ChillsDB 2.0: Individual Differences in Aesthetic Chills Among 2,900+ Southern California Participants.

We significantly enriched ChillsDB, a dataset of audiovisual stimuli validated to elicit aesthetic chills. A total of 2,937 participants from Southern California were exposed to 40 stimuli, consisting of 20 stimuli (10 from ChillsDB and 10 new) presented either in audiovisual or audio-only formats. Questionnaires were administered assessing demographics, personality traits, state affect, and political orientation. Detailed data on chills responses is captured alongside participants' ratings of the stimuli. The dataset combines controlled elicitation of chills using previously validated materials with individual difference measures to enable investigation of predictors and correlates of aesthetic chills phenomena. It aims to support continued research on the mechanisms and therapeutic potential of aesthetic chills responses.

Using evaluation to enhance a pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) social marketing campaign in real time in Los Angeles County, California.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the application of a formative evaluation conducted concurrently with implementation of a public health social marketing campaign to allow for substantive changes to the campaign messaging to subsequently improve acceptability. METHOD: A serial cross-sectional survey was used to evaluate the acceptability of two campaign messages among Black and Latino men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender persons (TGP) in Los Angeles County from 2016 to 2018 through an online survey. Theinitial message, which presented the PrEP Protectors, a trio of superheroes embodying the power, knowledge, and protection pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) can provide, was revised based on respondent feedback collected in the survey to increase specificity and clarity. An adjusted regression model tested whether the revised campaign message, (the initial campaign plus revised imagery and streamlined language) was predictive of increased campaign acceptability compared to the initial message alone. RESULTS: A total of 911 eligible respondents were surveyed, most were MSM (83 %),

Seroprevalence of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Among Skilled Nursing Facility Residents and Staff Members-Los Angeles County, August-September 2020.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of current or past coronavirus disease 2019 in skilled nursing facility (SNF) residents is unknown because of asymptomatic infection and constrained testing capacity early in the pandemic. We conducted a seroprevalence survey to determine a more comprehensive prevalence of past coronavirus disease 2019 in Los Angeles County SNF residents and staff members. METHODS: We recruited participants from 24 facilities; participants were requested to submit a nasopharyngeal swab sample for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing and a serum sample for detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. All participants were cross-referenced with our surveillance database to identify persons with prior positive SARS-CoV-2 results. RESULTS: From 18 August to 24 September 2020, we enrolled 3305 participants (1340 residents and 1965 staff members). Among 856 residents providing serum samples, 362 (42%) had current or past SARS-CoV-2 infection. Of the 346 serology-positive residents, 199 (58%) did not have a documented prior positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR result. Among 1806 staff members providing serum, 454 (25%) had current or past SARS-CoV-2 infection. Of the 447 serology-positive staff members, 353 (79%) did not have a documented prior positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR result. CONCLUSIONS: Past testing practices and policies missed a substantial number of SARS-CoV-2 infections in SNF residents and staff members.

Reaching racial/ethnic and sexual and gender minorities with HIV prevention information via social marketing.

The Pre-exposure Prophylaxis, Data to Care, Implementation, and Evaluation (PrIDE) multi-site demonstration project utilized a cluster evaluation approach and identified six funding recipients that evaluated similar media evaluation questions (Baltimore, Los Angeles County, Lousiana, Michigan, New York City, and Virginia). All of the evaluated social marketing campaigns were developed in collaboration with health department staff, external marketing firms, and community advisory boards (CAB) aiming to produce changes in PrEP outcomes by reaching racial/ethnic and sexual and gender minorities. Jurisdictions demonstrated changes in PrEP awareness, knowledge, willingness to take PrEP, and/or PrEP literacy following initiation of the campaigns. In data from four sites, PrEP awareness significantly increased from 72 % at baseline to 86 % at mid-project, and to 90 % post-campaigns. The campaigns illustrate the importance of partnerships and stakeholder engagement, audience segmentation, and intentional evaluation planning. As PrEP services mature, evaluating PrEP demand and PrEP use resulting from campaigns, will be necessary. Also, future campaigns for racial/ethnic and sexual and gender minorities should identify the best channels to reach each group based on their input, disaggregate data by priority group, and determine campaign effectiveness.