Guaranteed Cost for an Event-Triggered Consensus Strategy for Interconnected Two Time-Scales Systems With Structured Uncertainty.

This article proposes the design of an event-triggered control strategy for consensus of interconnected two-time scales systems with structured uncertainty. The control design under consideration ensures also that consensus is achieved with an overall guaranteed cost. Since each system involves processes evolving on both fast and slow time scales, two Zeno-free event-triggered mechanisms are designed to independently decide the sampling and transmission instants for the slow and fast states, respectively. As the first step, we design an event-triggering consensus protocol in the ideal/nominal case when the interconnected systems are not affected by uncertainties and the interactions happen over a fixed interaction network. Next, the results are extended in order to take into account structured uncertainties affecting the systems' dynamics. At this step, we go further and we provide sufficient conditions for event-triggering consensus with a guaranteed overall cost. Finally, two numerical examples are provided to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed theoretical results.

Fixed-Time Synchronization of Competitive Neural Networks With Multiple Time Scales.

In this brief, we investigate the fixed-time synchronization of competitive neural networks with multiple time scales. These neural networks play an important role in visual processing, pattern recognition, neural computing, and so on. Our main contribution is the design of a novel synchronizing controller, which does not depend on the ratio between the fast and slow time scales. This feature makes the controller easy to implement since it is designed through well-posed algebraic conditions (i.e., even when the ratio between the time scales goes to 0, the controller gain is well defined and does not go to infinity). Last but not least, the closed-loop dynamics is characterized by a high convergence speed with a settling time which is upper bounded, and the bound is independent of the initial conditions. A numerical simulation illustrates our results and emphasizes their effectiveness.

Analysis of the Tradeoff Between Health and Economic Impacts of the Covid-19 Epidemic.

Various measures have been taken in different countries to mitigate the Covid-19 epidemic. But, throughout the world, many citizens don't understand well how these measures are taken and even question the decisions taken by their government. Should the measures be more (or less) restrictive? Are they taken for a too long (or too short) period of time? To provide some quantitative elements of response to these questions, we consider the well-known SEIR model for the Covid-19 epidemic propagation and propose a pragmatic model of the government decision-making operation. Although simple and obviously improvable, the proposed model allows us to study the tradeoff between health and economic aspects in a pragmatic and insightful way. Assuming a given number of phases for the epidemic (namely, 4 in this paper) and a desired tradeoff between health and economic aspects, it is then possible to determine the optimal duration of each phase and the optimal severity level (i.e., the target transmission rate) for each of them. The numerical analysis is performed for the case of France but the adopted approach can be applied to any country. One of the takeaway messages of this analysis is that being able to implement the optimal 4-phase epidemic management strategy in France would have led to 1.05 million of infected people and a GDP loss of 231 billions € instead of 6.88 millions of infected and a loss of 241 billions €. This indicates that, seen from the proposed model perspective, the effectively implemented epidemic management strategy is good economically, whereas substantial improvements might have been obtained in terms of health impact. Our analysis indicates that the lockdown/severe phase should have been more severe but shorter, and the adjustment phase occurred earlier. Due to the natural tendency of people to deviate from the official rules, updating measures every month over the whole epidemic episode seems to be more appropriate.