Managing Hallux Rigidus in the Elite Athlete.

Hallux rigidus can present a difficult problem to both competitive and elite athletic populations. Once an appropriate diagnostic workup has been performed, nonoperative management strategies, including anti-inflammatory medications, injection therapies, shoewear modifications, and orthotic devices, represent the mainstay conservative management options. Surgical management can be considered where an athlete's athletic performance is limited. A joint-sparing cheilectomy can provide a predictable return to sport at the most elite levels. The addition of a proximal phalangeal osteotomy can be considered when necessary. Arthroplasty or arthrodesis techniques can be used for persistent symptoms or progressive disease, but with less predictable outcomes.

Editorial Commentary: Large, Deep, and Cystic Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus May Be Better Treated With Bone Grafting Techniques or Autologous Osteochondral Transplantation Rather Than Bone Marrow Stimulation.

Osteochondral lesions of the talus are a challenging problem to treat. Debridement with bone marrow stimulation has represented the mainstay of treatment for the injuries, with good to excellent results reported. However, some patients do not do well with simple debridement and bone marrow stimulation, which yields a surface of fibrocartilage rather than articular cartilage. Recent studies have focused on prognostic indicators of successful treatment with bone marrow stimulation techniques, including lesion size, ankle stability, lesion location, containment, and the presence of a cyst, among others. The presence of a large bone cyst may be an indication for a more aggressive approach. Cystic lesions may be better suited for bone grafting techniques or articular cartilage replacement procedures (e.g., autologous osteochondral transplantation). Of importance, lesions larger than 90-100 mm sq and deeper than 7.5 mm may be similarly treated.

Management of High-Energy Tibial Pilon Fractures.

➤ Pilon fractures in the younger patient population are frequently high-energy, intra-articular injuries and are associated with devastating, long-term impacts on patient-reported outcomes and health-related quality of life, as well as high rates of persistent disability.➤ Judicious management of associated soft-tissue injury, including open fractures, is essential to minimizing complications. Optimizing medical comorbidities and negative social behaviors (e.g., smoking) should be addressed perioperatively.➤ Delayed internal fixation with interval temporizing external fixation represents the preferred technique for managing most high-energy pilon fractures presenting with characteristically substantial soft-tissue trauma. In some cases, surgeons elect to utilize circular fixation for these scenarios.➤ Although there have been treatment advances, the results have been generally poor, with high rates of posttraumatic arthritis, despite expert care.➤ Primary arthrodesis may be indicated in cases with severe articular cartilage injury that, in the opinion of the treating surgeon, is likely unsalvageable at the time of the index management.➤ The addition of intrawound vancomycin powder at the time of definitive fixation represents a low-cost prophylactic measure that appears to be effective in reducing gram-positive deep surgical site infections.

Paediatric ankle cartilage lesions: Proceedings of the International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle.

BACKGROUND: The evidence supporting best practice guidelines in the field of cartilage repair of the ankle are based on both low quality and low levels of evidence. Therefore, an international consensus group of experts was convened to collaboratively advance toward consensus opinions based on the best available evidence on key topics within cartilage repair of the ankle. The purpose of this article is to report the consensus statements on "Pediatric Ankle Cartilage Lesions" developed at the 2019 International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. METHODS: Forty-three international experts in cartilage repair of the ankle representing 20 countries convened to participate in a process based on the Delphi method of achieving consensus. Questions and statements were drafted within four working groups focusing on specific topics within cartilage repair of the ankle, after which a comprehensive literature review was performed and the available evidence for each statement was graded. Discussion and debate occurred in cases where statements were not agreed upon in unanimous fashion within the working groups. A final vote was then held, and the strength of consensus was characterised as follows: consensus: 51-74%; strong consensus: 75-99%; unanimous: 100%. RESULTS: A total of 12 statements on paediatric ankle cartilage lesions reached consensus during the 2019 International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. Five achieved unanimous support, and seven reached strong consensus (>75% agreement). All statements reached at least 84% agreement. CONCLUSIONS: This international consensus derived from leaders in the field will assist clinicians with the management of paediatric ankle cartilage lesions.

Terminology for osteochondral lesions of the ankle: proceedings of the International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle.

BACKGROUND: The evidence supporting best practice guidelines in the field of cartilage repair of the ankle is based on both low quality and low levels of evidence. Therefore, an international consensus group of experts was convened to collaboratively advance toward consensus opinions based on the best available evidence on key topics within cartilage repair of the ankle. The purpose of this article is to report the consensus statements on "terminology for osteochondral lesions of the ankle" developed at the 2019 International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. METHODS: Forty-three international experts in cartilage repair of the ankle representing 20 countries were convened and participated in a process based on the Delphi method of achieving consensus. Questions and statements were drafted within four working groups focusing on specific topics within cartilage repair of the ankle, after which a comprehensive literature review was performed, and the available evidence for each statement was graded. Discussion and debate occurred in cases where statements were not agreed on in unanimous fashion within the working groups. A final vote was then held, and the strength of consensus was characterised as follows: consensus, 51%-74%; strong consensus, 75%-99%; unanimous, 100%. RESULTS: A total of 11 statements on terminology and classification reached consensus during the 2019 International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. Definitions are provided for osseous, chondral and osteochondral lesions, as well as bone marrow stimulation and injury chronicity, among others. An osteochondral lesion of the talus can be abbreviated as OLT. CONCLUSIONS: This international consensus derived from leaders in the field will assist clinicians with the appropriate terminology for osteochondral lesions of the ankle.

Thread Delamination in 4.5 mm AO Cannulated Screws: A Small Case Series in the Pediatric Trauma Population.

BACKGROUND: Thread delamination associated with cannulated screws have been reported but likely represent an under-recognized complication in the orthopaedic literature. The purpose of this study is to report the occurrence of repeated hardware failures through thread delamination in the setting of a commonly used orthopaedic cannulated screw implant in a small cohort involving pediatric fracture care at a single academic level I trauma center. METHODS: Between August 2015 and December 2020, 9 cases of hardware failure associated with 4.5 mm arbeitsgemeinschaft für osteosynthesefragen cannulated stainless-steel screws were identified within a pediatric orthopaedic division at a single academic level I trauma center. Three cases were excluded, and 6 cases of thread delamination were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Six cases of thread delamination comprised a cohort of patients with a mean age of 13.7 years (range: 12 to 15 y). All cases involved 4.5 mm arbeitsgemeinschaft für osteosynthesefragen cannulated screws, including 5 partially threaded and 1 fully threaded screw. Five cases involved open reduction and internal fixation of incarcerated medial humeral epicondylar fragments and the other case was an open reduction and internal fixation of a displaced medial malleolar fracture. Five of these occurred within a recent 18-month period of time. There were 4 cases of partial, distal thread delamination, 1 case of partial proximal thread delamination and another case of complete thread delamination which had unwound into the tibiotalar joint and required an anterior ankle arthrotomy to retrieve the thread. None of the 5 patients in this series who currently harbor a retained thread have experienced symptoms because of this issue. CONCLUSIONS: Thread delamination associated with cannulated screw implantation likely represents an under-reported phenomenon in orthopaedic surgery. In cases where retained, delaminated threads exist, these do not appear to cause short-term concern. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-case series.

Freddie Fu: A Leader of Leaders.

Freddie Fu had a profound and undeniable impact on the field of orthopaedic surgery. He was a leader both personally and professionally and dedicated his career to ensuring that those around him had the opportunity to thrive. His life and career were distinguished by his exceptional leadership, boundless collaboration, and dedication to diversity. Freddie Fu's ability to train future leaders represents one of his greatest professional legacies, which will continue to permeate the field of orthopaedic surgery for decades to come. He was a giant, and those fortunate enough to train under him are better because of it.

The Mandated Publication of Individual Hospital Charge Description Masters Does Not Permit the Estimation of Complex Procedure Charges.

BACKGROUND: As healthcare spending continues to rise, price transparency is crucial for patients to calculate a reasonable cost estimate for tests and procedures. Legislative efforts have been successful at mandating increased hospital price transparency, including publishing charge description masters (CDMs), but their usefulness in permitting patients to assess the cost for complex procedures is unclear. We sought to determine CDM and diagnosis-related group (DRG) prevalence and evaluate whether these are effective tools for patients to preemptively ascertain the costs for simple and complex tests and procedures. METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis of publicly available 2019 CDMs and DRGs from 122 hospitals in the United States, including the top-20 as ranked by the US News & World Report Honor Roll and two top-ranked hospitals per state. We first determined the availability of CDMs and DRGs and then determined the ability to estimate the hospital charge for a three-view knee radiograph and a primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using CDM and DRG data. RESULTS: One hundred fifteen of 122 (94.3%) hospitals published a CDM, and 78 (63.9%) published a DRG. Top-ranked hospitals published DRGs more frequently than those outside of the Honor Roll designation (P = 0.04). The estimated charge for a three-view knee radiograph could be calculated from 113/115 (98.3%) CDMs. The estimated total charge for a primary TKA could not be obtained from any of the available CDMs. By comparison, the estimated charge for a primary TKA could be obtained from 76/78 (97.4%) of the available DRGs. DISCUSSION: CDMs are available as currently mandated for most hospitals and generally can be used to identify the charges for simple procedures, but they are ineffective tools for patients to estimate the charges associated with a multifaceted healthcare procedure, such as TKA. Although DRGs are less frequently available, they are a more effective resource for patients to estimate charges.

Stress Shielding of Ligaments Using Nonabsorbable Suture Augmentation May Influence the Biology of Ligament Healing.

Nonabsorbable suture augmentation of ligament reconstruction has seen an increase in use over the past several years with the goal of protecting the newly reconstructed ligament while allowing early rehabilitation for a potential earlier return to activity and sport. By spanning the joint with a durable nonabsorbable suture, this construct shares the stress and load seen by the reconstructed ligament, thereby protecting it from forces that could result in an early failure during the early ligamentization phase of the tendon graft. However, stress shielding of the ligament via nonabsorbable suture augmentation is also a double-edged sword, as a reduction in the stress and load seen by the ligament during this healing phase may ultimately have an impact on the final strength and composition of the reconstructed ligament. Although the long-term effects of this stress shielding have yet to be studied or reported in human subjects, multiple biomechanical and animal studies have demonstrated overall changes in architecture, tensile strength, and mechanical properties of a stress-shielded autograft ligament reconstruction.

Temporizing Care of Acute Traumatic Foot and Ankle Injuries.

Temporizing care has become a critical part of the treatment armamentarium for select foot and ankle injuries. Indications for performing temporizing care are based on the specific injury pattern, the host, associated injuries, as well as surgeon resources. Foot and ankle injuries are often associated with severe adjacent injury to the soft tissue sleeve. An acute procedure performed through a traumatized soft tissue envelope will often lead to the failure of wound healing and/or infectious complications. Thus, delayed reconstruction of acute foot and ankle injuries is often advisable in these cases.

Evidence-based Treatment of Failed Primary Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: A Systematic Review on Clinical Outcomes of Bone Marrow Stimulation.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to systematically review the literature and to evaluate the outcomes following bone marrow stimulation (BMS) for nonprimary osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT). DESIGN: A literature search was performed to identify studies published using PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, CDSR, DARE, and CENTRAL. The review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. Two authors separately and independently screened the search results and conducted the quality assessment using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS). Studies were pooled on clinical, sports, work, and imaging outcomes, as well as revision rates and complications. The primary outcome was clinical success rate. RESULTS: Five studies with 70 patients were included in whom nonprimary OLTs were treated with secondary BMS. The pooled clinical success rate was 61% (95% confidence interval [CI], 50-72). The rate of return to any level of sport was 83% (95% CI, 70-91), while the return to pre-injury level of sport was 55% (95% CI, 34-74). The rate of return to work was 92% (95% CI, 78-97), and the complication rate was assessed to be 10% (95% CI, 4-22). Imaging outcomes were heterogeneous in outcome assessment, though a depressed subchondral bone plate was observed in 91% of the patients. The revision rate was 27% (95% CI, 18-40). CONCLUSIONS: The overall success rate of arthroscopic BMS for nonprimary osteochondral lesions of the talus was 61%, including a revision rate of 27%. Return to sports, work, and complication outcomes yielded fair to good results.

The Use of a Synthetic Cartilage Implant for Hallux Rigidus: A Systematic Review.

Background. Hallux rigidus is a common pathology afflicting the foot, for which various joint salvage techniques have been described with a multitude of different implants. Recently, a synthetic cartilage implant composed of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) received FDA premarket approval for the treatment of arthritis of the great toe. The purpose of this study was to (1) systematically review the clinical evidence supporting the use of a PVA implant in hallux rigidus and (2) determine the strength of the recommendation that can be made supporting the use of a PVA implant by evaluating the quality of evidence available. Methods. A systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis. Using the terms "cartiva OR polyvinyl alcohol OR synthetic cartilage OR hemiarthroplasty AND hallux rigidus OR great toe arthritis OR first toe arthritis" we searched the PubMed/Medline database. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Clinical Practice Guideline and Systematic Review Methodology. Results. Seven studies met the inclusion criteria, 6 of these were derived from a single randomized controlled trial. A moderate recommendation can be given for the use of a PVA implant for hallux rigidus based on short-term outcomes. A limited recommendation can be given for the use of a PVA implant for hallux rigidus based on mid-term outcomes. Conclusion. There are limited studies available detailing the outcomes of a PVA implant for hallux rigidus; however, the results that are available demonstrate a high level of evidence.Levels of Evidence: Level I: Systematic review.

Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Corticosteroids for Plantar Fasciitis: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: Plantar fasciitis is the most common cause of plantar heel pain. Several recent randomized control trials (RCTs) have been published comparing the use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and corticosteroids (CSs) for the treatment of plantar fasciitis. PURPOSE: To perform a systematic review of RCTs to compare whether PRP or CS injections result in decreased pain levels and improved patient outcomes in the treatment of plantar fasciitis. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 1. METHODS: Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were screened according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines to identify RCTs comparing PRP and CS injections for plantar fasciitis. The visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores were compared between groups at 1, 1.5, 3, 6, and 12 months, where possible. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan, and P < .05 was considered to be statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 9 RCTs were identified comparing 239 patients with PRP with 240 patients with CS injections. At the follow-up time points, including 1-1.5, 3, 6, and 12 months, there were statistically significant differences in VAS scores in favor of PRP (P = .004, P < .00001, P < .00001, and P < .00001, respectively). At 1 and 3 months, there was no difference in AOFAS scores (P = .76 and P = .35, respectively). However, at 6 and 12 months, there was a difference in AOFAS scores in favor of PRP (P < .00001 and P < .00001, respectively). CONCLUSION: In patients with chronic plantar fasciitis, the current clinical evidence suggests that PRP may lead to a greater improvement in pain and functional outcome over CS injections.

How Should Postoperative Cellulitis Be Treated in Patients With Total Ankle Arthroplasty (TAA) in Place?

RECOMMENDATION: In the absence of evidence, we recommend that (1) patients with total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) in place who develop postoperative cellulitis be evaluated thoroughly to rule out periprosthetic joint infection of the ankle, and that (2) isolated cellulitis may be treated with antibiotics, elevation, and close monitoring. Aspiration can be considered in certain cases, with the potential risk of introducing deep space infection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Consensus. DELEGATE VOTE: Agree: 92%, Disagree: 0%, Abstain: 8% (Super Majority, Strong Consensus).

The Role of Platelet-Rich Plasma in Cartilage Pathology: An Updated Systematic Review of the Basic Science Evidence.

PURPOSE: To review the basic science studies on platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for cartilage and determine whether there has been an improvement in methodology and outcome reporting that would allow for a more meaningful analysis regarding the mechanism of action and efficacy of PRP for cartilage pathology. METHODS: The PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were screened in May 2017 with publication dates of January 2011 through May 2017 using the following key words: "platelet-rich plasma OR PRP OR autologous conditioned plasma (ACP) OR ACP AND cartilage OR chondrocytes OR chondrogenesis OR osteoarthritis OR arthritis." Two authors independently performed the search, determined study inclusion, and extracted data. Data extracted included cytology/description of PRP, study design, and results. RESULTS: Twenty-seven studies (11 in vitro, 13 in vivo, 3 in vitro and in vivo) met the inclusion criteria and were included in the study. All of the studies (100%) reported the method by which PRP was prepared. Two studies reported basic cytologic analysis of PRP, including platelet, white blood cell, and red blood cell counts (6.7%). Nine studies reported both platelet count and white blood cell count (30.0%). Twelve studies reported platelet count alone (40.0%). Nine studies (30.0%) made no mention at all as to the composition of the PRP used. PRP was shown to increase cell viability, cell proliferation, cell migration, and differentiation. Several studies demonstrated increased proteoglycan and type II collagen content. PRP decreased inflammation in 75.0% of the in vitro studies reporting data and resulted in improved histologic quality of the cartilage tissue in 75.0% of the in vivo studies reporting data. CONCLUSIONS: Although the number of investigations on PRP for cartilage pathology has more than doubled since 2012, the quality of the literature remains limited by poor methodology and outcome reporting. A majority of basic science studies suggest that PRP has beneficial effects on cartilage pathology; however, the inability to compare across studies owing to a lack of standardization of study methodology, including characterizing the contents of PRP, remains a significant limitation. Future basic science and clinical studies must at a minimum report the contents of PRP to better understand the clinical role of PRP for cartilage pathology. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Establishing proof of concept for PRP to treat cartilage pathology is important so that high-quality clinical studies with appropriate indications can be performed.

Medical comorbidities increase the rate of surgical site infection in primary Achilles tendon repair.

PURPOSE: To assess the effects of medical comorbidities on the incidence of surgical site infection following primary Achilles tendon repair. A secondary aim was to assess the effects of specific medical comorbidities on the cost and extent of healthcare utilization related to surgical site infection following primary Achilles tendon repair. METHODS: 24,269 patients undergoing primary Achilles tendon repair between 2005 and 2012 were examined. Current Procedural Terminology codes for primary Achilles tendon repair, and incision and drainage were used to search for and compile patient data from the United Healthcare Orthopedic and Medicare databases. Primary outcome measures regarding surgical site infection following primary Achilles tendon repair included the rate of occurrence, cost, and duration of treatment. RESULTS: Patients with one or more preexisting medical comorbidities at the time of surgery had an increased rate of surgical site infection compared to those without. Diabetes and vascular complications were associated with the highest surgical site infection rates. The rate of surgical incision and drainage was higher in patients with cardiac arrhythmias and uncomplicated hypertension. The presence of a medical comorbidity significantly increased the cost and duration of surgical site infection treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Medical comorbidities can complicate the postoperative course for patients undergoing Achilles tendon repair, which increases the cost of care and duration of treatment. A better understanding of the relationship between each medical comorbidity and surgical site infections following Achilles tendon repair may be ascertained with additional prospective studies, thus, allowing for a more accurate evaluation and stratification of surgical candidates to improve patient outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective cohort study, Level III.

Postoperative Reoperations and Complications in 32,307 Ankle Fractures With and Without Concurrent Ankle Arthroscopic Procedures in a 5-Year Period Based on a Large U.S. Healthcare Database.

Residual symptoms often persist even after successful operative reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of ankle fractures. Concurrent ankle arthroscopic procedures (CAAPs) have been proposed to improve clinical outcomes; however, a dearth of evidence is available supporting this practice. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the reoperation and complication rates after ORIF of ankle fractures with and without CAAPs. Reoperations and complications after ORIF of ankle fractures were identified using the PearlDiver database from January 2007 to December 2011. The CAAPs included bone marrow stimulation, debridement, synovectomy, and unspecified cartilage procedures. Reoperation procedures consisted of ankle fracture repeat fixation, arthroscopic procedures, osteochondral autograft transfers, and ankle arthrodesis. Of the 32,307 patients who underwent ankle fracture fixation, 248 received CAAP and 32,059 did not. No significant difference was found in the reoperation rate between the 2 groups (7.7% versus 8.6%; odds ratio 0.89; 95% confidence interval 0.55 to 1.42; p = .61). Of the 248 patients in the CAAP group, 19 (7.7%) underwent reoperation, of which 13 (68.4%) were arthroscopic debridement and 6 were either ankle refixation or osteochondral autograft transfer. For the non-CAAP group, 3021 reoperation procedures were performed, consisting of ankle refixation in 83.2%, arthroscopic procedures in 14.3%, and ankle arthrodesis in 2.5%. The complication rate in the non-CAAP group included wound dehiscence in 2.4%, wound surgery in 0.4%, deep vein thrombosis in 0.8%, and pulmonary embolism in 0.4%. No complications were detected in the CAAP group. Ankle fracture fixation with CAAPs did not increase the postoperative reoperation rate compared with ankle fracture fixation without CAAPs.

Suture Button Versus Syndesmotic Screw for Syndesmosis Injuries: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: Operative treatment is indicated for unstable syndesmosis injuries, and approximately 20% of all ankle fractures require operative fixation for syndesmosis injuries. PURPOSE: To perform a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluating clinical outcomes between suture button (SB) and syndesmotic screw (SS) fixation techniques for syndesmosis injuries of the ankle. STUDY DESIGN: Meta-analysis. METHODS: A literature search was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines to identify randomized controlled trials comparing the SB and SS techniques for syndesmosis injuries. Level of evidence was assessed per the criteria of the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. Statistical analysis was performed with RevMan, and a P value ≤.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Five clinical studies were identified, allowing comparison of 143 patients in the SB group with 142 patients in the SS group. Patients treated with the SB technique had a higher postoperative American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society score at a mean 20.8 months (95.3 vs 86.7, P < .001). The SB group resulted in a lower rate of broken implants (0.0% vs 25.4%, P < .001), implant removal (6.0% vs 22.4%, P = .01), and joint malreduction (0.8% vs 11.5%, P = .05) as compared with the SS group. CONCLUSION: The SB technique results in improved functional outcomes as well as lower rates of broken implant and joint malreduction. Based on the findings of this meta-analysis, the SB technique warrants a grade A recommendation by comparison with the SS technique for the treatment of syndesmosis injuries.

Diagnosis: History, Physical Examination, Imaging, and Arthroscopy: Proceedings of the International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle.

BACKGROUND: The evidence supporting best practice guidelines in the field of cartilage repair of the ankle are based on both low quality and low levels of evidence. Therefore, an international consensus group of experts was convened to collaboratively advance toward consensus opinions based on the best available evidence on key topics within cartilage repair of the ankle. The purpose of this article is to report the consensus statements on "Diagnosis: History, Physical Examination, Imaging, and Arthroscopy" developed at the 2017 International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. METHODS: Seventy-five international experts in cartilage repair of the ankle representing 25 countries and 1 territory were convened and participated in a process based on the Delphi method of achieving consensus. Questions and statements were drafted within 11 working groups focusing on specific topics within cartilage repair of the ankle, after which a comprehensive literature review was performed and the available evidence for each statement was graded. Discussion and debate occurred in cases where statements were not agreed upon in unanimous fashion within the working groups. A final vote was then held, and the strength of consensus was characterized as follows: consensus: 51 - 74%; strong consensus: 75 - 99%; unanimous: 100%. RESULTS: A total of 12 statements on the diagnosis of cartilage injuries of the ankle reached consensus during the 2017 International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. Two achieved unanimous support and 10 reached strong consensus (greater than 75% agreement). All statements reached at least 86% agreement. CONCLUSIONS: This international consensus derived from leaders in the field will assist clinicians in the diagnosis of cartilage injuries of the ankle.