RESUMEN
Background: A pure ovarian dysgerminoma in a postmenopausal female is a rare phenomenon. Case: A 65-year-old female presented with a large pelvic mass. Following surgical debulking, the patient was diagnosed with FIGO Stage IIB ovarian dysgerminoma. She was treated with three cycles of etoposide and cisplatin and has been disease-free for 12 months. Conclusion: Dysgerminomas in postmenopausal females are uncommon. Gynecologic oncologists should be familiar with the pathological diagnosis and treatment recommendations to achieve optimal outcomes.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of intramedullary screw-based fixation on early postoperative complications after olecranon fractures. We hypothesized that intramedullary screw-based fixation results in decreased need for reoperation compared with plate and screw-based and tension band-based fixation. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Two academic Level-1 trauma centers. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Five hundred fifty-six patients treated with a tension band-based, plate and screw-based, or intramedullary screw-based construct for an olecranon fracture over a 10-year period. INTERVENTION: Open reduction and internal fixation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: Unplanned reoperation. Demographic, injury type and severity, supplemental fixation, and length of follow-up data were viewed as potential confounders and analyzed as such. RESULTS: We identified 556 relevant patients. One hundred ninety-nine patients were treated with an intramedullary screw-based construct, 229 with a plate and screw-based construct, and 128 with a tension band-based construct. We observed significant differences in the age, fracture type, percentage of open fractures, use of supplemental fixation, and treating institution between the treatment groups. Ninety-five patients (17.1%) had an unplanned reoperation. When we adjusted for confounders, intramedullary screw-based fixation reduced the odds of an unplanned reoperation by 54% compared with plate and screw-based treatment. In the adjusted analysis, we did not observe a difference between plate and screw-based treatment and tension band-based fixation. CONCLUSIONS: Intramedullary screw-based fixation of olecranon fractures results in decreased need for early reoperation compared with more common olecranon fixation strategies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Asunto(s)
Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas , Olécranon , Fracturas del Cúbito , Tornillos Óseos , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Humanos , Olécranon/diagnóstico por imagen , Olécranon/cirugía , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Fracturas del Cúbito/cirugíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To determine the association between displaced femoral shaft bone fragments ("spikes") seen on radiographs after intramedullary nail insertion and the need for future motion surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study. SETTING: Academic trauma center. PATIENTS: We included patients with femoral shaft fractures treated with intramedullary nail insertion. Case patients (n = 22) had developed knee stiffness treated with motion surgery. The control group was a randomly selected sample (1:3 ratio). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Motion surgery to address knee stiffness. We defined a "spike distance ratio" and "spike area ratio" from initial postoperative anteroposterior and lateral radiographs. Multivariable logistic regression determined the effect of spike distance and area ratios on the likelihood of need for motion surgery, controlling for polytraumatic injuries and bilateral fractures. RESULTS: The case group had a median femoral spike distance ratio of 1.9 [interquartile range (IQR), 1.6-2.5] compared with 1.5 (IQR, 1.2-1.8) in the control group. An increased femoral spike distance ratio was associated with increased odds of motion surgery (P < 0.01). A femoral spike distance >2 times the femoral radius had 32 times the odds (95% confidence interval, 2-752) of motion surgery compared with patients with distance ratios <1.25. Median femoral spike area ratios were similar between the case (0.2; IQR, 0.1-0.5) and control (0.2; IQR, 0.0-0.5) groups and were not associated with increased odds of motion surgery (P = 0.34). CONCLUSIONS: A larger spike distance ratio is associated with increased odds of subsequent motion surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas del Fémur , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas , Clavos Ortopédicos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Fracturas del Fémur/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas del Fémur/cirugía , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To determine if the use of intrawound vancomycin powder reduces surgical-site infection after open reduction and internal fixation of bicondylar tibial plateau, tibial pilon, and calcaneus fractures. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: Level I trauma center. PATIENTS: All fractures operatively treated from January 2011 to February 2015 were reviewed; 583 high-risk fractures were included, of which 35 received topical vancomycin powder. A previously published prospectively collected cohort of 235 similar high-risk fractures treated at our center from 2007 through 2010 served as a second comparison group. INTERVENTION: Topical vancomycin powder at wound closure. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Deep surgical-site infection. Analyses used both univariate comparison of all patients and 1:2 matching analysis using both nearest neighbor and propensity-based matching. RESULTS: Compared with a control group of fractures treated during the same time period without vancomycin powder, the infection rate with vancomycin powder was significantly lower [0% (0/35) vs. 10.6% (58/548), P = 0.04]. Compared with our previously published historical infection rate of 13% for these injuries, vancomycin powder was also associated with significantly decreased deep surgical-site infection (0% vs. 13%, P = 0.02). These results agreed with the matched analyses, which also showed lower infection in the vancomycin powder group (0% vs. 11%-16%, P ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Vancomycin powder may play a role in lowering surgical-site infection rates after fracture fixation. A larger randomized controlled trial is needed to validate our findings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas de la Tibia , Vancomicina , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Polvos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/tratamiento farmacológico , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Fracturas de la Tibia/tratamiento farmacológico , Fracturas de la Tibia/cirugíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Occupational therapy is often prescribed after the acute treatment of upper extremity fractures. However, high out-of-pocket expenses and logistical constraints can reduce access to formal therapy services. We aimed to quantify preferences of patients with upper extremity fracture for attending occupational therapy, when considering possible differences in clinical outcomes. DESIGN: Discrete choice experiment. SETTING: Level 1 trauma centre in Baltimore, Maryland, USA. PARTICIPANTS: 134 adult patients with upper extremity fractures. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The scenarios were described with five attributes: cost, duration of therapy session, location of therapy, final range of motion and pain. We report the relative importance of each attribute as a proportion of total importance, and the willingness to pay for benefits of the therapy services. RESULTS: Of the 134 study participants, the mean age was 47 years and 53% were men. Cost (32%) and range of motion (29%) were the attributes of greatest relative importance. Pain (17%), duration of therapy (13%) and location of therapy (8%) were of lesser importance. Patients were willing to pay $85 more per therapy session for a 40% improvement in their range of motion. Patients were willing to pay $43 more per therapy session to improve from severe pain to mild pain. Patients were indifferent to whether the therapy treatment was home-based or in a clinical environment. CONCLUSIONS: When deciding on an upper extremity fracture therapy programme, out-of-pocket costs are a paramount consideration of patients. Improvements in range of motion are of greater importance than residual pain, the duration of therapy sessions and the location of service provision. Patients with upper extremity fracture should be prescribed occupational therapy services that align with these patients' preferences.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas Óseas , Terapia Ocupacional , Adulto , Femenino , Gastos en Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prioridad del Paciente , Extremidad SuperiorRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: We assessed the outcome and safety of posterior plating of distal tibial fractures. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective case series at a Level I trauma center. Seventy-four consecutive patients with distal tibial fractures treated with anatomically contoured 3.5-mm T-shaped locking compression plate using a posterolateral approach from January 2008 through April 2018 were included in the study. The mean patient age was 48 years (range, 18-87 years). Fifty-nine percent of the patients were male patients, 47% of the fractures were open fractures; and 27% of the patients had multiple traumatic injuries. Eleven fractures were AO/OTA type 42, 22 were type 43A, and 41 were type 43C. Sixty-two (84%) patients were treated with initial spanning external fixation (median time, 23 days) and staged open reduction and internal fixation. The main outcome measure was unplanned reoperation to address implant failure, nonunion, deep surgical site infection, or symptomatic implant. RESULTS: Overall risk of unplanned reoperation was 15% (11 of 74 patients, 95% confidence interval, 9%-25%). Four (5%) reoperations were for nonunion, three (4%) were for surgical site infection, two (3%) were for infected nonunion, and two (3%) were for implant prominence. Loss of alignment >10 degrees occurred in one patient who underwent unplanned reoperation for nonunion. No plate breakage occurred. Median time to reoperation was 221 days (range, 22-436 days). Only one other complication was noted: wound dehiscence associated with the posterolateral approach, which was treated with irrigation and débridement and a 6-week regimen of oral antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: Use of a posterolateral approach with a pre-contoured locking compression T-plate for the treatment of distal tibial fractures led to reasonable outcomes with an acceptable risk of unplanned reoperation, even with a high proportion of open fractures commonly staged with external fixation.
Asunto(s)
Placas Óseas , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Fracturas Abiertas/cirugía , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Fracturas de la Tibia/cirugía , Adulto , Traumatismos del Tobillo/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos del Tobillo/cirugía , Fijadores Externos , Femenino , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/instrumentación , Curación de Fractura , Fracturas Abiertas/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas no Consolidadas/cirugía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Radiografía , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fracturas de la Tibia/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To determine the recovery priorities of extremity fracture patients during the subacute phase and the patient factors associated with variation in recovery priorities. DESIGN: Discrete choice experiment. SETTING: Academic trauma center. PATIENTS: One hundred ninety-eight patients with a fracture to the appendicular skeleton. Patients with severe traumatic brain injuries, spinal cord injuries, and non-English-speaking patients were excluded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: The relative importance of clinical recovery, work-related recovery, and obtaining disability benefits after injury. RESULTS: In the subacute period, clinical recovery was the main priority for fracture patients (mean: 62%, SD: 5.3). Work-related recovery (mean: 27%, SD: 3.9) and the receipt of other disability benefits (mean: 11%, SD: 6.4) were each of significantly less importance. Heterogeneity was observed across these estimates based on the physical demands of preinjury employment, preinjury physical health, preinjury work status, health insurance type, and the severity of the fracture. CONCLUSION: Clinical recovery was of paramount importance for fracture patients during the subacute recovery phase. However, patients also valued resuming work and access to disability benefits. Understanding a patient's recovery priorities early in the clinical care pathway will enable the development of multidisciplinary care plans that are responsive to these priorities and, hence, deliver value-based health care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.