Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Brain Behav Immun ; 88: 71-74, 2020 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32561222

RESUMEN

Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) emerged in December 2019 from Wuhan, China. It typically presents with mild upper respiratory tract infection symptoms and may have life threatening complications, including acute respiratory distress syndrome, acute stroke, myocardial infarction, kidney failure, shock, and even death. Coronavirus infections are known to have neuroinvasive potential with consequent neuropsychiatric manifestations. We analyzed COVID-19 adult patients in the TriNetX database, which is a global health collaborative clinical research platform collecting real-time electronic medical records data from a network of health care organizations (HCOs) from January 20, 2020 to June 10th, 2020. 40,469 patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 among whom 9086 (22.5%) patients had neuropsychiatric manifestations. The most common neurologic manifestations included headache (3.7%) and sleep disorders (3.4%), Encephalopathy (2.3%), Stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA) (1.0%) and 0.6% had seizures. Most common psychiatric manifestations included anxiety and other related disorders (4.6%), mood disorders (3.8%), while 0.2% patients had suicidal ideation. Early recognition and prompt management of neuropsychiatric manifestations in these patients have a potential to decrease overall morbidity and mortality.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/fisiopatología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/psicología , Neumonía Viral/fisiopatología , Neumonía Viral/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Ageusia/etiología , Ansiedad/etiología , Ansiedad/psicología , Betacoronavirus , Encefalopatías/etiología , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/complicaciones , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Cefalea/etiología , Humanos , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/etiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos del Humor/etiología , Trastornos del Humor/psicología , Mialgia/etiología , Trastornos del Olfato/etiología , Dolor/etiología , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/complicaciones , SARS-CoV-2 , Convulsiones/etiología , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia/etiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Ideación Suicida , Adulto Joven
2.
Stroke ; 51(4): 1339-1343, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32078482

RESUMEN

Background and Purpose- Industry payments to physicians raise concerns regarding conflicts of interest that could impact patient care. We explored nonresearch and nonownership payments from industry to vascular neurologists to identify trends in compensation. Methods- Using Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology data, we explored financial relationships between industry and US vascular neurologists from 2013 to 2018. We analyzed payment characteristics, including payment categories, payment distribution among physicians, regional trends, and biomedical manufacturers. Furthermore, we analyzed the top 1% (by compensation) of vascular neurologists with detailed payment categories, their position, and their contribution to stroke guidelines. Results- The number of board certified vascular neurologist increased from 1169 in 2013 to 1746 in 2018. The total payments to vascular neurologist increased from $99 749 in 2013 to $1 032 302 in 2018. During the study period, 16% to 17% of vascular neurologists received industry payments. Total payments from industry and mean physician payments increased yearly over this period, with consulting fee (31.1%) and compensation for services other than consulting (30.7%) being the highest paid categories. The top 10 manufacturers made the majority of the payments, and the top 10 products changed from drug or biological products to devices. Physicians from south region of the United States received the highest total payment (38.72%), which steadily increased. Payments to top 1% vascular neurologists increased from 64% to 79% over the period as payments became less evenly distributed. Among the top 1%, 42% specialized in neuro intervention, 11% contributed to American Heart Association/American Stroke Association guidelines, and around 75% were key leaders in the field. Conclusions- A small proportion of US vascular neurologists consistently received the majority of industry payments, the value of which grew over the study period. Only 11% of the top 1% receiving industry payments have authored American Heart Association/American Stroke Association guidelines, but ≈75% seem to be key leaders in the field. Whether this influences clinical practice and behavior requires further investigation.


Asunto(s)
Cardiología/economía , Cardiología/tendencias , Conflicto de Intereses/economía , Neurólogos/economía , Neurólogos/tendencias , Cardiología/legislación & jurisprudencia , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S./economía , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S./legislación & jurisprudencia , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S./tendencias , Conflicto de Intereses/legislación & jurisprudencia , Bases de Datos Factuales/tendencias , Industria Farmacéutica/economía , Industria Farmacéutica/legislación & jurisprudencia , Industria Farmacéutica/tendencias , Sector de Atención de Salud/economía , Sector de Atención de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Sector de Atención de Salud/tendencias , Humanos , Neurólogos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...