A recurrent de novo MAX p.Arg60Gln variant causes a syndromic overgrowth disorder through differential expression of c-Myc target genes.

Cyclin D2 (CCND2) stabilization underpins a range of macrocephaly-associated disorders through mutation of CCND2 or activating mutations in upstream genes encoding PI3K-AKT pathway components. Here, we describe three individuals with overlapping macrocephaly-associated phenotypes who carry the same recurrent de novo c.179G>A (p.Arg60Gln) variant in Myc-associated factor X (MAX). The mutation, located in the b-HLH-LZ domain, causes increased intracellular CCND2 through increased transcription but it does not cause stabilization of CCND2. We show that the purified b-HLH-LZ domain of MAXArg60Gln (Max∗Arg60Gln) binds its target E-box sequence with a lower apparent affinity. This leads to a more efficient heterodimerization with c-Myc resulting in an increase in transcriptional activity of c-Myc in individuals carrying this mutation. The recent development of Omomyc-CPP, a cell-penetrating b-HLH-LZ-domain c-Myc inhibitor, provides a possible therapeutic option for MAXArg60Gln individuals, and others carrying similar germline mutations resulting in dysregulated transcriptional c-Myc activity.

Zinc Fingers 10 and 11 of Miz-1 undergo conformational exchange to achieve specific DNA binding.

Miz-1 (ZBTB17) is a poly-zinc finger BTB/POZ transcription factor with 12 consecutive C2H2 zinc fingers (ZFs) that binds transcriptional start sites (TSSs) to regulate the expression of genes involved in cell development and proliferation. As of now, it is not known which of the 12 consecutive ZFs are responsible for the recognition of the 24 base pair consensus sequence found at these TSSs. Evidence suggests ZFs 7-12 plays this role. We provide validation for this and describe the structural and dynamical characterization of unprecedented conformational exchange in the linker between ZFs 10 and 11. This conformational exchange uncouples ZFs 7-10 from 11 and 12 and promotes a scanning-recognition mechanism through which the two segments cooperate to bind two sub-sites at both ends of the consensus. We further show that this can result in the coiling of TSSs as part of Miz-1's mechanism of transcriptional transactivation.

Methods of Expression, Purification, and Preparation of the c-Myc b-HLH-LZ for Its Biophysical Characterization.

The b-HLH-LZ domain of c-Myc is a key target for the development of cancer therapies by blunting its binding to DNA with cell penetrant b-HLH-LZs and/or by stabilizing it into a state that cannot recognize Max to activate and amplify transcription of oncogenic genes. Although recent milestones have been reached with DNA binding blunting of c-Myc with the cell penetrant b-HLH-LZ Omomyc, the targeting of its b-HLH-LZ with small molecules, peptides, or proteins is lagging. As reviewed recently, the main problem relies in the intrinsically disordered nature of the b-HLH-LZ of c-Myc. This greatly complicates the classical approach of targeting a docking site with inhibitors. The solution state methods such as NMR are progressing towards the characterization of the ensembles of structures or states the b-HLH-LZ can adopt. However, the delicate balance that dictates the population of these dynamically interchanging states relies on its primary structure and the weak polar, electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions allowed. In this context, it is of the utmost importance to study the b-HLH-LZ of c-Myc in its WT background and avoid the use of tags such as His-tags. These tags could disrupt the balance of forces which could alter the conformational and physical transitions and states it can undergo and adopt. Here, we describe a robust protocol to express the WT b-HLH-LZ in E. coli and purify it, without the need of tags, to obtain the required quantities for solution state biophysical characterization such as NMR.

Intrinsic cell-penetrating activity propels Omomyc from proof of concept to viable anti-MYC therapy.

Inhibiting MYC has long been considered unfeasible, although its key role in human cancers makes it a desirable target for therapeutic intervention. One reason for its perceived undruggability was the fear of catastrophic side effects in normal tissues. However, we previously designed a dominant-negative form of MYC called Omomyc and used its conditional transgenic expression to inhibit MYC function both in vitro and in vivo. MYC inhibition by Omomyc exerted a potent therapeutic impact in various mouse models of cancer, causing only mild, well-tolerated, and reversible side effects. Nevertheless, Omomyc has been so far considered only a proof of principle. In contrast with that preconceived notion, here, we show that the purified Omomyc mini-protein itself spontaneously penetrates into cancer cells and effectively interferes with MYC transcriptional activity therein. Efficacy of the Omomyc mini-protein in various experimental models of non-small cell lung cancer harboring different oncogenic mutation profiles establishes its therapeutic potential after both direct tissue delivery and systemic administration, providing evidence that the Omomyc mini-protein is an effective MYC inhibitor worthy of clinical development.

Biophysical characterization of the b-HLH-LZ of ΔMax, an alternatively spliced isoform of Max found in tumor cells: Towards the validation of a tumor suppressor role for the Max homodimers.

It is classically recognized that the physiological and oncogenic functions of Myc proteins depend on specific DNA binding enabled by the dimerization of its C-terminal basic-region-Helix-Loop-Helix-Leucine Zipper (b-HLH-LZ) domain with that of Max. However, a new paradigm is emerging, where the binding of the c-Myc/Max heterodimer to non-specific sequences in enhancers and promoters drives the transcription of genes involved in diverse oncogenic programs. Importantly, Max can form a stable homodimer even in the presence of c-Myc and bind DNA (specific and non-specific) with comparable affinity to the c-Myc/Max heterodimer. Intriguingly, alterations in the Max gene by germline and somatic mutations or changes in the gene product by alternative splicing (e.g. ΔMax) were recently associated with pheochromocytoma and glioblastoma, respectively. This has led to the proposition that Max is, by itself, a tumor suppressor. However, the actual mechanism through which it exerts such an activity remains to be elucidated. Here, we show that contrary to the WT motif, the b-HLH-LZ of ΔMax does not homodimerize in the absence of DNA. In addition, although ΔMax can still bind the E-box sequence as a homodimer, it cannot bind non-specific DNA in that form, while it can heterodimerize with c-Myc and bind E-box and non-specific DNA as a heterodimer with high affinity. Taken together, our results suggest that the WT Max homodimer is important for attenuating the binding of c-Myc to specific and non-specific DNA, whereas ΔMax is unable to do so. Conversely, the splicing of Max into ΔMax could provoke an increase in overall chromatin bound c-Myc. According to the new emerging paradigm, the splicing event and the stark reduction in homodimer stability and DNA binding should promote tumorigenesis impairing the tumor suppressor activity of the WT homodimer of Max.

Structural Insights into c-Myc-interacting Zinc Finger Protein-1 (Miz-1) Delineate Domains Required for DNA Scanning and Sequence-specific Binding.

c-Myc-interacting zinc finger protein-1 (Miz-1) is a poly-Cys2His2 zinc finger (ZF) transcriptional regulator of many cell cycle genes. A Miz-1 DNA sequence consensus has recently been identified and has also unveiled Miz-1 functions in other cellular processes, underscoring its importance in the cell. Miz-1 contains 13 ZFs, but it is unknown why Miz-1 has so many ZFs and whether they recognize and bind DNA sequences in a typical fashion. Here, we used NMR to deduce the role of Miz-1 ZFs 1-4 in detecting the Miz-1 consensus sequence and preventing nonspecific DNA binding. In the construct containing the first 4 ZFs, we observed that ZFs 3 and 4 form an unusual compact and stable structure that restricts their motions. Disruption of this compact structure by an electrostatically mismatched A86K mutation profoundly affected the DNA binding properties of the WT construct. On the one hand, Miz1-4WT was found to bind the Miz-1 DNA consensus sequence weakly and through ZFs 1-3 only. On the other hand, the four ZFs in the structurally destabilized Miz1-4A86K mutant bound to the DNA consensus with a 30-fold increase in affinity (100 nm). The formation of such a thermodynamically stable but nonspecific complex is expected to slow down the rate of DNA scanning by Miz-1 during the search for its consensus sequence. Interestingly, we found that the motif stabilizing the compact structure between ZFs 3 and 4 is conserved and enriched in other long poly-ZF proteins. As discussed in detail, our findings support a general role of compact inter-ZF structures in minimizing the formation of off-target DNA complexes.

Miz-1 and Max compete to engage c-Myc: implication for the mechanism of inhibition of c-Myc transcriptional activity by Miz-1.

c-Myc is a basic helix-loop-helix leucine zipper (b-HLH-LZ) transcription factor deregulated in the majority of human cancers. As a heterodimer with Max, another b-HLH-LZ transcription factor, deregulated and persistent c-Myc accumulates at transcriptionally active promoters and enhancers and amplifies transcription. This leads to the so-called transcriptional addiction of tumor cells. Recent studies have showed that c-Myc transcriptional activities can be reversed by its association with Miz-1, a POZ transcription factor containing 13 classical zinc fingers. Although evidences have led to suggest that c-Myc interacts with both Miz-1 and Max to form a ternary repressive complex, earlier evidences also suggest that Miz-1 and Max may compete to engage c-Myc. In such a scenario, the Miz-1/c-Myc complex would be the entity responsible for the inhibition of c-Myc transcriptional amplification. Considering the implications of the Miz-1/c-Myc interaction, it is highly important to solve this duality. While two potential c-Myc interacting domains (hereafter termed MID) have been identified in Miz-1 by yeast two-hybrid, with the b-HLH-LZ as a bait, the biophysical characterization of these interactions has not been reported so far. Here, we report that the MID located between the 12th and 13th zinc finger of Miz-1 and the b-HLH-LZ of Max compete to form a complex with the b-HLH-LZ of c-Myc. Our results support the notion that the repressive action of Miz-1 on c-Myc does not rely on the formation of a ternary complex. The implications of these observations for the mechanism of inhibition of c-Myc transcriptional activity by Miz-1 are discussed. Proteins 2017; 85:199-206. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Methods for the expression, purification, preparation, and biophysical characterization of constructs of the c-Myc and Max b-HLH-LZs.

Specific heterodimerization and DNA binding by the b-HLH-LZ transcription factors c-Myc and Max is central to the activation and repression activities of c-Myc that lead to cell growth, proliferation, and tumorigenesis (Adhikary and Eilers, Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 6:635-645, 2005; Eilers and Eisenman, Genes Dev 22:2755-2766, 2008; Grandori et al., Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 16:653-699, 2000; Whitfield and Soucek, Cell Mol Life Sci 69:931-934, 2011). Although many c-Myc-interacting partner proteins are known to interact through their HLH domain (Adhikary and Eilers, Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 6:635-645, 2005), current knowledge regarding the structure and the determinants of molecular recognition of these complexes is still very limited. Moreover, recent advances in the development and use of b-HLH-LZ dominant negatives (Soucek et al., Nature 455:679-683, 2008) and inhibitors of c-Myc interaction with its protein partners (Bidwell et al., J Control Release 135:2-10, 2009; Mustata et al., J Med Chem 52:1247-1250, 2009; Prochownik and Vogt, Genes Cancer 1:650-659, 2010) or DNA highlight the importance of efficient protocols to prepare such constructs and variants. Here, we provide methods to produce and purify high quantities of pure and untagged b-HLH-LZ constructs of c-Myc and Max as well as specific c-Myc/Max heterodimers for their biophysical and structural characterization by CD, NMR, or crystallography. Moreover, biochemical methods to analyze the homodimers and heterodimers as well as DNA binding of these constructs by native electrophoresis are presented. In addition to enable the investigation of the c-Myc/Max b-HLH-LZ complexes, the protocols described herein can be applied to the biochemical characterization of various mutants of either partner, as well as to ternary complexes with other partner proteins.

New structural determinants for c-Myc specific heterodimerization with Max and development of a novel homodimeric c-Myc b-HLH-LZ.

c-Myc must heterodimerize with Max to accomplish its functions as a transcription factor. This specific heterodimerization occurs through the b-HLH-LZ (basic region, helix 1-loop-helix 2-leucine zipper) domains. In fact, many studies have shown that the c-Myc b-HLH-LZ (c-Myc'SH) preferentially forms a heterodimer with the Max b-HLH-LZ (Max'SH). The primary mechanism underlying the specific heterodimerization lies on the destabilization of both homodimers and the formation of a more stable heterodimer. In this regard, it has been widely reported that c-Myc'SH has low solubility and homodimerizes poorly and that repulsions within the LZ domain account for the homodimer instability. Here, we show that replacing one residue in the basic region and one residue in Helix 1 (H(1)) of c-Myc'SH with corresponding residues conserved in b-HLH proteins confers to c-Myc'SH a higher propensity to form a stable homodimer in solution. In stark contrast to the wild-type protein, this double mutant (L362R, R367L) of the c-Myc b-HLH-LZ (c-Myc'RL) shows limited heterodimerization with Max'SH in vitro. In addition, c-Myc'RL forms highly stable and soluble complexes with canonical as well as non-canonical E-box probes. Altogether, our results demonstrate for the first time that structural determinants driving the specific heterodimerization of c-Myc and Max are embedded in the basic region and H(1) of c-Myc and that these can be exploited to engineer a novel homodimeric c-Myc b-HLH-LZ with the ability of binding the E-box sequence autonomously and with high affinity.

The Max b-HLH-LZ can transduce into cells and inhibit c-Myc transcriptional activities.

The inhibition of the functions of c-Myc (endogenous and oncogenic) was recently shown to provide a spectacular therapeutic index in cancer mouse models, with complete tumor regression and minimal side-effects in normal tissues. This was achieved by the systemic and conditional expression of omomyc, the cDNA of a designed mutant of the b-HLH-LZ of c-Myc named Omomyc. The overall mode of action of Omomyc consists in the sequestration of Max and the concomitant competition of the Omomyc/Max complex with the endogenous c-Myc/Max heterodimer. This leads to the inhibition of the transactivation of Myc target genes involved in proliferation and metabolism. While this body of work has provided extraordinary insights to guide the future development of new cancer therapies that target c-Myc, Omomyc itself is not a therapeutic agent. In this context, we sought to exploit the use of a b-HLH-LZ to inhibit c-Myc in a cancer cell line in a more direct fashion. We demonstrate that the b-HLH-LZ domain of Max (Max*) behaves as a bona fide protein transduction domain (PTD) that can efficiently transduce across cellular membrane via through endocytosis and translocate to the nucleus. In addition, we show that the treatment of HeLa cells with Max* leads to a reduction of metabolism and proliferation rate. Accordingly, we observe a decrease of the population of HeLa cells in S phase, an accumulation in G1/G0 and the induction of apoptosis. In agreement with these phenotypic changes, we show by q-RT-PCR that the treatment of HeLa cells with Max* leads to the activation of the transcription c-Myc repressed genes as well as the repression of the expression of c-Myc activated genes. In addition to the novel discovery that the Max b-HLH-LZ is a PTD, our findings open up new avenues and strategies for the direct inhibition of c-Myc with b-HLH-LZ analogs.

The Max homodimeric b-HLH-LZ significantly interferes with the specific heterodimerization between the c-Myc and Max b-HLH-LZ in absence of DNA: a quantitative analysis.

Specific heterodimerization plays a crucial role in the regulation of the biology of the cell. For example, the specific heterodimerization between the b-HLH-LZ transcription factors c-Myc and Max is a prerequisite for c-Myc transcriptional activity that leads to cell growth, proliferation and tumorigenesis. On the other hand, the Mad proteins can compete with c-Myc for Max. The Mad/Max heterodimer antagonizes the effect of the c-Myc/Max heterodimer. In this contribution, we have focused on the specific heterodimerization between the b-HLH-LZ domains of c-Myc and Max using CD and NMR. While the c-Myc and Max b-HLH-LZ domains are found to preferentially form a heterodimer; we demonstrate for the first time that a significant population of the Max homodimeric b-HLH-LZ can also form and hence interferes significantly with the specific heterodimerization. This indicates that the Max/Max homodimer can also interfere with c-Myc/Max functions, therefore adding to the complexity of the regulation of transcription by the Myc/Max/Mad network. The demonstration of the existence of the homodimeric population was made possible by the application of numerical routines that enable the simulation of composite spectroscopic signal (e.g. CD) as a function of temperature and total concentration of proteins. From a systems biology perspective, our routines may be of general interest as they offer the opportunity to treat many competing equilibriums in order to predict the probability of existence of protein complexes.

Elucidation of the structural determinants responsible for the specific formation of heterodimeric Mxd1/Max b-HLH-LZ and its binding to E-box sequences.

The proteins of the Mxd family (formally known as Mad) are antagonists of the oncoprotein c-Myc. They compete with c-Myc for their obligate partner Max to prevent the c-Myc/Max heterodimer from binding to E-box sequences in the target gene promoters. In cancer cells, where Myc is overexpressed, the expression of Mxd proteins is usually insufficient or abrogated. However, the reintroduction of Mxd1 expression in these cells prevents growth and proliferation. While the antagonism of c-Myc functions by Mxd proteins is of potential relevance for the development of cancer treatment strategies, the structural determinants responsible for the specific heterodimerization between the Mxd and the Max b-helix-loop-helix-leucine zippers are not fully understood. Moreover, whether the heterodimer is assembled on DNA or in the nucleoplasm prior to DNA binding is under debate. In this article, we demonstrate that Mxd1 D112a and Max N78a and H81d, which are located in the leucine zippers of the proteins, can dictate the specificity of heterodimerization and whether or not the Mxd1/Max/DNA complex forms. Our results also indicate that additional specific determinants exist in the helix-loop-helix domains of Max and Mxd1. Finally, we provide evidence that heterodimerization must precede DNA binding in vivo.

Structural and thermodynamical characterization of the complete p21 gene product of Max.

The b-HLH-LZ family of transcription factors contains numerous proteins including the Myc and Mad families of proteins. Max heterodimerizes with other members to bind the E-Box DNA sequence in target gene promoters. Max is the only protein in this network that recognizes and binds E-Box DNA sequences as a homodimer in vitro and represses transcription of Myc target genes in vivo. Key information such as the structure of p21 Max, the complete gene product, and its KD in the absence of DNA are still unknown. Here, we report the characterization of the secondary and quaternary structures, the dimerization and DNA binding of p21 Max and a thermodynamically stable mutant. The helical content of p21 Max indicates that its N-terminal and C-terminal regions are unstructured in the absence of DNA. NMR experiments further support the location of folded and unfolded domains. We also show that p21 Max has an apparent KD (37 degrees C) of 7 x 10(-6), a value 10-100 times smaller than the b-HLH-LZ itself. We demonstrate that electrostatic repulsions are responsible for the higher KD of the b-HLH-LZ. Finally, we show that a p21 Max double mutant forms a very stable dimer with a KD (37 degrees C) of 3 x 10(-10) and that the protein/DNA complex depicts a higher temperature of denaturation than p21 Max/DNA complex. Our results indicate that Max could homodimerize, bind DNA, and repress transcription in vivo and that its mutant could be more efficient at repressing the expression of c-Myc target genes.

Toward the elucidation of the structural determinants responsible for the molecular recognition between Mad1 and Max.

Mad1 is a member of the Mad family. This family is part of the larger Myc/Max/Mad b-HLH-LZ eukaryotic transcription-factor network. Mad1 forms a specific heterodimer with Max and acts as a transcriptional repressor when bound to an E-box sequence (CACGTG) found in the promoter of c-Myc target genes. Mad1 cannot form a complex with DNA by itself under physiological conditions. A global model for the molecular recognition has emerged in which the Mad1 b-HLH-LZ homodimer is destabilized and the Mad/Max b-HLH-LZ heterodimer is favored. The detailed structural determinants responsible for the molecular recognition remain largely unknown. In this study, we focus on the elucidation of the structural determinants responsible for the destabilization of the Mad1 b-HLH-LZ homodimer. Conserved acidic residues at the dimerization interface (position a) of the LZ of all Max-interacting proteins have been hypothesized to be involved in the destabilization of the homodimeric states. In Mad1, this position corresponds to residue Asp 112. As reported for the complete gene product of Mad1, we show that wild-type b-HLH-LZ does not homodimerize or bind DNA under physiological conditions. On the other hand, the single mutation of Asp 112 to an Asn enables the b-HLH-LZ to dimerize and bind DNA. Our results suggest that Asp 112 is implicated in the destabilization of Mad1 b-HLH-LZ homodimer. Interestingly, this side chain is observed to form a salt bridge at the interface of the LZ domain in the crystal structure of Mad1/Max heterodimeric b-HLH-LZ bound to DNA [Nair, S. K., and Burley, S. K. (2003) Cell 112, 193-205]. This clearly suggests that Asp 112 plays a crucial role in the molecular recognition between Max and Mad1.