Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Acute Med Surg ; 11(1): e942, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38500638

RESUMEN

Aim: Prescription drug and over-the-counter (OTC) drug overdose is a major problem in emergency departments in Japan, and some need advanced care which is more than observation. We aimed to identify the prehospital risk factors for the need of advanced care among overdose patients. Methods: This was a single-center retrospective cohort study. We included overdoses patients of prescription drugs or OTC drugs, who admitted to our hospital between 2016 and 2021. We grouped them into advanced care and non-advanced care. The main outcome was the need for advanced care. We performed a multiple logistic regression analysis, calculated the PAV score (Paracetamol use, Alcohol use, abnormal Vital signs on scene) and performed a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results: There were 229 subjects. The logistic regression analysis revealed that alcohol, paracetamol, and the abnormal vital signs on scene were associated with advanced care (alcohol-odds ratio [OR]: 2.95; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.29-6.75; paracetamol-OR: 5.47; 95% CI: 2.18-13.71; abnormal vital signs-OR: 4.61, 95% CI: 2.07-10.27). The rate of advanced care in the high PAV score (2 and 3) group was statistically higher than that in the low PAV score (0-1) group (p = 0.04). Area under the ROC curve of the PAV score was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.65-0.80). Conclusion: Alcohol, paracetamol use and abnormal vital signs on scene might be risk factors for advanced care among prescription drugs or OTC drugs overdose patients, and the PAV score may predict the need for advanced care.

2.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38386985

RESUMEN

Temperature control is the only neuroprotective intervention suggested in current international guidelines for patients with return of spontaneous circulation after cardiac arrest, but the prevalence of temperature control therapy, temperature settings, and outcomes have not been clearly reported. We aimed to investigate changes over 7 years in provision of temperature control treatment among out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients in Kanto region, Japan. Data of all adult OHCA patients who survived for more than 24 hours in the prospective cohort studies, SOS-KANTO 2012 (conducted from 2012 to 2013) and SOS-KANTO 2017 (conducted from 2019 to 2021), in Japan were included. We compared the prevalence of temperature control and the proportion of mild (≥35°C) and moderate (from 32°C to 34.9°C) hypothermia between the two study groups. We also performed a Cox regression analysis to evaluate 30-day mortality adjusted by temperature control therapy (none, moderate hypothermia, or mild hypothermia), age, sex, past medical history, witnessed status, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, initial rhythm, location of arrest, and dataset (SOS-KANTO 2012 or 2017). We analyzed data from 2936 patients (n = 1710, SOS-KANTO 2012; n = 1226, SOS-KANTO 2017). Use of temperature control was lower (45.3% vs. 41.4%, p = 0.04), moderate hypothermia was lower (p < 0.01), and mild hypothermia was higher (p < 0.01) in SOS-KANTO 2017 compared with SOS-KANTO 2012. The survival rate was significantly higher for patients with mild (p < 0.01) and moderate (p < 0.01) hypothermia compared with those who did not receive temperature control therapy. Overall, the incidence of moderate hypothermia decreased and that of mild hypothermia increased and the use of temperature control decreased between the two studies conducted 7 years apart in the Kanto area, Japan. Temperature control management might improve survival of patients with OHCA.

3.
J Intensive Care ; 11(1): 34, 2023 Jul 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37488591

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The efficacies of fresh frozen plasma and coagulation factor transfusion have been widely evaluated in trauma-induced coagulopathy management during the acute post-injury phase. However, the efficacy of red blood cell transfusion has not been adequately investigated in patients with severe trauma, and the optimal hemoglobin target level during the acute post-injury and resuscitation phases remains unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to examine whether a restrictive transfusion strategy was clinically non-inferior to a liberal transfusion strategy during the acute post-injury phase. METHODS: This cluster-randomized, crossover, non-inferiority multicenter trial was conducted at 22 tertiary emergency medical institutions in Japan and included adult patients with severe trauma at risk of major bleeding. The institutions were allocated a restrictive or liberal transfusion strategy (target hemoglobin levels: 7-9 or 10-12 g/dL, respectively). The strategies were applied to patients immediately after arrival at the emergency department. The primary outcome was 28-day survival after arrival at the emergency department. Secondary outcomes included transfusion volume, complication rates, and event-free days. The non-inferiority margin was set at 3%. RESULTS: The 28-day survival rates of patients in the restrictive (n = 216) and liberal (n = 195) strategy groups were 92.1% and 91.3%, respectively. The adjusted odds ratio for 28-day survival in the restrictive versus liberal strategy group was 1.02 (95% confidence interval: 0.49-2.13). Significant non-inferiority was not observed. Transfusion volumes and hemoglobin levels were lower in the restrictive strategy group than in the liberal strategy group. No between-group differences were noted in complication rates or event-free days. CONCLUSIONS: Although non-inferiority of the restrictive versus liberal transfusion strategy for 28-day survival was not statistically significant, the mortality and complication rates were similar between the groups. The restrictive transfusion strategy results in a lower transfusion volume. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: umin.ac.jp/ctr: UMIN000034405, registration date: 8 October 2018.

4.
Injury ; 53(6): 2133-2138, 2022 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35300867

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE: Complex pelvic injuries are among the types of trauma with the highest mortality. Treatment strategies should be based on the hemodynamic status, the anatomical type of fracture, and the associated injuries. Combination therapies, including preperitoneal pelvic packing, temporary mechanical stabilization, resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta, and angioembolization, are recommended for pelvic injuries. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of urgent angioembolization alone on severe pelvic injury-associated mortality. DESIGN, SETTINGS, AND PARTICIPANTS: We used the Japan Trauma Data Bank database, a multicenter observational study, to retrospectively identify adult patients with isolated blunt pelvic injuries (Abbreviated Injury Scale [AIS] score: 3-5) from 2004 to 2018. OUTCOME MEASURES AND ANALYSIS: The primary outcome measure was in-hospital mortality. We subdivided patients into two groups, those who underwent urgent angioembolization and non-urgent angioembolization, and compared their mortality rates. We performed multiple imputation and multivariable analyzes to compare the mortality rates between groups after adjusting for known potential confounding factors (age, sex, Glasgow Coma Scale score, systolic blood pressure on hospital arrival, Injury Severity Score, pelvic AIS score, laparotomy, resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta, and external fixation) and for within-hospital clustering using the generalized estimating equation. MAIN RESULTS: We analyzed 4207 of 345,932 trauma patients, of whom 799 underwent urgent angioembolization. The in-hospital mortality rate was significantly higher in the urgent embolization group than in the non-urgent embolization group (7.4 vs. 4.0%; p < 0.01). However, logistic regression analysis revealed that the mortality rates of patients with urgent angioembolization significantly decreased after adjusting for factors independently associated with mortality (odds ratio: 0.60; 95% confidence interval: 0.37-0.96; p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Urgent angioembolization may be an effective treatment for severe pelvic injury regardless of the pelvic AIS score and the systolic blood pressure on hospital arrival.


Asunto(s)
Oclusión con Balón , Fracturas Óseas , Huesos Pélvicos , Heridas no Penetrantes , Adulto , Fracturas Óseas/complicaciones , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Japón/epidemiología , Huesos Pélvicos/lesiones , Resucitación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Heridas no Penetrantes/complicaciones , Heridas no Penetrantes/terapia
5.
J Nippon Med Sch ; 89(3): 342-346, 2022 Jun 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33692306

RESUMEN

External iliac artery (EIA) injuries caused by blunt trauma are rare. Here, we describe a blunt EIA injury after a motorbike accident suffered by a 16-year-old male. Despite conservative treatment, intermittent claudication persisted. He was successfully treated by elective endovascular stent-graft implantation on day 59 after the injury. Ankle-brachial index (ABI) improved, as did his symptoms. A contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan on postoperative day 90 showed no residual stenosis and favorable peripheral blood flow. This report suggests that elective endovascular stent-graft implantation might be a viable treatment option for blunt EIA injuries.


Asunto(s)
Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Heridas no Penetrantes , Adolescente , Prótesis Vascular , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/métodos , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Humanos , Arteria Ilíaca/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Ilíaca/cirugía , Masculino , Stents , Resultado del Tratamiento , Heridas no Penetrantes/complicaciones , Heridas no Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagen , Heridas no Penetrantes/cirugía
6.
Ann Intensive Care ; 11(1): 171, 2021 Dec 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34897587

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Only a few studies have reported the association between age and mortality in COVID-19 patients who require invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). We aimed to evaluate the effect of age on COVID-19-related mortality among patients undergoing IMV therapy. METHODS: This cohort study was conducted using the COVID-19 Registry Japan database, a nationwide multi-centre study of hospitalized patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19. Of all 33,808 cases registered between 1 January 2020 to 28 February 2021, we analysed 1555 patients who had undergone IMV. We evaluated mortality rates between age groups using multivariable regression analysis after adjusting for known potential components, such as within-hospital clustering, comorbidities, steroid use, medication for COVID-19, and vital signs on admission, using generalized estimation equation. RESULTS: By age group, the mortality rates in the IMV group were 8.6%, 20.7%, 34.9%, 49.7% and 83.3% for patients in their 50s, 60s, 70s, 80s, and 90s, respectively. Multivariable analysis showed that compared with those for patients aged < 60 years, the odds ratios (95% confidence interval) of death were 2.6 (1.6-4.1), 6.9 (4.2-11.3), 13.2 (7.2-24.1), 92.6 (16.7-515.0) for patients in their 60s, 70s, 80s, and 90s, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort study, age had a great effect on mortality in COVID-19 patients undergoing IMV, after adjusting for variables independently associated with mortality. This study suggested that age was associated with higher mortality and that preventing progression to severe COVID-19 in elderly patients may be a great public health issue.

7.
Int J Hematol ; 114(2): 164-171, 2021 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33895968

RESUMEN

Coagulation disorder is a major cause of death in sepsis patients. Recently, sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) scoring was developed as a new criterion for coagulopathy-associated sepsis. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the SIC score for predicting the prognosis of septic shock. We analyzed data from a multicenter observational study conducted from 2011 to 2013. We grouped the participants into those who did and did not use vasopressors, and compared the in-hospital mortality rates of SIC and non-SIC patients. Patients who needed vasopressors were considered to have septic shock. We performed survival analysis adjusted by factors independently associated with mortality. SIC developed in 66.4% of patients who used vasopressors and 42.2% of patients who did not. The in-hospital mortality difference between the SIC and non-SIC groups was statistically significant in those who needed vasopressors (35.8% vs 27.9%, p < 0.01). Cox regression analysis indicated that SIC was significantly correlated with mortality risk in patients who used vasopressors (hazard ratio [HR] 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13-1.70; p < 0.01), but not in those who did not (HR 1.38; 95% CI 0.81-2.34; p = 0.23). In conclusion, the SIC score might be a good diagnostic indicator of fatal coagulopathy among sepsis patients who need vasopressors.


Asunto(s)
Coagulación Sanguínea , Enfermedad Crítica , Sepsis/sangre , Sepsis/diagnóstico , Choque Séptico/sangre , Choque Séptico/diagnóstico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biomarcadores , Trastornos de la Coagulación Sanguínea/sangre , Trastornos de la Coagulación Sanguínea/diagnóstico , Trastornos de la Coagulación Sanguínea/etiología , Pruebas de Coagulación Sanguínea , Femenino , Humanos , Japón , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recuento de Plaquetas , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Sepsis/complicaciones , Sepsis/mortalidad , Choque Séptico/complicaciones , Choque Séptico/mortalidad
8.
J Orthop Surg Res ; 14(1): 302, 2019 Sep 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31488166

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The management of cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) has changed drastically in the last decades, and surgery is the primary treatment. However, the optimum timing of early surgical treatment (within 24 h or 72 h after injury) is still controversial. We sought to determine the optimum timing of surgery for cervical SCI, comparing the length of the intensive care unit (ICU) stay and in-hospital mortality in patients who underwent surgical treatments (decompression and stabilization) for cervical SCI within 24 h after injury and within 7 days after injury. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study using Japan Trauma Data Bank (JTDB) which is a nationwide, multicenter database. We selected adult isolated cervical SCI patients who underwent operative management within 7 days after injury, between 2004 and 2015. The main outcome measures were the length of ICU stay and in-hospital mortality. We grouped the patients into two, based on the time from onset of injury to surgery, an early group (within 24 h) and a late group (from 25 h to 7 days). Next, we performed multivariable analyses for analyzing the relevance between the timing of surgery and the length of ICU stay after adjusting for baseline characteristics using propensity score. We also performed the Cox survival analyses to evaluate in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: From 236,698 trauma patients registered in JTDB, we analyzed 514 patients. The early group comprised 291 patients (56.6%), and the late group comprised 223 (43.4%). The length of ICU stay did not differ between the two groups (early, 10 days; late, 11 days; p = 0.29). There was no significant difference for length of ICU stay between the early and late group even after adjustment by multivariate analysis (p = 0.64). There was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality between the two groups (the early group 3.8%, the late group 2.2%, p = 0.32), and no significant difference was found in the Cox survival analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that neither the length of ICU stay nor in-hospital mortality after spinal column stabilization or spinal cord decompression for cervical SCI significantly differed according to the timing of surgery between 24 h and 7 days.


Asunto(s)
Vértebras Cervicales/lesiones , Vértebras Cervicales/cirugía , Bases de Datos Factuales/tendencias , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/cirugía , Tiempo de Tratamiento/tendencias , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/epidemiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
Surg Today ; 47(7): 827-835, 2017 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27888344

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This study investigated the advantages of performing urgent resuscitative surgery (URS) in the emergency department (ED); namely, our URS policy, to avoid a delay in hemorrhage control for patients with severe torso trauma and unstable vital signs. METHODS: We divided 264 eligible cases into a URS group (n = 97) and a non-URS group (n = 167) to compare, retrospectively, the observed survival rate with the predicted survival using the Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS). RESULTS: While the revised trauma score and the injury severity score were significantly lower in the URS group than in the non-URS group, the observed survival rate was significantly higher than the predicted rate in the URS (48.5 vs. 40.2%; p = 0.038). URS group patients with a systolic blood pressure (SBP) <90 mmHg and a Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score of ≥9 had significantly higher observed survival rates than predicted survival rates (0.433 vs. 0.309, p = 0.008), (0.795 vs. 0.681, p = 0.004). The implementation of damage control surgery (DCS) was found to be a significant predictor of survival (OR 5.23, 95% CI 0.113-0.526, p < 0.010). CONCLUSION: The best indications for the URS policy are an SBP <90 mmHg, a GCS ≥9 on ED arrival, and/or the need for DCS. By implementing our URS policy, satisfactory survival of patients requiring immediate hemostatic surgery was achieved.


Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria , Hemorragia/prevención & control , Hemorragia/cirugía , Hemostasis Quirúrgica , Resucitación/métodos , Torso/lesiones , Torso/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Escala de Coma de Glasgow , Hemorragia/mortalidad , Hemostasis Quirúrgica/mortalidad , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Sístole , Índices de Gravedad del Trauma , Signos Vitales
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...