RESUMEN
Background: The effects of aspirin in adults without atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), stratified by statin use across different ASCVD risks, remain uncertain. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of aspirin in adults without ASCVD, stratified by statin use across different ASCVD risks. Methods: We searched databases through March 2022 and selected randomized controlled trials of aspirin without ASCVD and follow-up of ≥1 year. We used random-effects models and estimated relative and absolute risks for cardiovascular outcomes, major bleeding, and mortality over 5 years. We calculated absolute risk differences assuming constant relative risks (RRs) across statin use and ASCVD risks. The Cholesterol Treatment Trialists Collaboration, and the ASCEND (A Study of Cardiovascular Events in Diabetes) trial were used to estimate baseline risks. Results: In 16 trials [171,215 individuals; median age, 64 (Q1-Q3: 60-65) years], aspirin vs control reduced myocardial infarction (MI) [RR: 0.85 (95% CI: 0.77-0.95)] but increased major bleeding [RR: 1.48 (95% CI: 1.32-1.66)]. Aspirin did not reduce mortality. Statin vs no statin was associated with lower bleeding and MI risk; the bleeding and MI risk were proportional to ASCVD risk. For every 10,000 adults, aspirin reduced MI (very low risk: 3 events as monotherapy or 1 event with statin; very high risk: 49 events as monotherapy or 37 events with statin) and increased major bleeding (very low risk: 21 events as monotherapy or 20 events with statin; very high risk: 98 events as monotherapy or 94 events with statin) proportional to baseline ASCVD risk. Conclusions: In adults without ASCVD, concomitant statin appeared to significantly reduce absolute risk reduction for MI associated with aspirin without influencing bleeding risk. The anticipated absolute risk of major bleeding with aspirin exceeds absolute MI benefits for every level of ASCVD risk.
Asunto(s)
Anticolesterolemiantes , Cardiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas , Anticolesterolemiantes/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , LDL-Colesterol , Consenso , Ezetimiba , Humanos , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/uso terapéutico , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
The purpose of this period prevalence study is to compare the prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in current/former established smokeless tobacco (SLT) users (ever SLT users who have used the product fairly regularly) to those who were: 1) never established cigarette smokers and SLT users, and 2) current/former established exclusive cigarette smokers (have smoked at least a 100 or more cigarettes in lifetime) only, adjusting for known risk factors for CVD. Analyses included 4,703 men ≥ 40 years of age who participated in the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study, Waves: 1-4, conducted between 2013 and 2017. Current users were those using SLT products daily or on some days, whereas former users had not used SLT and/or cigarettes in the past 12 months. CVD prevalence was defined as a self-reported diagnosis of congestive heart failure, stroke, or myocardial infarction. Among current/former established SLT users, years of use defined exposure history, while pack-years defined exposure history for smokers. Adjusted odds ratios (AOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported with trend tests to examine dose-response associations. Current/former established exclusive SLT users were not significantly more likely to have had any CVD compared to never established cigarette and SLT users (OR = 1.7 [0.8-3.7]), or current/former established exclusive cigarette smokers (OR = 0.9 [0.5-1.8]). Current/former established exclusive cigarette smokers were more likely to have had any CVD compared to those who were never established cigarette and SLT users (OR = 1.6 [1.1-2.3]).
RESUMEN
Importance: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is typically estimated with the Friedewald or Martin/Hopkins equation; however, if triglyceride levels are 400 mg/dL or greater, laboratories reflexively perform direct LDL-C (dLDL-C) measurement. The use of direct chemical LDL-C assays and estimation of LDL-C via the National Institutes of Health Sampson equation are not well validated, and data on the accuracy of LDL-C estimation at higher triglyceride levels are limited. Objective: To compare an extended Martin/Hopkins equation for triglyceride values of 400 to 799 mg/dL with the Friedewald and Sampson equations. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study evaluated consecutive patients at clinical sites across the US with patient lipid distributions representative of the US population in the Very Large Database of Lipids from January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2015, with triglyceride levels of 400 to 799 mg/dL. Data analysis was performed from November 9, 2020, to March 23, 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures: Accuracy in LDL-C classification according to guideline-based categories and absolute errors between estimated LDL-C and dLDL-C levels. Patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to derivation and validation data sets. Levels of dLDL-C were measured by vertical spin-density gradient ultracentrifugation. The LDL-C levels were estimated using the Friedewald method, with a fixed ratio of triglycerides to very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL-C ratio of 5:1), extended Martin/Hopkins equation with a flexible ratio, and Sampson equation with VLDL-C estimation by multiple least-squares regression. Results: A total of 111â¯939 patients (mean [SD] age, 52 [13] years; 65.0% male) with triglyceride levels of 400 to 799 mg/dL were included, representing 2.2% of 5â¯081â¯680 patients in the database. Across all individual guideline LDL-C classes (<40, 40-69, 70-99, 100-129, 130-159, 160-189, and ≥190), estimation of LDL-C by the extended Martin/Hopkins equation was most accurate (62.1%) compared with the Friedewald (19.3%) and Sampson (40.4%) equations. In classifying LDL-C levels less than 70 mg/dL across all triglyceride strata, the extended Martin/Hopkins equation was most accurate (67.3%) compared with Friedewald (5.1%) and Sampson (26.4%) equations. In addition, for classifying LDL-C levels less than 40 mg/dL across all triglyceride strata, the extended Martin/Hopkins equation was most accurate (57.2%) compared with the Friedewald (4.3%) and Sampson (14.4%) equations. However, considerable underclassification of LDL-C occurred. The magnitude of error between the Martin/Hopkins equation estimation and dLDL-C was also smaller: at LDL-C levels less than 40 mg/dL, 2.7% of patients had 30 mg/dL or greater differences between dLDL-C and estimated LDL-C using the Martin/Hopkins equation compared with the Friedewald (92.5%) and Sampson (38.7%) equations. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, the extended Martin/Hopkins equation offered greater LDL-C accuracy compared with the Friedewald and Sampson equations in patients with triglyceride levels of 400 to 799 mg/dL. However, regardless of method used, caution is advised with LDL-C estimation in this triglyceride range.
Asunto(s)
Lipoproteínas LDL/análisis , Estadística como Asunto/normas , Triglicéridos/análisis , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Hiperlipidemias/sangre , Hiperlipidemias/diagnóstico , Hiperlipidemias/epidemiología , Lipoproteínas LDL/sangre , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadística como Asunto/métodos , Triglicéridos/sangre , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
At a population level, engagement in healthy lifestyle behaviors is suboptimal in the United States. Moreover, marked disparities exist in healthy lifestyle behaviors and cardiovascular risk factors as a result of social determinants of health. In addition, there are specific challenges to engaging in healthy lifestyle behaviors related to age, developmental stage, or major life circumstances. Key components of a healthy lifestyle are consuming a healthy dietary pattern, engaging in regular physical activity, avoiding use of tobacco products, habitually attaining adequate sleep, and managing stress. For these health behaviors, there are guidelines and recommendations; however, promotion in clinical settings can be challenging, particularly in certain population groups. These challenges must be overcome to facilitate greater promotion of healthy lifestyle practices in clinical settings. The 5A Model (assess, advise, agree, assist, and arrange) was developed to provide a framework for clinical counseling with consideration for the demands of clinical settings. In this science advisory, we summarize specific considerations for lifestyle-related behavior change counseling using the 5A Model for patients across the life span. In all life stages, social determinants of health and unmet social-related health needs, as well as overweight and obesity, are associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease, and there is the potential to modify this risk with lifestyle-related behavior changes. In addition, specific considerations for lifestyle-related behavior change counseling in life stages in which lifestyle behaviors significantly affect cardiovascular disease risk are outlined. Greater attention to healthy lifestyle behaviors during every clinician visit will contribute to improved cardiovascular health.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Promoción de la Salud , Estilo de Vida Saludable , Motivación , American Heart Association , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Engagement in healthy lifestyle behaviors is suboptimal. The vast majority of the US population does not meet current recommendations. A healthy lifestyle is defined by consuming a healthy dietary pattern, engaging in regular physical activity, avoiding exposure to tobacco products, habitually attaining adequate amounts of sleep, and managing stress levels. For all these health behaviors there are well-established guidelines; however, promotion in clinical settings can be challenging. It is critical to overcome these challenges because greater promotion of heathy lifestyle practices in clinical settings effectively motivates and initiates patient behavior change. The 5A Model (assess, advise, agree, assist, and arrange) was developed to provide a framework for clinical counseling with requisite attention to the demands of clinical settings. In this science advisory, we present strategies, based on the 5A Model, that clinicians and other health care professionals can use for efficient lifestyle-related behavior change counseling in patients at all levels of cardiovascular disease risk at every visit. In addition, we discuss the underlying role of psychological health and well-being in lifestyle-related behavior change counseling, and how clinicians can leverage health technologies when providing brief patient-centered counseling. Greater attention to healthy lifestyle behaviors during routine clinician visits will contribute to promoting cardiovascular health.
Asunto(s)
Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Promoción de la Salud , Estilo de Vida Saludable , Motivación , American Heart Association , Estados UnidosAsunto(s)
Cardiología , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Dietoterapia/métodos , Hipertrigliceridemia , Política Nutricional , Conducta de Reducción del Riesgo , Cardiología/métodos , Cardiología/tendencias , Factores de Riesgo Cardiometabólico , Reglas de Decisión Clínica , Consenso , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/prevención & control , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Humanos , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/uso terapéutico , Hipertrigliceridemia/etiología , Hipertrigliceridemia/metabolismo , Hipertrigliceridemia/psicología , Hipertrigliceridemia/terapia , Manejo de Atención al Paciente/normas , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There has been an increase in the use of smokeless tobacco recently. Whether smokeless tobacco use may predispose individuals to use other addictive substances is unknown. The use of multiple addictive substances may compound an individual's adverse health effects. METHODS: In a cross-sectional analysis, we used the 2016-2017 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) survey database to identify all individuals who reported the use of smokeless tobacco and extracted data regarding baseline and demographic patterns, as well as information regarding the use of other addictive substances. Weighted multivariable logistic regression models adjusting for age, gender, race/ethnicity, poverty level, education, employment status, and marital status were used to determine the odds ratios (ORs) for use of alcohol, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, and marijuana among smokeless tobacco users. RESULTS: We identified 30,395 (3.38%) individuals in our study population who reported smokeless tobacco use. Compared with non-users, smokeless tobacco users were more likely to be unmarried, male, Caucasian, belonging to the lower socioeconomic strata, and did not have a formal college education (P <0.01). In multivariable analyses, smokeless tobacco use was associated with a higher likelihood of cigarettes use (OR: 1.76 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 1.66-1.86, P <0.01]), e-cigarette use (OR: 1.61 [95% CI: 1.52-1.71, P <0.01]), and heavy alcohol consumption (OR:2.36 [95% CI: 2.17-2.56, P <0.01]) but not marijuana use (OR: 1.11 [95% CI: 0.90-1.38, P = 0.33]). CONCLUSION: In a large, nationally representative sample, smokeless tobacco use was associated with the increased use of cigarettes, e-cigarettes, and alcohol. Simultaneous use of these substances may compound the adverse health effects of smokeless tobacco use. Public health interventions addressing this concerning trend are warranted.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/diagnóstico , Tabaco sin Humo/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Sistema de Vigilancia de Factor de Riesgo Conductual , Correlación de Datos , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados UnidosAsunto(s)
Cardiología/normas , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/terapia , Consenso , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Testimonio de Experto/normas , Informe de Investigación/normas , Cardiología/métodos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas/métodos , Miembro de Comité , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo de Enfermedad Cardiaca , Humanos , Conducta de Reducción del Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Although significant progress has been made to reduce the global burden of cardiovascular disease, efforts have focused primarily on treatment of manifest disease rather than on prevention of events. An enormous opportunity exists to transition focus from intervention to providing equal attention to prevention of cardiovascular disease. The nascent specialty of "preventive cardiology" is emerging from the background of long-established services such as lipid, diabetes, hypertension, and general cardiology clinics. It is incumbent on the cardiology community to invest in cardiovascular prevention because past gains are threatened with the rising tide of obesity and diabetes. Now is the time to establish a dedicated preventive cardiology subspecialty to train the clinicians of the future. This American College of Cardiology Council Perspective aims to define the need for preventive cardiology as a unique subspecialty, broaches controversies, provides a structure for future training and education, and identifies possible paths forward to professional certification.
Asunto(s)
Cardiología/educación , Cardiología/organización & administración , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Medicina Preventiva/educación , Medicina Preventiva/organización & administración , Aterosclerosis/prevención & control , Aterosclerosis/terapia , Glucemia/análisis , Cardiología/historia , Certificación , Curriculum , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/prevención & control , Educación Médica , Historia del Siglo XX , Historia del Siglo XXI , Humanos , Inflamación/metabolismo , Obesidad/complicaciones , Obesidad/prevención & control , Riesgo , Cese del Hábito de Fumar , Resultado del TratamientoAsunto(s)
American Heart Association , Anticolesterolemiantes/uso terapéutico , Aterosclerosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Cardiología , Colesterol/sangre , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Medición de Riesgo , Aterosclerosis/sangre , Biomarcadores/sangre , Humanos , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas , Factores de Riesgo , Estados UnidosAsunto(s)
Comités Consultivos/normas , Cardiología/métodos , Cardiología/normas , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/terapia , Informe de Investigación/normas , Comités Consultivos/organización & administración , Cardiología/organización & administración , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Maternal pregnancy complications, particularly preeclampsia and gestational diabetes mellitus, are described to increase the risk for subsequent coronary artery disease (CAD). In addition, black women are at higher risk for CAD. The objective of this study was to compare the prevalence and extent of CAD as detected by coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) in black women with and without a history of prior pregnancy complications. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated patient characteristics and CCTA findings in groups of black women with a prior history of preterm delivery (n=154), preeclampsia (n=137), or gestational diabetes mellitus (n=148), and a matched control group of black women who gave birth without such complications (n=445). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess risk factors of CAD. RESULTS: All groups with prior pregnancy complications showed higher rates of any (≥20% luminal narrowing) and obstructive (≥50% luminal narrowing) CAD (preterm delivery: 29.2% and 9.1%; preeclampsia: 29.2% and 7.3%; and gestational diabetes mellitus: 47.3% and 15.5%) compared with control women (23.8% and 5.4%). After accounting for confounding factors at multivariate analysis, gestational diabetes mellitus remained a strong risk factor of any (odds ratio, 3.26; 95% CI, 2.03-5.22; P<0.001) and obstructive CAD (odds ratio, 3.00; 95% CI, 1.55-5.80; P<0.001) on CCTA. CONCLUSIONS: Black women with a history of pregnancy complications, particularly gestational diabetes mellitus, have a higher prevalence of CAD on CCTA while only a history of gestational diabetes mellitus was independently associated with any and obstructive CAD on CCTA.