Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35805222

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Mindful parenting and the use of technology for parenting intervention have expanded separately from one another with promising results, but their relationship is underexplored. The current study protocol proposes a new universal intervention via app, MINd Us TOghether (MinUTo), based on mindful parenting for parents of typically developing children of 4-5 years of age. METHODS: The effect of the intervention is evaluated using a randomised controlled trial. Around 2000 parents are enrolled and randomised to the intervention and control groups. Data are collected in three different waves from parents at baseline and endline; APP usage data allow for the analysis of intervention adherence. The MinUTo app proposes contents and activities for five dimensions of mindful parenting. Each dimension is presented within a two-week distance, explaining its importance, providing information, and offering activities for parents and children. EXPECTED RESULTS: We hypothesise a positive effect of the intervention on primary outcomes (mindful parenting, parenting stress, parent behaviours and parental time investment), increasing parents' skills and promoting a positive parent-child relationship. We also test possible effects on secondary outcomes (parenting attitudes and beliefs) at an explorative level. CONCLUSIONS: The study will add new considerations about the psychological and economic impact of technologies in implementing parenting interventions in non-clinical populations.


Asunto(s)
Atención Plena , Responsabilidad Parental , Niño , Crianza del Niño , Preescolar , Humanos , Relaciones Padres-Hijo , Responsabilidad Parental/psicología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
2.
Health Policy ; 120(7): 780-9, 2016 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27263061

RESUMEN

Physicians are often alleged responsible for the manipulation of delivery timing. We investigate this issue in a setting that negates the influence of financial incentives on physician's behavior. Working on a sample of women admitted at the onset of labor in a big public hospital in Italy we estimate a model for the exact time of delivery as driven by individual Indication to Cesarean Section (ICS) and covariates. We find that ICS does not affect the day of delivery but leads to a circadian rhythm in the likelihood of delivery. The pattern is consistent with the postponement of high ICS deliveries in the late night\early morning shift. Our evidence hardly supports the manipulation of timing of births as driven by medical staff's "demand for leisure". Physicians seem to manipulate the exact timing of delivery to reduce exposure to risk factors extant during off-peak periods.


Asunto(s)
Cesárea/estadística & datos numéricos , Toma de Decisiones , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Política de Salud , Humanos , Italia , Embarazo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo
3.
J Health Econ ; 28(2): 290-304, 2009 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19135274

RESUMEN

In this paper we assess the relative effectiveness of user charges and administrative waiting times as a tool for rationing public healthcare in Italy. We measure demand elasticities by estimating a simultaneous equation model of GP primary care visits, public specialist consultations and private specialist consultations, as if they were part of an incomplete system of demand. We find that for public specialist consultations, own price elasticity of demand is about -0.3, while elasticity to administrative waiting time is about -.04. No substitution exists between the demand for public and private specialists, so that user charges act as a net deterrent for over-consumption. The public provision of healthcare does not induce the wealthy to opt out. Moreover our evidence suggests that user charges and waiting lists do not serve redistributive purposes.


Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud/organización & administración , Asignación de Recursos para la Atención de Salud , Programas Nacionales de Salud/organización & administración , Sector Privado , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Italia , Medicina , Modelos Econométricos , Especialización , Listas de Espera
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...