A randomized, open-label 3-way crossover study to investigate the relative bioavailability and bioequivalence of crushed sildenafil 20 mg tablets mixed with apple sauce, extemporaneously prepared suspension (EP), and intact sildenafil 20 mg tablets in healthy volunteers under fasting conditions.

The relative bioavailability and bioequivalence of 20-mg doses of a pediatric formulation of sildenafil extemporaneous preparation suspension (EP; 10 mg/mL), the sildenafil 20-mg intact tablet and the crushed sildenafil 20-mg tablet mixed with apple sauce were assessed in a single-dose, randomized, open-label, 3-way crossover study with 18 healthy adult volunteers. Blood samples were collected at predefined times and analyzed for sildenafil plasma concentrations. Natural log-transformed sildenafil pharmacokinetic parameters (Cmax , AUClast , and AUCinf ) were used to estimate relative bioavailability and construct 90% confidence intervals (CI) using a mixed-effects model. Bioequivalence was concluded among the three formulations with one exception, in which the EP suspension showed a 15% decrease in Cmax with a lower 90% CI of 76% compared with the intact tablet. The 15% decrease in sildenafil Cmax is not considered to be clinically relevant. Therefore, the EP suspension is considered to be an appropriate pediatric formulation. All 3 formulations were well tolerated in healthy adult volunteers.

Evaluation of the effect of fluconazole and ketoconazole on the pharmacokinetics of tofacitinib in healthy adult subjects.

Tofacitinib is a novel, oral JAK inhibitor that is being investigated as a targeted immunomodulator. Tofacitinib is predominantly metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and to a lesser extent by CYP2C19. Two Phase 1, randomized, open-label, single sequence studies in 24 healthy subjects (12 per study) characterized the effects of fluconazole (moderate CYP3A4/potent CYP2C19 inhibitor) and ketoconazole (potent CYP3A4 inhibitor) on tofacitinib pharmacokinetics. In the fluconazole study, subjects received a single tofacitinib 30 mg dose. After 72 hours, subjects received fluconazole 400 mg, followed by 200 mg once daily (QD; days 2-7) plus tofacitinib 30 mg on day 5. In the ketoconazole study, a single tofacitinib 10 mg dose was administered. After 24 hours, subjects received ketoconazole (400 mg QD; days 1-3) plus tofacitinib 10 mg on day 3. Treatment comparisons were made using mixed-effect models. Tofacitinib area under the curve and maximal plasma concentration increased by 79% and 27%, respectively, with fluconazole co-administration and by 103% and 16%, respectively, with ketoconazole co-administration. Tofacitinib half-life increased by approximately 1 hour during co-administration with fluconazole or ketoconazole. Co-administration of moderate to potent CYP3A4 inhibitors is likely to increase the systemic exposure of tofacitinib and thus may warrant dosage adjustments or restrictions.

The pharmacokinetics of lersivirine (UK-453,061) and HIV-1 protease inhibitor coadministration in healthy subjects.

OBJECTIVE: Lersivirine (UK-453,061) is a next-generation nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, active against wild-type HIV-1 and several nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-resistant strains. Four studies evaluated the pharmacokinetic (PK) interactions between lersivirine and various HIV-1 protease inhibitors. METHODS: Four phase I trials were conducted to assess the PK of lersivirine when coadministered with lopinavir/ritonavir, darunavir/ritonavir, or atazanavir with/without ritonavir, and to examine the effects of lersivirine on the PK of atazanavir with/without ritonavir. PK data included the area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time zero to the end of the dosing interval (AUC24), maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), minimum plasma concentration (Cmin, C24, or Ctrough), and time to Cmax (Tmax). Safety was assessed by recording adverse events, vital signs, and laboratory data. RESULTS: Coadministration of lersivirine with lopinavir/ritonavir, darunavir/ritonavir, or atazanavir/ritonavir decreased mean plasma lersivirine AUC24 by 43%, 22%, and 19%, respectively. Atazanavir had no effect on lersivirine exposure, except for a 16% decrease in lersivirine C24. Lersivirine had no effect on atazanavir AUC24 or Cmax, although Ctrough was reduced by 18% in the absence of ritonavir. CONCLUSIONS: Lersivirine exposure was reduced when coadministered with ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors; a dose adjustment may be warranted. Unboosted atazanavir had no effect on lersivirine exposure, except for a small decrease in lersivirine C24. Lersivirine had no effect on atazanavir (with/without ritonavir) exposure, except for a decrease in Ctrough. Caution should be applied when unboosted atazanavir is coadministered with lersivirine. Coadministration of lersivirine with lopinavir/ritonavir, darunavir/ritonavir, or atazanavir with/without ritonavir seems to be generally well tolerated.

The effect of lersivirine, a next-generation NNRTI, on the pharmacokinetics of midazolam and oral contraceptives in healthy subjects.

PURPOSE: Lersivirine is a next-generation non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) with a unique resistance profile that exhibits potent antiretroviral activity against wild-type human immunodeficiency virus and clinically relevant NNRTI-resistant strains. Results from in vitro and in vivo investigations suggest that lersivirine is a cytochrome P450 (CYP3A4) inducer that is metabolized by CYP3A4 and uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 2B7. In order to formally assess the effects of lersivirine on CYP3A4 metabolism and/or glucuronidation, we performed studies aimed at investigating the effects of lersivirine co-administration on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of midazolam, ethinylestradiol and levonorgestrel. METHODS: Two drug-drug interaction studies were performed. Healthy subjects were co-administered (1) single dose midazolam, a prototypical CYP3A4 substrate, followed by 14 days of lersivirine twice daily with single dose midazolam on the final day of lersivirine dosing or (2) 10 days of once-daily (QD) lersivirine and QD oral contraceptives (OCs; ethinylestradiol and levonorgestrel), substrates for CYP3A4, UGT2B7, and/or P-glycoprotein. The effects of co-administration on the PK parameters of midazolam and OCs were assessed. RESULTS: At clinically relevant lersivirine doses (500-1,000 mg total daily dose), the mean plasma exposure of midazolam was reduced in a dose-dependent manner by 20-36 %. Co-administration of lersivirine 1,000 mg QD with OCs had minor PK effects, increasing ethinylestradiol exposure by 10 % and reducing levonorgestrel exposure by 13 %. CONCLUSIONS: These data further support previous observations that lersivirine is a weak CYP3A4 inducer, a weak inhibitor of glucuronidation, and a P-glycoprotein inhibitor. In both studies, lersivirine appeared to have a good safety and tolerability profile.

No effect of a single supratherapeutic dose of lersivirine, a next-generation nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, on corrected QT interval in healthy subjects.

The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of a supratherapeutic dose of lersivirine (LRV) on corrected QT (QTc) interval using Fridericia's equation (QTcF) in healthy subjects. In this randomized, single-dose, placebo- and active-controlled 3-way crossover study, healthy adult males (n = 48) were randomized to receive LRV (2,400 mg), moxifloxacin (400 mg), or placebo for each treatment period. Triplicate 12-lead electrocardiogram measurements were performed, PK samples were collected, and vital signs were measured. Adverse event monitoring and safety laboratory testing were performed. All subjects were white (mean age, 39 years; body mass index [BMI], 25.6 kg/m(2)) and completed the study. Following LRV administration, the upper bound of the 90% confidence interval (CI) for time-matched adjusted mean differences to placebo QTcF at each time point postdose was below the regulatory threshold of 10 ms, satisfying the criteria for a negative thorough QT/QTc study. The highest upper bound of QTcF 90% CI occurred at 6 h for LRV (3.32 ms; 90% CI, 1.47 to 5.17 ms). The study was deemed adequately sensitive as the lower bound of the 90% CI for the adjusted mean QTcF differences between moxifloxacin and placebo at the moxifloxacin historical T(max) of 3 h was >5 ms (15.29 ms; 90% CI, 13.44 to 17.14 ms). There was no statistically significant relationship between LRV exposure and placebo-adjusted change from baseline QTcF or clinically significant changes in QRS complex, pulse rate (PR) interval, heart rate, or blood pressure. LRV (2,400 mg) did not prolong the QTcF interval, and no clinically relevant electrocardiogram or vital sign changes were observed in healthy subjects.

Pharmacokinetic effects of coadministration of lersivirine with raltegravir or maraviroc in healthy subjects.

Lersivirine (UK-453,061) is a new nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor currently being developed as a treatment for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. Lersivirine shows potent activity against wild-type and clinically relevant drug-resistant strains. Previous studies have demonstrated that lersivirine is metabolized by glucuronidation via UGT2B7 and by cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4). Lersivirine is also a weak inducer of the CYP3A4 enzyme. Therefore, coadministered lersivirine could potentially affect the pharmacokinetics of maraviroc, a CCR5 antagonist metabolized by CYP3A4, and raltegravir, an integrase inhibitor metabolized by glucuronidation. Two open-label studies assessed the pharmacokinetics of raltegravir and of maraviroc when they were coadministered with lersivirine and the pharmacokinetics of lersivirine when it was coadministered with raltegravir. Minor, clinically nonsignificant effects on the pharmacokinetics of raltegravir coadministered with lersivirine were observed at steady state for raltegravir, with estimated mean changes of -15%, -29%, and +25% in the area under the concentration-time profile from time zero to the end of the dosing interval (AUC(tau)), maximum plasma concentration (C(max)), and concentration observed 12 h postdose (C(12)), respectively. There were no clinically relevant effects of steady-state raltegravir on lersivirine AUC(tau), C(max), or concentration observed 24 h postdose (C(24)) (estimated mean changes of -2 to +5%). Coadministration of lersivirine at steady state with maraviroc resulted in no clinically relevant effects on maraviroc AUC(tau), C(max), or C(12) (estimated mean changes of +3.4 to +8.6%). Lersivirine appeared to be generally well tolerated in these studies and appears to be suitable for coadministration with raltegravir or maraviroc without the need for dose modification.

Safety and tolerability of lersivirine, a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, during a 28-day, randomized, placebo-controlled, Phase I clinical study in healthy male volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Lersivirine is a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor undergoing clinical development for the treatment of HIV-1. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to investigate the safety and tolerability of multiple oral doses of lersivirine administered to healthy male subjects to assist in the planning of longer term studies. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter, Phase I clinical study in fasting, healthy male volunteers. Subjects were randomly assigned in a ratio of 7:7:4:4 to receive lersivirine 500 mg BID, lersivirine 750 mg once daily, efavirenz 600 mg once daily, or placebo once daily for 28 days. Safety and tolerability were assessed throughout the study by continuous collection of adverse events (AEs), including adverse drug reactions, illnesses with onset during the study, exacerbation of previous illnesses, and clinically significant changes in physical examination findings. Vital sign measurements and ECGs were performed at screening; on day 1 (predose and 2, 3, and 4 hours postdose); on days 7, 14, 21, and 28 (predose); at discharge; and at follow-up. Safety laboratory tests (including hematology, chemistry, and urinalysis) were performed at screening; days 0, 7, 14, 21, and 27; and at follow-up. RESULTS: Of the 66 healthy male subjects enrolled (age range, 21-51 years; body mass index, 18.1-29.9 kg/m(2)), 40 were white, 22 were Asian, 3 were black, and 1 was of mixed race. There were no clinically significant laboratory abnormalities, including changes in lipid profile, liver or renal function test results, or ECG findings. Overall, 86% (18/21) of subjects in the lersivirine 500-mg BID group, 81% (17/21) in the lersivirine 750-mg once-daily group, 92% (11/12) in the efavirenz 600-mg once-daily group, and 92% (11/12) in the placebo group experienced at least one treatment-related AE. Eight subjects were permanently discontinued from the study; 4 subjects in the efavirenz group (3 of whom participated in the trial at the Brussels study center) were permanently discontinued due to AEs considered to be treatment related. No subjects receiving lersivirine permanently discontinued the study due to treatment-related AEs, although one subject temporarily discontinued treatment. In addition, 4 subjects withdrew consent (2 subjects [1 of whom was at the Brussels study center] receiving lersivirine 750 mg once daily and 2 subjects [1 of whom was at the Brussels study center] receiving efavirenz). There were no deaths or serious AEs in any of the study groups. CONCLUSION: Lersivirine appeared to be well tolerated after 28 days of continuous dosing in this small, selected group of young, healthy male volunteers.

Modulation of 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (11betaHSD) activity biomarkers and pharmacokinetics of PF-00915275, a selective 11betaHSD1 inhibitor.

CONTEXT: 11beta-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 (11betaHSD1) is a promising target for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. 11betaHSD1 catalyzes the intracrine conversion of inactive cortisone to the active glucocorticoid cortisol. OBJECTIVE: Demonstrating inhibition of 11betaHSD1 is challenging because there is no accessible way to directly assess the enzyme activity in vivo. Thus, it was proposed to assess the enzyme activity, in an indirect fashion, using two biomarker methods: the prednisolone generation study (conversion of oral prednisone to prednisolone in plasma) and the ratio of cortisol and cortisone metabolites in urine. DESIGN: This was a phase 1, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, multiple-dose study. SETTING: The study was conducted in a clinical research unit. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty healthy adult volunteers participated in the study. INTERVENTION: Oral doses of PF-00915275 (0.3-15 mg) and prednisone (10 mg) were administered during the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of PF-00915275, a selective 11betaHSD1 inhibitor, were measured. RESULTS: Overall, multiple oral doses of PF-00915275 were safe and well tolerated. After oral administration, PF-00915275 was rapidly absorbed, slowly eliminated, and generally displayed dose-proportional increases in exposure. At the 15-mg dose, mean exposure to prednisolone was reduced by 37%, and there was a dose-dependent fall in the 5alpha-tetrahydrocortisol + 5beta-tetrahydrocortisol to tetrahydrocortisone ratio with maximum inhibition of 26% after 14 d. The urinary free cortisol to urinary free cortisone ratio, an indicator of 11betaHSD2 inhibition, did not change. CONCLUSION: PF-00915275 was safe at all doses tested. The results of the prednisolone generation test and the urinary metabolite ratios confirm that PF-00915275 is a selective 11betaHSD1 inhibitor.