Expert Perspectives on Controversies in Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer Management: Narrative Review and Report of the First US Prostate Cancer Conference Part 1.

Purpose: Castration-sensitive prostate cancer (CSPC) is a complex and heterogeneous condition encompassing a range of clinical presentations. As new approaches have expanded management options, clinicians are left with myriad questions and controversies regarding the optimal individualized management of CSPC. Materials and Methods: The US Prostate Cancer Conference (USPCC) multidisciplinary panel was assembled to address the challenges of prostate cancer management. The first annual USPCC meeting included experts in urology, medical oncology, radiation oncology, and nuclear medicine. USPCC co-chairs and session moderators identified key areas of controversy and uncertainty in prostate cancer management and organized the sessions with multidisciplinary presentations and discussion. Throughout the meeting, experts responded to questions prepared by chairs and moderators to identify areas of agreement and controversy. Results: The USPCC panel discussion and question responses for CSPC-related topics are presented. Key advances in CSPC management endorsed by USPCC experts included the development and clinical utilization of gene expression classifiers and artificial intelligence (AI) models for risk stratification and treatment selection in specific patient populations, the use of advanced imaging modalities in patients with clinically localized unfavorable intermediate or high-risk disease and those with biochemical recurrence, recommendations of doublet or triplet therapy for metastatic CSPC (mCSPC), and consideration of prostate and/or metastasis-directed radiation therapy in select patients with mCSPC. Conclusions: CSPC is a diverse disease with many therapeutic options and the potential for adverse outcomes associated with either undertreatment or overtreatment. Future studies are needed to validate and clinically integrate novel technologies, including genomics, AI, and advanced imaging, to optimize outcomes among patients with CSPC.

Expert Perspectives on Controversies in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Management: Narrative Review and Report of the First US Prostate Cancer Conference Part 2.

Background: Management strategies for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) have rapidly shifted in recent years. As novel imaging and therapeutic approaches have made their way to the clinic, providers are encountering increasingly challenging clinical scenarios, with limited guidance from the current literature. Materials and Methods: The US Prostate Cancer Conference (USPCC) is a multidisciplinary meeting of prostate cancer experts intended to address the many challenges of prostate cancer management. At the first annual USPCC meeting, areas of controversy and consensus were identified during a 2-day meeting that included expert presentations, full-panel discussions, and postdiscussion responses to questions developed by the USPCC cochairs and session moderators. Results: This narrative review covers the USPCC expert discussion and perspectives relevant to mCRPC, including neuroendocrine/aggressive-variant prostate cancer (NEPC/AVPC). Areas of broad agreement identified among USPCC experts include the benefits of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors for patients with BRCA1/2 mutations, the use of radioligand therapy in patients with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-positive mCRPC, and the need for clinical trials that address real-world clinical questions, including the performance of novel therapies when compared with modern standard-of-care treatment. Ongoing areas of controversy and uncertainty included the appropriateness of PARP inhibitors in patients with non-BRCA1/2 mutations, the optimal definition of PSMA positivity, and systemic therapies for patients with NEPC/AVPC after progression on platinum-based therapies. Conclusions: The first annual USPCC meeting identified several areas of controversy in the management of mCRPC, highlighting the urgent need for clinical trials designed to facilitate treatment selection and sequencing in this heterogeneous disease state.

Organ preservation in muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The most common definitive treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is radical cystectomy. However, removing the bladder and surrounding organs poses risks of morbidity that can reduce quality of life, and raises the risk of death. Treatment strategies that preserve the organs can manage the local tumor and mitigate the risk of distant metastasis. Recent data have demonstrated promising outcomes in several bladder-preservation strategies. RECENT FINDINGS: Bladder preservation with trimodality therapy (TMT), combining maximal transurethral resection of the bladder tumor, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy (RT), was often reserved for nonsurgical candidates for radical cystectomy. Recent meta-analyses show that outcomes of TMT and radical cystectomy are similar. More recent bladder-preservation approaches include combining targeted RT (MRI) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), ICIs and chemotherapy, and selecting patients based on genomic biomarkers and clinical response to systemic therapies. These are all promising strategies that may circumvent the need for radical cystectomy. SUMMARY: MIBC is an aggressive disease with a high rate of systemic progression. Current management includes neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy and radical cystectomy with lymph node dissection. Novel alternative strategies, including TMT approaches, combinations with RT, chemotherapy, and/or ICIs, and genomic biomarkers, are in development to further advance bladder-preservation options for patients with MIBC.

First analysis of the safety and efficacy of UGN-101 in the treatment of ureteral tumors.

OBJECTIVE: UGN-101 has been approved for the chemoablation of low-grade upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC) involving the renal pelvis and calyces. Herein is the first reported cohort of patients with ureteral tumors treated with UGN-101. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients treated with UGN-101 for UTUC at 15 high-volume academic and community centers focusing on outcomes of patients treated for ureteral disease. Patients received UGN-101 with either adjuvant or chemo-ablative intent. Response rates are reported for patients receiving chemo-ablative intent. Adverse outcomes were characterized with a focus on the rate of ureteral stenosis. RESULTS: In a cohort of 132 patients and 136 renal units, 47 cases had tumor involvement of the ureter, with 12 cases of ureteral tumor only (8.8%) and 35 cases of ureteral plus renal pelvic tumors (25.7%). Of the 23 patients with ureteral involvement who received UGN-101 induction with chemo-ablative intent, the complete response was 47.8%, which did not differ significantly from outcomes in patients without ureteral involvement. Fourteen patients (37.8%) with ureteral tumors had significant ureteral stenosis at first post-treatment evaluation, however, when excluding those with pre-existing hydronephrosis or ureteral stenosis, only 5.4% of patients developed new clinically significant stenosis. CONCLUSIONS: UGN-101 appears to be safe and may have similar efficacy in treating low-grade urothelial carcinoma of the ureter as compared to renal pelvic tumors.

Advances in chemoablation in upper tract urothelial carcinoma: overview of indications and treatment patterns.

Localized upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a difficult disease for clinicians to treat, due to the multitude of oncological and patient factors to consider. Despite the challenges of diagnostic staging, endoscopic management, and disease recurrence, there is still a need for local therapeutic options that do not subject patients to the morbidities of radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Intraluminal chemotherapies have allowed for improved oncological control in patients with low-grade disease receiving renal-sparing treatment approaches. This narrative review discusses the treatment modalities available for localized low-grade UTUC, with a focus on the current status of chemoablation. The OLYMPUS trial was a pivotal study that lead to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of UGN-101 (mitomycin-C) in April 2020 for the treatment of low-grade UTUC, and intraluminal chemotherapy is now a widely used modality for managing this disease. The trial reported a complete response (CR) rate of 59%, and an estimated treatment durability of 82% at 1 year. However, a concern was the reported 44% ureteral stricture rate using the retrograde approach. More research is currently underway to determine the ideal instillation method for intraluminal therapies (e.g., retrograde vs. antegrade). Lastly, we discuss upcoming treatment options. Newer novel agents like padeliporfin vascular targeted photodynamic (VTP) therapy (brand name TOOKAD) are currently being studied, which will in hope provide additional treatment options for UTUC patients.

Route of Administration for UGN-101 and Impact on Oncological and Safety Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: UGN-101 can be used for chemoablation of low-grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). The gel can be administered via a retrograde route through a ureteral catheter or an antegrade route via a nephrostomy tube. OBJECTIVE: To report outcomes of UGN-101 by route of administration. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We performed a retrospective review of 132 patients from 15 institutions who were treated with UGN-101 for low-grade UTUC via retrograde versus antegrade administration. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Survival outcomes are reported per patient. Treatment, complications, and recurrence outcomes are reported per renal unit. Statistical analysis was performed for primary endpoints of oncological response and ureteral stricture occurrence. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 136 renal units were evaluated, comprising 78 retrograde and 58 antegrade instillations. Median follow-up was 7.4 mo. There were 120 cases (91%) of biopsy-proven low-grade UTUC. Tumors were in the renal pelvis alone in 89 cases (65%), in the ureter alone in 12 cases (9%), and in both in 35 cases (26%). Seventy-six patients (56%) had residual disease before UGN-101 treatment. Chemoablation with UGN-101 was used in 50/78 (64%) retrograde cases and 26/58 (45%) antegrade cases. A complete response according to inspection and cytology was achieved in 31 (48%) retrograde and 30 (60%) antegrade renal units (p = 0.1). Clavien grade 3 ureteral stricture occurred in 21 retrograde cases (32%) and only six (12%) antegrade cases (p < 0.01). Limitations include treatment bias, as patients in the antegrade group were more likely to undergo endoscopic mechanical ablation before UGN-101 instillation. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary results show a significantly lower rate of stricture occurrence with antegrade administration of UGN-101, with no apparent impact on oncological efficacy. PATIENT SUMMARY: We compared results for two different delivery routes for the drug UGN-101 for treatment of cancer in the upper urinary tract. For the antegrade route, a tube is inserted through the skin into the kidney. For the retrograde route, a catheter is inserted past the bladder into the upper urinary tract. Our results show a lower rate of narrowing of the ureter (the tube draining urine from the kidney into the bladder) using the antegrade route, with no difference in cancer control.

Mitomycin Gel (UGN-101) as a Kidney-sparing Treatment for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma in Patients with Imperative Indications and High-grade Disease.

BACKGROUND: Intracavitary UGN-101 is approved for the treatment of low-grade noninvasive upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Post-commercialization studies underscore the benefit of UGN-101 administration for patients with imperative indications for whom radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) is not a viable option. OBJECTIVE: To describe the use, efficacy, and safety of UGN-101 in patients with UTUC with imperative indications for renal preservation, including high-grade disease. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients receiving UGN-101 with imperative indications were retrospectively analyzed using a multicenter centralized registry from 15 high-volume academic and community centers. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: We defined imperative indications as patients with a solitary kidney, the presence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) with a glomerular filtration rate <30 ml/min, bilateral UTUC, and patients unfit for or unwilling to undergo surgical extirpation. Tumor characteristics, disease progression/recurrence, and adverse events were recorded on a per-renal-unit basis. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: UGN-101 was instilled into 52 renal units (38%) in 48 patients for imperative indications, including 29 patients (56%) with a solitary kidney, 11 kidneys (21%) in the setting of bilateral UTUC, six patients (12%) with CKD, and six patients (12%) who were unfit for or unwilling to undergo RNU. Twelve renal units had biopsy-proven high-grade papillary disease. Tumors were completely ablated before induction therapy in 34% of cases, while 66% had tumor present. Following induction therapy, 17 patients (40%) had no evidence of disease (NED) on ureteroscopy, 88% of whom maintained this status at median follow-up of 10.8 mo. In the cohort with high-grade disease, five patients (45%) had NED at initial post-induction primary disease evaluation. Adverse events included pyelonephritis (8%), ureteral stenosis (8%), anemia (6%), and acute renal failure (4%). Limitations include the retrospective study design, the lack of long-term follow up, and patient selection bias. CONCLUSIONS: Intracavitary therapy with UGN-101 in patients with UTUC and imperative indications shows promise as a kidney-sparing treatment modality. While long-term follow-up is needed, this intracavitary treatment may help in prolonging time to RNU and delaying the morbidity of hemodialysis in this comorbid population. PATIENT SUMMARY: We reviewed results for patients with cancer in the upper urinary tract and an additional condition that would not allow kidney removal who received treatment with a gel called UGN-101. Our results suggest that UGN-101 shows promise as a kidney-sparing treatment. It may delay the time until kidney removal is needed in these patients and avoid the negative effects associated with dialysis.

Within State Variability of Antimicrobial Susceptibility: Missouri as an Archetype to Assess Guidelines for Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for Transurethral Procedures.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate variability among hospitals in susceptibility of common uropathogens to antimicrobial agents frequently used in transurethral procedures in order to examine whether state-based guidelines might be more appropriate than national prophylactic guidelines. METHODS: Hospital-level antibiograms were requested from all hospitals throughout the state of Missouri. We studied Escherichia coli, Klebsiella, and Proteus sensitivities to evaluate common guideline recommended antimicrobials including trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), third-generation cephalosporins, cefazolin, penicillin combinations, gentamicin, and fluoroquinolones. We evaluated variability and association between hospital characteristics and antimicrobial sensitivities. RESULTS: Data was requested from 81 hospitals across the state and 38 provided the requested data (47% response rate). Susceptibility was highest for third-generation cephalosporins for E. coli (mean of 94%), Proteus (96%), and Klebsiella (96%). Gentamicin also had high susceptibility for the bacteria studied; 94% for E. coli and 96% for Klebsiella. Current first line recommended agents showed more modest coverage for E. coli (cefazolin 84%, TMP-SMX 78%), Proteus (cefazolin 82%, TMP-SMX 71%), and Klebsiella (cefazolin 90%, TMP-SMX 89%). CONCLUSION: Post transurethral procedure infections are common. Rates can be limited with appropriate prophylaxis. Deciding on empirical coverage must take into account local resistance patterns. There is substantial variability among and within states in antimicrobial susceptibility for common uropathogens. When selecting antimicrobial prophylaxis, urologists should consider local- rather than state- or nation-level antibiograms, given the considerable variability. Future studies should consider the merits of very-broad spectrum prophylaxis and the potential role of molecular urinary pathogen (and pathogen-resistance) testing when selecting an optimal regimen.

Holistic Assessment of Quality of Life Predicts Survival in Older Patients with Bladder Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if clustering methods can use a holistic assessment of health-related quality-of-life after bladder cancer diagnosis to predict survival outcomes independent of clinical characteristics. In the United States, an estimated 81,180 cases of bladder cancer will be diagnosed in 2022. We aim to help address the knowledge gap concerning the impact of patient functional status on outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a cross-sectional, retrospective cohort study of patients in the End Results-Medicare Health Outcomes Survey Registry. Age and 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) responses were used as K-means inputs to identify homogenous clusters of older patients with bladder cancer. We analyzed the association between the identified clusters, patient and disease characteristics, and outcomes. We used Cox proportional hazard regression to compare overall survival. RESULTS: We identified 5 homogenous clusters that exhibited differences in patient characteristics and survival. There was no significant difference in cancer stage or surgery type among the clusters. The Cox proportional hazard regression demonstrated significant associations of cluster with gender, age, education, marital status, smoking status, type of surgery, and cancer stage on overall survival. Cluster independently predicted overall survival. CONCLUSION: Using unsupervised machine learning, we identified clusters of patients with bladder cancer who had similar mental and physical function scores. Cluster grouping suggests that patients' mental and physical function may not be based on disease or treatment. There are significant survival differences between all clusters, demonstrating that a holistic assessment of patient-reported health-related quality-of-life has the potential to predict survival and possible modifiable risk factors in older patients with bladder cancer.

Early experience with UGN-101 for the treatment of upper tract urothelial cancer - A multicenter evaluation of practice patterns and outcomes.

BACKGROUND: UGN-101 is a novel delivery system for intracavitary treatment of upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC). UGN-101 was approved based on a pivotal trial for small volume residual low-grade UTUC. Our aim was to report our experience with UGN-101 in a more heterogenous and real-world setting. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all UGN-101 cases from 15 institutions with a focus on practice patterns, efficacy, and adverse effects. We include UGN-101 utilization in both the chemoablative and adjuvant setting. RESULTS: There were a total 136 renal units treated from 132 patients. The majority of cases were biopsy proven low-grade UTUC. Practice patterns varied considerably - the most common administration technique was antegrade instillation via a percutaneous nephrostomy. When utilized in the adjuvant setting, 69% of patients were disease free at the time of their first endoscopic evaluation, while in the chemoablative setting, 37% were endoscopically clear on the first evaluation (P < 0.001). Complete response was higher in patients with smaller tumor size prior to UGN-101 induction; low volume (<1 cm) residual disease was associated with a 70% complete response, similar to disease free rate at first endoscopic evaluation when UGN-101 was used in the adjuvant setting. The use of maintenance doses of UGN-101 was reported in 27% of cases. The overall incidence of new onset, clinically significant ureteral stenosis was 23%. CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the largest review of patients treated with UGN-101 and can serve as a basis of ongoing hypotheses regarding treatment with UGN-101 for UTUC.

Antegrade administration of mitomycin gel for upper tract urothelial carcinoma via percutaneous nephrostomy tube: a multi-institutional retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the safety profile of antegrade mitomycin gel instillation through a percutaneous nephrostomy tube (PCNT) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) with the aim of decreasing morbidity associated with therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing antegrade administration of mitomycin gel via PCNT were retrospectively included for analysis from four tertiary referral centres between 2020 and 2022. The primary outcome was safety profile, as graded by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (v5.0). Post-therapy disease burden was assessed by primary disease evaluation (PDE) via ureteroscopy. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients received at least one dose of mitomycin gel via PCNT for UTUC, 29 of whom completed induction and underwent PDE. Thirteen patients (41%) had residual tumour present prior to induction therapy. At a median of 15.0 months following first dose of induction therapy, ureteric stenosis occurred in three patients (9%), all of whom were treated without later recurrence or chronic stenosis. Other adverse events included fatigue (27%), flank pain (19%), urinary tract infection (12%), sepsis (8%) and haematuria (8%). No patients had impaired renal function during follow-up and there were no treatment-related deaths. Seventeen patients (59%) had no evidence of disease at PDE and have not experienced recurrence at a median follow-up of 13.0 months post induction. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of mitomycin gel via a PCNT offers a low rate of ureteric stenosis, demonstrates a favourable safety profile, and is administered without general anaesthesia.

A narrative review of the role of glucocorticoid receptors in prostate cancer: developments in last 5 years.

Background and Objective: Glucocorticoids, secreted from the adrenal gland, are commonly used in the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) because of their anti-inflammatory and anti-toxic effects. However, glucocorticoids have been reported to have the opposite effects within the course of treatment. Many studies have shown that glucocorticoid receptors (GRs) are involved in the establishment of a dominant population of androgen-independent malignant cells, which may result in CRPC. In this review, we summarized the mechanisms of GRs in CRPC and the clinical application of glucocorticoids based on the present evidence. Methods: We summarized the isoforms of GRs and the mechanisms involved in CRPC. An updated literature search was performed from the ClinicalTrials database, the National Center for Biotechnology Information database and European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials database. The focus was on the timeframe from 2017 to 2022. At least one primary or secondary outcome [prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate, progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) and median time to PSA progression] according to studies should be included. Key Content and Findings: The molecular structures and applications of the isoforms of GR have been intensively researched in the past 60 years. In recent years, researchers have pointed out that GRs may be involved in the development of CRPC via genomic and non-genomic effects. Clinical trials in the past 5 years have focused on the efficacy of drugs regarding CRPC. The use of glucocorticoids during treatments of CRPC follows the guidelines (e.g., NCCN Guidelines®, guidelines of CSCO, etc.). Based on the collected data, prednisone appears to be the most widely used steroid hormone, followed by dexamethasone. Comparisons of the PSA response rate and the median time to PSA progression revealed that the efficacy of the 2 hormones is similar; however, further research on the effect of steroid hormone in CRPC is still required. Conclusions: Various GR isoforms may play an important part in the development of CRPC, whose mechanism remains unclear. Most clinical trials have focused on the use of prednisone in the last 5 years. The efficacy of prednisone and dexamethasone is similar.

A Seat at the Table: The Correlation Between Female Authorship and Urology Journal Editorial Board Membership.

BACKGROUND: Gender disparities in editorial board composition exist across a variety of surgical subspecialties. OBJECTIVE: To investigate temporal variation in gender representation on the editorial boards of urology journals and assess the relationship between editorial board composition and female authorship. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We analyzed female authorship and editorial board composition between 2002 and 2020 among eight high-impact urology journals. Female publication status was assessed using publication records retrieved from PubMed. Editorial board information was manually extracted and titles were grouped for comparison as Editor-in-Chief, mid-level editor, and consulting editors. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Female representation across different editorial levels was analyzed via hierarchical logistic regression with additional terms to test for between-journal differences in overall representation and change over time. The relationship between representation on editorial boards and as publication authors was assessed at the journal level via correlation. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Eight journals and 49 412 articles were analyzed. No female has held the title of Editor-in-Chief for any of these eight journals in 18 yr. Significant growth was seen for mid-level editors, whereas no growth was seen for consulting editors. Neurourology and Urodynamics and Journal of Sexual Medicine had significantly higher than average female editorial board representation (p < 0.05). Across the eight journals, there was a statistically significant correlation between the proportion of overall female authors and female editors (r = 0.93, 95% confidence interval 0.65-0.99). For all journals, the proportion of female contributing authors is greater than the proportion of female editorial board members. CONCLUSIONS: Women in urology represent a small but increasing presence as editorial board members. Clear differences exist between journals, potentially attributable to specialty-specific demographics. Despite increasing representation, no female has ever been appointed Editor-in-Chief for any of the eight journals evaluated. At the journal-specific level, a positive correlation was observed between female editorial staff and female authorship. Given the implication of both academic authorship and editorial board assignment on academic advancement, actionable changes are outlined to guide improvement in gender diversity at the journal level. PATIENT SUMMARY: Females are under-represented on the editorial boards for urology journals, although some roles have seen growth over time. Moreover, female editorial board membership is associated with representation of females among article authors. Gender disparities in both are noteworthy because they affect career paths and contribute to the gender gap in urology.