Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in non-myocardial disorders.

This article reviews and discusses non-myocardial disorders which represent diagnostic challenges when evaluating patients for suspected heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. This includes pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension, which is important to differentiate from post-capillary hypertension caused by left sided heart disease. The impact of electrical disorders on LV diastolic function is also reviewed, and includes a discussion of left bundle branch, which has both a direct effect on LV diastolic function, as well as a long-term effect due to remodeling. Furthermore, evaluation of diastolic function in patients with atrial fibrillation is discussed. Pericardial diseases are reviewed as well as effects of a normal pericardium on diastolic function in failing hearts. Finally, the article reviews how valvular diseases impact LV diastolic function.

Impact of Left Atrial Pressure on Outcomes After Mitral Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair.

Background: Increased left atrial pressure (LAP) has been associated with adverse outcomes after mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER). We sought to evaluate outcomes based on differences in post-procedural LAP measured after final clip deployment. Methods: We included consecutive patients who underwent M-TEER at our institution between 2014-2022 with LAP monitoring. Patients were stratified into 3 groups according to tertiles of post-TEER mean LAP. Outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard models. Results: We included 273 patients (mean age 76.8±10.8 years, 42.5% women, 78.4% Caucasian). The mean post-TEER LAP was 8.7±1.7 mmHg in tertile 1 (N=85), 14.4±1.6 mmHg in tertile 2 (N=95), and 21.9±3.8 mmHg in tertile 3 (N=93). In comparison with tertile 1, both tertiles 2 and 3 were associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalization at 2 years (adjHR 2.27, 95% CI 1.25-4.12; and adjHR 3.00, 95% CI 1.59-5.64 respectively). Among patients with primary MR, higher LAP was associated with increased risk of 2-year all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalization [tertile 2 vs. 1: adjHR 3.00, 95% CI 1.37-6.56; and tertile 3 vs. 1: adjHR 5.52, 95% CI 2.04-14.95). However, in patients with secondary MR, neither being in tertile 2 (adjHR 1.53; 95% CI 0.55-4.24), nor tertile 3 (adjHR 2.18; 95% CI 0.82-5.77) were associated with the composite outcome compared with tertile 1. Any degree of LAP reduction following M-TEER was associated with lower mortality or heart failure hospitalization compared with no LAP reduction (adjHR 0.59; 95% CI 0.39-0.88). Conclusions: Elevated LAP after M-TEER was associated with increased 2-year risk of mortality or heart failure hospitalization. Exploration of reasons for elevated LAP after M-TEER, and ways to lower it warrant further investigation.

Evaluation of left ventricular filling pressure by echocardiography in patients with atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Echocardiography is widely used to evaluate left ventricular (LV) diastolic function in patients suspected of heart failure. For patients in sinus rhythm, a combination of several echocardiographic parameters can differentiate between normal and elevated LV filling pressure with good accuracy. However, there is no established echocardiographic approach for the evaluation of LV filling pressure in patients with atrial fibrillation. The objective of the present study was to determine if a combination of several echocardiographic and clinical parameters may be used to evaluate LV filling pressure in patients with atrial fibrillation. RESULTS: In a multicentre study of 148 atrial fibrillation patients, several echocardiographic parameters were tested against invasively measured LV filling pressure as the reference method. No single parameter had sufficiently strong association with LV filling pressure to be recommended for clinical use. Based on univariate regression analysis in the present study, and evidence from existing literature, we developed a two-step algorithm for differentiation between normal and elevated LV filling pressure, defining values ≥ 15 mmHg as elevated. The parameters in the first step included the ratio between mitral early flow velocity and septal mitral annular velocity (septal E/e'), mitral E velocity, deceleration time of E, and peak tricuspid regurgitation velocity. Patients who could not be classified in the first step were tested in a second step by applying supplementary parameters, which included left atrial reservoir strain, pulmonary venous systolic/diastolic velocity ratio, and body mass index. This two-step algorithm classified patients as having either normal or elevated LV filling pressure with 75% accuracy and with 85% feasibility. Accuracy in EF ≥ 50% and EF < 50% was similar (75% and 76%). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with atrial fibrillation, no single echocardiographic parameter was sufficiently reliable to be used clinically to identify elevated LV filling pressure. An algorithm that combined several echocardiographic parameters and body mass index, however, was able to classify patients as having normal or elevated LV filling pressure with moderate accuracy and high feasibility.

Prognostic Value of Right Ventricular Afterload in Patients Undergoing Mitral Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) and secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) are associated with adverse outcomes after mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair. We aim to study the prognostic value of invasively measured right ventricular afterload in patients undergoing mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair. METHODS AND RESULTS: We identified patients who underwent right heart catheterization ≤1 month before transcatheter edge-to-edge repair. The end points were all-cause mortality and a composite of mortality and heart failure hospitalization at 2 years. Using the receiver operating characteristic curve-derived threshold of 0.6 for pulmonary effective arterial elastance ([Ea], pulmonary artery systolic pressure/stroke volume), patients were stratified into 3 profiles based on PH severity (low elastance [HE]: Ea <0.6/mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP)) <35; High Elastance with No/Mild PH (HE-): Ea ≥0.6/mPAP <35; and HE with Moderate/Severe PH (HE+): Ea ≥0.6/mPAP ≥35) and MR pathogenesis (Primary MR [PMR])/low elastance, PMR/HE, and secondary MR). The association between this classification and clinical outcomes was examined using Cox regression. Among 114 patients included, 50.9% had PMR. Mean±SD age was 74.7±10.6 years. Patients with Ea ≥0.6 were more likely to have diabetes, atrial fibrillation, New York Heart Association III/IV status, and secondary MR (all P<0.05). Overall, 2-year cumulative survival was 71.1% and was lower in patients with secondary MR and mPAP ≥35. Compared with patients with low elastance, cumulative 2-year event-free survival was significantly lower in HE- and HE+ patients (85.5% versus 50.4% versus 41.0%, respectively, P=0.001). Also, cumulative 2-year event-free survival was significantly higher in patients with PMR/low elastance when compared with PMR/HE and patients with secondary mitral regurgitation (85.5% versus 55.5% versus 46.1%, respectively, P=0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of the preprocedural cardiopulmonary profile based on mPAP, MR pathogenesis, and Ea guides patient selection by identifying hemodynamic features that indicate likely benefit from mitral-transcatheter edge-to-edge repair in PH or lack thereof.

Safety and Efficacy of Metabolic Modulation With Ninerafaxstat in Patients With Nonobstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: In nonobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (nHCM), there are no approved medical therapies. Impaired myocardial energetics is a potential cause of symptoms and exercise limitation. Ninerafaxstat, a novel cardiac mitotrope, enhances cardiac energetics. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ninerafaxstat in nHCM. METHODS: Patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and left ventricular outflow tract gradient <30 mm Hg, ejection fraction ≥50%, and peak oxygen consumption <80% predicted were randomized to ninerafaxstat 200 mg twice daily or placebo (1:1) for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability, with efficacy outcomes also assessed as secondary endpoints. RESULTS: A total of 67 patients with nHCM were enrolled at 12 centers (57 ± 11.8 years of age; 55% women). Serious adverse events occurred in 11.8% (n = 4 of 34) in the ninerafaxstat group and 6.1% (n = 2 of 33) of patients in the placebo group. From baseline to 12 weeks, ninerafaxstat was associated with significantly better VE/Vco2 (ventilatory efficiency) slope compared with placebo with a least-squares (LS) mean difference between the groups of -2.1 (95% CI: -3.6 to -0.6; P = 0.006), with no significant difference in peak VO2 (P = 0.90). The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Clinical Summary Score was directionally, though not significantly, improved with ninerafaxstat vs placebo (LS mean 3.2; 95% CI: -2.9 to 9.2; P = 0.30); however, it was statistically significant when analyzed post hoc in the 35 patients with baseline Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Clinical Summary Score ≤80 (LS mean 9.4; 95% CI: 0.3-18.5; P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: In symptomatic nHCM, novel drug therapy targeting myocardial energetics was safe and well tolerated and associated with better exercise performance and health status among those most symptomatically limited. The findings support assessing ninerafaxstat in a phase 3 study.

Efficacy and Safety of Aficamten in Symptomatic Nonobstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Results From the REDWOOD-HCM Trial, Cohort 4.

BACKGROUND: This open-label phase 2 trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of aficamten in patients with nonobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (nHCM). METHODS: Patients with symptomatic nHCM (left ventricular outflow tract obstruction gradient ≤ 30 mmHg, left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] ≥ 60%, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide [NT-proBNP] > 300 pg/mL) received aficamten 5-15 mg once daily (doses adjusted according to echocardiographic LVEF) for 10 weeks. RESULTS: We enrolled 41 patients (mean ± SD age 56 ± 16 years; 59% female). At Week 10, 22 (55%) patients experienced an improvement of ≥ 1 New York Heart Association class; 11 (29%) became asymptomatic. Clinically relevant improvements in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Clinical Summary Scores occurred in 22 (55%) patients. Symptom relief was paralleled by reductions in NT-proBNP levels (56%; P < 0.001) and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (22%; P < 0.005). Modest reductions in LVEF (mean ± SD) of -5.4% ± 10 to 64.6% ± 9.1 were observed. Three (8%) patients had asymptomatic reduction in LVEF < 50% (range: 41%-48%), all returning to normal after 2 weeks of washout. One patient with prior history of aborted sudden cardiac death experienced a fatal arrhythmia during the study. CONCLUSIONS: Aficamten administration for symptomatic nHCM was generally safe and was associated with improvements in heart failure symptoms and cardiac biomarkers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04219826.

Noninvasive Prediction of Pulmonary Capillary Wedge Pressure in Patients With Normal Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: Comparison of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance With Comprehensive Echocardiography.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) was recently reported to predict mean pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP). However, there is a paucity of data on its accuracy for estimation of PCWP in patients with normal left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF). We sought to examine its accuracy against the invasive gold standard and to compare it with the accuracy of comprehensive echocardiography. METHODS: Stable patients with EF of ≥50% who underwent right heart catheterization, CMR, and echocardiographic imaging within 1 week were included. Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure was estimated by CMR using a previously validated equation where PCWP is estimated based on the left atrial maximum volume and LV mass. Echocardiographic estimation of PCWP was based on 2016 American Society of Echocardiography/European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging guidelines, taking into account the presence of myocardial disease. RESULTS: The mean age of the 79 patients was 55 ± 15 years, and 58.2% were female. There were 33 patients with PCWP >15 mm Hg by right heart catheterization. Cardiac magnetic resonance prediction of PCWP had an area under the curve (AUC) = 0.72. In comparison, echocardiographic prediction of PCWP showed a higher accuracy (AUC = 0.87 vs AUC = 0.72; P = .008). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with normal LV EF, CMR estimation of mean PCWP based on LV mass and left atrial volume has modest accuracy for detecting patients with mean PCWP >15 mm Hg. Comprehensive echocardiography predicts elevated PCWP with higher accuracy in comparison with CMR.

Echocardiographic Profiling Predicts Clinical Outcomes After Mitral Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair.

BACKGROUND: Prior studies investigating the impact of residual mitral regurgitation (MR), tricuspid regurgitation (TR), and elevated predischarge transmitral mean pressure gradient (TMPG) on outcomes after mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) have assessed each parameter in isolation. We sought to examine the prognostic value of combining predischarge MR, TR, and TMPG to study long-term outcomes after TEER. METHODS AND RESULTS: We reviewed the records of 291 patients who underwent successful mitral TEER at our institution between March 2014 and June 2022. Using well-established outcomes-related cutoffs for predischarge MR (≥moderate), TR (≥moderate), and TMPG (≥5 mm Hg), 3 echo profiles were developed based on the number of risk factors present (optimal: 0 risk factors, mixed: 1 risk factor, poor: ≥2 risk factors). Discrimination of the profiles for predicting the primary composite end point of all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization at 2 years was examined using Cox regression. Overall, mean age was 76.7±10.6 years, 43.3% were women, and 53% had primary MR. Two-year event-free survival was 61%. Predischarge TR≥moderate, MR≥moderate, and TMPG≥5 mm Hg were risk factors associated with the primary end point. Compared with the optimal profile, there was an incremental risk in 2-year event-rate with each worsening profile (optimal as reference; mixed profile: hazard ratio (HR), 2.87 [95% CI, 1.71-5.17], P<0.001; poor profile: HR, 3.76 [95% CI, 1.84-6.53], P<0.001). Echocardiographic profile was statistically associated with the 2-year mortality end point (optimal as reference; mixed profile: HR, 3.55 [95% CI, 1.81-5.96], P<0.001; poor profile: HR, 3.39 [95% CI, 2.56-7.33], P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The echocardiographic profile integrating predischarge TR, MR, and TMPG presents a novel prognostic stratification tool for patients undergoing mitral TEER.

American Society of Echocardiography COVID-19 Statement Update: Lessons Learned and Preparation for Future Pandemics.

The COVID-19 pandemic has evolved since the publication of the initial American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) statements providing guidance to echocardiography laboratories. In light of new developments, the ASE convened a diverse, expert writing group to address the current state of the COVID-19 pandemic and to apply lessons learned to echocardiography laboratory operations in future pandemics. This statement addresses important areas specifically impacted by the current and future pandemics: (1) indications for echocardiography, (2) application of echocardiographic services in a pandemic, (3) infection/transmission mitigation strategies, (4) role of cardiac point-of-care ultrasound/critical care echocardiography, and (5) training in echocardiography.

Echocardiographic Evaluation of Diastolic Function in Special Populations.

Left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction results from a combination of impaired relaxation, reduced restoring forces, and increased chamber stiffness. Noninvasive assessment of diastology uses a multiparametric approach involving surrogate markers of increased filling pressures, which include mitral inflow, septal and lateral annular velocities, tricuspid regurgitation velocity, and left atrial volume index. However, these parameters must be used cautiously. This is because the traditional algorithms for evaluating diastolic function and estimation of LV filling pressures (LVFPs), as recommended by the American Society of Echocardiography and European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging 2016 guidelines, do not apply to unique patients with underlying cardiomyopathies, significant valvular disease, conduction abnormalities, arrhythmias, LV assist devices, and heart transplants, which alter the relation between the conventional indexes of diastolic function and LVFP. The purpose of this review is to provide solutions for evaluating LVFP through illustrative examples of these special populations, incorporating supplemental Doppler indexes, such as isovolumic relaxation time, mitral deceleration time, and pulmonary venous flow analysis, as needed to formulate a more comprehensive approach.

Prevalence of Diastolic Dysfunction in Adult Survivors of Childhood Cancer: A Report From SJLIFE Cohort.

Background: The prevalence of diastolic dysfunction has not been systematically evaluated in a large population of survivors of childhood cancer using established guidelines and standards. Objectives: This study sought to assess the prevalence and progression of diastolic dysfunction in adult survivors of childhood cancer exposed to cardiotoxic therapy. Methods: Comprehensive, longitudinal echocardiographic examinations of adult survivors of childhood cancer ≥18 years of age and ≥10 years from diagnosis in SJLIFE (St. Jude Lifetime Cohort Study) were performed. Diastolic dysfunction was defined based on 2016 American Society of Echocardiography/European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging guidelines. Results: Among 3,342 survivors, the median (25th-75th percentiles [quartile (Q)1-Q3]) age at diagnosis was 8.1 years (Q1-Q3: 3.6-13.7 years), 30.1 years (Q1-Q3: 24.4-37.0 years) at the baseline echocardiography evaluation (Echo 1), and 36.6 years (Q1-Q3: 30.8-43.6 years) at the last follow-up echocardiography evaluation (1,435 survivors) (Echo 2). The proportion of diastolic dysfunction was 15.2% (95% CI: 14.0%-16.4%) at Echo 1 and 15.7% (95% CI: 13.9%-17.7%) at Echo 2, largely attributable to concurrent systolic dysfunction. Less than 5% of survivors with preserved ejection fraction had diastolic dysfunction (2.2% at Echo 1, 3.7% at Echo 2). Using global longitudinal strain assessment in adult survivors with preserved ejection fraction (defined with a cutpoint worse than -15.9%), the proportion of diastolic dysfunction increased to 9.2% at baseline and 9.0% at follow-up. Conclusions: The prevalence of isolated diastolic dysfunction is low among adults who received cardiotoxic therapies for childhood cancer. The inclusion of left ventricular global longitudinal strain significantly increased the identification of diastolic dysfunction.

Imaging for implementation of heart failure guidelines.

The classification of heart failure with implications for pharmacological therapeutic interventions rests on defining ejection fraction (EF) which is an imaging parameter. Imaging can provide diagnostic clues as to aetiology of heart failure; it can also guide and help assess response to treatment. Echocardiography, CMR, cardiac computed tomography, positron emission tomography, and Tc 99 m pyrophosphate scanning provide information about the aetiology of heart failure. Further, echocardiography plays the primary role in the evaluation of LV diastolic function and the estimation of left ventricular (LV) filling pressures both at rest and with exercise during diastolic stress testing. Heart failure guidelines recognize four stages (A, B, C, and D) for heart failure. Cardiac imaging along with risk factors and clinical status is needed for identifying these stages. There are joint societal echocardiographic guidelines by American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) of Echocardiography and European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging that are applicable to the imaging of heart failure patients. There are also separate guidelines for the evaluation of patients being considered for LV assist device implantation and for multimodality imaging of patients with heart failure and preserved EF. Cardiac catheterization is needed in patients whose haemodynamic status is uncertain after clinical and echocardiographic evaluation and to evaluate for coronary artery disease. Myocardial biopsy can identify the presence of myocarditis or specific infiltrative diseases when the findings by non-invasive imaging are not conclusive.