RESUMEN
Acanthamoebae, pathogenic free-living amoebae, can cause Granulomatous Amoebic Encephalitis (GAE) and keratitis, and for both types of infection, no adequate treatment options are available. As the metabolism of pathogens is an attractive treatment target, we set out to examine the energy metabolism of Acanthamoeba castellanii and studied the aerobic and anaerobic capacities of the trophozoites. Under anaerobic conditions, or in the presence of inhibitors of the electron-transport chain, A. castellanii trophozoites became rounded, moved sluggishly and stopped multiplying. This demonstrates that oxygen and the respiratory chain are essential for movement and replication. Furthermore, the simultaneous activities of both terminal oxidases, cytochrome c oxidase and the plant-like alternative oxidase, are essential for normal functioning and replication. The inhibition of normal function caused by the inactivity of the respiratory chain was reversible. Once respiration was made possible again, the rounded, rather inactive amoebae formed acanthopodia within 4 h and resumed moving, feeding and multiplying. Experiments with radiolabelled nutrients revealed a preference for lipids over glucose and amino acids as food. Subsequent experiments showed that adding lipids to a standard culture medium of trophozoites strongly increased the growth rate. Acanthamoeba castellanii trophozoites have a strictly aerobic energy metabolism and ß-oxidation of fatty acids, the Krebs cycle, and an aerobic electron-transport chain coupled to the ATP synthase, producing most of the used ATP. The preference for lipids can be exploited, as we show that three known inhibitors of lipid oxidation strongly inhibited the growth of A. castellanii. In particular, thioridazine and perhexiline showed potent effects in low micromolar concentrations. Therefore, this study revealed a new drug target with possibly new options to treat Acanthamoeba infections.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: MERS-CoV is a respiratory pathogen with a case-fatality rate of 36%, and for which no vaccines are currently licensed. MVA-MERS-S is a candidate vaccine based on recombinant modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA). In this study, the safety, immunogenicity, and optimal dose schedule of MVA-MERS-S was assessed in individuals with previous exposure to SARS-CoV-2 infections and vaccines. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled phase 1b clinical trial at two university medical centres in Germany and the Netherlands. Healthy volunteers aged 18-55 years were assigned by computer randomisation to receive three intramuscular injections of 107 or 108 plaque-forming units (PFU) of MVA-MERS-S, with two treatment groups each of either 28-day or 56-day intervals between the initial two doses, and one control arm that received only placebo, at a ratio of 2:2:2:2:1. The third dose was given after 224 days. The sponsor, clinical and laboratory staff, and participants were masked to both vaccine dose and dosing interval. The primary outcome was safety, assessed in the all participants who had received at least one injection; daily solicited vaccine reactions were recorded after each dose for 7 days, unsolicited adverse events for 28 days, and serious adverse events throughout the study. The secondary outcome was humoral immunogenicity, measured with vaccine-induced geometric mean antibody concentrations and seroconversion rates, analysed in all participants who received at least three allocated treatments. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04119440) and is completed. FINDINGS: Between 26 July, 2021, and 3 March, 2022, 244 volunteers were screened, 177 of whom were eligible and 140 were randomly assigned either to the 28-day 107 PFU group (n=32), 56-day 107 PFU group (n=31), 28-day 108 PFU group (n=31), 56-day 108 PFU group (n=30), or placebo group (n=16). In total, 178 doses were administered of 107 PFU of MVA-MERS-S, 174 of 108 PFU, and 164 doses of placebo, and 139 participants received at least one injection. 73 (53%) were female and 66 (48%) were male. No serious vaccine-related adverse events occurred. Solicited local reactions were mild in 288 (93%, 95% CI 90-96) of 309 reports and consisted primarily of pain or tenderness. Pain or tenderness (of any severity) occurred after 69 (39%, 32-46) of 178 107 PFU injections, 138 (79%; 73-85) of 174 108 PFU injections, and 18 (11%; 7-11) of 164 placebo injections. Of 595 reported solicited systemic reactions, 479 (81%, 77-83) were graded as mild. Systemic reactions of any grade occurred after 77 (43%; 36-51) 107 PFU injections, 102 (59%; 51-66) 108 PFU injections, and 67 (41%; 34-49) of 164 placebo injections. At 28 days after the second dose, MERS-CoV neutralising antibodies were highest for participants assigned to 56-day 108 PFU, with geometric mean ratios of 7·2 (95% CI 3·9-13·3) for the 56-day 108 PFU group versus the 28-day 108 PFU group (p<0·0001), 3·9 (2·1-7·2) for the 56-day 108 PFU group versus the 56-day 107 PFU group (p=0·0031), and 5·4 (2·9-10·0) for the 56-day 108 PFU group versus the 28-day 107 PFU group (p=0·0003). INTERPRETATION: MVA-MERS-S was safe and immunogenic in individuals with previous and concurrent SARS-CoV-2 exposure. The second vaccination with the 108 PFU dose of MVA-MERS-S elicited a stronger humoral immune response when administered 56 days after the first dose than a 28-day interval. Further studies are needed to verify these findings in groups at risk for MERS-CoV exposure, and at risk of severe disease, including older individuals and those with relevant comorbidities. FUNDING: Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, the German Centre for Infection Research, and the German Research Foundation.
RESUMEN
The evolution of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) requires ongoing monitoring to judge the ability of newly arising variants to escape the immune response. A surveillance system necessitates an understanding of differences in neutralization titers measured in different assays and using human and animal serum samples. We compared 18 datasets generated using human, hamster, and mouse serum and six different neutralization assays. Datasets using animal model serum samples showed higher titer magnitudes than datasets using human serum samples in this comparison. Fold change in neutralization of variants compared to ancestral SARS-CoV-2, immunodominance patterns, and antigenic maps were similar among serum samples and assays. Most assays yielded consistent results, except for differences in fold change in cytopathic effect assays. Hamster serum samples were a consistent surrogate for human first-infection serum samples. These results inform the transition of surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 antigenic variation from dependence on human first-infection serum samples to the utilization of serum samples from animal models.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Neutralizantes , Anticuerpos Antivirales , COVID-19 , Pruebas de Neutralización , SARS-CoV-2 , Animales , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , COVID-19/inmunología , COVID-19/sangre , COVID-19/virología , Ratones , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/sangre , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/inmunología , Cricetinae , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , Modelos Animales de EnfermedadRESUMEN
Antigenic characterization of newly emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants is important to assess their immune escape and judge the need for future vaccine updates. To bridge data obtained from animal sera with human sera, we analyzed neutralizing antibody titers in human and hamster single infection sera in a highly controlled setting using the same authentic virus neutralization assay performed in one laboratory. Using a Bayesian framework, we found that titer fold changes in hamster sera corresponded well to human sera and that hamster sera generally exhibited higher reactivity.
RESUMEN
Monoclonal antibodies are an increasingly important tool for prophylaxis and treatment of acute virus infections like SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, their use is often restricted due to the time required for development, variable yields and high production costs, as well as the need for adaptation to newly emerging virus variants. Here we use the genetically modified filamentous fungus expression system Thermothelomyces heterothallica (C1), which has a naturally high biosynthesis capacity for secretory enzymes and other proteins, to produce a human monoclonal IgG1 antibody (HuMab 87G7) that neutralises the SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOCs) Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta, and Omicron. Both the mammalian cell and C1 produced HuMab 87G7 broadly neutralise SARS-CoV-2 VOCs in vitro and also provide protection against VOC Omicron in hamsters. The C1 produced HuMab 87G7 is also able to protect against the Delta VOC in non-human primates. In summary, these findings show that the C1 expression system is a promising technology platform for the development of HuMabs in preventive and therapeutic medicine.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Animales , Cricetinae , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2/genética , COVID-19/prevención & control , Primates , Inmunoglobulina G , Anticuerpos Monoclonales , Hongos , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus , Anticuerpos Antivirales , MamíferosRESUMEN
Human metapneumovirus (HMPV), a member of the Pneumoviridae family, causes upper and lower respiratory tract infections in humans. In vitro studies with HMPV have mostly been performed in monolayers of undifferentiated epithelial cells. In vivo studies in cynomolgus macaques and cotton rats have shown that ciliated epithelial cells are the main target of HMPV infection, but these observations cannot be studied in monolayer systems. Here, we established an organoid-derived bronchial culture model that allows physiologically relevant studies on HMPV. Inoculation with multiple prototype HMPV viruses and recent clinical virus isolates led to differences in replication among HMPV isolates. Prolific HMPV replication in this model caused damage to the ciliary layer, including cilia loss at advanced stages post-infection. These cytopathic effects correlated with those observed in previous in vivo studies with cynomolgus macaques. The assessment of the innate immune responses in three donors upon HMPV and RSV inoculation highlighted the importance of incorporating multiple donors to account for donor-dependent variation. In conclusion, these data indicate that the organoid-derived bronchial cell culture model resembles in vivo findings and is therefore a suitable and robust model for future HMPV studies. IMPORTANCE: Human metapneumovirus (HMPV) is one of the leading causative agents of respiratory disease in humans, with no treatment or vaccine available yet. The use of primary epithelial cultures that recapitulate the tissue morphology and biochemistry of the human airways could aid in defining more relevant targets to prevent HMPV infection. For this purpose, this study established the first primary organoid-derived bronchial culture model suitable for a broad range of HMPV isolates. These bronchial cultures were assessed for HMPV replication, cellular tropism, cytopathology, and innate immune responses, where the observations were linked to previous in vivo studies with HMPV. This study exposed an important gap in the HMPV field since extensively cell-passaged prototype HMPV B viruses did not replicate in the bronchial cultures, underpinning the need to use recently isolated viruses with a controlled passage history. These results were reproducible in three different donors, supporting this model to be suitable to study HMPV infection.
Asunto(s)
Metapneumovirus , Infecciones por Paramyxoviridae , Humanos , Animales , Metapneumovirus/fisiología , Citología , Replicación Viral , Infecciones por Paramyxoviridae/patología , Epitelio , Macaca , TropismoRESUMEN
The COVID-19 pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2, lead to mild to severe respiratory illness and resulted in 6.9 million deaths worldwide. Although vaccines are effective in preventing COVID-19, they may not be sufficient to protect immunocompromised individuals from this respiratory illness. Moreover, novel emerging variants of SARS-CoV-2 pose a risk of new COVID-19 waves. Therefore, identification of effective antivirals is critical in controlling SARS and other coronaviruses, such as MERS-CoV. We show that Fangchinoline (Fcn), a bisbenzylisoquinoline alkaloid, inhibits replication of SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2, and MERS-CoV in a range of in vitro assays, by blocking entry. Therapeutic use of Fcn inhibited viral loads in the lungs, and suppressed associated airway inflammation in hACE2. Tg mice and Syrian hamster infected with SARS-CoV-2. Combination of Fcn with remdesivir (RDV) or an anti-leprosy drug, Clofazimine, exhibited synergistic antiviral activity. Compared to Fcn, its synthetic derivative, MK-04-003, more effectively inhibited SARS-CoV-2 and its variants B.1.617.2 and BA.5 in mice. Taken together these data demonstrate that Fcn is a pan beta coronavirus inhibitor, which possibly can be used to combat novel emerging coronavirus diseases.
Asunto(s)
Bencilisoquinolinas , COVID-19 , Coronavirus del Síndrome Respiratorio de Oriente Medio , Humanos , Ratones , Animales , SARS-CoV-2 , Antivirales/farmacología , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Pandemias , Bencilisoquinolinas/farmacología , Bencilisoquinolinas/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
The antigenic evolution of SARS-CoV-2 requires ongoing monitoring to judge the immune escape of newly arising variants. A surveillance system necessitates an understanding of differences in neutralization titers measured in different assays and using human and animal sera. We compared 18 datasets generated using human, hamster, and mouse sera, and six different neutralization assays. Titer magnitude was lowest in human, intermediate in hamster, and highest in mouse sera. Fold change, immunodominance patterns and antigenic maps were similar among sera. Most assays yielded similar results, except for differences in fold change in cytopathic effect assays. Not enough data was available for conclusively judging mouse sera, but hamster sera were a consistent surrogate for human first-infection sera.
RESUMEN
Mucins play an essential role in protecting the respiratory tract against microbial infections while also acting as binding sites for bacterial and viral adhesins. The heavily O-glycosylated gel-forming mucins MUC5AC and MUC5B eliminate pathogens by mucociliary clearance. Transmembrane mucins MUC1, MUC4, and MUC16 can restrict microbial invasion at the apical surface of the epithelium. In this study, we determined the impact of host mucins and mucin glycans on epithelial entry of SARS-CoV-2. Human lung epithelial Calu-3 cells express the SARS-CoV-2 entry receptor ACE2 and high levels of glycosylated MUC1, but not MUC4 and MUC16, on their cell surface. The O-glycan-specific mucinase StcE specifically removed the glycosylated part of the MUC1 extracellular domain while leaving the underlying SEA domain and cytoplasmic tail intact. StcE treatment of Calu-3 cells significantly enhanced infection with SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus and authentic virus, while removal of terminal mucin glycans sialic acid and fucose from the epithelial surface did not impact viral entry. In Calu-3 cells, the transmembrane mucin MUC1 and ACE2 are located to the apical surface in close proximity and StcE treatment results in enhanced binding of purified spike protein. Both MUC1 and MUC16 are expressed on the surface of human organoid-derived air-liquid interface (ALI) differentiated airway cultures and StcE treatment led to mucin removal and increased levels of SARS-CoV-2 replication. In these cultures, MUC1 was highly expressed in non-ciliated cells while MUC16 was enriched in goblet cells. In conclusion, the glycosylated extracellular domains of different transmembrane mucins might have similar protective functions in different respiratory cell types by restricting SARS-CoV-2 binding and entry.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Mucinas , Humanos , Mucinas/metabolismo , Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina 2 , SARS-CoV-2/metabolismo , Antígeno Ca-125/metabolismo , Pulmón/metabolismo , PolisacáridosRESUMEN
SARS-CoV-2 can enter cells after its spike protein is cleaved by either type II transmembrane serine proteases (TTSPs), like TMPRSS2, or cathepsins. It is now widely accepted that the Omicron variant uses TMPRSS2 less efficiently and instead enters cells via cathepsins, but these findings have yet to be verified in more relevant cell models. Although we could confirm efficient cathepsin-mediated entry for Omicron in a monkey kidney cell line, experiments with protease inhibitors showed that Omicron (BA.1 and XBB1.5) did not use cathepsins for entry into human airway organoids and instead utilized TTSPs. Likewise, CRISPR-edited intestinal organoids showed that entry of Omicron BA.1 relied on the expression of the serine protease TMPRSS2 but not cathepsin L or B. Together, these data force us to rethink the concept that Omicron has adapted to cathepsin-mediated entry and indicate that TTSP inhibitors should not be dismissed as prophylactic or therapeutic antiviral strategy against SARS-CoV-2. IMPORTANCE Coronavirus entry relies on host proteases that activate the viral fusion protein, spike. These proteases determine the viral entry route, tropism, host range, and can be attractive drug targets. Whereas earlier studies using cell lines suggested that the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 has changed its protease usage, from cell surface type II transmembrane serine proteases (TTSPs) to endosomal cathepsins, we report that this is not the case in human airway and intestinal organoid models, suggesting that host TTSP inhibition is still a viable prophylactic or therapeutic antiviral strategy against current SARS-CoV-2 variants and highlighting the importance of relevant human in vitro cell models.
Asunto(s)
Serina Proteasas , Humanos , Antivirales , COVID-19/virología , SARS-CoV-2/fisiología , Serina Proteasas/metabolismo , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus/genética , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus/metabolismo , Internalización del VirusRESUMEN
SARS coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the causative agent of COVID-19, emerged in China in December 2019. Vaccines developed were very effective initially, however, the virus has shown remarkable evolution with multiple variants spreading globally over the last three years. Nowadays, newly emerging Omicron lineages are gaining substitutions at a fast rate, resulting in escape from neutralization by antibodies that target the Spike protein. Tools to map the impact of substitutions on the further antigenic evolution of SARS-CoV-2, such as antigenic cartography, may be helpful to update SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. In this review, we focus on the antigenic evolution of SARS-CoV-2, highlighting the impact of Spike protein substitutions individually and in combination on immune escape.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus/genética , AnticuerposRESUMEN
Emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants have accrued mutations within the spike protein rendering most therapeutic monoclonal antibodies against COVID-19 ineffective. Hence there is an unmet need for broad-spectrum mAb treatments for COVID-19 that are more resistant to antigenically drifted SARS-CoV-2 variants. Here we describe the design of a biparatopic heavy-chain-only antibody consisting of six antigen binding sites recognizing two distinct epitopes in the spike protein NTD and RBD. The hexavalent antibody showed potent neutralizing activity against SARS-CoV-2 and variants of concern, including the Omicron sub-lineages BA.1, BA.2, BA.4 and BA.5, whereas the parental components had lost Omicron neutralization potency. We demonstrate that the tethered design mitigates the substantial decrease in spike trimer affinity seen for escape mutations for the hexamer components. The hexavalent antibody protected against SARS-CoV-2 infection in a hamster model. This work provides a framework for designing therapeutic antibodies to overcome antibody neutralization escape of emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Animales , Cricetinae , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus/genética , Cadenas Pesadas de Inmunoglobulina/genética , Anticuerpos MonoclonalesRESUMEN
Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) clade B viruses are found in camelids and humans in the Middle East, but clade C viruses are not. We provide experimental evidence for extended shedding of MERS-CoV clade B viruses in llamas, which might explain why they outcompete clade C strains in the Arabian Peninsula.
Asunto(s)
Camélidos del Nuevo Mundo , Infecciones por Coronavirus , Herpesvirus Cercopitecino 1 , Coronavirus del Síndrome Respiratorio de Oriente Medio , Animales , Humanos , Esparcimiento de Virus , CamelusRESUMEN
The Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) is a respiratory disease caused by MERS coronavirus (MERS-CoV). In follow up to a phase 1 trial, we perform a longitudinal analysis of immune responses following immunization with the modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA)-based vaccine MVA-MERS-S encoding the MERS-CoV-spike protein. Three homologous immunizations were administered on days 0 and 28 with a late booster vaccination at 12 ± 4 months. Antibody isotypes, subclasses, and neutralization capacity as well as T and B cell responses were monitored over a period of 3 years using standard and bead-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), 50% plaque-reduction neutralization test (PRNT50), enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISpot), and flow cytometry. The late booster immunization significantly increases the frequency and persistence of spike-specific B cells, binding immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) and neutralizing antibodies but not T cell responses. Our data highlight the potential of a late boost to enhance long-term antibody and B cell immunity against MERS-CoV. Our findings on the MVA-MERS-S vaccine may be of relevance for coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination strategies.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Coronavirus del Síndrome Respiratorio de Oriente Medio , Vacunas Virales , Anticuerpos Antivirales , COVID-19/prevención & control , Ensayos Clínicos Fase I como Asunto , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Vacunación , Virus VacciniaRESUMEN
The emergence and rapid spread of SARS-CoV-2 variants may affect vaccine efficacy substantially. The Omicron variant termed BA.2, which differs substantially from BA.1 based on genetic sequence, is currently replacing BA.1 in several countries, but its antigenic characteristics have not yet been assessed. Here, we used antigenic cartography to quantify and visualize antigenic differences between early SARS-CoV-2 variants (614G, Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Zeta, Delta, and Mu) using hamster antisera obtained after primary infection. We first verified that the choice of the cell line for the neutralization assay did not affect the topology of the map substantially. Antigenic maps generated using pseudo-typed SARS-CoV-2 on the widely used VeroE6 cell line and the human airway cell line Calu-3 generated similar maps. Maps made using authentic SARS-CoV-2 on Calu-3 cells also closely resembled those generated with pseudo-typed viruses. The antigenic maps revealed a central cluster of SARS-CoV-2 variants, which grouped on the basis of mutual spike mutations. Whereas these early variants are antigenically similar, clustering relatively close to each other in antigenic space, Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 have evolved as two distinct antigenic outliers. Our data show that BA.1 and BA.2 both escape vaccine-induced antibody responses as a result of different antigenic characteristics. Thus, antigenic cartography could be used to assess antigenic properties of future SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern that emerge and to decide on the composition of novel spike-based (booster) vaccines.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Animales , Línea Celular , Cricetinae , Humanos , Sueros Inmunes , SARS-CoV-2/genéticaRESUMEN
Ongoing outbreaks of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) continue posing a global health threat. Vaccination of livestock reservoir species is a recommended strategy to prevent spread of MERS-CoV among animals and potential spillover to humans. Using a direct-contact llama challenge model that mimics naturally occurring viral transmission, we tested the efficacy of a multimeric receptor binding domain (RBD) particle-display based vaccine candidate. While MERS-CoV was transmitted to naïve animals exposed to virus-inoculated llamas, immunization induced robust virus-neutralizing antibody responses and prevented transmission in 1/3 vaccinated, in-contact animals. Our exploratory study supports further improvement of the RBD-based vaccine to prevent zoonotic spillover of MERS-CoV.
RESUMEN
The ability of SARS-CoV-2 to evolve in response to selective pressures poses a challenge to vaccine and antiviral efficacy. The S1 subunit of the spike (S) protein contains the receptor-binding domain and is therefore under selective pressure to evade neutralizing antibodies elicited by vaccination or infection. In contrast, the S2 subunit of S is only transiently exposed after receptor binding, which makes it a less efficient target for antibodies. As a result, S2 has a lower mutational frequency than S1. We recently described monomeric and dimeric SARS-CoV-2 fusion-inhibitory lipopeptides that block viral infection by interfering with S2 conformational rearrangements during viral entry. Importantly, a dimeric lipopeptide was shown to block SARS-CoV-2 transmission between ferrets in vivo. Because the S2 subunit is relatively conserved in newly emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOCs), we hypothesize that fusion-inhibitory lipopeptides are cross-protective against infection with VOCs. Here, we directly compared the in vitro efficacies of two fusion-inhibitory lipopeptides against VOC, in comparison with a set of seven postvaccination sera (two doses) and a commercial monoclonal antibody preparation. For the beta, delta, and omicron VOCs, it has been reported that convalescent and postvaccination sera are less potent in virus neutralization assays. Both fusion-inhibitory lipopeptides were equally effective against all five VOCs compared to ancestral virus, whereas postvaccination sera and therapeutic monoclonal antibody lost potency to newer VOCs, in particular to omicron BA.1 and BA.2. The neutralizing activity of the lipopeptides is consistent, and they can be expected to neutralize future VOCs based on their mechanism of action. IMPORTANCE SARS-CoV-2, the causative agent of COVID-19, continues to spread globally, with waves resulting from new variants that evade immunity generated by vaccines and previous strains and escape available monoclonal antibody therapy. Fusion-inhibitory peptides may provide an intervention strategy that is not similarly affected by this viral evolution.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Animales , Anticuerpos Monoclonales , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes , Anticuerpos Antivirales , COVID-19/prevención & control , Hurones , Humanos , Lipopéptidos/química , Lipopéptidos/farmacología , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del CoronavirusRESUMEN
The ongoing evolution of SARS-CoV-2 has resulted in the emergence of Omicron, which displays notable immune escape potential through mutations at key antigenic sites on the spike protein. Many of these mutations localize to the spike protein ACE2 receptor binding domain, annulling the neutralizing activity of therapeutic antibodies that were effective against other variants of concern (VOCs) earlier in the pandemic. Here, we identified a receptor-blocking human monoclonal antibody, 87G7, that retained potent in vitro neutralizing activity against SARS-CoV-2 variants including the Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta, and Omicron (BA.1/BA.2) VOCs. Using cryo-electron microscopy and site-directed mutagenesis experiments, we showed that 87G7 targets a patch of hydrophobic residues in the ACE2-binding site that are highly conserved in SARS-CoV-2 variants, explaining its broad neutralization capacity. 87G7 protected mice and hamsters prophylactically against challenge with all current SARS-CoV-2 VOCs and showed therapeutic activity against SARS-CoV-2 challenge in both animal models. Our findings demonstrate that 87G7 holds promise as a prophylactic or therapeutic agent for COVID-19 that is more resilient to SARS-CoV-2 antigenic diversity.
Asunto(s)
Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina 2 , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina 2/antagonistas & inhibidores , Animales , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/farmacología , Microscopía por Crioelectrón , Humanos , Glicoproteínas de Membrana , Ratones , Pruebas de Neutralización , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus/genética , Proteínas del Envoltorio ViralRESUMEN
The severe acute respiratory distress syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron variant is spreading rapidly, even in vaccinated individuals, raising concerns about immune escape. Here, we studied neutralizing antibodies and T cell responses targeting SARS-CoV-2 D614G [wild type (WT)] and the Beta, Delta, and Omicron variants of concern in a cohort of 60 health care workers after immunization with ChAdOx-1 S, Ad26.COV2.S, mRNA-1273, or BNT162b2. High binding antibody levels against WT SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) were detected 28 days after vaccination with both mRNA vaccines (mRNA-1273 or BNT162b2), which substantially decreased after 6 months. In contrast, antibody levels were lower after Ad26.COV2.S vaccination but did not wane. Neutralization assays showed consistent cross-neutralization of the Beta and Delta variants, but neutralization of Omicron was significantly lower or absent. BNT162b2 booster vaccination after either two mRNA-1273 immunizations or Ad26.COV2 priming partially restored neutralization of the Omicron variant, but responses were still up to 17-fold decreased compared with WT. SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells were detected up to 6 months after all vaccination regimens, with more consistent detection of specific CD4+ than CD8+ T cells. No significant differences were detected between WT- and variant-specific CD4+ or CD8+ T cell responses, including Omicron, indicating minimal escape at the T cell level. This study shows that vaccinated individuals retain T cell immunity to the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant, potentially balancing the lack of neutralizing antibodies in preventing or limiting severe COVID-19. Booster vaccinations are needed to further restore Omicron cross-neutralization by antibodies.