Evolution of serious and life-threatening COVID-19 pneumonia as the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic progressed: an observational study of mortality to 60 days after admission to a 15-hospital US health system.

OBJECTIVE: In order to predict at hospital admission the prognosis of patients with serious and life-threatening COVID-19 pneumonia, we sought to understand the clinical characteristics of hospitalised patients at admission as the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic progressed, document their changing response to the virus and its variants over time, and identify factors most importantly associated with mortality after hospital admission. DESIGN: Observational study using a prospective hospital systemwide COVID-19 database. SETTING: 15-hospital US health system. PARTICIPANTS: 26 872 patients admitted with COVID-19 to our Northeast Ohio and Florida hospitals from 1 March 2020 to 1 June 2022. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: 60-day mortality (highest risk period) after hospital admission analysed by random survival forests machine learning using demographics, medical history, and COVID-19 vaccination status, and viral variant, symptoms, and routine laboratory test results obtained at hospital admission. RESULTS: Hospital mortality fell from 11% in March 2020 to 3.7% in March 2022, a 66% decrease (p<0.0001); 60-day mortality fell from 17% in May 2020 to 4.7% in May 2022, a 72% decrease (p<0.0001). Advanced age was the strongest predictor of 60-day mortality, followed by admission laboratory test results. Risk-adjusted 60-day mortality had all patients been admitted in March 2020 was 15% (CI 3.0% to 28%), and had they all been admitted in May 2022, 12% (CI 2.2% to 23%), a 20% decrease (p<0.0001). Dissociation between observed and predicted decrease in mortality was related to temporal change in admission patient profile, particularly in laboratory test results, but not vaccination status or viral variant. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital mortality from COVID-19 decreased substantially as the pandemic evolved but persisted after hospital discharge, eclipsing hospital mortality by 50% or more. However, after accounting for the many, even subtle, changes across the pandemic in patients' demographics, medical history and particularly admission laboratory results, a patient admitted early in the pandemic and predicted to be at high risk would remain at high risk of mortality if admitted tomorrow.

Clinical T2 N0 M0 Esophageal Cancer: Identifying Predictive Factors of Upstaging.

BACKGROUND: Inaccuracy of clinical staging renders management of clinical T2 N0 M0 (cT2 N0 M0) esophageal cancer difficult. When an underlying advanced-stage disease is understaged to cT2 N0 M0, patients miss the opportunity to gain the potential benefits of neoadjuvant therapy. This study aimed to identify preoperative factors that predict underlying advanced-stage esophageal cancer. METHODS: From 2000 to 2020, 1579 patients with esophageal cancer underwent esophagectomy. Sixty patients who underwent upfront surgery for cT2 N0 M0 esophageal cancer were included in this study. The median age was 62.5 years, and 78% (n = 47) of these patients were male. Radiologic, clinical, and endoscopic factors were evaluated as preoperative markers. The Fisher exact and the Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used for categoric and continuous variables, respectively. Random forest classification was used to identify preoperative factors for predicting upstaging and downstaging. RESULTS: Of the 60 patients, 8 (13%) were found to have pathologic T2 N0 M0 esophageal cancer. Sixteen (27%) patients had cancer that was pathologically downstaged, and 36 (60%) had upstaged disease. Seven (19%) patients had upstaged cancer on the basis of the pathologic T stage, 14 (39%) had upstaging on the basis of the pathologic N stage, and 15 (42%) had upstaging on the basis of both T and N stages. Dysphagia (P = .003) and tumor maximum standardized uptake value (P = .048) were predictors of upstaging, with a combined predictive value of up to 75%. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of dysphagia and of high maximum standardized uptake value (≥5) of the tumor is predictive of more advanced underlying disease for patients with cT2 N0 M0 esophageal cancer, and these patients should be considered for neoadjuvant therapy.

Thoracoabdominal Esophagectomy: Then and Now.

BACKGROUND: Open approaches for esophagectomy are often still useful; of these, left thoracoabdominal esophagectomy (TAE) is poorly understood and often criticized. Hence, we examined TAE's worldwide utilization, survival, and present-day use and outcomes at our institution compared with contemporary national averages. METHODS: The Worldwide Esophageal Cancer Collaboration database includes 8854 patients who underwent esophagectomy for cancer between 2005 and 2014, a period when TAE was our center's most common approach. Two propensity score-matched models were constructed: worldwide TAE vs worldwide non-TAE (751 matched pairs); and our high-volume center TAE vs worldwide non-TAE (273 matched pairs). All-cause mortality was compared between matched groups. Institutional TAE data from 2017 to 2021 were assessed for present-day use and outcomes. RESULTS: Worldwide, propensity score-matched patients undergoing TAE had a median of 20 lymph nodes resected vs 17 after non-TAE (P < .0001). Five-year survival was 34% for worldwide TAE vs 42% for worldwide non-TAE groups (P = .04). Three-year matched survival was 52% for high-volume TAE compared with 54% for worldwide non-TAE groups (P = .1). From 2017 to 2021 at our institution, 90 (26%) of 346 esophagectomies were performed by TAE. Pneumonia developed in 5 patients (5.6%), with 88 patients (98%) alive at 30 days, comparable to contemporary averages of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. CONCLUSIONS: When it is performed as the primary approach in high volumes, TAE can have comparable outcomes to non-TAE with low morbidity. At present, we find that TAE is most useful in patients with truncal obesity, prior abdominal operations, and locally advanced cardia tumors with potential for variable extent of resection.

Development and validation of a universal esophageal patient-reported outcome measure: The Cleveland Clinic Esophageal Questionnaire (CEQ).

OBJECTIVE: Currently, there is no validated patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) applicable to all esophageal diseases. Our objective was to create a psychometrically robust, validated universal esophageal PROM that can also objectively assess patients' quality of life (QoL). METHODS: The pilot PROM constructed based on expert opinions, literature review, and previous unpublished institutional research had 27 items covering 8 domains. It was completed by 30 patients in the outpatient clinic followed by a structured debriefing interview, which allowed for refining the PROM. The final PROM: Cleveland Clinic Esophageal Questionnaire (CEQ) included 34 items across 6 domains (Dysphagia, Eating, Pain, Reflux & Regurgitation, Dyspepsia, Dumping), each accompanied by a corresponding QoL component. Further psychometric assessment of the PROM was conducted by evaluating (1) acceptability, (2) construct validity, (3) reliability, and (4) responsiveness. RESULTS: Five hundred forty-six unique patients (median 63.7 years [54.3-71.7], 53% male [287], 86% White) completed CEQ at >90% completion within 5 minutes. Construct validity was demonstrated by differentiating scores across esophageal cancer (n = 146), achalasia (n = 170), hiatal hernia (n = 160), and other diagnoses (n = 70). Internal reliability (Cronbach alpha 0.83-0.89), and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients 0.63-0.85) were strong. Responsiveness was demonstrated through CEQ domains improving for 53 patients who underwent surgery for achalasia or hiatal hernia (Cohen d 0.86-2.59). CONCLUSIONS: We have constructed a psychometrically robust, universal esophageal PROM that allows concise, consistent, objective quantification of symptoms and their effect on the patient. The CEQ is valuable in prognostication and tracking of longitudinal outcomes in both benign and malignant esophageal diseases.

The Value of Fundoplication in the Treatment of Type I Achalasia.

BACKGROUND: Type I achalasia comprises 20% of achalasia and has nearly absent esophageal motor activity. Concerns that fundoplication decreases the effectiveness of Heller myotomy in these patients has increased adoption of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). Hence, we compared outcomes after Heller myotomy with Dor fundoplication vs POEM. METHODS: From 2005 to 2020, 150 patients with type I achalasia underwent primary surgical myotomy (117 Heller myotomy, 33 POEM). Patient demographics, prior treatments, timed barium esophagrams, Eckardt scores, and reinterventions were assessed between the 2 groups. Median follow-up was 5 years for Heller myotomy and 2.5 years for POEM. RESULTS: The Heller myotomy group was younger, had fewer comorbidities, and lower body mass index vs POEM. Risk-adjusted models demonstrated clinical success (Eckardt ≤3) in 83% of Heller myotomies and 87% of POEMs at 3 years; longitudinal complete timed barium esophagram emptying and reintervention were also similar. An abnormal pH test result was documented in 10% (6 of 60) after Heller myotomy and in 45% (10 of 22) after POEM (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite nearly absent esophageal contractility, Heller myotomy with Dor fundoplication and POEM result in similar long-term symptom relief, esophageal emptying, and occurrence of reintervention in patients with type I achalasia. There is decreased esophageal acid exposure with the addition of a fundoplication, without compromised esophageal drainage, allaying fears of a detrimental effect of a fundoplication. Hence, choice of procedure may be personalized based on patient characteristics and esophageal morphology and not solely on manometric subtype.

Paraconduit hernia following esophagectomy: Is it safe to watch and wait?

OBJECTIVES: We hypothesized that emergency complications related to asymptomatic paraconduit hernias may occur less often than generally believed. Therefore, we assessed the occurrence and timing of paraconduit hernia diagnosis after esophagectomy, as well as outcomes of these asymptomatic patients managed with a watch-and-wait approach. METHODS: From 2006 to 2021, 1214 patients underwent esophagectomy with reconstruction at the Cleveland Clinic. Among these patients, computed tomography scans were reviewed to identify paraconduit hernias. Medical records were reviewed for timing of hernia diagnosis, hernia characteristics, and patient symptoms, complications, and management. During this period, patients with asymptomatic paraconduit hernias were typically managed nonoperatively. RESULTS: Paraconduit hernias were identified in 37 patients. Of these, 31 (84%) had a pre-esophagectomy hiatal hernia. Twenty-one hernias (57%) contained colon, 7 hernias (19%) contained pancreas, and 9 hernias (24%) contained multiple organs. Estimated prevalence of paraconduit hernia was 3.3% at 3 years and 7.7% at 10 years. Seven patients (19%) had symptoms, 4 of whom were repaired electively, with 2 currently awaiting repairs. No patient with a paraconduit hernia experienced an acute complication that required emergency intervention. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of paraconduit hernia increases with time, suggesting that long-term symptom surveillance is reasonable. Emergency complications as a result of asymptomatic paraconduit hernias are rare. A small number of patients will experience hernia-related symptoms, sometimes years after hernia diagnosis. Our findings suggest that observation of asymptomatic paraconduit hernias (watch and wait) may be considered, with repair considered electively in patients with persistent symptoms.

Outcomes of Calvarial and Soft-Tissue Reconstruction with Latissimus Dorsi-Rib Osteomyocutaneous Free Flap.

BACKGROUND: The latissimus dorsi-rib osteomyocutaneous free flap (LDRF) has been used for autologous reconstruction of large composite calvarial and scalp defects. In this study, the authors aim to present clinical and patient-reported outcomes after LDRF reconstruction. METHODS: An anatomical study was conducted to evaluate the distribution of the connecting perforators between the thoracodorsal and intercostal systems. An institutional review board-approved retrospective review of 10 patients who underwent LDRF with one or two ribs for treatment of cranial defects was conducted. Patient-reported outcomes regarding quality of life, neurologic status, and functional status were evaluated using validated surveys. One-way analysis of variance and post hoc Tukey tests were used for anatomical outcomes. Preoperative and postoperative scores were compared using paired t tests. RESULTS: The tenth rib (4.65 ± 2.01) followed by the ninth rib (3.7 ± 1.63) had the highest number of perforators. A combination of the ninth and eleventh ribs exhibited maximal perforator number and pedicle length. All patients had stable LDRF reconstructions. Eight patients completed both preoperative and postoperative questionnaires; Median clinical follow-up was 48 months (range, 34 to 70 months). Scores trended toward improvement but did not reach statistical significance on the Karnofsky Performance Scale ( P = 0.22), the Functional Independence Measure (Motor, P = 0.52; Cognitive, P = 0.55), or the Headache Disability Index ( P = 0.38). The minimum clinically important difference was surpassed, demonstrating improvement of function for 71% of patients on the Barthel Index and 63% on the Selective Functional Movement Assessment test. CONCLUSION: The LDRF can improve cognitive and physical functional status in complex patients with prior failed reconstructions for composite scalp and skull defects. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection with versus without traction for pathologically staged T1B esophageal cancer: a multicenter retrospective study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Positive vertical margins (VMs) are common after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of T1b esophageal cancer (EC) and are associated with an increased risk of recurrence. Traction during ESD provides better exposure of the submucosa and may allow deeper dissection, potentially reducing the risk of positive VMs. We conducted a retrospective multicenter study to compare the proportion of resections with positive VMs in ESD performed with versus without traction in pathologically staged T1b EC. METHODS: Patients who underwent ESD revealing T1b EC (squamous or adenocarcinoma) at 10 academic tertiary referral centers in the United States (n = 9) and Brazil (n = 1) were included. Demographic and clinical data were abstracted. ESD using either traction techniques (tunneling, pocket) or traction devices (clip line, traction wire) were classified as ESD with traction (Tr-ESD) and those without were classified as conventional ESD without traction. The primary outcome was a negative VM. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess associations with negative VMs. RESULTS: A total of 166 patients with pathologically staged T1b EC underwent Tr-ESD (n = 63; 38%) or conventional ESD without traction (n = 103; 62%). Baseline factors were comparable between both groups. On multivariable analysis, Tr-ESD was found to be independently associated with negative VMs (odds ratio, 2.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-4.91; P = .037) and R0 resection (odds ratio, 2.83; 95% confidence interval, 1.33-6.23; P = .008). CONCLUSION: Tr-ESD seems to be associated with higher odds of negative VMs than ESD without traction for pathologically staged T1b EC, and future well-conducted prospective studies are warranted to establish the findings of the current study.

Preoperative predictors of spread through air spaces in lung cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Spread through air spaces (STAS) is a new histologic feature of invasion of non-small cell lung cancer that lacks sensitivity and specificity on frozen sections and is associated with higher recurrence and worse survival with sublobar resections. Our objective is to identify preoperative characteristics that are predictive of STAS to guide operative decisions. METHODS: From January 2018 through December 2021, 439 cT1-3N0 M0 patients with non-small cell lung cancer and a median age of 68 years, 255 (58%) women, who underwent primary surgery at our institution were included. Patients who received neoadjuvant therapy and whose STAS status was not documented were excluded. Age, sex, smoking status, tumor size, ground-glass opacities, maximum standardized uptake values, and molecular markers on preoperative biopsy were evaluated as preoperative markers. Comparisons between groups were conducted using standardized mean differences and random forest classification was used for prediction modeling. RESULTS: Of the 439 patients, 177 had at least 1 STAS-positive tumor, and 262 had no STAS-positive tumors. Overall, 179 STAS tumors and 293 non-STAS tumors were evaluated. Younger age (50 years or younger), solid tumor, size ≥2 cm, and maximum standardized uptake value ≥2.5 were independently predictive of STAS with prediction probabilities of 50%, 40%, 38%, and 40%, respectively. STAS tumors were more likely to harbor KRAS mutations and be PD-L1 negative. CONCLUSIONS: Young age (50 years or younger), larger (≥2 cm) solid tumors, high maximum standardized uptake values, and presence of KRAS mutation, are risk factors for STAS and can be considered for lobectomy. Smoking status and gender are still controversial risk factors for STAS.

Quantifying the subjective: length-to-height ratio characterizes achalasia esophageal tortuosity.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal morphology in achalasia is thought to affect outcomes, with "end-stage" sigmoidal morphology faring poorly; however, evaluation of morphology's role in outcomes has been limited by lack of objective characterization. Hence, the goals of this study were twofold: characterize the variability of timed barium esophagram (TBE) interpretation and evaluate an objective classification of TBE tortuosity: length-to-height ratio (LHR). We hypothesized that the esophagus must elongate to become sigmoidal such that sigmoidal morphology would demonstrate a larger LHR. METHODS: Ninety pre-operative TBEs were selected from an institutional database. Esophageal morphology was categorized as straight, intermediate, or sigmoidal. Esophageal length was measured by a mid-lumen line from the aortic knob to the esophagogastric junction on TBE; height was measured vertically from the aortic knob to the level of the esophagogastric junction. The length divided by the height generated the LHR. Descriptive statistics and frequency of expert agreement were calculated. Median LHR was compared between consensus morphologies. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) determined the optimal LHR for sigmoidal vs non-sigmoidal characterization. RESULTS: From a total of 90 pre-operative TBEs, expert consensus morphology was reached in 56 (62.2%) cases. Pairs of experts agreed on morphology in 62-74% of TBEs, with all three experts agreeing on 46.7-48.9% of cases. Median LHR between expert consensus morphologies was 1.03, 1.09, and 1.24 for straight, intermediate, and sigmoidal morphologies, respectively (p < 0.001). ROC demonstrated that an LHR cutoff of 1.13 was 100% sensitive and 95% specific (AUC 0.99) for ruling out sigmoidal morphology. CONCLUSION: These findings confirm our anecdotal experience that subjective morphology interpretation is variable, even between experts at a high-volume center. LHR provides an objective method for classification, allowing us to overcome the limitations of inter-observer variability, thus paving the way for future study of the role of morphology in achalasia outcomes.

Joint 2022 European Society of Thoracic Surgeons and The American Association for Thoracic Surgery guidelines for the prevention of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism in thoracic surgery.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE), which includes deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, is a potentially fatal but preventable postoperative complication. Thoracic oncology patients undergoing surgical resection, often after multimodality induction therapy, represent among the highest risk groups for postoperative VTE. Currently there are no VTE prophylaxis guidelines specific to these thoracic surgery patients. Evidenced-based recommendations will help clinicians manage and mitigate risk of VTE in the postoperative period and inform best practice. OBJECTIVE: These joint evidence-based guidelines from The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons aim to inform clinicians and patients in decisions about prophylaxis to prevent VTE in patients undergoing surgical resection for lung or esophageal cancer. METHODS: The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel that included broad membership to minimize potential bias when formulating recommendations. The McMaster University GRADE Centre supported the guideline development process, including updating or performing systematic evidence reviews. The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used, including GRADE Evidence-to-Decision frameworks, which were subject to public comment. RESULTS: The panel agreed on 24 recommendations focused on pharmacological and mechanical methods for prophylaxis in patients undergoing lobectomy and segmentectomy, pneumonectomy, and esophagectomy, as well as extended resections for lung cancer. CONCLUSIONS: The certainty of the supporting evidence for the majority of recommendations was judged as low or very low, largely due to a lack of direct evidence for thoracic surgery. The panel made conditional recommendations for use of parenteral anticoagulation for VTE prevention, in combination with mechanical methods, over no prophylaxis for cancer patients undergoing anatomic lung resection or esophagectomy. Other key recommendations include: conditional recommendations for using parenteral anticoagulants over direct oral anticoagulants, with use of direct oral anticoagulants suggested only in the context of clinical trials; conditional recommendation for using extended prophylaxis for 28 to 35 days over in-hospital prophylaxis only for patients at moderate or high risk of thrombosis; and conditional recommendations for VTE screening in patients undergoing pneumonectomy and esophagectomy. Future research priorities include the role of preoperative thromboprophylaxis and the role of risk stratification to guide use of extended prophylaxis.

How Much Delay Matters? How Time to Treatment Impacts Overall Survival in Early Stage Lung Cancer.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to identify drivers of time from diagnosis to treatment (TTT) of surgically resected early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and determine the effect of TTT on post-resection survival. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Large database studies that lack relevant comorbidity data have identified longer TTT asa driver of worse overall survival. METHODS: From January 1, 2014 to April 1, 2018, 599 patients underwent lung resection for clinical stage I and II NSCLC. Random forest classification, regression, and survival were used to estimate likelihood of TTT = 0 (tissue diagnosis obtained at surgery), >0 (diagnosis obtained pre-resection), and effect of TTT on all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Patients with TTT > 0 (n = 413) had median TTT of 42 days (25-75 th percentile: 27-59 days). Patients with TTT = 0 (n = 186) had smaller tumors and higher percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV 1 %). Patients with history of stroke, oncology consultation, invasive mediastinal staging, low and high extremes of FEV 1 % had longer TTT. Higher clinical stage, lack of preoperative stress test, anemia, older age, lower FEV1% and diffusion lung capacity, larger tumor size, and longer TTT were the most important predictors of all-cause mortality. One- and 5-year overall survival decreased when TTT was >50 days. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative physiologic workup and multidisciplinary evaluation were the predominant drivers of longer TTT. Patients with TTT = 0have more favorable presentation and should be considered in TTT analyses for early stage lung cancer populations. The time needed to clinically stage and optimize patients for resection is not deleterious to overall survival until resection is performed after 50 days from diagnosis.

Adjuvant Therapy After Neoadjuvant Therapy for Esophageal Cancer: Who Needs It?

OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that, on average, patients do not benefit from additional adjuvant therapy after neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer, although subsets of patients might. Therefore, we sought to identify profiles of patients predicted to receive the most survival benefit or greatest detriment from adding adjuvant therapy. BACKGROUND: Although neoadjuvant therapy has become the treatment of choice for locally advanced esophageal cancer, the value of adding adjuvant therapy is unknown. METHODS: From 1970 to 2014, 22,123 patients were treated for esophageal cancer at 33 centers on 6 continents (Worldwide Esophageal Cancer Collaboration), of whom 7731 with adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma received neoadjuvant therapy; 1348 received additional adjuvant therapy. Random forests for survival and virtual-twin analyses were performed for all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Patients received a small survival benefit from adjuvant therapy (3.2±10 months over the subsequent 10 years for adenocarcinoma, 1.8±11 for squamous cell carcinoma). Consistent benefit occurred in ypT3-4 patients without nodal involvement and those with ypN2-3 disease. The small subset of patients receiving most benefit had high nodal burden, ypT4, and positive margins. Patients with ypT1-2N0 cancers had either no benefit or a detriment in survival. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant therapy after neoadjuvant therapy has value primarily for patients with more advanced esophageal cancer. Because the benefit is often small, patients considering adjuvant therapy should be counseled on benefits versus morbidity. In addition, given that the overall benefit was meaningful in a small number of patients, emerging modalities such as immunotherapy may hold more promise in the adjuvant setting.

Joint 2022 European Society of Thoracic Surgeons and The American Association for Thoracic Surgery guidelines for the prevention of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism in thoracic surgery.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE), which includes deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, is a potentially fatal but preventable postoperative complication. Thoracic oncology patients undergoing surgical resection, often after multimodality induction therapy, represent among the highest risk groups for postoperative VTE. Currently there are no VTE prophylaxis guidelines specific to these thoracic surgery patients. Evidenced-based recommendations will help clinicians manage and mitigate risk of VTE in the postoperative period and inform best practice. OBJECTIVE: These joint evidence-based guidelines from The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons aim to inform clinicians and patients in decisions about prophylaxis to prevent VTE in patients undergoing surgical resection for lung or esophageal cancer. METHODS: The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel that included broad membership to minimize potential bias when formulating recommendations. The McMaster University GRADE Centre supported the guideline development process, including updating or performing systematic evidence reviews. The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used, including GRADE Evidence-to-Decision frameworks, which were subject to public comment. RESULTS: The panel agreed on 24 recommendations focused on pharmacological and mechanical methods for prophylaxis in patients undergoing lobectomy and segmentectomy, pneumonectomy, and esophagectomy, as well as extended resections for lung cancer. CONCLUSIONS: The certainty of the supporting evidence for the majority of recommendations was judged as low or very low, largely due to a lack of direct evidence for thoracic surgery. The panel made conditional recommendations for use of parenteral anticoagulation for VTE prevention, in combination with mechanical methods, over no prophylaxis for cancer patients undergoing anatomic lung resection or esophagectomy. Other key recommendations include: conditional recommendations for using parenteral anticoagulants over direct oral anticoagulants, with use of direct oral anticoagulants suggested only in the context of clinical trials; conditional recommendation for using extended prophylaxis for 28 to 35 days over in-hospital prophylaxis only for patients at moderate or high risk of thrombosis; and conditional recommendations for VTE screening in patients undergoing pneumonectomy and esophagectomy. Future research priorities include the role of preoperative thromboprophylaxis and the role of risk stratification to guide use of extended prophylaxis. (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2022;▪:1-31).

Thoracoabdominal approach for traumatic diaphragmatic hernia in a hemodynamically unstable patient.

Background: Diaphragmatic hernias with strangulated contents are a surgical challenge. Thoracoabdominal incisions are commonly used for a variety of thoracic and vascular cases, although rarely used for diaphragmatic hernias, which are typically repaired with laparotomy, thoracotomy, or minimally invasive approaches. Case report: We present the unique case of a 60-year-old, critically ill unstable patient with severe heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction (15-25%) and severe valve disease presenting with a left-sided diaphragmatic hernia containing strangulated small intestine and requiring urgent surgical exploration. This was safely and efficiently repaired via a thoracoabdominal approach at the index surgery, with intestines left in discontinuity and placement of temporary chest and abdominal closure. At the second planned operation, good continuity was successfully restored. Results: The patient had early extubation, gradual diet advancement with full recovery, and discharge home on postoperative day 17. Conclusion: A thoracoabdominal incision can safely be used in large strangulated diaphragmatic hernias, including in critically unstable patients. This approach provides rapid access to both the chest and abdomen with excellent, speedy, and safe exposure, which can save a life in extreme conditions.

A comparative study of robotic and laparoscopic approaches to Heller myotomy.

OBJECTIVE: Minimally invasive Heller myotomy for achalasia is commonly performed laparoscopically, but recently done with robotic assistance. We compare outcomes of the 2 approaches. METHODS: From January 2010 to January 2020, 447 patients underwent Heller myotomy with anterior fundoplication (170 with robotic assistance and 277 laparoscopically). End points included short-term and longitudinal esophageal emptying according to timed barium esophagram, symptom relief according to Eckardt score, and time-related reintervention. Normal esophageal morphology, present in 328 patients, was defined as nonsigmoidal with width <5 cm. We performed a propensity score--matched analysis to evaluate outcomes among robotic and laparoscopic groups. RESULTS: Timed barium esophagrams showed complete emptying at 5 minutes in 58% (77/132) of the robotic group and 48% (115/241) of the laparoscopic group in the short term (within 6 months of surgery). In the propensity-matched patients with normal esophageal morphology, the robotic group had a higher longitudinal prevalence of complete emptying of barium at 5 minutes (54% vs 34% at 4 years; P = .05), better intermediate-term Eckardt scores (1.7% vs 10% > 3 at 4 years; P = .0008), and actuarially fewer reinterventions (1.2% vs 11% at 3 years; P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Both robotically assisted and laparoscopic Heller myotomy had excellent outcomes in patients treated for achalasia. In a matched subgroup of patients with normal esophageal morphology within this heterogeneous disease, the robotic approach might be associated with greater esophageal emptying, palliation of symptoms, and freedom from reintervention in the intermediate term. Long-term analysis would be important to determine if this trend persists.

Select octogenarians with stage IIIa non-small cell lung cancer can benefit from trimodality therapy.

Objectives: Currently, more than 36% of patients diagnosed with lung cancer are 75 years of age or older. Management of stage IIIA cancer is variable, especially for octogenarians who might not be offered surgery because of questionable benefit. In this study we investigated the outcomes of definitive chemoradiotherapy (CR) and trimodality therapy (TM) management (CR and surgery) for clinical stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in patients 80 years of age or older. Methods: The National Cancer Data Base was queried for stage IIIA NSCLC in patients 80 years of age or older between 2004 and 2015. Patients were divided according to treatment type: definitive CR and TM. Patient demographic characteristics, facility type, Charlson-Deyo score, final tumor pathology, and survival data were extracted. Univariate analysis was performed, followed by 3:1 propensity matching to analyze overall survival differences. Unadjusted and adjusted Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were performed. Results: From the database, 6048 CR and 190 TM octogenarians were identified. Patients in the TM group were younger (82 years old [TM] vs 83 years old [CR]; P < .0001), more likely to be treated at an academic/research institution (36% [TM] vs 26% [CR]; P = .003), had greater proportion of adenocarcinoma (52% [TM] vs 34% [CR]; P < .001), and a smaller tumor size (38 mm [TM] vs 33 mm [CR]; P = .025). After 3:1 matching, the 5-year overall survival for the TM group was 29% (95% CI, 22%-38%) versus 15% (95% CI, 11%-20%) for the CR group. Conclusions: Selected elderly patients with stage IIIa NSCLC can benefit from an aggressive TM approach.

A Phase 1 Study of Concurrent Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab Plus Chemoradiation Followed by Consolidation Pembrolizumab in Patients With Resectable Stage IIIA NSCLC.

Introduction: Evidence supports the addition of immunotherapy to definitive chemoradiation for unresectable stage IIIA NSCLC. Adding pembrolizumab to neoadjuvant chemoradiation in patients with resectable stage IIIA NSCLC requires study for safety and feasibility. Methods: Patients with resectable stage IIIA NSCLC received neoadjuvant cisplatin, etoposide, and pembrolizumab concurrently with thoracic radiotherapy of 45 Gy in 25 fractions. Patients without progression underwent resection followed by 6 months of consolidation pembrolizumab. Safety and feasibility were defined as less than or equal to 30% grade 3 or higher pulmonary toxicity or any grade 4 or 5 nonhematologic toxicity. A total of 10 patients were to be enrolled initially. If less than or equal to two patients had events, another 10 were to be enrolled. Results: The study closed after enrolling nine patients. The median age was 66 (range: 49-76) years. A total of 67% were female. Median follow-up was 38.3 months. Serious adverse events occurred in seven patients, including two grade 5 events: one sudden cardiac arrest in the neoadjuvant phase and one fatal pneumocystis pneumonia after resection. Eight patients were assessable for response. The overall response rate was 67%. Six underwent complete resection. Four achieved pathologic complete response, whereas one additional patient had complete nodal clearance. Median progression-free survival has not been reached. The 3-year overall survival was 64%. Conclusions: Adding pembrolizumab to neoadjuvant concurrent cisplatin, etoposide, and radiotherapy in resectable stage IIIA NSCLC resulted in an encouraging pathologic complete response rate. Higher-than-expected toxicities necessitated trial closure after meeting the rule for infeasibility. The relationship of grade 5 events to the addition of pembrolizumab is unclear.

Esophageal adenocarcinoma: A dire need for early detection and treatment.

Esophageal cancer is the sixth most common cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Esophageal adenocarcinoma is the most common subtype of esophageal cancer in the United States, and its incidence has risen dramatically in the last few decades. Modern endoscopic and surgical techniques have significantly improved morbidity and mortality rates of patients undergoing treatment for esophageal cancer. However, most cases are diagnosed at a late stage when the prognosis is poor, emphasizing the need for an effective screening strategy. This clinical overview focuses on screening, multidisciplinary evaluation, and treatment of early esophageal adenocarcinoma.

A Delphi Consensus report from the "Prolonged Air Leak: A Survey" study group on prevention and management of postoperative air leaks after minimally invasive anatomical resections.

OBJECTIVES: This study reports the results of an international expert consensus process evaluating the assessment of intraoperative air leaks (IAL) and treatment of postoperative prolonged air leaks (PAL) utilizing a Delphi process, with the aim of helping standardization and improving practice. METHODS: A panel of 45 questions was developed and submitted to an international working group of experts in minimally invasive lung cancer surgery. Modified Delphi methodology was used to review responses, including 3 rounds of voting. The consensus was defined a priori as >50% agreement among the experts. Clinical practice standards were graded as recommended or highly recommended if 50-74% or >75% of the experts reached an agreement, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 32 experts from 18 countries completed the questionnaires in all 3 rounds. Respondents agreed that PAL are defined as >5 days and that current risk models are rarely used. The consensus was reached in 33/45 issues (73.3%). IAL were classified as mild (<100 ml/min; 81%), moderate (100-400 ml/min; 71%) and severe (>400 ml/min; 74%). If mild IAL are detected, 68% do not treat; if moderate, consensus was not; if severe, 90% favoured treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This expert consensus working group reached an agreement on the majority of issues regarding the detection and management of IAL and PAL. In the absence of prospective, randomized evidence supporting most of these clinical decisions, this document may serve as a guideline to reduce practice variation.