Wound Healing Society 2023 update on guidelines for arterial ulcers.

The Wound Healing Society guidelines for the treatment of arterial insufficiency ulcers were originally published in 2006, with the last update in 2014. These guidelines provided recommendations, along with their respective levels of evidence, on seven categories: diagnosis, surgery, infection control, wound bed preparation, dressings, adjuvant therapy and long-term maintenance. Over the last 9 years, additional literature regarding these aspects of arterial ulcer management has been published. An advisory panel comprised of academicians, clinicians and researchers was chosen to update the 2014 guidelines. Members included vascular surgeons, internists, plastic surgeons, anaesthesiologists, emergency medicine physicians and dermatologists, all with expertise in wound healing. The goal of this article is to evaluate relevant new findings upon which an updated version of the guidelines will be based.

Dermatology workforce in the United States - Part I: Overview, transformations, and implications.

The dermatology workforce continues to evolve to meet the growing and diversified demands of the US population. Part 1 of this continuing medical education series is designed to provide an overview of the dermatology workforce as well as delineate the motivators and socioeconomic implications of significant workforce transformations which are impacting dermatologic health care. Part 2 of the series will consider the impact of workforce challenges on patient outcomes and discuss potential actions that may help to optimize workforce organization and care delivery.

Dermatology workforce in the United States - Part II: Patient outcomes, challenges, and potential solutions.

This continuing medical education (CME) series assesses key features and ongoing transformations within the dermatology workforce. Part 1 of this series described precipitants and implications of recent workforce changes. Part 2 reviews the influence that these workforce dynamics have had on patient access, outcomes, and satisfaction. Additionally, it assesses potential solutions for optimizing care for underserved groups and the broader dermatologic patient population.

Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Autoantibody (ANCA)-Associated Vasculitis With Mucosal Involvement Following COVID-19 Pneumonia.

Antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitides (AAV) are a group of inflammatory disorders in which autoantibodies damage small arteries throughout the body, including in the upper and lower respiratory system, kidneys, as well as the skin. AAV may be precipitated by a variety of causes, including infections. In this report, we examine the case of a patient who developed AAV that was suspected primarily based on mucocutaneous hemorrhagic bullae, elevated ANCA levels, and subsequently confirmed by kidney biopsy, while recovering from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. AAV and COVID-19 infections may present with similar symptoms, rendering an accurate diagnosis challenging. Additionally, only a few other cases describing a similar onset of AAV post-COVID-19 infection have been described in the literature. Initial presenting features of AAV in such cases have varied considerably, which makes the diagnosis even more challenging. We also engage in a review of such cases to assess key similarities, different treatment options, and outcomes. Lastly, the fact that several mechanisms have been proposed for AAV highlights the need for continued research to help clarify the pathophysiology while also identifying the optimal therapy.

Practitioner assessment of mental health in dermatologic disease.

Patients with certain dermatologic skin diseases have been found to be at increased risk for depression and suicidal ideation. As there is not much information available on mental health interventions taken in dermatologic practices, we conducted a survey to assess the extent to which dermatologists monitor and follow up with the mental health of their patients. We discovered that dermatologists are aware of mental health issues associated with these dermatologic diseases but have no standard of care for their assessment. By obtaining this information, we can enable ourselves to fill in these deficiencies to help improve patient care.

Patient safety in dermatology: a ten-year update.

OBJECTIVE: We update and expand our 2010 article in this journal, Patient safety in dermatology: A review of the literature [4][DH1]. METHODS: PubMed at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), United States National Library of Medicine (NLM) was searched September 2019 for English language articles published between 2009 and 2019 concerning patient safety and medical error in dermatology. Potentially relevant articles and communications were critically evaluated by the authors with selected references from 2020 added to include specific topics: medication errors, diagnostic errors including telemedicine, office-based surgery, wrong-site procedures, infections including COVID-19, falls, laser safety, scope of practice, and electronic health records. SUMMARY: Hospitals and clinics are adopting the methods of high-reliability organizations to identify and change ineffective practice patterns. Although systems issues are emphasized in patient safety, people are critically important to effective teamwork and leadership. Advancements in procedural and cosmetic dermatology, organizational and clinical guidelines, and the revolution in information technology and electronic health records have introduced new sources of potential error. CONCLUSION: Despite the growing number of dermatologic patient safety studies, our review supports a continuing need for further studies and reports to reduce the number of preventable errors and provide optimal care.

The corporatization of care in academic dermatology.

Concern over the corporatization of medicine has existed since the late 1800s and continues to grow today in the face of large-scale mergers, vertical integration of health care services, and private equity (PE) investment in dermatology practices. Although academic departments have traditionally been viewed as exempt from Corporate Practice of Medicine (CPOM) laws, they face the same health care landscape and cultural pressures as private and PE-backed practices, as well as some unique financial challenges. To adapt to these difficult realities, academic dermatology has embraced new models of care, some of which mirror the controversial strategies used by PE-backed practices to maximize profit. We explore the corporatization of academic dermatology and its manifestations in changing practice patterns, patient care, education, and research.

DERM: A Four-Step Dermatology Education Digital Tool Kit for Nondermatologists.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Dermatology is often an overlooked and underemphasized area of training in postgraduate primary care medical education, with an abundance of dermatological educational resources available, but no clear guidelines on how to best take advantage of them. The objective of this study was to develop a dermatology digital tool kit designed to describe, evaluate, recognize, and manage (DERM) common dermatological conditions in primary care residency education and to evaluate potential improvement in clinical confidence. METHODS: A total of 14 family medicine (FM) and 33 internal medicine (IM) residents were given the DERM tool kit to complete over 7 weeks. Effects on residents' self-reported comfort with dermatology and resources used were measured by voluntary anonymous surveys distributed before and after DERM completion. RESULTS: A response rate of 100% (14/14) for FM residents and 52% (17/33) for IM residents was achieved. The majority of residents (61%) recalled minimal dermatology education-less than 2 weeks-in medical school and 71% agreed that there is not enough dermatology in their residency curriculum. A statistically significant increase in resident comfort with describing (P=0.002), recognizing and diagnosing (P<0.001), and managing (P=0.001) dermatologic conditions was observed postcompletion. Residents reported they would recommend this tool to other primary care residents. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing the DERM digital tool kit is feasible with primary care residents and appears to improve comfort with describing, recognizing and diagnosing, and managing dermatologic conditions.