Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Epilepsy Behav Rep ; 18: 100527, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35243289

RESUMEN

Epilepsy surgery is an effective treatment option for drug-resistant focal epilepsy patients with associated structural brain lesions. However, little epidemiological data are available regarding the number of patients with these lesions. We reviewed data regarding (1) the prevalence and incidence of epilepsy; (2) the proportion of epilepsy patients with focal epilepsy, drug-resistant epilepsy, and drug-resistant focal epilepsies; and (3) the number of epilepsy presurgical evaluations and surgical resections. We also assessed the relative proportion of brain lesions using post-surgical histopathological findings from 541 surgical patients from the Cleveland Clinic and 9,523 patients from a European multi-center cohort. Data were combined to generate surgical candidate incidence and prevalence estimates and the first lesion-specific estimates for hippocampal sclerosis (HS), low-grade epilepsy-associated brain tumors (LEAT), malformations of cortical development (MCD), glial scars, vascular malformations, and encephalitis. The most frequently diagnosed brain lesions were HS (incidence = 2.32 ± 0.26 in 100,000, prevalence = 19.40 ± 2.16 in 100,000) for adults and MCD (incidence = 1.15 ± 0.34 in 100,000, prevalence = 6.52 ± 1.89 in 100,000) for children. Our estimates can guide patient advocacy groups, clinicians, researchers, policymakers in education, development of health care strategy, resource allocation, and reimbursement schedules.

2.
Telemed J E Health ; 26(10): 1301-1303, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32429769

RESUMEN

Introduction: During the current pandemic, measures for preventing SARS-CoV-2 virus exposure has severely impacted the delivery of outpatient clinical care to patients with a chronic neurological condition. Telemedicine has emerged as an obvious choice to counter these impediments. However, its potential for maintaining outpatient care at pre-pandemic levels during these rapidly changing times is untested. Therefore, we analyzed our experience in a tertiary care epilepsy center. Methods: We divided the study period from March 1, 2020 to April 15, 2020 into a baseline, transition (to telemedicine), and current phase. We divided outpatient encounters into clinic, virtual (using Cleveland Clinic Express Care Online platform), and telephone (including commercial video conferencing platforms). Results: Completed outpatient visits during baseline and current period were 595 and 590, respectively. Nearly 1 out of 4 patients missed outpatient visits during the transition period. The virtual visits accounted for 19.7% of completed visits during baseline and increased to 66.8% during the current period. There were no telephone visits during the baseline phase but accounted for 26.1% of completed visits during the current phase. Less than 1 percent of completed visits in the current phase were in the clinic. Conclusion: We provide evidence that telemedicine's robust and rapid scalability can help maintain a seamless transition of outpatient care during the pandemic.


Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Control de Infecciones/organización & administración , Pandemias/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Telemedicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros Médicos Académicos , Atención Ambulatoria/métodos , COVID-19 , Estudios de Cohortes , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Ohio , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Pandemias/estadística & datos numéricos , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos
3.
Cleve Clin J Med ; 81(1): 51-61, 2014 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24391107

RESUMEN

The number of obese older adults is on the rise, although we lack a proper definition of obesity in this age group. The ambiguity is primarily related to sarcopenia, the progressive loss of muscle and gain in fat that come with aging. Whether to treat and how to treat obesity in the elderly is controversial because of a paucity of established guidelines, but also because of the obesity paradox-ie, the apparently protective effect of obesity in this age group.


Asunto(s)
Cirugía Bariátrica , Estilo de Vida , Obesidad/terapia , Anciano , Índice de Masa Corporal , Dieta , Humanos , Obesidad/complicaciones , Obesidad/diagnóstico , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Calidad de Vida , Entrenamiento de Fuerza , Sarcopenia/complicaciones , Circunferencia de la Cintura , Pérdida de Peso
4.
Endocr Pract ; 19(3): 485-93, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23425653

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Perioperative glycemic control in critically ill cardiothoracic surgery patients may improve postsurgical outcomes. The objective of the study was to compare outcomes before and after the implementation of a protocol using subcutaneous (SC) glargine at transition from intravenous insulin infusion (IVII). METHODS: In August 2006, the Cleveland Clinic began using glargine and supplemental rapid-acting sliding scale insulin (SSI) at transition from IVII (glargine-SSI group). Before August 2006, only supplemental insulin was used (SSI-only group). The primary outcome was first blood glucose (BG1) after discontinuation of IVII. Secondary outcomes included the absolute difference between the last glucose before discontinuation of IVII (BG0) and BG1, mean glucose in the first 24 hours after discontinuation of IVII (BG24), need for SSI, and hypoglycemia. RESULTS: Mean BG0, BG1, and BG24, and the difference between BG1 and BG0 and between BG24 and BG0 were not significantly different between groups. Diabetes mellitus (DM) patients who had received glargine had a lower mean difference between BG1 and BG0 and a lower mean BG24 than those who had not received glargine (14.6 mg/dL vs. 33.1 mg/dL; P = .20, and 163.8 mg/dL vs. 177.9 mg/dL; P = .29, respectively). A higher proportion of DM patients needed SSI than did non-DM patients (82% vs. 36%; P<.001). CONCLUSION: Glargine administered at the cessation of IVII enabled less SSI coverage in diabetic patients subsequent to transition from IVII. However, there was no significant difference in BG control between the glargine-SSI and SSI-only groups. Prospective studies involving more patients are needed to show possible clinically significant benefits of this intervention.


Asunto(s)
Glucemia/efectos de los fármacos , Insulina de Acción Prolongada/uso terapéutico , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Torácicos , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Insulina Glargina , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...