then measurement of ABI for peripheral artery occlusive disease severity assessment. Tibial artery peak systolic velocity (PSV) is of particular value in the evaluation of patients with incompressible tibial arteries producing a falsely elevated ABI. Calculation of the ankle-profunda index (average tibial artery PSV/proximal profunda femoris artery PSV) also correlates with ABI reduction and can be used as an additional measure of peripheral artery occlusive disease. Tibial artery PSVs can be used to supplement ABI as an objective outcome measure after peripheral arterial interventions, and this aspect of duplex scanning warrants further clinical research.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagen , Arterias Tibiales/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía Doppler Dúplex , Índice Tobillo Braquial , Velocidad del Flujo Sanguíneo , Humanos , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/fisiopatología , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Flujo Sanguíneo Regional , Arterias Tibiales/fisiopatología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
The CEAP (Clinical-Etiology-Anatomy-Pathophysiology) classification is an internationally accepted standard for describing patients with chronic venous disorders and it has been used for reporting clinical research findings in scientific journals. Developed in 1993, updated in 1996, and revised in 2004, CEAP is a classification system based on clinical manifestations of chronic venous disorders, on current understanding of the etiology, the involved anatomy, and the underlying venous pathology. As the evidence related to these aspects of venous disorders, and specifically of chronic venous diseases (CVD, C2-C6) continue to develop, the CEAP classification needs periodic analysis and revisions. In May of 2017, the American Venous Forum created a CEAP Task Force and charged it to critically analyze the current classification system and recommend revisions, where needed. Guided by four basic principles (preservation of the reproducibility of CEAP, compatibility with prior versions, evidence-based, and practical for clinical use), the Task Force has adopted the revised Delphi process and made several changes. These changes include adding Corona phlebectatica as the C4c clinical subclass, introducing the modifier "r" for recurrent varicose veins and recurrent venous ulcers, and replacing numeric descriptions of the venous segments by their common abbreviations. This report describes all these revisions and the rationale for making these changes.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome Postrombótico/clasificación , Terminología como Asunto , Várices/clasificación , Venas , Insuficiencia Venosa/clasificación , Enfermedad Crónica , Consenso , Técnica Delphi , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Humanos , Síndrome Postrombótico/diagnóstico , Síndrome Postrombótico/fisiopatología , Síndrome Postrombótico/terapia , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Várices/diagnóstico , Várices/fisiopatología , Várices/terapia , Venas/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia Venosa/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Venosa/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia Venosa/terapiaAsunto(s)
Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/terapia , Consenso , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Humanos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/diagnóstico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/epidemiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/microbiología , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The external carotid artery (ECA) serves as a major collateral pathway for ophthalmic and cerebral artery blood supply. It is routinely examined as part of carotid duplex ultrasound, but criteria for determining ECA stenosis are poorly characterized and typically extrapolated from internal carotid artery data. This is despite the fact that the ECA is smaller in diameter, with a higher resistance and lower volume flow pattern. We hypothesized that using the cutoff of a peak systolic velocity (PSV) ≥125 cm/s, extrapolated from internal carotid artery data, will overestimate the prevalence of ≥50% ECA stenosis and aimed to determine a more appropriate criterion. METHODS: From December 2016 to July 2017, consecutive carotid duplex ultrasound studies performed in our university hospital Intersocietal Accreditation Commission-accredited vascular laboratory were prospectively identified and categorized with respect to prevalence and distribution of ECA PSVs and color aliasing, an indication of turbulent flow or flow acceleration. Presence of color aliasing was determined by two individual reviewers and agreement assessed by Cohen κ coefficient. ECA stenosis was calculated by the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) method in patients with computed tomography angiography (CTA) performed within 3 months of carotid duplex ultrasound without an intervening intervention. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to identify best criteria for determining ≥50% ECA stenosis. RESULTS: There were 1324 ECAs from 662 patients analyzed; 174 patients had a total of 252 ECAs with PSV ≥125 cm/s (19% of the total sample). Of those ECAs with PSVs ≥125 cm/s, 30.5% were between 125 and 149 cm/s, 22.2% were between 150 and 174 cm/s, 13.1% were between 175 and 199 cm/s, and 34.1% were ≥200 cm/s. There were 341 ECAs that were analyzed for the presence of color aliasing. In 86 ECAs with PSV ≥200 cm/s, 58.1% had color aliasing, whereas in 255 ECAs with PSV <200 cm/s, only 19.2% had color aliasing (P = .0001). There were 325 CTA studies reviewed and assessed for the presence of a ≥50% ECA stenosis as determined by CTA. Overall, the combination of an ECA PSV ≥200 cm/s with the presence of color aliasing provided the highest combination of sensitivity (90%), specificity (96%), positive predictive value (83%), and negative predictive value (98%) and the greatest area under the curve of 0.971 for determining the presence of a ≥50% ECA stenosis based on CTA. CONCLUSIONS: A PSV ≥125 cm/s alone probably overestimates the prevalence of ≥50% ECA stenosis. A PSV ≥200 cm/s combined with color aliasing is highly predictive of >50% ECA stenosis based on correlation with CTA.
Asunto(s)
Arteria Carótida Externa/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis Carotídea/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía Doppler en Color , Anciano , Velocidad del Flujo Sanguíneo , Arteria Carótida Externa/fisiopatología , Estenosis Carotídea/epidemiología , Estenosis Carotídea/fisiopatología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Prevalencia , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A lower extremity venous duplex ultrasound (LEVDUS) examination positive for deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is an indication for anticoagulation. Incomplete examinations that fail to examine all lower extremity veins in patients not otherwise indicated for anticoagulation may be followed by repeated examination to exclude missed or progressing DVT. This study examined the frequency of incomplete LEVDUS studies, reasons for incomplete studies, veins incompletely examined, and follow-up LEVDUS after incomplete LEVDUS. The incidence of a positive finding of DVT was compared between initial complete LEVDUS and follow-up LEVDUS after an initial incomplete examination to determine whether improving rates of follow-up LEVDUS after an incomplete examination is a reasonable target for quality improvement. METHODS: At a single academic medical center from January 2017 to December 2017, incomplete LEVDUS studies were prospectively identified in patients who did not otherwise have an identified indication for anticoagulation. Rate of DVT in complete LEVDUS was also determined during the same time frame. Incomplete LEVDUS reports were reviewed for clinical setting, patient demographics, examination indication, ordering providers, reasons for incomplete examinations, anatomic locations of veins not visualized, rates of follow-up LEVDUS examinations within 30 days of the initially incomplete study, and rates of DVT identified in follow-up examinations of initially incomplete examinations. RESULTS: Of the 2843 LEVDUS examinations performed in 2017, 341 studies identified DVT and 197 incomplete examinations did not identify DVT. Veins not visualized on incomplete studies included tibial veins (n = 170 [86.3%]), femoral veins (n = 73 [37.1%]), and popliteal veins (n = 76 [38.6%]), with the most common reasons for incomplete studies being bandages or fixation devices (46.2%), intolerance of the patient for the study (14.7%), and body habitus or edema (17.4%). Only a minority of incomplete studies not identifying DVT (27.9%) had a follow-up examination performed. The majority of the repeated examinations were performed after incomplete LEVDUS examinations that were originally performed for high-risk screening (80%) as opposed to clinical suspicion for DVT (20%). There was no significant difference in demographic features of patients with initially incomplete studies who did or did not have a follow-up examination and no significant difference in the rates of DVT (13.1%) in complete LEVDUS examinations compared with the rate of DVT found in follow-up examinations of initially incomplete LEVDUS examinations (9.1%; P = .33). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients with incomplete LEVDUS, even those with symptoms or signs suggestive of DVT, do not have a follow-up examination within 30 days of the incomplete study. The rate of DVT detected in initially complete studies was similar to that in patients with follow-up examinations whose initial study was incomplete and did not identify DVT. This suggests that to avoid missing DVT in patients with incomplete LEVDUS studies, quality assurance programs should be initiated to ensure that follow-up LEVDUS studies are performed after an incomplete LEVDUS examination.
Asunto(s)
Extremidad Inferior/irrigación sanguínea , Ultrasonografía Doppler Dúplex , Venas/diagnóstico por imagen , Trombosis de la Vena/diagnóstico por imagen , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Competencia Clínica , Errores Diagnósticos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Trombosis de la Vena/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Prior studies have suggested improved wound complication rates but decreased primary patency in lower extremity bypasses performed with endoscopic vein harvest (EVH) vs open vein harvest (OVH). We hypothesize that the inferior patency reflects the initial learning curve for EVH and that improved patency can be achieved with experience. METHODS: This was a single-institution review of 113 patients with critical limb ischemia who underwent infrainguinal bypass with a continuous segment of great saphenous vein harvested endoscopically (n = 49) or through a single open incision (n = 64) from 2012 to 2017. EVH was performed by surgeons with >5 years' experience with this technique. Operative outcomes, patency, complications, and readmission rates were compared between the harvest methods. EVH data were also compared with our prior reported series of our initial experience with this technique to determine the effects of experience on outcomes. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in patient demographics, medications, operative indications, or inflow/outflow vessels between the two groups. Mean operative time was 322 minutes and median hospital length of stay was 6 days for OVH, and was 340 minutes and 5 days for EVH, which was not significant. Harvest-related wound complications were more frequent with OVH (28% vs 2%, P < .001). Primary patency at 1 and 3 years was 65% and 58% for OVH, and 79% and 71% for EVH, respectively (P = .18), assisted primary patency was 77% and 74% for OVH and 94% and 89% for EVH, respectively (P = .05), and secondary patency was 82% and 79% for OVH and 95% and 95% for EVH, respectively (P = .03). The 30-day readmission rates were similar between OVH (20%) and EVH (12%, P = .26), but 90-day readmissions were more frequent in the OVH group (34% vs 14%, P = .018). Compared with our earlier series of EVH, the current cohort had significantly improved 3-year primary (71% vs 42%, P = .012), primary assisted patency (89 vs 66%, P = .034), and secondary patency (95% vs 66%, P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: With experience, lower extremity bypass using EVH can result in improved patency compared with OVH and initial EVH use, while also resulting in fewer wound complications and readmissions, with comparable operative times and hospital length of stay. This technique should be more widely adopted by vascular surgeons as a primary method of vein harvest.
Asunto(s)
Endoscopía/efectos adversos , Isquemia/cirugía , Recuperación del Miembro/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/cirugía , Vena Safena/trasplante , Recolección de Tejidos y Órganos/efectos adversos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Endoscopía/métodos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Isquemia/etiología , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Recuperación del Miembro/métodos , Extremidad Inferior/irrigación sanguínea , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/complicaciones , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Recolección de Tejidos y Órganos/métodos , Trasplante Autólogo/efectos adversos , Trasplante Autólogo/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Grado de Desobstrucción VascularRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The major advantage of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) over open repair (OAR) is improved perioperative morbidity and mortality. Long term results of the two modalities are comparable. We sought to quantify factors predicting perioperative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing OAR. METHODS: Consecutive non-ruptured OAR were analyzed for patient demographic factors, perioperative variables including blood pressure, temperature, and glucose control, intraoperative factors, and complications including wound, pulmonary, renal and cardiac, and 30-day mortality. Uni- and multivariate analysis was performed to determine predictors of morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: 240 elective open AAA repairs over 10 consecutive years were performed. 46% required suprarenal clamping. At least one complication occurred in 47% and 30-day mortality was 5.4%. By multivariate analysis, independent predictors of morbidity (any complication) were suprarenal clamping (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1-3.2, pâ¯=â¯0.029), operative time (OR 1.005, 95% CI 1.002-1.008, pâ¯=â¯0.002), and low postoperative temperature (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1-2.3, pâ¯=â¯0.025). Multivariate predictors of 30 day mortality included advanced age (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.1-1.3, pâ¯=â¯0.002) and operative time (OR 1.007, 95% CI 1.001-1.013, pâ¯=â¯0.024). Glucose control did not predict morbidity or mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Control of postoperative temperature is a potentially modifiable factor that may reduce morbidity in patients undergoing open AAA repair, thereby minimizing the early advantage of EVAR.