Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros













Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Sci Rep ; 7(1): 15738, 2017 Nov 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29146945

RESUMEN

Direct killing of malignant cells combined with induction of tumour-specific immune responses makes oncolytic vaccines attractive for cancer therapy. We previously developed a heterologous cancer immunization strategy that utilized a replication-defective adenovirus-vectored primary vaccine encoding a tumour antigen followed by boosting with a replication-competent Maraba virus expressing the same antigen. To assess the safety of oncolytic Maraba virus-based booster vaccines and inform the design of clinical trials, we conducted translational studies in cats, which have immune systems that are similar to people and spontaneously develop cancers of comparable types and etiologies. A dose of Maraba virus up to 2.5 × 1011 pfu per cat was well-tolerated, with adverse effects limited to mild, transient pyrexia, weight loss, neutropenia, lymphopenia and thrombocytopenia. Maraba viral genomes were present in some urine, stool and most plasma samples up to one week post-infection, but no infectious viruses were recovered. Post-mortem analysis showed one heart, one lung and all spleen samples contained Maraba virus genomes. No replication-competent viruses were recovered from any tissues. Post-mortem histopathological analyses revealed hyperplasia of lymphoid tissues, but no abnormal lesions were attributed to vaccination. This study demonstrated that Maraba virus-vectored cancer vaccines were well-tolerated and supports their use in treating cats.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra el Cáncer/inmunología , Vectores Genéticos/metabolismo , Virus Oncolíticos/inmunología , Enfermedad Aguda , Animales , Recuento de Células Sanguíneas , Temperatura Corporal , Vacunas contra el Cáncer/administración & dosificación , Gatos , Femenino , Fiebre/etiología , Genoma Viral , Virus Oncolíticos/genética , Especificidad de Órganos , Proyectos Piloto , Salivación , Distribución Tisular , Vacunación/efectos adversos , Viremia/inmunología , Esparcimiento de Virus , Pérdida de Peso
2.
Can Vet J ; 45(11): 924-30, 2004 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15600158

RESUMEN

Feces were collected from 107 asymptomatic dogs at a research facility in Guelph, Ontario. The prevalence of Giardia infection was 11% (12/107). To assess the effectiveness of Giardia vaccination for treatment of Giardia carriage, 9 additional asymptomatic Giardia antigen-positive dogs were brought into the facility. The Giardia antigen-positive dogs were then randomly allocated to receive either vaccine (n = 10) or a saline placebo (n = 10). Feces were then monitored monthly for 6 mo for Giardia antigen and Giardia cysts. At weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 following vaccination, there were more Giardia-positive dogs in the vaccinated group (10/10, 9/10, 9/10, 8/10, respectively) compared with the controls (7/10, 7/10, 8/10, 4/10, respectively). At week 20, an equal number of dogs (5/10) were Giardia positive, and at week 24, fewer dogs were positive in the vaccinated group than in the control group (2/10 versus 5/10, respectively). However, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups. Vaccination was, therefore, not an effective treatment for asymptomatic canine Giardia infections in this setting.


Asunto(s)
Antígenos de Protozoos/análisis , Enfermedades de los Perros/prevención & control , Giardia/inmunología , Giardiasis/veterinaria , Vacunas Antiprotozoos/administración & dosificación , Animales , Enfermedades de los Perros/epidemiología , Perros , Heces/parasitología , Femenino , Giardiasis/epidemiología , Giardiasis/prevención & control , Masculino , Ontario , Prevalencia , Distribución Aleatoria , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vacunación/normas , Vacunación/veterinaria
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA