Caseinomacropeptide specifically stimulates exocrine pancreatic secretion in the anesthetized rat.

The effect of caseinomacropeptide (CMP) (the [106-169] fragment of kappa-casein produced during digestion of milk protein), was studied in anesthetized rats using bile diversion for a pure pancreatic juice collection system. Intraduodenal administration of CMP induced a dose-related specific stimulation of pancreatic secretion which was nearly abolished by devazepide, atropine, hexamethonium, vagotomy or perivagal capsaicin pretreatment. Moreover, CMP did not inhibit in vitro trypsin activity. These results demonstrate that CMP is more likely to stimulate pancreatic secretion specifically through cholecystokinin release and activation of a vago-vagal cholinergic reflex loop than by inhibition of luminal trypsin, in anesthetized rats.

Effect of sumatriptan on external pancreatic secretion and its interaction with endogenous norepinephrine in the rat.

We reported previously that blocking norepinephrine reuptake by nisoxetine could modulate external pancreatic secretion in the rat. We report in this study the interaction of serotonin (5-HT) with endogenous catecholamines by using sumatriptan, an agonist of 5-HT1 receptors, in combination with nisoxetine. Urethane-anesthetized male Wistar rats were fitted with an acute pancreatic fistula. Nisoxetine (0.3 mg/kg, i.v.) and sumatriptan (0.1-1 mg/kg, s.c.) were administered alone or in combination. Pancreatic secretion was measured under stimulation by 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2DG; 75 mg/kg, i.v.), by vagal electrical stimulation (4 V, 2 ms, 10 Hz), or by acetylcholine (60-1,800 microg/kg.h). (i) 2DG: Nisoxetine alone inhibited 2DG-induced pancreatic secretion (p < 0.01). Sumatriptan alone also produced a dose-related inhibition of 2DG-induced pancreatic secretion (p < 0.01). When sumatriptan and nisoxetine were combined, protein response to 2DG remained inhibited, whereas water and electrolyte secretion was restored. (ii) Vagal stimulation: Nisoxetine did not modify water and electrolyte output in response to vagal electrical stimulation (VES), whereas it inhibited protein response by 75%. Sumatriptan alone strongly inhibited pancreatic response to VES (p < 0.01). When nisoxetine and sumatriptan were combined, the protein response to VES remained inhibited, whereas water and electrolyte response to VES was restored. (iii) Acetylcholine: Nisoxetine and sumatriptan alone or combined did not modify pancreatic response to acetylcholine. These results indicate that noradrenergic and serotonergic agents can indirectly affect pancreatic secretion through a modulation of the vagal cholinergic pathway. Nisoxetine and sumatriptan interact negatively on hydroelectrolytic pancreatic secretion, whereas they inhibit the secretion of enzymes both alone and in combination.

Modulation of external pancreatic secretion by endogenous norepinephrine: study with a norepinephrine uptake blocker in the rat.

The effect of endogenous catecholamines on pancreatic secretion was analyzed with nisoxetine, a specific norepinephrine uptake blocker, and specific adrenoceptor antagonists in anesthetized acute fistula rats. Nisoxetine was administered alone or with alpha-1 (prazosin), alpha-2 (idazoxan or yohimbine), or beta (propranolol) adrenoceptor antagonists. Pancreatic secretion was measured in basal conditions or after stimulation by 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2DG), electrical vagal stimulation, or acetylcholine. (a) Basal. Nisoxetine alone had no effect. Associated with idazoxan or yohimbine, nisoxetine produced a dose-related stimulation (p < 0.01) of water and electrolyte without changing protein output. Addition of propranolol abolished this stimulation. (b) 2DG. Nisoxetine inhibited 2DG-induced secretion (p < 0.01). Idazoxan or yohimbine suppressed the nisoxetine inhibition of water and electrolyte output (p < 0.01) but had no effect on protein output, which was restored only by adding a mixture of idazoxan, prazosin, and propranolol. (c) Electrical stimulation. Nisoxetine did not modify water and electrolyte but inhibited protein response by 75%. Adding idazoxan to nisoxetine significantly increased (p < 0.01) water and bicarbonate response and partly restored protein response. Water and bicarbonate response was restored by propranolol, whereas protein response was only restored by adding a mixture of idazoxan, prazosin, and propranolol. (d) Nisoxetine did not modify pancreatic response to acetylcholine. In conclusion, endogenous norepinephrine affects the response to vagally mediated effects through several subtypes of adrenoceptors, without changing basal or acetylcholine stimulated secretion.

Modulation by alcohol and methadone of 2-deoxyglucose-stimulated pancreatic secretion in the rat.

Alcohol intake is a major problem in drug addicts, and it is not clear whether the effects of alcohol and opiates are additive or potentiating. Vagally stimulated pancreatic secretion in rats is potently inhibited by opiates acting centrally at mu-receptors. In the present experiments, we determined the effects of methadone on 2-deoxyglucose (2DG)-stimulated pancreatic secretion in rats treated with acute (1.9 g/kg.3 h, intravenously) or chronic (1 or 3 month drinking) ethanol. In both acute and 1 month chronic alcoholic rats, methadone administered at its 50% inhibitory dose (ID50) reduced by about 50% 2DG-stimulated pancreatic secretion of sodium, bicarbonate and protein, and ethanol had only faint, nonsignificant inhibitory effects. In 3 month chronic alcoholic rats, similar results were obtained, but methadone inhibited 2DG-stimulated pancreatic secretion by 60 to 90% in these older rats. No significant interaction was found in any condition between ethanol and methadone, suggesting that they had only additive, but not potentiating effects in this method.