Adaptive upregulation of gastric and hypothalamic ghrelin receptors and increased plasma ghrelin in a model of cancer chemotherapy-induced dyspepsia.

Chemotherapy treatment can lead to delayed gastric emptying, early satiety, anorexia, nausea and vomiting, described collectively as the cancer-associated dyspepsia syndrome (CADS). Administration of ghrelin (GHRL), an endogenous orexigenic peptide known to stimulate gastric motility, has been shown to reduce the symptoms of CADS induced in relevant animal models with the potent chemotherapeutic agent, cisplatin. We examined the effects in the rat of cisplatin (6 mg/kg i.p.) treatment on the expression of GHRL and ghrelin receptor (GHSR) mRNAs in the hypothalamus and the stomach at a time-point (2 days) when the effects of cisplatin are pronounced. In addition, plasma levels of GHRL (acylated and total including des-acyl GHRL) were measured and the effect on these levels of treatment with the synthetic glucocorticoid dexamethasone (2 mg/kg s.c. bd.) was investigated. Cisplatin increased GHSR mRNA expression in the stomach (67%) and hypothalamus (52%) but not GHRL mRNA expression and increased the percentage of acylated GHRL (7.03+/-1.35% vs. 11.38+/-2.40%) in the plasma. Dexamethasone reduced the plasma level of acylated GHRL and the percentage of acylated GHRL to values below those in animals treated with saline alone (7.03+/-1.35% vs. 2.60+/-0.49%). Our findings support the hypothesis that an adaptive upregulation of the ghrelin receptor may occur during cancer chemotherapy-associated dyspepsia. This may have a role in defensive responses to toxic challenges to the gut. In addition, our results provide preliminary evidence for glucocorticoid modulation of plasma ghrelin levels.

Energy restriction enhances therapeutic efficacy of the PPARgamma agonist, rosiglitazone, through regulation of visceral fat gene expression.

AIM: Consumption of a palatable diet can induce hyperphagia, leading to weight gain (dietary obesity) and insulin resistance in rats. Thiazolidinediones (TZDs) can also induce hyperphagia in rats but conversely have an insulin-sensitizing effect. The aim of this study was to investigate whether preventing TZD-induced hyperphagia (i.e. energy restriction) in dietary obese (DIO) rats would enhance the insulin-sensitizing effects of treatment at a therapeutic dose; and, within this paradigm, to produce an original survey of candidate TZD-gene targets in the clinically relevant visceral white adipose tissue (WAT) depot. METHODS: DIO rats that were either freely fed or energy restricted (i.e. pair-fed to the level of untreated controls) were treated with rosiglitazone maleate (RSG; 3 mg/kg/day) for 2 weeks, the restricted group controlling for treatment-induced hyperphagia and weight gain. The outcome measures were circulating concentrations of various biochemical markers of insulin resistance, and gene expression was measured in epididymal WAT. RESULTS: In both freely fed and pair-fed groups, compared to untreated DIO controls, RSG reduced plasma levels of insulin (-29% and -43%; p < 0.05 and p < 0.001, respectively), free fatty acids (FFAs; -45% and -48%; p < 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively) and triglycerides (TGs; -63% and -72%; both p < 0.001), reflected in improved insulin sensitivity, as measured by homeostasis model assessment (-29% and -43%; p < 0.01 and p < 0.0001). RSG also increased the expression of the fatty acid transport/synthesis genes, fatty acid transport protein (2.4-3.2-fold), epidermal fatty acid-binding protein (FABP; 1.7-2.0-fold), heart FABP (25-29-fold) and fatty acid synthase (2.3-2.9-fold; all p < 0.05) in both groups. Adipocyte FABP was also increased by RSG treatment, but only in combination with energy restriction (1.52-fold; p < 0.05) as was hexokinase II expression (p < 0.001). In contrast, the drug had no effect on expression of several genes associated with lipolysis. Although obesity-induced hyperleptinaemia was normalized only in the energy-restricted group, leptin messenger RNA (mRNA) expression was reduced in both treated groups (all p < 0.01). Resistin and tumour necrosis factor-alpha expression was also reduced, though in the latter case, only with energy restriction (p < 0.05). Other adipokines were unaffected by RSG treatment. CONCLUSION: Our results clearly show that energy restriction enhances the therapeutic efficacy of TZDs and suggest that this occurs, at least in part, through a modulatory effect on gene expression in visceral WAT. These findings improve our understanding of the underlying mechanistic basis for the clinical usefulness of dietary restriction as an adjunct to TZD therapy in type 2 diabetes.

The relationship between the effects of short-chain fatty acids on intestinal motility in vitro and GPR43 receptor activation.

The G protein-coupled receptors, GPR41 and GPR43, are activated by short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), with distinct rank order potencies. This study investigated the possibility that SCFAs modulate intestinal motility via these receptors. Luminal SCFA concentrations within the rat intestine were greatest in the caecum (c. 115 mmol L(-1)) and proximal colon. Using similar concentrations (0.1-100 mmol L(-1)), SCFAs were found to inhibit electrically evoked, neuronally mediated contractions of rat distal colon, possibly via a prejunctional site of action; this activity was independent of the presence or absence of the mucosa. By contrast, SCFAs reduced the amplitude but also reduced the threshold and increased the frequency of peristaltic contractions in guinea-pig terminal ileum. In each model, the rank-order of activity was acetate (C2) approximately propionate (C3) approximately butyrate (C4) > pentanoate (C5) approximately formate (C1), consistent with activity at the GPR43 receptor. GPR43 mRNA was expressed throughout the rat gut, with highest levels in the colon. However, the ability of SCFAs to inhibit neuronally mediated contractions of the colon was similar in tissues from wild-type and GPR43 gene knockout mice, with identical rank-orders of potency. In conclusion, SCFAs can modulate intestinal motility, but these effects can be independent of the GPR43 receptor.

Behavioural and hypothalamic molecular effects of the anti-cancer agent cisplatin in the rat: A model of chemotherapy-related malaise?

Many cancer patients receiving chemotherapy experience fatigue, disturbed circadian rhythms, anorexia and a variety of dyspeptic symptoms including nausea. There is no animal model for this 'chemotherapy-related malaise' so we investigated the behavioural and molecular effects of a potent chemotherapeutic agent, cisplatin (CP, 6 mg/kg, i.p.) in rats. Dark-phase horizontal locomotor activity declined post-CP reaching a nadir on day 3 (P < 0.001), before recovering after 7 days. CP's effect was most marked in the late part (05.00-07.00) of the dark-phase. Food intake reached a nadir (P > 0.001) at 2 days, coincident with an increase in gastric contents (cisplatin 9.04+/-0.8 vs. saline 2.32+/-0.3 g; P < 0.001). No changes occurred in hypothalamic mRNA expression for AGRP, NPY, HCRT, CRH, IL-1, IL-6, TNFalpha, ABCG1, SLC6A4, PPIA and HPRT mRNA but tryptophan hydroxylase (TPH) mRNA was decreased (47%, P < 0.05) at day 21 post-CP. This shows that despite marked behavioural effects of cisplatin, only a discrete change (TPH) was found in hypothalamic mRNA expression and that occurred when the animals' behaviour had recovered. Findings are discussed in relation to the neuropharmacology of chemotherapy-induced malaise.