Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 31(2): 146-154, 2023 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36912227

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: A vagal paraganglioma is a rare head and neck tumor arising from the paraganglionic tissue within the perineurium of the vagus nerve, anywhere along the course of the nerve. Due to its proximity to the internal carotid artery, the internal jugular vein and the lower cranial nerves, this disorder poses significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. The diagnostic workup and management keep on evolving. RECENT FINDINGS: This article gives a concise update of the clinical spectrum and the current state-of-the-art diagnostic workup and management of vagal paraganglioma. SUMMARY: Every patient with suspected vagal paraganglioma needs to be evaluated by a multidisciplinary team. The management strategy is selected depending on the growth rate of the tumor, the age and fitness of the patient, the number of affected cranial nerves, the metabolic activity of the paraganglioma, and the eventual multicentricity. An algorithm guiding the clinician through the different treatment options is presented.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello , Paraganglioma Extraadrenal , Paraganglioma , Humanos , Paraganglioma Extraadrenal/diagnóstico , Paraganglioma/diagnóstico , Paraganglioma/terapia
2.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 279(12): 5831-5837, 2022 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35751694

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This long-term follow-up study aims to externally validate the inside-out technique for surgical treatment of preauricular sinuses. METHODS: We analyzed the medical records of all patients who underwent the IO procedure at University Hospitals Leuven from 1 November 2005 to 30 November 2019 (N = 110). We were able to contact 77 of these 110 patients for a telephone interview, where we used a standardized questionnaire to evaluate recurrence, patient satisfaction and aesthetic result. RESULTS: We studied 110 patients (68 males, 77 females), resulting in 145 PAS (35 left, 40 right, 35 bilateral), with a median follow-up of 53 months. Fifteen PAS (10.3%) developed an early (< 4 weeks) postoperative complication (wound dehiscence, infection, abcedation, swelling). Two PAS (2 different patients) needed revision surgery because of recurrence, one after 15 months, the other after 4 years. The 5-year Kaplan-Meier recurrence-free percentage was 97.7%, equating to an estimated recurrence rate of 2.3%. Ninety-four percent was satisfied with the aesthetic result, giving 4 or 5 points on a 5-point Likert scale. CONCLUSIONS: This study was able to externally validate the IO technique for the treatment of PAS. The IO technique should be first choice, since it guarantees low recurrence rates, excellent aesthetic results, and good patient satisfaction.


Asunto(s)
Anomalías Craneofaciales , Masculino , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Resultado del Tratamiento , Anomalías Craneofaciales/cirugía , Reoperación , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...