Quantification of Geographic Atrophy Using Spectral Domain OCT in Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

PURPOSE: To compare geographic atrophy (GA) area and enlargement rate measured with spectral domain OCT (SD-OCT) with fundus autofluorescence (FAF), color fundus photography (CFP), and infrared reflectance (IR) imaging. DESIGN: Retrospective, multicenter, natural history case series. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 70 eyes with GA from 48 participants were included. METHODS: Participants underwent SD-OCT, FAF, CFP, and IR imaging at baseline and 12 months in the study eye. Spectral domain OCT images were graded for GA area using 2 distinct criteria: (1) complete retinal pigment epithelium and outer retinal atrophy (cRORA) and (2) hypertransmission through Bruch's membrane. Areas were measured with SD-OCT using a custom-developed tool that allows for mapping areas of retinal layer loss on SD-OCT cross-sectional scans with co-registered IR images. Circularity index was calculated from area and perimeter. Spectral domain OCT images were also assessed for presence of reticular pseudodrusen, outer-retinal tubules, and hyporeflective wedge-shaped bands. Area of GA was measured in millimeters squared from FAF, CFP, and IR images. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Geographic atrophy mean baseline area and enlargement rate measured with 2 SD-OCT criteria, FAF, CFP, and IR. RESULTS: At baseline, the mean GA area was 6.9 (standard deviation [SD], 4.7) mm2 using the SD-OCT cRORA criteria and 7.3 (SD, 4.7) mm2 using the SD-OCT hypertransmission criteria. The mean annual enlargement rate of GA was 1.6 (SD, 1.1) mm2 using the SD-OCT cRORA criteria and 1.5 (SD, 1.0) mm2 using the SD-OCT hypertransmission criteria. When comparing both SD-OCT grading criteria with FAF, CFP, and IR, there were no statistically significant differences in baseline area or annual enlargement rate of GA. Circularity index was identified as the risk factor for increased annual enlargement rate. CONCLUSIONS: Measuring GA using retinal layer morphology provides a novel means of obtaining area measurements. Area measurements tend to vary based on criteria used and are comparable to other imaging modalities.

Youth exposure to violence involving a gun: evidence for adverse childhood experience classification.

Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) have historically included child maltreatment, household dysfunction, and other critical issues known to impact children negatively. Although youth experiences with violence are broadly captured in some ACE measures, youth exposure to violence involving a gun has not been included specifically in the operationalizing, and therefore scientific study, of ACEs. There are numerous implications of this omission, including limiting access to ACE interventions that are currently available and resources for individuals who have been exposed to gun violence. Thus, and given the persistent prevalence of gun violence in the US, we conducted a systematic review of the literature over the past two decades on the assessment of and response to ACEs and gun violence. Eighty-one journal articles across four search engines met our inclusion criteria. Our findings provide evidence that youth gun violence exposure should be classified as an ACE. In addition to increasing access to resources for youth affected by gun violence, these findings may improve the likelihood of funding and research into gun violence, with direct implications for prevention and intervention efforts.

Optical coherence tomography evaluation in the Multicenter Uveitis Steroid Treatment (MUST) trial.

PURPOSE: To describe the evaluation of optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans in the Muliticenter Uveitis Steroid Treatment (MUST) trial and report baseline OCT features of enrolled participants. METHODS: Time-domain OCTs acquired by certified photographers using a standardized scan protocol were evaluated at a reading center. Accuracy of retinal thickness data was confirmed with quality evaluation, and caliper measurement of centerpoint thickness (CPT) was performed when retinal thickness data were unreliable. Morphological evaluation included cysts, subretinal fluid, epiretinal membranes (ERMs), and vitreomacular traction. RESULTS: Of the 453 OCTs evaluated, automated retinal thickness was accurate in 69.5% of scans, caliper measurement was performed in 26%, and 4% were ungradable. Intraclass correlation was.98 for reproducibility of caliper measurement. Macular edema (centerpoint thickness ≥ 240 µm) was present in 36%. Cysts were present in 36.6% of scans and ERMs in 27.8%, predominantly central. Intergrader agreement ranged from 78 to 82% for morphological features. CONCLUSION: Retinal thickness data can be retrieved in a majority of OCT scans in clinical trial submissions for uveitis studies. Small cysts and ERMs involving the center are common in intermediate and posterior/panuveitis requiring systemic corticosteroid therapy.

Quantitative analysis of the Stratus optical coherence tomography fast macular thickness map reports.

The cross sectional optical coherence tomography images have an important role in evaluating retinal diseases. The reports generated by the Stratus fast macular thickness scan protocol are useful for both clinical and research purposes. The centerpoint thickness is an important outcome measure for many therapeutic trials related to macular disease. The data is susceptible to artifacts such as decentration and boundary line errors and could be potentially erroneous. An understanding of how the data is generated is essential before utilizing the data. This article describes the interpretation of the fast macular thickness map report, assessment of the quality of an optical coherence tomography image and identification of the artifacts that could influence the numeric data.

Quality issues in interpretation of optical coherence tomograms in macular diseases.

PURPOSE: To analyze the scan characteristics associated with poor-quality Stratus optical coherence tomograms submitted to a reading center for multicenter clinical trials. METHODS: Data from evaluation of 6,741 fast macular thickness map reports from trials involving age-related macular degeneration (AMD), diabetic macular edema, and retinal vein occlusion were analyzed. Optical coherence tomograms with an erroneous centerpoint thickness needing manual remeasurement (MR) were categorized as being of poor quality. The frequency of MR and the artifacts associated were analyzed by disease type, underlying retinal morphology, and severity of retinal thickening. RESULTS: MR was performed in 2,027 (30%) optical coherence tomograms. AMD had the highest frequency of MR (54.9%), followed by retinal vein occlusion (23.9%) and diabetic macular edema (16.3%). Boundary line errors were the most common artifact across all disease types (61.3% of scans requiring MR) and increased with increasing retinal thickness. Decentration artifact was seen in 15.4% of scans requiring MR. The median absolute difference between machine and manually measured centerpoint thickness assessed in a subset of 84 scans was 75.5 microm. CONCLUSION: Artifacts causing erroneous reported centerpoint thickness are common. Identifying clues that indicate suboptimal quality of optical coherence tomography (OCT) images are important to avoid erroneous interpretation of OCT data in clinical trials.