Neoadjuvant therapy leads to objective response in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is the second most common hepatic malignancy and has a poor prognosis. Surgical resection is the standard of care for patients with resectable disease, representing 30-40% of cases. Increasingly, neoadjuvant systemic therapy is being utilized in patients due to high-risk anatomic or biologic considerations. However, data on the clinical effect of this approach are limited. We performed a cohort study to evaluate the effect of neoadjuvant therapy in patients with oncologically high-risk iCCA. METHODS: iCCA patients (n = 181) between the years 2014-2020 were reviewed for clinical, histopathologic, treatment, and outcome-related data. Tumor regression grade was scored per CAP criteria for gastrointestinal carcinomas. RESULTS: 47 iCCA patients received neoadjuvant therapy and 72 did not. Neoadjuvant treatment led to objective response and tumor regression by CAP score. After adjustment for age, clinical stage, and tumor size, the outcomes of patients who had neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery were not significantly different from those patients who had surgery first. DISCUSSION: In conclusion, neoadjuvant therapy in iCCA facilitated surgical care. The progression-free and overall survival for surgical patients with and without neoadjuvant therapy were not significantly different suggesting this approach needs further exploration as an effective treatment paradigm.

WITHDRAWN: Neoadjuvant therapy leads to objective response in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

The Publisher regrets that this article is an accidental duplication of an article that has already been published, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2024.04.011. The duplicate article has therefore been withdrawn. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at https://www.elsevier.com/about/policies/article-withdrawal.

CT findings in idiopathic myointimal hyperplasia of mesenteric veins (IMHMV) and comparison to other colitides.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to determine computed tomography (CT) findings that aid in differentiating idiopathic myointimal hyperplasia of mesenteric veins (IMHMV) from other colitides. METHODS: Retrospective review of histiologic proven cases of IMHMV (n = 12) with contrast enhanced CT (n = 11) and/or computed tomography angiography (CTA) (n = 9) exams. Control groups comprised of CT of infectious colitis (n = 13), CT of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) (n = 12), and CTA of other colitides (n = 13). CT exams reviewed by 2 blinded gastrointestinal radiologists for maximum bowel wall thickness, enhancement pattern, decreased bowel wall enhancement, submucosal attenuation value, presence and location of IMV occlusion, peripheral mesenteric venous occlusion, dilated pericolonic veins, subjective IMA dilation, maximum IMA diameter, maximum peripheral IMA branch diameter, ascites, and mesenteric edema. Presence of early filling veins was an additional finding evaluated on CTA exams. RESULTS: Statistically significant CT findings of IMHMV compared to control groups included greater maximum bowel wall thickness, decreased bowel enhancement, IMV occlusion, and peripheral mesenteric venous occlusion (p < 0.05). Dilated pericolonic veins were seen more frequently in IMHMV compared to the infectious colitis group (64% versus 15%, p = 0.02). Additional statistically significant finding on CTA included early filling veins in IMHMV compared to the CTA control group (100% versus 46%, p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: IMHMV is a rare chronic non-thrombotic ischemia predominantly involving the rectosigmoid colon. CT features that may aid in differentiating IMHMV from other causes of left-sided colitis include marked bowel wall thickening with decreased enhancement, IMV and peripheral mesenteric venous occlusion or tapering, and early filling of dilated veins on CTA.