The Evolution of Hand Injuries at a State's Only Level I Trauma Center: A Look From the 1980s Through the Global Pandemic.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to evaluate any changes to hand trauma in the past three decades and through the COVID-19 pandemic. We hypothesized that improved consumer safety regulations, changes in access to care, and the impact of a global pandemic, among other variables, have significantly influenced the mechanisms and treatment of hand injuries between the 1980s, 2010s (pre-COVID-19), and 2020s (post-COVID-19). METHODS: A retrospective single-center review was performed at the only level I trauma center in Mississippi, identifying all hand trauma consultations between 2012-2019 and 2020-2021, compared to aggregated data from 1989. RESULTS: Car accidents, gunshots, saw injuries, door injuries, and falls increased in 2012-2019 and 2020-2021 compared to 1989, whereas knife injuries, glass injuries, industrial injuries, and burns decreased. Crush injuries, de-gloving injuries, and lacerations with irregular edges were increased in recent cohorts, corresponding with increased amputations and tissue loss. Skin and subcutaneous injuries decreased in modern cohorts, corresponding with a decreased ability for primary skin repair and the need for more flaps. Additionally, while hospitalizations have increased, patients have improved follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The nature of hand trauma has changed significantly over the past three decades. Increased numbers of cars and greater access to firearms might have led to increased rates of high-energy trauma, whereas burn and industrial injuries have decreased, potentially secondary to improved safety efforts. Despite increased overall hand trauma, time to treatment and follow-up have improved. Through this study, we can be more cognizant of the evolution of hand trauma in the modern era. This can allow improved access to care and further refine management to optimize functionality for hand injuries.

Plastic Surgery: Beware the Candle Burning at Both Ends.

Background: Plastic surgery dates back to 800 BC, where forehead flaps were used to reconstruct noses in India. Today, it is one of the most romanticized fields in medicine. Due to the influence of social media, there has never been a larger spotlight. Ironically, this spotlight brings a narrowed perception of the scope of plastic surgery. This study aimed to assess the scope through the eyes of the average American to identify gaps in knowledge to better represent the field. Methods: A series of questions were developed under survey methodologists and administered by Qualtrics. Responses were gathered, and data were analyzed to assess the public's knowledge of plastic surgery's scope. Results: Two thousand five hundred responses were obtained, balanced across demographics similar to that of the United States. The US population has a poor understanding of the scope of plastic surgery and how to obtain board certification. Conclusions: This survey demonstrates a gap in awareness of plastic surgery as a field and the scope outside aesthetic procedures dramatized by the media. There remains no clear understanding of the qualifications of plastic surgeons or the provider makeup of the field of cosmetic surgery. Subspecialties proved to be overlooked, and knowledge of board certification was sparse. Further effort is needed to educate both the public and patients of the scope of plastic surgery, so that they might seek and gain access to appropriate treatment in the most efficient manner to optimize outcomes regarding the form and function of the body.

The Influence of Training Pathway, Institution Type, Gender, and a Global Pandemic on Post Graduation Career Plans in Plastic Surgery.

Background: Anecdotal statements are often made about what percentage of residents go into fellowship versus private practice versus academia after graduation. However, few objective studies have been completed on this topic. This project is designed to shed light on the career choices of plastic surgery residents immediately after graduation from 2018 to 2022. A secondary objective was to determine whether the COVID-19 pandemic had any measurable impact on postgraduation plans. Methods: After obtaining institutional review board approval, publicly available data were obtained from institution websites or via program queries. Comparison between pre-COVID-19 and post-COVID-19 (2018-2019 versus 2020-2022), integrated versus independent, and private versus public cohorts were analyzed using Fisher exact test. A two-sided P value less than 0.01 was considered statistically significant. Results: Data were collected for 690 graduates across 64 plastic surgery training programs. Responses were obtained from 60 of 88 (68%) integrated and 30 of 47 (64%) independent programs. Most graduates pursued fellowship training (61%), followed by private practice (28%), academic practice (5%), or military post (1%). Independent residents were more likely to pursue private practice (40% versus 26%, P = 0.001), whereas integrated residents were more likely to pursue fellowship (49% versus 70%, P < 0.0001). Public institution graduates were more likely to go into private practice (37% versus 23%, P = 0.0002), whereas private institution residents were more likely to pursue fellowship (55% versus 72%, P < 0.0001). Public institutions were more likely to graduate women (45% versus 35%, P = 0.009). The COVID-19 pandemic (P = 0.31) had no impact on postgraduation plans. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that training pathway and institution type have a significant impact on postgraduation plans, whereas a global pandemic does not. This information can be used by educators, residents, and medical students as they plan for the future.

Apocrine Hidrocystoma of the Upper Eyelid.

What is an apocrine hidrocystoma?How does an apocrine hidrocystoma present?What are the histological features of an apocrinehidrocystoma?What is the treatment and prognosis?

Eyelid Reconstruction: An Algorithm Based on Defect Location.

ABSTRACT: Eyelid reconstruction is a complex topic. This review looks at articles from 1990 to 2018 on eyelid reconstruction that had at least 10 patients and a mean 6 month follow-up. The authors present the results of our findings and propose an algorithm to guide the surgeon in choosing the best technique based on location, size, and lamella. Defects less than 1/3rd of the upper or lower eyelid may be closed primarily. Anterior and posterior lamella defects of the lower eyelid greater than 1/3rd in size should be reconstructed with a double mucosal and myocutaneous island flap. Those greater than 50% in size should be recreated with a Tripier flap for the anterior lamella and conchal chondroperichondral graft for the posterior lamella. For total lid reconstruction, a Fricke flap is best for the anterior lamella and the tarsoconjunctival free graft/lateral orbital rim periosteal flap is best for the posterior lamella. Fullthickness defects between 1/3rd and 2/3rd in size of the upper eyelid should be reconstructed with a myotarsocutaneous flap and those greater than 2/3rd should be reconstructed with a Cutler-Beard flap for the anterior lamella and auricular cartilage for the posterior lamella. For the medial canthal region, the island pedicle and horizontal cheek advancement flap is recommended for the anterior lamella and a composite upper lid graft for the posterior lamella. For the lateral canthal region, a bilobed flap is recommended for the anterior lamella and a periosteal flap for the posterior lamella.

Postoperative Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Utilizing Enoxaparin Does Not Increase Bleeding Complications After Abdominal Body Contouring Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) chemoprophylaxis warrants an individualized, risk-stratified approach, and constitutes a relatively controversial topic in plastic surgery. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the safety of a 7-day postoperative enoxaparin regimen for VTE prophylaxis compared with a single preoperative dose of heparin in abdominal body contouring surgery. METHODS: This single-institution pre-post study investigated the safety of a 7-day enoxaparin postoperative regimen in abdominal body contouring procedures performed by a single surgeon from 2007 to 2018. Four procedures were included: traditional panniculectomy, abdominoplasty, fleur-de-lis panniculectomy, and body contouring liposuction. Group I patients received a single dose of 5000 U subcutaneous heparin in the preoperative period, and no postoperative chemical prophylaxis was administered. Group II patients received 40 mg subcutaneous enoxaparin in the immediate preoperative period, then once daily for 7 days postoperatively. RESULTS: A total of 195 patients were included in the study, 66 in Group I and 129 in Group II. The groups demonstrated statistically similar VTE risk profiles, based on the 2005 Caprini risk-assessment model. There were no statistically significant differences in the 2 primary outcomes: postoperative bleeding and VTE events. Group I patients had higher reoperation rates (22.7% vs 10.1%, P = 0.029), which was secondary to higher rates of revision procedures. CONCLUSIONS: A 7-day postoperative course of once-daily enoxaparin for VTE risk reduction in abdominal body contouring surgery does not significantly increase the risk of bleeding. Implementation of this regimen for postdischarge chemoprophylaxis, when indicated following individualized risk stratification, is appropriate.