Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin ; 24(6): 585-596, 2021 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33797978

RESUMEN

This study aims to evaluate the mechanical performance of custom 3D-printed titanium plates in the treatment of distal humerus fractures. Rigidity of four plating configurations were investigated by finite element analysis. The results reveal that implementation of custom designs with minimal screw holes, lateral-medial linking screw and lateral brim could significantly improve stiffness and consequently leads to better biomechanical stability as compared to standard osteosynthesis design. Biomechanical testing was also performed to validate practical usability. The results confirm that newly designed custom plates fabricated by selective laser melting is a possible alternative for the treatment of distal humerus fracture.


Asunto(s)
Placas Óseas , Húmero/cirugía , Rayos Láser , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Análisis de Elementos Finitos , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Humanos , Estrés Mecánico
2.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 45(21): E1386-E1390, 2020 Nov 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32796462

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: An in vitro biomechanical study. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to discuss whether pedicle screw systems can control spinal rotational instability in a functional spinal unit of lumbar spine on human cadaver. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Rotational experiments using deer lumbar cadaveric models showed that rotational range of motion (ROM) of the model fixed by a pedicle screw system with crosslinking after total facetectomy for both the sides was larger than that in the intact model, and stated that spinal rotational instability could not be controlled using a pedicle screw system. METHODS: A rotation experiment using 10 functional spinal units (L3-4) of lumbar spine on human cadavers was performed by preparing the four models (intact model, damaged model, pedicle screw model, and crosslink (CL) model) in stages, then calculating and comparing rotational ROM among the four models. RESULTS: Rotational ROM in the CL model was still larger than that of the intact model in all the samples. And, rotational ROM decreased in the order of damaged model >> pedicle screw model > CL model > intact model. Statistical analysis revealed significant differences between all models (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Pedicle screw systems may not control severe spinal rotational instability in human lumbar cadaveric models with total facetectomy on both the sides. This may represent a major biomechanical drawback to the pedicle screw system. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.


Asunto(s)
Inestabilidad de la Articulación/cirugía , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Tornillos Pediculares , Rotación , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Animales , Fenómenos Biomecánicos/fisiología , Cadáver , Ciervos , Femenino , Humanos , Inestabilidad de la Articulación/diagnóstico por imagen , Inestabilidad de la Articulación/fisiopatología , Vértebras Lumbares/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Lumbares/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Rango del Movimiento Articular/fisiología , Fusión Vertebral/instrumentación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...