Dry eye parameters measured with an ocular surface analyzer in eyes after vitrectomy for vitreomacular interface disorders.

Purpose: Dry eye disease (DED) might be caused by multiple ocular surgical interventions. The aim of the study was to estimate the extent of DED in patients undergoing core vitrectomy for vitreoretinal interface disorders. Methods: In this prospective observational study, we included patients with 12 months of follow-up after vitrectomy. The following data were collected as controls: age, sex, best-corrected visual acuity before and after surgery, and phakic status. In OSA (ocular surface analysis), the following parameters were evaluated: NIBUT (non-invasive tear break-up time), sltDear (thickness of the lipid layer), Meibomian gland (MGD) loss, and the height of tear meniscus. Shapiro-Wilk test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for statistical analysis. Results: We evaluated 48 eyes of 24 patients (10 men, 14 women; 64.63 ± 14.10 years) 1 year after vitrectomy. From the analyzed ocular surface parameters, NIBUT was significantly lower in operated versus non-operated eyes (P = 0.048). The higher the level of difference in MGD loss between both eyes, the higher the level of difference in NIBUT between both eyes (rs = 0.47, P = 0.032). Conclusion: NIBUT levels were still decreased 12 months after vitrectomy. Patients with more pronounced MGD loss or decreased NIBUT levels in the fellow eye were more likely to experience such disorders. The tear meniscus height was lower in patients undergoing surgery for retinal detachment than in those with vitreoretinal disorders. This might allow the suggestion to include artificial tears in pre- and post-operative care in vitrectomized eyes.

Surgical classification for large macular hole: based on different surgical techniques results: the CLOSE study group.

BACKGROUND: The CLOSE study group proposes an updated surgical classification for large macular holes based on a systematic review of new treatments. Recently, many new techniques have been introduced to treat large full-thickness macular holes (FTMH); although the indications are not clear. An updated surgical classification is needed to help surgical decision-making. METHODS: We gathered published series by the CLOSE Study Group members and from literature search until June 2021. Techniques included: internal limiting membrane peeling (ILM peeling), ILM flaps, macular hydrodissection (macular hydro), human amniotic membrane graft (hAM), and autologous retinal transplantation (ART). Within each technique, chi-square test assessed association between the minimal linear diameter (MLD) (in µm) and closure rate; the postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) gains were compared among groups. RESULTS: Data extraction included 31 published articles: total of 1135 eyes. Eyes were divided into the following groups: ILM peel (n: 683), ILM Flap (n: 233), macular hydrodissection (n: 64), hAM (n: 59), and ART (n: 96). The initial BCVA and size were heterogenous between the groups. ILM peel showed the best results in large FTMH ≤ 535 µm (closure rate 96.8%); adjusted mean BCVA: 0.49 (LogMAR) with a statistical difference among groups. Large FTMH between 535 and 799 µm: ILM flap technique showed better results (closure rate 99.0%); adjusted mean BCVA: 0.67(LogMAR); also with a statistical difference. For large FTMH ≥ 800 µm more invasive techniques are required. Use of hAM, macular hydrodissection and ART showed higher closure rates for this category (100%, 83.3% and 90.5% respectively), and adjusted mean BCVA varied from 0.76 to 0.89. Although there was no statistical difference between those techniques for this group due to the smaller number of cases. CONCLUSIONS: The CLOSE study group demonstrated the potential usefulness of a new surgical classification for large FTMHs and propose OCT biomarkers for use in clinical practice and future research. This new classification demonstrated that Large (400-550 µm) and X-Large (550-800 µm) holes can be treated highly successfully with ILM peel and ILM flap techniques, respectively. Further studies are necessary for the larger FTMHs (XX-Large and Giant), using the CLOSE classification, in order to determine which technique is better suited for each hole size and characteristics.