RESUMEN
In this study, the authors explore how young adults navigated the dual challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic and jail reentry in a large urban environment. Fifteen young adults (aged 18-25) participated in up to nine monthly semi-structured interviews to discuss their experiences of reentry during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic (i.e., spring and summer 2020). Participants held mixed attitudes and beliefs about COVID-19. Several participants viewed the pandemic as a hoax, while others took the pandemic more seriously, particularly if their friends and family members had contracted the virus. Yet nearly all participants viewed the pandemic as having a relatively minimal impact on their lives compared to the weight of their reentry challenges and probation requirements. Young adults described COVID-19 stay-at-home orders as limiting their exposure to negative influences and facilitating compliance with probation requirements. However, resource closures due to COVID-19, including schools, employment programs, and social services presented barriers to reentry success. The authors draw upon these findings to pose implications for interventions supporting young adult reentry. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12103-022-09683-8.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to gauge adherence to nationally endorsed protocols in implementation of pulse oximetry (POx) screening for critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) in infants after mandate by all states and to assess associated characteristics. STUDY DESIGN: Between March and October 2019, an online questionnaire was administered to nurse supervisors who oversee personnel conducting POx screening. The questionnaire used eight questions regarding performance and interpretation of screening protocols to measure policy consistency, which is adherence to nationally endorsed protocols for POx screening developed by professional medical societies. Multilevel linear regression models evaluated associations between policy consistency and characteristics of hospitals and individuals, state of hospital location, early versus late mandate adopters, and state reporting requirements. RESULTS: Responses from 189 nurse supervisors spanning 38 states were analyzed. Only 17% received maximum points indicating full policy consistency, and 24% selected all four options for potential hypoxia that require a repeat screen. Notably, 33% did not recognize ≤90% SpO2 as an immediate failed screen and 31% responded that an infant with SpO2 of 89% in one extremity will be rescreened by nurses in an hour rather than receiving an immediate physician referral. Lower policy consistency was associated with lack of state reporting mandates (beta = -1.23 p = 0.01) and early adoption by states (beta = -1.01, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: When presented with SpO2 screening values on a questionnaire, a low percentage of nurse supervisors selected responses that demonstrated adherence to nationally endorsed protocols for CCHD screening. Most notably, almost one-third of respondents did not recognize ≤90% SpO2 as a failed screen that requires immediate physician follow-up. In addition, states without reporting mandates and early adopter states were associated with low policy consistency. Implementing state reporting requirements might increase policy consistency, but some inconsistency may be the result of unique protocols in early adopter states that differ from nationally endorsed protocols. KEY POINTS: · Low adherence to nationally endorsed protocols.. · Inconsistent physician follow-up to hypoxia.. · Reporting improved consistency with national policy..
RESUMEN
Me dirigido a usted para presentarle los fundamentos que tengo acerca sobre la implementación de la materia, procedimientos de la cadena de custodia (PCC) en la malla curricular de Enfermería en universidades de la ciudad de La Paz, intentando de esta manera contribuir al perfil profesional del futuro (a) Licenciado (a) en Enfermería de la ciudad de La Paz- Bolivia (AU).
Asunto(s)
Perfil Laboral , MétodosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Substance abuse, particularly among homeless youths, is a significant public health challenge in the United States. Detailed data about health care utilization resulting from this preventable behavior remain sparse. This study aimed to compare health care utilization rates related to substance abuse among homeless and nonhomeless youths. METHODS: A secondary data analysis evaluated records of homeless and nonhomeless patients under age 25 with a primary diagnosis of substance abuse, identified in 2013 and 2014 New York Statewide Inpatient and Emergency Department (ED) Databases. Outcomes included ED visit rate, hospitalization rate, in-hospital mortality, cost, length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) utilization, and revisit or readmission rate. Multivariable regression models with a year fixed effect and facility random effect were used to evaluate the association between homelessness and each outcome. RESULTS: A total of 68,867 cases included hospitalization or an ED visit related to substance abuse (68,118 nonhomeless and 749 homeless cases). Rates of ED visits related to substance abuse were 9.38 and 4.96, while rates of hospitalizations related to substance abuse were 10.53 and 1.01 per 1,000 homeless and nonhomeless youths, respectively. Homeless patients were more likely to utilize and revisit the ICU, be hospitalized or readmitted, incur higher costs, and have longer LOS than nonhomeless youths (all p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The hospitalization and ED visit rates related to substance abuse were 10 and two times higher among homeless youths compared with nonhomeless youths, respectively. Detailed observation is needed to clarify whether homeless youths receive high-quality care for substance abuse when necessary.
Asunto(s)
Jóvenes sin Hogar , Personas con Mala Vivienda , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Humanos , New York/epidemiología , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/terapia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Efforts have been made to simplify and reduce technical errors, such as limb leads reversal and inaccurate chest leads placement, for the 12-lead ECG tests. We compared standard ECG using individual electrodes with a novel pre-positioned electrode system to determine equivalency. METHODS: Subjects were recruited from the Emergency Department and cardiac lab of an acute care hospital in Los Angeles. First, subjects underwent a conventional 12-lead ECG using Philips PageWriter (clinical ECG). A second ECG was then performed using a novel system containing pre-positioned electrodes and a compact recorder (study ECG). All ECGs were reviewed by 3 blinded, board-certified adult cardiologists using 14 pre-specified ECG diagnostic categories to determine if the interpretations of clinical ECG and study ECG of the same patient were "equivalent". Majority rule was applied when there were discrepant interpretations among the 3 cardiologists. RESULTS: One hundred subjects, ages 18 to 74 completed the study. With pre-positioned electrodes, the rate of "electrode fit" as judged by the research associates at the time of lead placement was 96.2%. We found that the study ECG system was equivalent (in clinical interpretation) to the clinical ECG system, with equivalency rate of 96% (95% confidence interval 92% to 100%) in "overall interpretation". The equivalence rate for the 14 ECG diagnostic categories ranged from 96% to 100%, with mean 99.2 ± 1.1%. CONCLUSIONS: 12-lead ECGs performed using single-piece, pre-positioned electrodes are clinically equivalent to those performed using 10 individually placed conventional electrodes. With 4 sizes for adults, the single-piece electrodes can fit 96% of the study patients.