Neurocognitive Functioning in Patients with 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome: A Meta-Analytic Review.

The 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS) is a known risk factor for development of schizophrenia and is characterized by a complex neuropsychological profile. To date, a quantitative meta-analysis examining cognitive functioning in 22q11.2DS has not been conducted. A systematic review of cross-sectional studies comparing neuropsychological performance of individuals with 22q11.2DS with age-matched healthy typically developing and sibling comparison subjects was carried out. Potential moderators were analyzed. Analyses included 43 articles (282 effects) that met inclusion criteria. Very large and heterogeneous effects were seen for global cognition (d = - 1.21) and in specific neuropsychological domains (intellectual functioning, achievement, and executive function; d range = - 0.51 to - 2.43). Moderator analysis revealed a significant role for type of healthy comparison group used (typically developing or siblings), demographics (age, sex) and clinical factors (externalizing behavior). Results revealed significant differences between pediatric and adult samples, with isolated analysis within the pediatric sample yielding large effects in several neuropsychological domains (intellectual functioning, achievement, visual memory; d range = - 0.56 to - 2.50). Large cognitive deficits in intellectual functioning and specific neuropsychological variables in individuals with 22q11.2DS represent a robust finding, but these deficits are influenced by several factors, including type of comparison group utilized, age, sex, and clinical status. These findings highlight the clinical relevance of characterizing cognitive functioning in 22q11.2DS and the importance of considering demographic and clinical moderators in future analyses.

Utility of the Rey-15 recognition trial to detect invalid performance in a forensic neuropsychological sample.

The current study sought to address the utility of the Rey Fifteen Item Test (Rey-15), with the use of a combined score [recall correct + (recognition correct - false positives)], to distinguish between valid and invalid performance among a sample of litigating persons referred for neuropsychological evaluation. Scores on the Rey-15 were analyzed across four comparison groups: (1) litigating persons with evidence of invalid performance (n = 29), (2) litigating persons with valid performance (n = 63), (3) learning-disabled patients (n = 36), and (4) a mixed clinical neuropsychological sample not involved in litigation (n = 54). A Rey-15 combined cutoff score of < 21 yielded the highest sensitivity (70%) and specificity (92.8%) rates. If the Rey-15 is to be used in clinical practice to detect invalid performance, the recognition trial with combined score < 21 should be used. Findings support the use of the combined Rey-15 score in place of the previously used recall Rey-15 score to improve sensitivity and specificity rates for detection of invalid performance in litigating neuropsychological referrals.

Multitasking in multiple sclerosis: can it inform vocational functioning?

OBJECTIVE: To examine associations between multitasking ability defined by performance on a complex task integrating multiple cognitive domains and vocational functioning in multiple sclerosis (MS). DESIGN: Survey data collection. SETTING: Laboratory with referrals from an outpatient clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Community-dwelling individuals with MS (N=30) referred between October 2011 and June 2012. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The modified Six Elements Test (SET) to measure multitasking ability, Fatigue Severity Scale to measure fatigue, several neuropsychological measures of executive functioning, and vocational status. RESULTS: Among the sample, 60% of individuals have reduced their work hours because of MS symptoms (cutback employment group) and 40% had maintained their work hours. Among both groups, SET performance was significantly associated with performance on several measures of neuropsychological functioning. Individuals in the cutback employment group demonstrated significantly worse overall performance on the SET (P=.041). Logistic regression was used to evaluate associations between SET performance and vocational status, while accounting for neuropsychological performance and fatigue. The overall model was significant (χ(2)3=8.65, P=.032), with fatigue [Exp(B)=.83, P=.01] and multitasking ability [Exp(B)=.60, P=.043] retained as significant predictors. CONCLUSIONS: Multitasking ability may play an important role in performance at work for individuals with MS. Given that multitasking was associated with vocational functioning, future efforts should assess the usefulness of incorporating multitasking ability into rehabilitation planning.