Association between Postoperative Adjuvant Vasodilator Therapy and In-Hospital Mortality for Non-Occlusive Mesenteric Ischemia: A Nationwide Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Although several clinical guidelines recommend vasodilator therapy for non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia (NOMI) and immediate surgery when bowel necrosis is suspected, these recommendations are based on limited evidence. METHODS: In this retrospective nationwide observational study, we used information from the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination inpatient database from July 2010 to March 2018 to identify patients with NOMI who underwent abdominal surgeries on the day of admission. We compared patients who received postoperative vasodilator therapy (vasodilator group) with those who did not (control group). Vasodilator therapy was defined as venous and/or arterial administration of papaverine and/or prostaglandin E1 within 2 days of admission. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included the prevalence of additional abdominal surgery performed ≥3 days after admission and short bowel syndrome. RESULTS: We identified 928 eligible patients (149 in the vasodilator group and 779 in the control group). One-to-four propensity score matching yielded 149 and 596 patients for the vasodilator and control groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality between the groups (control vs. vasodilator, 27.5% vs. 30.9%; risk difference, 3.4%; 95% confidence interval, -4.9 to 11.6; p=0.42) and no significant difference in the prevalences of abdominal surgery, bowel resection ≥3 days after admission, and short bowel syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative vasodilator use was not significantly associated with a reduction in in-hospital mortality or additional abdominal surgery performed ≥3 days after admission in surgically treated NOMI patients.

Association Between Head Computed Tomography Findings and In-Hospital Mortality in COVID-19 Patients.

OBJECTIVE: The present study investigated the association between head computed tomography (CT) findings and mortality in patients with COVID-19. Specifically, we focused on low-density lesions identified on head CT screenings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a single-center, retrospective cohort study based on data obtained from the medical charts of inpatients admitted to the Tokyo Metropolitan Hiroo Hospital between January 1 and December 31, 2021. We focused on the basal ganglia--a representative anatomical region for assessing routine head CT in patients with COVID-19. Patients were divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of low-density lesions in the basal ganglia. The primary outcome was all-cause in-hospital mortality, and the secondary outcome was the length of hospital stay. We performed multivariable regression analyses for outcomes to adjust for patients' background and disease severity. RESULTS: During the study period, 1,906 COVID-19 patients were admitted to our facility. Among them, 1,203 patients underwent head CT evaluations and were included in this study. The median age was 56 years (interquartile range: 43-76 years) and 725 patients (60.3%) were male. A total of 235 (19.5%) patients required oxygen therapy on admission and 1,051 (87.4%) patients had pneumonia. Crude in-hospital mortality was 6.1% and the median length of hospital stay was 10 days (interquartile range: 8-14 days). The multivariate regression analyses showed that low-density lesions in the basal ganglia were significantly associated with increased in-hospital mortality and prolonged hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of ischemic changes in the basal ganglia denoted by low-density findings may be a promising prognostic factor in patients with COVID-19.

Association Between Intraoperative Landiolol Use and In-Hospital Mortality After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Nationwide Observational Study in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Ischemic heart disease is a leading cause of death worldwide, and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is a major treatment. Landiolol is an ultra-short-acting beta-antagonist known to prevent postoperative atrial fibrillation. However, the effectiveness of intraoperative landiolol on mortality remains unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the association between intraoperative landiolol use and the in-hospital mortality in patients undergoing CABG. METHODS: To conduct this retrospective cohort study, we used data from the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination inpatient database. All patients who underwent CABG during hospitalization between July 1, 2010, and March 31, 2020, were included. Patients who received intraoperative landiolol were defined as the landiolol group, whereas the other patients were defined as the control group. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Propensity score matching was used to compare the landiolol and control groups. RESULTS: In total, 118,506 patients were eligible for this study, including 25,219 (21%) in the landiolol group and 93,287 (79%) in the control group. One-to-one propensity score matching created 24,893 pairs. After propensity score matching, the in-hospital mortality was significantly lower in the landiolol group than that in the control group (3.7% vs 4.3%; odds ratio 0.85; 95% confidence interval 0.78 to 0.94; P = .010). CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative landiolol use was associated with decreased in-hospital mortality in patients undergoing CABG. Further randomized controlled trials are required to confirm these findings.

The Accuracy and Potential Racial and Ethnic Biases of GPT-4 in the Diagnosis and Triage of Health Conditions: Evaluation Study.

BACKGROUND: Whether GPT-4, the conversational artificial intelligence, can accurately diagnose and triage health conditions and whether it presents racial and ethnic biases in its decisions remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: We aim to assess the accuracy of GPT-4 in the diagnosis and triage of health conditions and whether its performance varies by patient race and ethnicity. METHODS: We compared the performance of GPT-4 and physicians, using 45 typical clinical vignettes, each with a correct diagnosis and triage level, in February and March 2023. For each of the 45 clinical vignettes, GPT-4 and 3 board-certified physicians provided the most likely primary diagnosis and triage level (emergency, nonemergency, or self-care). Independent reviewers evaluated the diagnoses as "correct" or "incorrect." Physician diagnosis was defined as the consensus of the 3 physicians. We evaluated whether the performance of GPT-4 varies by patient race and ethnicity, by adding the information on patient race and ethnicity to the clinical vignettes. RESULTS: The accuracy of diagnosis was comparable between GPT-4 and physicians (the percentage of correct diagnosis was 97.8% (44/45; 95% CI 88.2%-99.9%) for GPT-4 and 91.1% (41/45; 95% CI 78.8%-97.5%) for physicians; P=.38). GPT-4 provided appropriate reasoning for 97.8% (44/45) of the vignettes. The appropriateness of triage was comparable between GPT-4 and physicians (GPT-4: 30/45, 66.7%; 95% CI 51.0%-80.0%; physicians: 30/45, 66.7%; 95% CI 51.0%-80.0%; P=.99). The performance of GPT-4 in diagnosing health conditions did not vary among different races and ethnicities (Black, White, Asian, and Hispanic), with an accuracy of 100% (95% CI 78.2%-100%). P values, compared to the GPT-4 output without incorporating race and ethnicity information, were all .99. The accuracy of triage was not significantly different even if patients' race and ethnicity information was added. The accuracy of triage was 62.2% (95% CI 46.5%-76.2%; P=.50) for Black patients; 66.7% (95% CI 51.0%-80.0%; P=.99) for White patients; 66.7% (95% CI 51.0%-80.0%; P=.99) for Asian patients, and 62.2% (95% CI 46.5%-76.2%; P=.69) for Hispanic patients. P values were calculated by comparing the outputs with and without conditioning on race and ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS: GPT-4's ability to diagnose and triage typical clinical vignettes was comparable to that of board-certified physicians. The performance of GPT-4 did not vary by patient race and ethnicity. These findings should be informative for health systems looking to introduce conversational artificial intelligence to improve the efficiency of patient diagnosis and triage.

Early initiation of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor in patients with scleroderma renal crisis: A nationwide inpatient database study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of early initiation of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) in patients with scleroderma renal crisis (SRC). METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study using a nationwide inpatient database in Japan from July 2010 to March 2020. All hospitalized patients with SRC were divided into those who received ACEi within two days of admission (early ACEi group) and those who did not (control group). Propensity-score overlap weighting analysis was performed to adjust for confounding factors. The primary outcome was the composite of in-hospital mortality or hemodialysis dependence at discharge. RESULTS: Of the 475 eligible patients, 248 (52.2%) were in the early ACEi group and 227 (47.8%) were in the control group. After overlap weighting, the primary outcome was significantly lower in the early ACEi group than in the control group (40.1% vs. 49.0%; odds ratio, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-1.00; P= 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed that early initiation of ACEi was associated with lower composite outcome of in-hospital mortality or hemodialysis dependence at discharge in patients with SRC. Further prospective studies are warranted to verify the present findings.

Trends in Mechanical Circulatory Support Use and Outcomes of Patients With Cardiogenic Shock in Japan, 2010 to 2020 (from a Nationwide Inpatient Database Study).

Little is known about the impact of the downgrade of guideline recommendations for intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) use and the approval of the Impella in Japan, where IABPs have been predominantly used. This study aimed to describe the annual trends in the mechanical circulatory support (MCS) use and outcomes in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) requiring MCS. Using the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database from July 2010 to March 2021, we identified inpatients with CS requiring MCS. The patients were stratified into 3 groups: (1) IABP alone, (2) Impella alone, and (3) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), regardless of IABP or Impella use. The patient characteristics and outcomes were reported by the fiscal year. Of the 160,559 eligible patients, 117,599 (73.2%) used IABP alone, 1,465 (0.9%) Impella alone, and 41,495 (25.8%) ECMO. The prevalence of the use of an IABP alone significantly decreased from 80.5% in 2010 to 65.3% in 2020 (p for trend <0.001), whereas the prevalence of the use of an Impella alone significantly increased from 0.0% to 5.0% and ECMO from 19.5% to 29.6% (p for trend <0.001 for both). In-hospital mortality significantly increased from 29.3% in 2010 to 32.6% in 2020 in the overall patients with CS requiring MCS but significantly decreased in those requiring ECMO from 73.7% to 64.1% (p for trend <0.001 for both). In conclusion, there were significant annual changes in the patterns of MCS use and clinical outcomes in patients with CS requiring MCS.

Trends in Treatment Patterns and Outcomes of Patients With Pulmonary Embolism in Japan, 2010 to 2020: A Nationwide Inpatient Database Study.

Background The impact of major changes in the treatment practice of pulmonary embolism (PE), such as limited indications for systemic thrombolysis and the introduction of direct oral anticoagulants, is not well documented. This study aimed to describe annual trends in the treatment patterns and outcomes in patients with PE. Methods and Results Using the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination inpatient database from April 2010 to March 2021, we identified hospitalized patients with PE. Patients with high-risk PE were defined as those admitted for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest or who received cardiopulmonary resuscitation, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, vasopressors, or invasive mechanical ventilation on the day of admission. The remaining patients were defined as patients with non-high-risk PE. The patient characteristics and outcomes were reported with fiscal year trend analyses. Of 88 966 eligible patients, 8116 (9.1%) had high-risk PE, and the remaining 80 850 (90.9%) had non-high-risk PE. Between 2010 and 2020, in patients with high-risk PE, the annual proportion of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use significantly increased from 11.0% to 21.3%, whereas that of thrombolysis use significantly decreased from 22.5% to 15.5% (P for trend <0.001 for both). In-hospital mortality significantly decreased from 51.0% to 43.7% (P for trend=0.04). In patients with non-high-risk PE, the annual proportion of direct oral anticoagulant use increased from 0.0% to 38.3%, whereas that of thrombolysis use significantly decreased from 13.7% to 3.4% (P for trend <0.001 for both). In-hospital mortality significantly decreased from 7.9% to 5.4% (P for trend <0.001). Conclusions Substantial changes in the PE practice and outcomes occurred in patients with high-risk and non-high-risk PE.

Impact of Preoperative Stoma Site Marking on Morbidity and Mortality in Patients with Colorectal Perforation: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative stoma site marking reduces the incidence of complications from elective surgery. However, the impact of stoma site marking in emergency patients with colorectal perforation remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the impact of stoma site marking on morbidity and mortality in patients with colorectal perforation who underwent emergency surgery. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination inpatient database from April 1, 2012, to March 31, 2020. We identified patients who underwent emergency surgery for colorectal perforation. We compared outcomes between those with and without stoma site marking using propensity score matching to adjust for confounding factors. The primary outcome was the overall complication rate, and the secondary outcomes were stoma-related, surgical, and medical complications and 30-day mortality. RESULTS: We identified 21,153 patients (682 with stoma site marking and 20,471 without stoma site marking) and grouped them into 682 pairs using propensity score matching. The overall complication rates were 23.5% and 21.4% in the groups with and without stoma site marking, respectively (p = 0.40). Stoma site marking was not associated with a decrease in stoma-related, surgical, or medical complications. The 30-day mortality did not differ significantly between the groups with and without stoma site marking (7.9% vs. 8.4%, p = 0.843). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative stoma site marking was not associated with a reduction in morbidity and mortality in patients with colorectal perforation who underwent emergency surgery.

Obstetric admission to intensive care units in Japan: a cohort study using the Japanese Intensive care PAtient Database.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to describe the epidemiology and annual trends of obstetric patients using a multicenter intensive care database. METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective cohort study used the Japanese Intensive care PAtient Database (JIPAD). We included obstetric patients registered in the JIPAD between 2015 and 2020. We investigated the proportion of obstetric patients among all patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). We also described the characteristics, procedures, and outcomes of obstetric patients. In addition, the annual trends were examined by nonparametric tests for trends. RESULTS: Of the 184,705 patients enrolled in the JIPAD, 750 (0.41%) were obstetric patients from 61 facilities. The median age was 34 years, the number of post-emergency surgeries was 450 (60.0%), and the median APACHE III score was 36. Mechanical ventilation was the most common procedure performed in 247 (32.9%) patients. There were five (0.7%) in-hospital deaths. The proportion of obstetric patients in the ICU did not change between 2015 and 2020 (P for trend = 0.32). However, there was a trend for a significant decrease in the severity of illness and length of hospital stay on an annual basis between 2015 and 2020. Most patients were admitted to the ICU because of a pregnancy-related disorder postoperatively. CONCLUSION: The proportion of obstetric patients was 0.41% of all ICU admissions. The proportion of obstetric patients admitted to the ICU did not change from 2015 to 2020, but the patients' severity of illness and length of hospital stay significantly decreased over time.

1-year functional outcomes after cardiopulmonary resuscitation for older adults with pre-existing long-term care needs.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the 1-year functional outcomes after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in adults aged ≥65 years with pre-existing long-term care needs. METHODS: This population-based cohort study was conducted in Tochigi Prefecture, one of 47 prefectures in Japan. We used medical and long-term care administrative databases, which included data on functional and cognitive impairment that were assessed with the nationally standardised care-needs certification system. Among individuals aged ≥65 years registered between June 2014 and February 2018, patients who underwent CPR were identified. The primary outcome was mortality and care needs at 1 year after CPR. The outcome was stratified by pre-existing care needs before CPR based on the total daily estimated care minutes: no care needs, support levels 1 and 2 and care-needs level 1 (estimated care time 25-49 min), care-needs levels 2 and 3 (50-89 min) and care-needs levels 4 and 5 (≥90 min). RESULTS: Among 594,092 eligible individuals, 5,086 (0.9%) underwent CPR. The 1-year mortalities after CPR in patients with no care needs, support levels 1 and 2 and care-needs level 1, care-needs levels 2 and 3 and care-needs levels 4 and 5 were 94.6% (n = 2,207/2,332), 96.1% (n = 736/766), 94.5% (n = 930/984) and 95.9% (n = 963/1,004), respectively. Among survivors, most patients had no change in care needs before and at 1 year after CPR. There was no significant association between pre-existing functional and cognitive impairment and 1-year mortality and care needs after adjusting for potential confounders. CONCLUSION: Healthcare providers need to discuss poor survival outcomes after CPR with all older adults and their families in shared decision making.

Postoperative norepinephrine versus dopamine in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: a propensity-matched analysis using a nationwide intensive care database.

BACKGROUND: Choosing catecholamines, such as norepinephrine and dopamine, for perioperative blood pressure control is essential for anesthesiologists and intensivists. However, studies specific to noncardiac surgery are limited. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the effects of postoperative norepinephrine and dopamine on clinical outcomes in adult noncardiac surgery patients by analyzing a nationwide intensive care patient database. METHODS: The Japanese Intensive care PAtient Database (JIPAD) was used for this multicenter retrospective study. Adult patients in the JIPAD who received norepinephrine or dopamine within 24 h after noncardiac surgery in 2018-2020 were included. We compared the norepinephrine and dopamine groups using a one-to-one propensity score matching analysis. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were intensive care unit (ICU) mortality, hospital length of stay, and ICU length of stay. RESULTS: A total of 6,236 eligible patients from 69 ICUs were allocated to the norepinephrine (n = 4,652) or dopamine (n = 1,584) group. Propensity score matching was used to create a matched cohort of 1,230 pairs. No differences in the in-hospital mortality was found between the two propensity score matched groups (risk difference: 0.41%, 95% CI [-1.15, 1.96], P = 0.608). Among the secondary outcomes, only the ICU length of stay was significantly shorter in the norepinephrine group than in the dopamine group (median length: 3 vs. 4 days, respectively; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In adult patients after noncardiac surgery, norepinephrine was not associated with decreased mortality but was associated with a shorter ICU length of stay than dopamine.

Reintubation in COVID-19 patients: a multicenter observational study in Japan (J-RECOVER study).

BACKGROUND: Reintubation is not an uncommon occurrence following extubation and discontinuation of mechanical ventilation. In COVID-19 patients, the proportion of reintubation may be higher than that of non-COVID-19 patients. Furthermore, COVID-19 patients may have a higher risk for developing laryngotracheal stenosis, along with a higher proportion of reintubation than in non-COVID-19 patients. Our understanding of the proportion of reintubation in COVID-19 patients is limited in Japan. Additionally, the reasons for reintubation have not been adequately examined in previous studies outside of Japan. Thus, the present study aimed to describe the proportion and causes of reintubation among COVID-19 patients in Japan. METHODS: This was a multicenter observational study that included 64 participating centers across Japan. This study included mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients who were discharged between April 1, 2020 and September 30, 2020. The outcomes examined were the proportion and causes of reintubation. RESULTS: A total of 373 patients were eligible for inclusion in the current analysis. The median age of patients was 64 years and 80.4% were male. Reintubation was required for 35 patients (9.4%) and the most common causes for reintubation were respiratory failure (71.4%; n = 25) and laryngotracheal stenosis (8.6%; n = 3). CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of reintubation among COVID-19 patients in Japan was relatively low. Respiratory failure was the most common cause for reintubation. Reintubation due to laryngotracheal stenosis accounted for only a small fraction of all reintubated COVID-19 patients in Japan.

Effectiveness of systemic thrombolysis on clinical outcomes in high-risk pulmonary embolism patients with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a nationwide inpatient database study.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend systemic thrombolysis as the first-line reperfusion treatment for patients with high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) who present with cardiogenic shock but do not require venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). However, little is known about the optimal reperfusion treatment in high-risk PE patients requiring VA-ECMO. We aimed to evaluate whether systemic thrombolysis improved high-risk PE patients' outcomes who received VA-ECMO. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study using the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination inpatient database from July 2010 to March 2021. We identified patients who were diagnosed with PE and received VA-ECMO on the day of admission. Patients who received systemic thrombolysis with monteplase or urokinase within two days of initiating VA-ECMO were defined as the thrombolysis group and the remaining patients as the control group. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality and secondary outcomes were favorable neurological outcomes, length of hospital stay, VA-ECMO duration, total hospitalization cost, major bleeding, and blood transfusion volume. Propensity-score inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was performed to compare the outcomes between the groups. RESULTS: Of 1220 eligible patients, 432 (35%) received systemic thrombolysis within two days of initiating VA-ECMO. Among the unweighted cohort, patients in the thrombolysis group were less likely to have poor consciousness at admission, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, and left heart catheterization. After IPTW, the patient characteristics were well-balanced between the two groups The crude in-hospital mortality was 52% in the thrombolysis group and 61% in the control group. After IPTW, in-hospital mortality did not differ significantly between the two groups (risk difference: - 3.0%, 95% confidence interval: - 9.6% to 3.5%). There were also no significant differences in the secondary outcomes. Sensitivity analyses showed a significant difference in major bleeding between the monteplase and control groups (risk difference: 6.9%, 95% confidence interval: 1.7% to 12.1%), excluding patients who received urokinase. There were no significant differences in the other sensitivity and subgroup analyses except for the total hospitalization cost. CONCLUSIONS: Systemic thrombolysis was not associated with reduced in-hospital mortality or increased major bleeding in the high-risk PE patients receiving VA-ECMO. However, systemic thrombolysis with monteplase was associated with increased major bleeding.

Does early excision or skin grafting of severe burns improve prognosis? A retrospective cohort study.

The present study aimed to investigate the appropriate timing of excision or skin grafting of burn wounds in patients with severe burns. We retrospectively analyzed data from the Diagnosis Procedure Combination Database, a nationwide inpatient database in Japan. Patients with severe burns (burn index ≥10) who underwent excision or skin grafting within 7 days from September 2010 to March 2019 were included. We defined the early surgery group as patients who underwent excision or skin grafting within 2 days of admission and the delayed surgery group as those who underwent surgery within 3-7 days of admission. Propensity score matching was used to compare the in-hospital mortality between the two groups, yielding a cohort of 389 pairs. A total of 2362 eligible patients were categorized into the early surgery group (n = 626) and delayed surgery group (n = 1736). The overall in-hospital mortality was 19.6%. In-hospital mortality did not differ significantly between the early surgery (15.9%) and the delayed surgery groups (17.2%; p = 0.70). These results suggest that excision or skin grafting within 2 days of admission was not associated with improved in-hospital mortality compared with surgery thereafter for patients with severe burns.

Association between comorbid mental illness and preceding emergency department visits in unplanned admissions.

Aim: To investigate the association between comorbid mental illness and preceding emergency department (ED) visits in patients with unplanned admission. Methods: This is a retrospective observational study using data from the EDs of three large tertiary medical facilities in Japan. We included adult patients who were admitted to these hospitals via the ED from 2017 to 2020. To investigate whether patients with mental illness were more likely to have preceding ED visits within 30 days prior to unplanned admissions compared with those without, we used univariate and multivariable logistic regression models. In the multivariable model, we adjusted for age category, gender, facility, year, and ambulance use. Results: Out of 15,429 total admissions, 766 (5.0%) cases had documented comorbid mental illness and 14,663 (95.0%) did not. The prevalence of preceding ED visits among patients with mental illness was significantly higher than in those without (17.1% vs 8.8%; unadjusted odds ratio 2.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.76-2.61; P < 0.001). This association was more prominent in the multivariable regression model (adjusted odds ratio 2.40, 95% CI 1.97-2.94; P < 0.001). Conclusions: The presence of mental illness was significantly associated with a higher prevalence of preceding ED visits within 30 days prior to the unplanned admission. The result suggests that physicians should be more cautious in discharging patients with mental illness from the EDs and in providing care after ED discharge.

Development and Validation of a Novel Method for Converting the Japan Coma Scale to Glasgow Coma Scale.

BACKGROUND: The Japan Coma Scale (JCS) is the most frequently adopted method for evaluating level of consciousness in Japan. However, no validated method for converting the JCS to the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) exists. The aims of the present study were to develop and validate a method to convert the JCS to GCS. METHODS: This is a multicenter retrospective analysis involving three emergency departments (EDs) in Japan. We included all adult patients who visited the ED between 2017 and 2020. The participating facilities were divided into two cohorts-one cohort to develop a table to convert the JCS to GCS (development cohort), and the other cohort to validate the conversion table (validation cohort). The conversion table of the JCS to GCS was developed based on the median values of the GCS. The outcome was the concordance rate between the JCS and GCS. RESULTS: We identified 8,194 eligible patients. The development cohort included 7,373 patients and the validation cohort included 821 patients. In the validation cohort, the absolute and relative concordance rates were 80.3% (95% confidence interval, 77.4-82.9%) and 93.2% (95% confidence interval, 91.2-94.8%), respectively. CONCLUSION: This study developed and validated a novel method for converting the JCS to GCS. Assuming the offset by a single category between the JCS and GCS is acceptable, the concordance rate was over 90% in the general adult patient population visiting the ED. The conversion method may assist researchers to convert JCS scores into GCS scores, which are more commonly recognized among global audiences.

Outcomes after early versus delayed antibiotic treatment of liver abscess in Japan: A nationwide retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The optimal timing of antibiotic administration in patients with a liver abscess undergoing liver aspiration or drainage is unknown. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study using the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database, a national inpatient database in Japan. RESULTS: A total of 34,424 patients who were emergently hospitalized due to liver abscess between July 2010 and March 2020 were included. Of these, 31,248 (90.8%) received antibiotics on the day of admission (early antibiotics group), and 3176 (9.2%) did not (delayed antibiotics group). Multivariable logistic regression analyses showed that in-hospital mortality of patients in the early antibiotics group was significantly lower than that in the delayed antibiotics group (odds ratio, 0.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-0.72; p <0.001). Patients in the early antibiotics group had a significantly lower proportion of clinical deterioration (odds ratio, 0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-0.84; p <0.001) and shorter length of stay (adjusted difference, -5.2 days; 95% confidence interval, -6.2 to -4.1 days; p <0.001) than those in the delayed antibiotics group. CONCLUSIONS: Starting antibiotic treatment on the day of admission was associated with lower mortality, a lower proportion of clinical deterioration, and a shorter length of hospital stay.