[Community-acquired bacterial infections among type 2 diabetic and non-diabetic patients hospitalized on a general medical ward: a clinical comparison]. / 2-es típusú diabetesesek és nem cukorbetegek területen szerzett, belgyógyászati osztályos felvételt igénylo bakteriális infekcióinak klinikai összehasonlítása.

Introduction: Previous data showed bacterial infections among diabetic patients to be more serious and frequent, with higher mortality rates in comparison with non-diabetics. Recent investigations, however, are contradictory. Aim: The goal of our prospective, observational study was to compare patients hospitalized on a general medical ward due to community-acquired bacterial infections with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) to those of non-diabetics (K) by 1) infection localization, 2) spectrum of pathogens, 3) three-month mortality rates. Method: Patients were consecutively involved (T2DM: n = 205, K: n = 202). We characterized the infections, clinical parameters, mortalities of the two groups, and matched them to international data. Results: No difference regarding clinical details of the groups were found except for glycemic parameters and BMI. In the T2DM group the skin- and soft tissue- (37.1%), in the K patients respiratory infections (37.1%) were the most common, followed by urinary ones (31.2% and 31.7%, respectively). Skin- and soft tissue infection incidence among T2DM subjects were higher compared to international results (37.1% vs. 16%). Co-presence of Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria in the skin- and soft tissue infections (23/76 vs. 5/46, p = 0.0149), and polymicrobial origin in the urinary tract infections (34.0% vs. 15.1%, p = 0.0335) were found to be more frequent in T2DM than in K. No difference regarding mortality rates were detected. In T2DM the skin- and soft tissue while in the K group the respiratory infections had the most death counts. Conclusions: We found higher rates of skin- and soft tissue infections among T2DM patients hospitalized on a general medical ward compared to international data. In total we did not find difference regarding three-month mortality between the groups. Our results highlight the importance of primary prevention and shows its inadequacy concerning skin and soft tissue infections among type 2 diabetics in Hungary. Orv Hetil. 2019; 160(41): 1623-1632.

Flow-mediated vasodilation assay indicates no endothelial dysfunction in hereditary angioedema patients with C1-inhibitor deficiency.

BACKGROUND: Hereditary angioedema with C1 inhibitor deficiency (C1-INH-HAE) is a rare, potentially life-threatening disorder characterized by recurrent edematous attacks. The edema formation is the consequence of interaction of bradykinin and various vasoactive peptides with endothelium. Besides these agents, danazol, a modified testosterone derivative used in these patients to prevent edematous attacks, can also affect the function of the endothelium, because it shifts the blood lipid profile to a pro-atherogenic phenotype. OBJECTIVE: To assess the endothelial function in C1-INH-HAE patients and in healthy matched controls. METHODS: To evaluate the endothelial function, we used the flow-mediated dilation method measured in the region of the brachial artery in 33 C1-INH-HAE patients and in 30 healthy matched controls. Laboratory measurements of standard biochemical parameters were performed on computerized laboratory analyzers. RESULTS: No difference was found in endothelial function (reactive hyperemia, RH) between patients (median, 9.0; 25%-75% percentile, 6.3-12.9) and controls (median, 7.37; 25%-75% percentile, 4.52-9.93). Although we found elevated cardiovascular risk (high body mass index and low-density lipoprotein/high-density lipoprotein ratio) in danazol-treated C1-INH-HAE patients, RH values did not differ between danazol-treated and nontreated patients. Furthermore, risk factors correlated with the endothelial function only in healthy controls and patients not treated with danazol. CONCLUSION: In summary, our results did not indicate any signs of endothelial dysfunction in C1-INH-HAE patients. Moreover, the normal endothelial function in danazol-treated patients with pro-atherogenic lipid profile suggests that elevated bradykinin level or other factor(s) involved in the pathogenesis of edematous attacks may have a protective role against endothelial dysfunction and atherosclerosis.