Mobile device: a useful tool to teach inhaler devices to healthcare professionals.

BACKGROUND: Proper inhaler device usage is paramount for control of underlying obstructive airway disease. Hence, education to healthcare professionals who will eventually educate patients need to be done effectively. We developed an application for mobile devices for education on six medical inhaler devices, the metered-dose inhaler (MDI), Turbuhaler, Accuhaler, Breezhaler, Ellipta and Respimat, and studied if there were any difference between the application and the manufacturer's instructions on inhaler technique. The aim of this study is to see if inhaler education via a mobile phone app is comparable to manual instruction for health care professions. METHODS: Participants, who were nursing students, were randomized to learn the inhaler devices via the manufacturer's instruction guide or a mobile device app designed specifically for education on inhaler devices. RESULTS: There were 45 participants in each group. 78% of them were females with a median age of 21 (IQR 3). 67% used an Apple mobile device and the remainder used an Android device. The mobile device showed better total improvement points for the Turbuhaler device (262 vs 287 points; P = 0.02). Participants learning from the manufacturer's guide had a significantly higher total improvement points in the Breezhaler (370 vs 327 points; P < 0.01) and Ellipta (214 vs 174 points; P < 0.01) device. Both interventions showed improvement in total scores for demonstrating the correct usage of all inhaler devices. MDI has the least number of correct steps for both interventions. The participants' reported their mean (SD) self-rated knowledge was significantly higher for those using the app for all devices as compared to those that did not (4.33 (0.68) vs 4.73 (0.42); P = < 0.01). Self-reported confidence level was found to be higher in the mobile app group, but this was not statistically significant. The app was well received and scored of 4.42 of 5 with regards to its quality. CONCLUSION: Using a mobile inhaler app is just as effective to teach inhaler device techniques to healthcare professionals and is likely a more convenient, versatile and important adjunct to learning. TRIAL REGISTRATION: National Healthcare Group Ethics Board (2018/00960).

Blood eosinophil count correlates with severity of respiratory failure in life-threatening asthma and predicts risk of subsequent exacerbations.

BACKGROUND: An elevated blood eosinophil count when asthma is stable predicts exacerbations and therapeutic response to corticosteroids or biologics targeting eosinophils. Few studies have examined the prognostic value of blood eosinophils measured at exacerbation. AIM: To elucidate the relationship between a spot blood eosinophil count-measured at the onset of a life-threatening asthma exacerbation-with indices of exacerbation severity and risk of subsequent exacerbations. METHODS: Real-world, retrospective review of all life-threatening asthma cases admitted at 4 public hospitals in Singapore between 2011-2015. We assessed the trends and correlations between blood eosinophil count on admission with arterial blood gas values, duration of mechanical ventilation, and risk of death, hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy or respiratory arrest. Risk of future exacerbations among survivors was modelled using Cox regression and survival curves. RESULTS: There were 376 index life-threatening exacerbations with median blood eosinophil count (5-95th percentiles) of 0.270 × 109 /L (0-1.410 × 109 /L). Arterial pH decreased and PCO2 increased with increasing eosinophil count. Duration of mechanical ventilation and risk of death, hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy or respiratory arrest did not vary with eosinophils. Among 329 survivors who were followed-up over a median of 52 months, blood eosinophils ≥1.200 × 109 /L was associated with an increased hazard of emergency visits and/or admissions for asthma (hazard ratio 1.8, 95% confidence interval 1.1-2.9, P = .02). CONCLUSION: In this study of life-threatening asthma, we found that a spot blood eosinophil count correlates with severity of respiratory failure and predicts risk of subsequent exacerbations.

Play and Learn with Patients-Designing and Evaluating a Serious Game to Enhance Nurses' Inhaler Teaching Techniques: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Objective: To describe the development and evaluation of a nurse-patient interactive serious game in improving nurses' self-efficacy and performances in teaching the correct inhaler technique. Materials and Methods: The technology, pedagogy, and content knowledge (TPACK) framework was applied to guide the development of the serious game. The learning effectiveness of the serious game was evaluated through a randomized controlled trial that involved 46 registered nurses. Participants in the experimental group were asked to teach the inhaler technique to a standardized patient using the serious game as a teaching tool, whereas participants in the control group were asked to provide their own usual teaching to a standardized patient without the serious game. The performances of both groups were assessed based on their feedback to a standardized patient who made several errors while demonstrating the inhaler technique. Self-efficacy levels of teaching the inhaler technique were examined before and after the intervention. Results: A significantly higher number of participants from the experimental group obtained perfect performance scores than those in the control group (65.21% vs. 21.74%, χ2 = 15.18, P < 0.01). The posttest self-efficacy mean scores for the experimental group improved significantly (P < 0.001) after the intervention, and significantly higher (P < 0.05) compared to the posttest mean scores of the control group. Conclusion: The study provided evidence on the effectiveness of a serious game in improving the self-efficacy and immediate postintervention performances of nurses teaching the inhaler technique. This game provides a practical and accessible learning tool to help nurses ensure effective patient education.