DNA Genotyping of Suspected Partial Hydatidiform Moles Detects Clinically Significant Aneuploidy.

The diagnosis of partial hydatidiform mole (PM) is especially difficult early in gestation as the morphology of nonmolar abortus (NMA) may mimic PM. Molecular genotyping analysis can definitively identify diandric triploidy, the genetic basis for PM, whereas NMA cases show a biparental inheritance. This 4-year retrospective study sought to determine what proportion of NMA cases which were initially suspected as being PM was aneuploid, and whether this knowledge of aneuploidy status is clinically useful. Cases with atypical villous morphology on histopathology suggestive of PM were subjected to molecular genotyping. The genotyping testing panel contained 19 highly polymorphic short-tandem repeat markers on chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X, and Y and 2 nonpolymorphic markers for sex determination. Informative molecular genotyping analysis was available in 127 cases (56 PMs and 71 NMAs). Aneuploidy was detected in 15/71 of NMAs (21.1%): 7 cases of trisomy 18, 3 of trisomy 13, 1 of trisomy 21, and 4 of monosomy X. It is concluded that most cases of aneuploid NMAs (11/15) detected by molecular genotyping analysis of atypical villous morphology cases are sporadic in type with a low or age-related recurrence risk. Nevertheless, this information may be useful in subsequent counseling and in women undergoing in vitro fertilization by directing preimplantation genetic diagnosis in subsequent cycles. In about a quarter of aneuploid NMAs (4/15) specific aneuploidy types which may be caused by unbalanced familial chromosome rearrangement are identified and are clinically important to patient management. Detection of clinically relevant aneuploidy in NMAs represents an important secondary benefit to the adoption of molecular genotyping analysis in suspected PM.

A Reappraisal of the Incidence of Placental Hydatidiform Mole Using Selective Molecular Genotyping.

OBJECTIVE: Reports on the incidence of hydatidiform mole (HM) have varied depending on study population and methodology. This institutional-based study was undertaken to identify the incidence of HM in a modern obstetric practice using advanced laboratory diagnostic techniques. METHODS: A retrospective review of consecutive hospital cases of HM was conducted for a 27-month period. Pathologic diagnoses of partial mole (PM) and complete mole (CM) were based on histopathologic assessment and selective use of p57 immunohistochemistry and molecular genotyping (MG) using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues. RESULTS: During the study period, 14,944 obstetric deliveries took place at our institution. Forty-nine cases of HM (18 CMs, 31 PMs) were identified. Histopathology with the selective use of p57 immunohistochemistry was used in 25 of 49 HMs (18 CMs, 7 PMs). Histopathologic features were equivocal in the remaining cases (24/49 cases), and adjunctive MG was performed; all were PMs. The incidence of HM was 3.3/1000 deliveries. Partial mole was more prevalent with a CM (PM ratio, 1:1.72). CONCLUSIONS: Our observed incidence of HM is greater than previous studies and is attributable to improved detection of PM cases. Molecular genotyping and cytogenetic evidence indicate that CM is almost half as common as PM. This ratio may be useful in benchmarking laboratory diagnosis and HM registries.

Placental Molar Disease: What are the Benefits and Barriers to the Adoption of a Comprehensive Diagnostic Service?

The molecular cytogenetic analysis of specimens (genotyping) suspicious for hydatidiform mole (HM) significantly improves diagnostic accuracy over histopathology and immunohistochemical analysis alone, particularly in the classification of partial mole. However, the implementation of this advance in diagnostics has been slow. This study sought to identify the major benefit and potential barriers to the adoption of genotyping. A pilot Placental Molar Diagnostic (PMD) Service was established combining histopathology, p57 immunohistochemistry, and molecular genotyping analysis for both in-house and referred-in cases suspicious for HM or with a preliminary diagnosis of HM. A retrospective analysis of 117 cases received in the first 16 mo was conducted to identify the utility of the PMD Service and factors or barriers which precluded optimal results. A final diagnosis of HM was made in 73 cases (37 complete HMs and 36 partial HMs). The remaining 44 cases were hydropic abortuses. Three potential barriers were identified that could lead to less than optimal results from a PMD Service: prevalence of noninformative genotyping, lack of any available or appropriate paraffin blocks, and inappropriate deferral of genotyping. The major utility of this pilot PMD Service was to increase the specificity of a diagnosis of HM, and avoid unnecessary clinical follow-up in 37% of cases with an initial suspicion or diagnosis of HM. Measures can be undertaken to address potential barriers to the implementation of a comprehensive placental diagnostic platform. Underutilization of molecular genotyping in the diagnosis of HM likely leads to inappropriate management and "downstream" costs in a significant proportion of patients suspected of having HM.

A pilot evaluation of a novel immunohistochemical assay for topoisomerase II-alpha and minichromosome maintenance protein 2 expression (ProEx C) in cervical adenocarcinoma in situ, adenocarcinoma, and benign glandular mimics.

The histopathologic distinction of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) and invasive adenocarcinoma (AC) from some benign endocervical lesions can be challenging. The ProEx C antibody reagent targets nuclear proteins (minichromosome maintenance protein 2, MCM2 and topoisomerase II-alpha, TOP2A), which are over expressed during the aberrant S-phase induction of HPV infected and neoplastic cells. In this immunohistochemical study the utility of the ProEx C reagent in distinguishing AIS and AC from a variety of non-neoplastic glandular lesions was examined. ProEx C immunohistochemical staining was performed on sections from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue of 65 cervical tissues including 48 non-neoplastic cervices (normal [n=10], microglandular hyperplasia [n=10], tubal metaplasia [n=11], cervical endometriosis [n=7], reactive endocervix [n=10]) and 17 cervices with glandular malignancy (AIS [n=12] and AC [n=5]). Both intensity and prevalence of immunoreactivity was scored. The median and distribution of scores for both prevalence and intensity was compared for AIS versus each of the 5 benign cervical lesions using a Mann-Whitney U test. The median and distribution of prevalence of immunohistochemical staining for AIS was different from all benign mimics, but the intensity of staining for AIS did overlap with some mimics as it was not significantly different from endometriosis, microglandular hyperplasia, and reactive endocervix. ProEx C reagent has potential as an adjunctive testing tool in the histopathologic diagnosis of both AIS and AC, particularly in difficult cases with small biopsies or foci of disease.

A parathyroid myxoadenoma observed grossly.

We are reporting a case of a patient with primary hyperparathyroidism because of an unusual parathyroid adenoma. The tumor had an extensive myxofibrous stroma without an identifiable lipomatous component. Though moderate to extensive myxoid alteration of the stroma has been reported in lipoadenomas, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first parathyroid adenoma in which the myxomatous component was recognized grossly and which lacked a stromal adipose component.

Testing for HPV as an objective measure for quality assurance in gynecologic cytology: positive rates in equivocal and abnormal specimens and comparison with the ASCUS to SIL ratio.

BACKGROUND: Inappropriate use of the category of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) can result in overtreatment or undertreatment of patients, which may decrease the cost effectiveness of screening. Quality assurance tools, such as the ASCUS to squamous intraepithelial lesion ratio (ASCUS:SIL) and case review, are imperfect. High-risk HPV (hrHPV) testing is an objective test for a known viral carcinogen, and hrHPV may be more useful in monitoring the quality of ASCUS interpretations. METHODS: hrHPV rates for cytologic diagnoses and patient age groups were calculated for a 2-year period. All hrHPV results for ASCUS and SIL over a 17-month period were analyzed by patient age group, over time, and by individual cytopathologist to compare hrHPV rates with the corresponding ASCUS:SIL. RESULTS: The hrHPV positive rate for SIL was >90%, and it was 32.6% for ASCUS. Stratification by patient age showed that approximately 50% of patients younger than 30 years and older than 70 years of age were hrHPV positive, whereas other patients had a lower rate ranging from 14% to 34%. The overall ASCUS:SIL was 1.42, and the overall hrHPV positive rate was 39.9%. Over time and by individual cytopathologist, the hrHPV rate performed similarly to the ASCUS:SIL. The analysis by patient age showed a high statistical correlation (R(2) = 0.9772) between the 2 methods. CONCLUSIONS: Despite differences between these techniques, the hrHPV rate closely recapitulates the ASCUS:SIL. When used together, the 2 methods can complement each other. The desirable hrHPV-positive range appears to be 40% to 50%; however, this may vary based on the patient population. The hrHPV rate is as quick and cost effective as determining the ASCUS:SIL.