Is there any role for sentinel node mapping in colorectal cancer staging? Personal experience and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: We explored the role of lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy (originally described for melanoma and breast cancer) in colon cancer. Pathologic techniques can successfully identify micrometastatic disease in lymph nodes, but they are not suitable for clinical routine use. We evaluated the role of sentinel node (SN) mapping in refining the staging of colorectal cancer. METHODS: A total of 56 open colorectal resections were performed, and Patent Blue V dye was injected under the serosa surrounding the tumor immediately after opening the abdomen. SNs were analysed by immunohistochemistry to find micrometastatic disease. A literature search for the role of SNs in colorectal cancer was also performed. RESULTS: We identified the SN in 100% of patients, with a mean of 2.02 SNs/patient (range 1-5). After immunohistochemical staining, we could upstage 21 out of 56 patients (37.5%), and we observed 10.7% false negative SNs (6/56 patients). Fewer than half of the articles described false negative rates of <15%, and most articles showed an upstaging rate of >5% of patients. These differences are probably the result of different sensitivities of the methods used in identifying the lymph node micrometastases. CONCLUSIONS: SN mapping is an easy and cost-effective technique that holds promise and warrants further investigations.

Primary carcinoid tumor of the ovary: report of an unusual case.

Carcinoid tumors are endocrine malignancies that are often associated with a characteristic syndrome, the malignant carcinoid syndrome, which is most common in patients with small bowel tumors and liver metastases. In the rare instances when the syndrome is present without liver metastases the primary tumor is usually localized to the bronchus or ovary and secretes hormones directly into the systemic circulation. About two thirds of patients with carcinoid syndrome have evidence of carcinoid heart disease. We report on a case of a primary ovarian carcinoid tumor with an unusual clinical presentation.

Bolus vs. continuous hepatic arterial infusion of cisplatin plus intravenous 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy for unresectable colorectal metastases.

UNLABELLED: A multicenter, randomized Phase 2 study that compared patients, affected by colorectal liver metastases, who received intrahepatic arterial infusion with two different schedules of cisplatin, bolus vs. continuous infusion, and systemic 5-fluorouracil. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to validate results of a previous Phase 2 trial on bolus cisplatin intrahepatic arterial infusion, which reported a 47 percent response rate and a 32 percent 4-year survival rate for Gennari's Stage 2 patients, with a high rate of neurologic, gastrointestinal, and hematologic toxicity. METHODS: One hundred nine patients were randomized in a Phase 2 study to receive cisplatin intrahepatic arterial infusion (24 mg/m2/day, 1-->5, bolus vs. continuous infusion) and systemic intravenous 5-fluorouracil (250, 375, or 500 mg/m2/day, 1-->5; escalating doses, respectively, at cycles I, II, III, and VI). To avoid neurotoxicity a maximum of six cycles was administered. RESULTS: Preliminary results for the 78 evaluable patients are similar to those of the previous study: response rate 46 percent and at a median follow-up of 16.5 months, the overall survival was 16.5 months, with 45 percent of the patients who received more than 3 cycles alive at 3 years. Toxicity, evaluable in 99 patients, showed a decreased incidence of neurotoxicity and a tolerable gastrointestinal and hematologic toxicity, lower in the cisplatin continuous infusion arm. CONCLUSION: This study clearly shows that cisplatin intrahepatic arterial infusion is able to provide a good palliative effect with a tolerable toxicity.