Careful Where You Cut: Strategies for Successful Nerve-preserving Mastectomy.

Breast neurotization represents an evolving technique that is not widely practiced in most centers specializing in breast cancer treatment. Recognizing the limited educational resources available for breast and plastic surgeons concerning mastectomy techniques that emphasize nerve preservation, our study sought to bridge this gap. Specifically, we aimed to provide a comprehensive exploration of the surgical applied anatomy of breast sensory innervation and a detailed, step-by-step guide for incorporating nerve-sparing mastectomy and breast neurotization into clinical practice. The significance of this work lies in its potential to enhance the understanding and implementation of nerve-preserving techniques in mastectomy procedures, contributing to improved patient outcomes and quality of life post surgery. We hope that by familiarizing breast and reconstructive surgeons with this procedure, we can gain momentum in our research efforts and ultimately enhance the care provided to mastectomy patients.

Indocyanine Green-Guided Near-Infrared Fluorescence Enhances Vascular Anatomy in Robot-Assisted DIEP Flap Harvest.

SUMMARY: Indocyanine green-guided near-infrared fluorescence imaging has gained clinical acceptance lately. This technology can be particularly advantageous in the case of robotic flap harvest. This article presents a new approach to deep epigastric pedicle dissection using indocyanine green-guided near-infrared fluorescence in the setting of robot-assisted deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps.

A retrospective review of submuscular implant-based breast reconstruction: The influence of dermal matrix (ADM) on complications and aesthetic outcomes.

PURPOSE: The use of acellular dermal matrix changed the breast reconstruction algorithm facilitating implant coverage and direct to implant technique. This study aims to evaluate the effect of the ADM surgical complications, breast aesthetics, and patient satisfaction. METHODS: In a tertiary hospital, patients that underwent implant-based breast reconstructions during a three-year period had their charts retrospectively reviewed, received post-operative BreastQ, and had their post-operative photos evaluated by a three-member panel using a multi-parameter breast specific scale (scored 1-5). The complication information was analysed per reconstructed breast while the analysis of aesthetic and patient-reported outcomes was done per patient. RESULTS: A total of 501 patients (990 breasts) were evaluated. In the complication analysis group, 20.3% of the breasts had ADM. Overall complications and major complications were more frequent in the ADM group. During the first 30 postoperative days the most frequent complications were: skin necrosis/delayed wound healing and haematoma, after 30 days was infection, and complications after 1 year being less than 1%. On the outcome analysis group, ADM was used in 21.5% patients, 44% had post-operative photos, and 29% answered the BreastQ. Factors associated with higher appearance score were bilateral reconstruction, prophylactic surgery, and nipple presence. ADM demonstrated no difference in satisfaction with breasts. CONCLUSION: In implant-based breast reconstructions ADM has been shown to increase rate of complications. The use of acellular dermal matrix did not influence the overall appearance or the patient-reported outcome. A good aesthetic outcome is positively influenced by bilateral reconstructions with preservation of the nipple.

The use of closed incision negative pressure therapy for incision and surrounding soft tissue management: Expert panel consensus recommendations.

As the use of closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) becomes more widespread, dressing designs have evolved to address implementation challenges and meet surgeon demand. While traditional application of ciNPT was limited to the immediate suture line, a novel dressing that covers the incision and additional surrounding tissues has become available. To expand upon previous ciNPT recommendations and provide guidance on this new dressing, an expert panel of plastic surgeons convened to review the current literature, identify challenges to the implementation and sustainability of ciNPT, and use a modified Delphi technique to form a consensus on the appropriate use of ciNPT with full-coverage dressings. After three rounds of collecting expert opinion via the Delphi method, consensus was reached if 80% of the panel agreed upon a statement. This manuscript establishes 10 consensus statements regarding when ciNPT with full-coverage foam dressings should be considered or recommended in the presence of patient or incision risk factors, effective therapeutic settings and duration, precautions for use, and tools and techniques to support application. The panel also discussed areas of interest for future study of ciNPT with full-coverage dressings. High-quality, controlled studies are needed to expand the understanding of the benefits of ciNPT over the incision and surrounding tissues.

Factors Influencing the Aesthetic Outcome and Quality of Life After Breast Reconstruction: A Cross-sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: The most important purpose of reconstruction is to increase or restore the patient's quality of life (QOL). The purpose of our study was to evaluate the QOL and aesthetic outcomes of patients after autologous versus implant-based breast reconstruction. METHODS: Patients who underwent breast reconstruction between 2009 and 2011 were included. The Breast-Q, a validated breast reconstruction QOL questionnaire, was used along with postoperative photographs panel analyses using a multiparameter breast-specific aesthetic outcome scale and retrospective evaluation of demographic and treatment data. RESULTS: Of 820 patients, 261 complete questionnaires were evaluated. On the multivariable linear regression, the "satisfaction with breasts" was positively influenced by autologous and bilateral reconstructions, whereas radiation therapy (RTx), the time between the reconstruction and the questionnaire, and the number of surgeries due to complications were negative factors (adjusted R = 0.183; P < 0.001). The same factors influenced the "satisfaction with the outcomes." The mean "overall breast appearance" was also positively influenced by autologous and bilateral reconstructions, and RTx and the total number of surgeries were negative predictive factors (adjusted R = 0.311, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The aesthetic result and QOL after breast reconstruction for breast cancer treatment are positively influenced by the use of autologous tissue and bilaterality. Factors that negatively influenced the aesthetic result and the QOL include use of RTx, a higher number of surgeries needed for the reconstruction, reoperations due to complications, higher body mass index, and a longer time elapsed between reconstruction and the questionnaire.