RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The French AmbUlatory Extraperitoneal Cesarean Section (FAUCS) is aimed at improving patients' birth experience and recovery. However, data are scarce regarding its maternal and neonatal safety. This study seeks to compare maternal and neonatal outcomes between FAUCS and conventional cesarean deliveries at term. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study involving women who underwent scheduled cesarean deliveries at term. We compared a total of 810 cases using the FAUCS technique with 217 cases using conventional cesarean deliveries. Surgical complications, adverse neonatal events, and maternal recovery parameters were compared. RESULTS: The incidence of overall surgical complications was comparable between the 2 groups, with rates of 1.97% for FAUCS and 1.85% for the conventional cesarean deliveries. The rates of specific complications such as bladder injury (0.1%), bowel injury (0.1%), blood transfusion (1.35%), and postpartum hemorrhage (1%) were consistent with existing literature. Neonatal outcomes, including neonatal acidemia and admission rates to the neonatal intensive care unit, were comparable between the groups and demonstrated favourable comparisons with previously reported data. Notably, women in the FAUCS group required less analgesia, with only 0.8% receiving morphine, as opposed to 38% in the control group. Furthermore, the FAUCS group demonstrated significantly quicker recovery, with 86% achieving autonomy and early discharge at their discretion within 48 hours after operation, in contrast to only 17% in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: When performed by experienced practitioners, FAUCS proves to be a safe procedure, with no increased risk for maternal or neonatal complications. Its significant benefits in terms of enhancing maternal recovery are noteworthy.
Asunto(s)
Cesárea , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cesárea/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Francia , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/efectos adversos , Recién Nacido , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Pelvic floor muscle assessment in situations of hip/groin pain in both male and female patients can be a key element in treatment success. We present herein, a 32 year old male professional cyclist, exhibiting right hip and groin pain during cycling and prolonged sitting. The pain commenced after the patient suffered a right hip severe contusion in 2013 causing a tear in the tensor fascia lata and gluteus medius muscle. The patient did not complain of pelvic floor dysfunctions. After receiving several series of conventional physical therapy for the hip/groin pain, the patient experienced partial pain relief and slight improvement of hip range of motion. His pelvic floor muscles and fascial involvement were subsequently assessed. Two sessions of Pelvic Floor Fascial Mobilization (PFFM) were performed and the patient fully recovered. The authors suggest that PFFM, a novel fascial-oriented manual therapy of the pelvic floor approach, can be used for both hip/groin and pelvic floor pain or dysfunction.