Patients selection for psychiatric neurosurgery: pitfalls and considerations.

Neurosurgical interventions (destructive or neuromodulation) are considered as a therapeutic option for patients with treatment resistant mental disorders. However, the issues of indications and contraindications for psychiatric surgery, method and patient selection remain unresolved. This article discusses possible problems and contradictions in the selection of patients, the need for an interdisciplinary team to work to solve the question of the feasibility of using neurosurgical methods. The authors have identified the main problems that increase the risks of selection and lead to a lack of results or low efficiency of neurosurgical intervention, namely: (1) diagnostic errors or inaccuracies; (2) inconclusive data on therapeutic resistance; (3) lack of a common understanding of the goals and desired results among participants in the selection of patients for neurosurgery. Possible predictors of surgical outcome and ethical issues are also discussed. Neurosurgical interventions as a treatment option for psychiatric disorders are not officially approved in most countries. So an appropriate algorithm for patient selection and clear criteria for outcome measures are needed.

Gamma Knife capsulotomy for correction of obsessive-compulsive symptoms in a patient with schizophrenia: Case report.

The treatment of mental illnesses that are resistant to conservative therapy poses a serious problem. Surgical methods with proven efficacy have been proposed for only a small group of psychiatric diseases, while in practice non-classical clinical situations are seen rather often. A 36-year-old man with a 18-year history of "schizophrenia with a predominant obsessive-compulsive syndrome" was referred to the Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery for consideration of neurosurgical treatment. Based on results of longitudinal independent evaluations of the patient in several specialized clinical centers the disease was considered resistant to medical therapy. Radiosurgical procedure was performed by means of Leksell Gamma Knife Perfexion™ (Elekta AB; Stockholm, Sweden). Ventral portion of the anterior limb of internal capsule was targeted with two 4-mm isocenters on each side, with prescription dose at 50% isodose line of 80 Gy and a maximal dose of 160 Gy. No obvious complications or side effects were noted during 13-month follow-up after radiosurgery. Gradual clinical improvement was observed with 25% reduction of the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) score at 13 months after treatment. Similarly, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) anxiety and depression scores decreased by 24% and 58%, respectively. This is the first published case of radiosurgical treatment of a psychiatric disorder in Russia. It demonstrates the potential efficacy of Gamma Knife capsulotomy for non-classical forms of obsessive-compulsive disorder comorbid with schizophrenia. Nevertheless, definitive conclusions about the reliability of this radiosurgical indication can only be made based on the results of larger studies.

Incidence of the Diagnosis of Anxiety Disorders in the Russian Federation: Results of a Web-Based Survey of Psychiatrists.

INTRODUCTION: According to the official Russian source, in 2017 only 0.27% of the population of Russia was diagnosed with International Classification of Diseases, tenth revision (ICD-10) F4 category disorders (neurotic, stress-related and somatoform disorders), despite these disorders being among the most prevalent mental disorders worldwide. Here we report the results of a large-scale survey among Russian psychiatrists with the primary objective to assess the proportion of psychiatrists who use the diagnoses of interest (mixed anxiety and depression disorder [MADD], adjustment disorder [AdD], panic disorder [PD], agoraphobia, generalized anxiety disorder [GAD], social phobia, simple phobia, acute stress disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder) and compare results with those of a recent World Psychiatric Association (WPA) and World Health Organization (WHO) survey. We also compared the incidence of these diagnoses between state and non-state psychiatric services in Russia. METHODS: Mean proportions and distribution of proportions of participants who made diagnoses of interest at different rates were calculated and compared with the results of the recent WPA and WHO survey. Risk ratios (RR) of the incidence of these diagnoses made at a frequency of at least once a week were calculated to compare state and non-state psychiatric services. The 95% confidence intervals of the RRs were calculated using the Koopman asymptotic score method. RESULTS: Responses of 960 Russian psychiatrists were included in the analysis. Of these 95, 89 and 87% reported making diagnoses of MADD, AdD and PD, respectively, during the preceding 12 months, a far larger proportion compared to other disorders of interest. In general, a significantly smaller proportion of participants in our survey made diagnoses of anxiety disorders compared to respondents in the international WPA-WHO survey. Based on RRs, diagnoses of MADD, AdD, PD, GAD and acute stress disorder were less frequently made in the state-operated psychiatric service. CONCLUSION: Our survey revealed a serious underdiagnosis of anxiety disorders in Russia that may be associated with complex factors that include, but are not limited to the current stigma associated with the state-operated psychiatric service, which is still the exclusive source of official statistical data in Russia.

Primary and Secondary Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia.

The negative symptoms of schizophrenia include volitional (motivational) impairment manifesting as avolition, anhedonia, social withdrawal, and emotional disorders such as alogia and affective flattening. Negative symptoms worsen patients' quality of life and functioning. From the diagnostic point of view, it is important to differentiate between primary negative symptoms, which are regarded as an integral dimension of schizophrenia, and secondary negative symptoms occurring as a result of positive symptoms, comorbid depression, side effects of antipsychotics, substance abuse, or social isolation. If secondary negative symptoms overlap with primary negative symptoms, it can create a false clinical impression of worsening deficit symptoms and disease progression, which leads to the choice of incorrect therapeutic strategy with excessive dopamine blocker loading. Different longitudinal trajectories of primary and secondary negative symptoms in different schizophrenia stages are proposed as an important additional discriminating factor. This review and position paper focuses primarily on clinical aspects of negative symptoms in schizophrenia, their definition, phenomenology, factor structure, and classification. It covers the historical and modern concepts of the paradigm of positive and negative symptoms in schizophrenia, as well as a detailed comparison of the assessment tools and psychometric tests used for the evaluation of negative symptoms.

Diagnosis and treatment depression in schizophrenia.

Depression is the third most common illness among patients with schizophrenia which negatively affects the course of the disease and significantly contributes to the mortality rate, due to increased suicide. Depression, along with negative symptoms and cognitive deficits, is one of the main factors that significantly decreases the quality of life and the disease prognosis in patients with schizophrenia. In addition, depression increases the frequency of exacerbations and readmissions, decreases the quality and duration of remissions and is associated with more frequent substance abuse and an increased economic burden. Data on the prevalence of depression among patients with schizophrenia are contradictory and are associated with a low detection rate of depression in such patients, a lack of clear diagnostic criteria and difficulties in differentiation between extrapyramidal and negative symptoms. The average prevalence of depression that meets the diagnostic criteria of major depressive episodes in patients with schizophrenia is 25% at a specific point, and 60% over the course of a lifetime; the frequency of subsyndromal depression is much higher. It is essential to distinguish between primary (axial syndrome) and secondary depressive symptoms (extrapyramidal symptoms, psychogenic or nosogenic reactions, social factors, etc.) to determine treatment strategies. The published data relating to randomized clinical trials for the development of evidence-based guidelines are limited. Current recommendations are based mainly on the results of small-scale trials and reviews. Certain atypical antipsychotics (quetiapine, lurasidone, amisulpride, aripiprazole, olanzapine, clozapine) are superior to typical antipsychotics in the reduction of depressive symptoms. Clozapine is effective in the management of patients at risk from suicide. The additional prescription of antidepressants, transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroconvulsive therapy are not always effective and are only possible following the management of acute psychosis in cases when antipsychotic monotherapy proved to be ineffective.

12-week double-blind randomized multicenter study of efficacy and safety of agomelatine (25-50 mg/day) versus escitalopram (10-20 mg/day) in out-patients with severe generalized anxiety disorder.

Treatment of severely symptomatic patients with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) raises particular concerns for clinicians. This 12-week double-blind study evaluated the efficacy of agomelatine (25-50 mg/day) in the treatment of patients with severe GAD, using escitalopram (10-20 mg) as active comparator. The primary outcome measure was the change from baseline of the total score on the Hamilton Anxiety scale (HAM-A) at week 12. Secondary outcome measures included rate of response to treatment (at least 50% score reduction from baseline) in the HAM-A psychic and somatic anxiety sub-scores, Clinical Global Impression severity and change scores, the Toronto Hospital Alertness Test, the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale, and the Leeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire Scores. Sixty one clinical centers (Australia, Canada, Czech Republic, Finland, Germany, Hungary, Poland, Russia, Slovakia) participated from April 2013 to February 2015. Patient characteristics and demographic data were comparable between treatment groups. Both treatments were associated with a clinically significant decrease in HAM-A total score at week 12; the non-inferiority of agomelatine versus escitalopram was not demonstrated (E(SE) = -0.91(0.69), 95%CI = [-2.26, 0.44], p = 0.195). At week 12, the response rate was 60.9% in the agomelatine group, and 64.8% in the escitalopram group. In both treatment arms, HAM-A psychic and somatic anxiety scores decreased, alertness and sleep parameters improved, and ability to experience pleasure increased. In these secondary outcome measures, there were no significant differences between the treatment groups. Agomelatine was well-tolerated, with a lower incidence of adverse events than escitalopram. Agomelatine and escitalopram are efficacious in treating GAD patients with severe symptoms.

The combined effect of CYP2D6 and DRD2 Taq1A polymorphisms on the antipsychotics daily doses and hospital stay duration in schizophrenia inpatients (observational naturalistic study).

BACKGROUND: To assess the correlation between the antipsychotics (AP) mean daily doses, hospital stay duration and CYP2D6, DRD2 polymorphisms in naturalistic study. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: CYP2D6 polymorphisms *3, *4, *5, *6, *1XN and DRD2/ANKK1 Taq1A polymorphisms were genotyped in a cohort of 226 Caucasian schizophrenic inpatients. AP daily doses, hospital stay duration and AP treatment duration were taken from medical records. To compare mean daily doses of AP among CYP2D6 PMs, EMs, UMs and DRD2/ANKK1 Taq1A carriers the actual AP doses were converted to chlorpromazine (CPZ) equivalents and DDD (defined daily dose). RESULTS: Significant correlation (p=0.004) between CYP2D6 metabolic activity and AP mean daily doses was observed only among DRD2/ANKK1 Taq1A polymorphic allele carriers: 250.53 (95%CI: 154.90-346.17), 473.82 (95%CI: 426.99-520.64) 602.77 (95%CI: 469.65-735.88) CPZ equivalents in PMs, EMs and UMs, consequently. PMs with DRD2/ANKK1 Taq1A CT genotype received significantly lower doses of AP comparing to CC genotype (p=0.02). Mean hospital stay duration of PMs+UMs was significantly higher comparing to EMs (66.4 days (95% CI: 56.9-75.8) vs 50.2 days (95%CI: 45.5-54.7); p=0.047). CONCLUSIONS: In a cohort of schizophrenia inpatients CYP2D6 metabolic activity affects mean AP daily dose only in the presence of DRD2 Taq1A polymorphic allele. CYP2D6 metabolic activity correlates independently from DRD2 Taq1A polymorphism with hospital stay duration. Subpopulation of schizophrenia inpatients with altered CYP2D6 activity (PMs and UMs) carriers of Taq1A polymorphisms needs special attention of clinicians in aligning of AP treatment.

Design and validation of standardized clinical and functional remission criteria in schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND: International Remission Criteria (IRC) for schizophrenia were developed recently by a group of internationally known experts. The IRC detect only 10%-30% of cases and do not cover the diversity of forms and social functioning. Our aim was to design a more applicable tool and validate its use - the Standardized Clinical and Functional Remission Criteria (SCFRC). METHODS: We used a 6-month follow-up study of 203 outpatients from two Moscow centers and another further sample of stable patients from a 1-year controlled trial of atypical versus typical medication. Diagnosis was confirmed by International Classification of Diseases Version 10 (ICD10) criteria and the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). Patients were assessed by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, including intensity threshold, and further classified using the Russian domestic remission criteria and the level of social and personal functioning, according to the Personal and Social Performance Scale (PSP). The SCFRC were formulated and were validated by a data reanalysis on the first population sample and on a second independent sample (104 patients) and in an open-label prospective randomized 12-month comparative study of risperidone long-acting injectable (RLAI) versus olanzapine. RESULTS: Only 64 of the 203 outpatients (31.5%) initially met the IRC, and 53 patients (26.1%) met the IRC after 6 months, without a change in treatment. Patients who were in remission had episodic and progressive deficit (39.6%), or remittent (15%) paranoid schizophrenia, or schizoaffective disorder (17%). In addition, 105 patients of 139 (51.7%), who did not meet symptomatic IRC, remained stable within the period. Reanalysis of data revealed that 65.5% of the patients met the SCFRC. In the controlled trial, 70% of patients in the RLAI group met the SCFRC and only 19% the IRC. In the routine treatment group, 55.9% met the SCFRC and only 5.7% the IRC. Results of the further independent sample demonstrated that 35% met the IRC, 65% the SCFRC, and 56% of patients met both the symptomatic and functional criteria. In the controlled trial of RLAI and olanzapine, 40% and 35% of patients, respectively, met the IRC, while 70% and 55%, respectively, met the SCFRC. CONCLUSION: In schizophrenia outpatients, a greater proportion of stable cases is detected in remission by SCFRC in comparison with IRC. The SCFRC were more sensitive to the full spectrum of schizophrenia. The SCFRC appear to be valid as a tool and clinically useful as they produce a comprehensive assessment of treatment effectiveness for a wide range of patients.

Management of schizophrenia: clinical experience with asenapine.

Schizophrenia is a chronic brain disorder comprising a range of clinical features, including positive and negative symptoms, cognitive dysfunction and mood symptoms (particularly depression and anxiety). The management of schizophrenia requires effective short- and long-term treatment with antipsychotic medication that is effective across these symptom domains, while being well tolerated over the long term. Asenapine is the first tetracyclic atypical antipsychotic to be licensed in the USA and several other countries outside Europe for the acute and maintenance treatment of schizophrenia in adults. It has a unique receptor-binding profile and a broad range of therapeutic effects. Since clinical trials are conducted under strict conditions in tightly defined patient populations, evidence of an agent's efficacy and tolerability under 'real-world' clinical practice conditions is also required. As in clinical trials, real-life case reports demonstrate that asenapine is effective in treating the positive symptoms of schizophrenia, both in the acute setting and for relapse prevention. It is also effective in treating negative symptoms and shows promise in the treatment of depressive symptoms associated with schizophrenia. Asenapine has a favourable tolerability profile, having a minimal impact on weight and metabolic parameters. As such, asenapine is valuable option for the treatment of schizophrenia in adults.

Remission in schizophrenia: results of cross-sectional with 6-month follow-up period and 1-year observational therapeutic studies in an outpatient population.

BACKGROUND: A standardized definition of remission criteria in schizophrenia was proposed by the International group of NC Andreasen in 2005 (low symptom threshold for the eight core Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) symptoms for at least 6 consecutive months). METHODS: A cross-sectional study of remission rate, using a 6-month follow-up to assess symptomatic stability, was conducted in two healthcare districts (first and second) of an outpatient psychiatric service in Moscow. The key inclusion criteria were outpatients with an International Classification of Diseases, 10th edition (ICD-10) diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Remission was assessed using modern criteria (severity and time criteria), PANSS and Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF). Patients who were stable but did not satisfied the symptomatic criteria were included in a further 1-year observational study, with the first group (first district) receiving risperidone (long-acting, injectable) (RLAI) and the second group (second district) continuing to receiving routine treatment. Symptoms were assessed with PANSS, social functioning with the personal and social performance scale, compliance with rating of medication influences scale, and extrapyramidal side effects with the Simpson-Angus scale. RESULTS: Only 64 (31.5%) of 203 outpatients met the criteria for symptomatic remission in the cross-sectional study, but at the end of the 6-month follow-up period, 158 (77.8%) were stable (irrespective of remission status). Among these only 53 (26.1%) patients fulfilled the remission criteria. The observational study had 42 stable patients in the RLAI group and 35 in the routine treatment group: 19.0% in the RLAI group and 5.7% in the control group met remission criteria after 12 months of therapy. Furthermore, reduction of PANSS total and subscale scores, as well as improvement in social functioning, was more significant in the first group. CONCLUSIONS: Only around one-quarter of our outpatient schizophrenic population met full remission criteria. Use of RLAI gave a better remission rate than achieved in standard care with routine treatment. Criteria for remission should take into account clinical course and functioning to support clinical care.

Activation of mGlu2/3 receptors as a new approach to treat schizophrenia: a randomized Phase 2 clinical trial.

Schizophrenia is a chronic, complex and heterogeneous mental disorder, with pathological features of disrupted neuronal excitability and plasticity within limbic structures of the brain. These pathological features manifest behaviorally as positive symptoms (including hallucinations, delusions and thought disorder), negative symptoms (such as social withdrawal, apathy and emotional blunting) and other psychopathological symptoms (such as psychomotor retardation, lack of insight, poor attention and impulse control). Altered glutamate neurotransmission has for decades been linked to schizophrenia, but all commonly prescribed antipsychotics act on dopamine receptors. LY404039 is a selective agonist for metabotropic glutamate 2/3 (mGlu2/3) receptors and has shown antipsychotic potential in animal studies. With data from rodents, we provide new evidence that mGlu2/3 receptor agonists work by a distinct mechanism different from that of olanzapine. To clinically test this mechanism, an oral prodrug of LY404039 (LY2140023) was evaluated in schizophrenic patients with olanzapine as an active control in a randomized, three-armed, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Treatment with LY2140023, like treatment with olanzapine, was safe and well-tolerated; treated patients showed statistically significant improvements in both positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia compared to placebo (P < 0.001 at week 4). Notably, patients treated with LY2140023 did not differ from placebo-treated patients with respect to prolactin elevation, extrapyramidal symptoms or weight gain. These data suggest that mGlu2/3 receptor agonists have antipsychotic properties and may provide a new alternative for the treatment of schizophrenia.