Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 400
Filtrar
1.
Ann Emerg Med ; 2024 Oct 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39425713

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate for increases in the use and costs of respiratory viral testing in pediatric emergency departments (EDs) because of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study using the pediatric health information system. Eligible subjects were children (90 days to 18 years) who were discharged from a pediatric ED and included in the pediatric health information system from October 2016 through March 2024. To evaluate for changes in the frequency and costs of respiratory viral testing, we performed an interrupted time series analysis across 3 study periods: prepandemic (October 1, 2016 to March 14, 2020), early pandemic (March 15, 2020 to December 31, 2023), and late pandemic (January 1, 2023 to March 31, 2024). RESULTS: We included 15,261,939 encounters from 34 pediatric EDs over the 90-month study period. At least 1 viral respiratory test was performed for 460,826 of 7,311,177 prepandemic encounters (6.3%), 1,240,807 of 5,100,796 early pandemic encounters (24.3%), and 545,696 of 2,849,966 late pandemic encounters (19.1%). There was a positive prepandemic slope in viral testing (0.17% encounters/month; 95% CI 0.17 to 0.18). The early pandemic was associated with a shift change of 4.98% (95% CI 4.90 to 5.07) and a positive slope (0.54% encounters/month; 95% CI 0.54 to 0.55). The late pandemic period was associated with a negative shift (-17.80%; 95% CI -17.90 to -17.70) and a positive slope (0.42% encounters/month; 95% CI 0.41 to 0.42). The slope in testing costs increased from $5,000/month (95% CI $4,200 to $5,700) to $33,000/month (95% CI $32,000 to $34,000) during the early pandemic. CONCLUSION: Respiratory testing and associated costs increased during the COVID-19 pandemic and were sustained despite decreasing incidence of disease. These findings highlight a need for further efforts to clarify indications for viral testing in the ED and efforts to reduce low-value testing.

2.
Am J Emerg Med ; 86: 129-134, 2024 Oct 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39427500

RESUMEN

This cross-sectional analysis of 86,111 visits for sickle cell disease and vaso-occlusive episodes (VOE) in U.S. pediatric emergency departments between 2013 and 2023 shows increased use of NSAIDs, ketamine, and acetaminophen, with unchanged opioid use. Hospitals with a higher volume of VOE visits more frequently administered opioids. BACKGROUND: Vaso-occlusive episodes (VOEs) are a hallmark of sickle cell disease (SCD), leading to frequent emergency department (ED) visits. Effective pain management is crucial, with guidelines recommending routine use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) with opioids, and emerging evidence supporting ketamine use. However, these recommendations are based on low-certainty evidence, and the impact of these guidelines on analgesia use over time remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to analyze trends in analgesia use over an 11-year period in pediatric SCD patients presenting to U.S. EDs with VOE and assess variations in treatment across hospitals. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted using data from the Pediatric Health Information System covering 34 U.S. children's hospitals from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2023. The primary outcomes were the proportions of visits where opioids, NSAIDs, acetaminophen, and/or ketamine were administered on the first calendar day of the initial visit. Secondary outcomes included the co-administration of NSAIDs with opioids. Logistic and linear regression models were used to assess trends and hospital-level variations. RESULTS: A total of 86,111 ED visits for VOE were analyzed. Opioids were administered in 82 % of encounters, NSAIDs in 72 %, acetaminophen in 17 %, and ketamine in 1 %. Co-administration of NSAIDs with opioids occurred in 59 % of the visits. Among discharged patients, there was a positive trend for NSAID use (slope: 1.68 %/year, 95 % CI: 0.91 %, 2.45 %) and NSAID-opioid co-administration (slope: 1.03 %/year, 95 % CI: 0.37 %, 1.69 %) over time. Acetaminophen use also increased over the study period (slope: 0.99 %/year, 95 % CI: 0.80 %, 1.17 %). In hospitalized patients, there was a significant upward trend for acetaminophen (slope: 1.29 %/year, 95 % CI: 0.69 %, 1.89 %) and ketamine (slope: 0.36 %/year, 95 % CI: 0.27 %, 0.45 %), while opioid use remained unchanged. Significant hospital-level variations were observed, with larger hospitals more likely to administer opioids but less likely to co-administer NSAIDs with opioids compared to medium-volume hospitals. CONCLUSION: Over the past decade, the use of NSAIDs, acetaminophen, and ketamine has increased in the management of VOE in pediatric SCD patients, while opioid use remains consistent. The co-administration of NSAIDs and opioids has also increased, reflecting guideline adherence. Variations in analgesia practices across hospitals underscore the need for standardizing pain management strategies in this population.

3.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(10): e2441821, 2024 Oct 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39470638

RESUMEN

Importance: Although a viral etiology can be detected in most cases of pediatric pneumonia, antibiotic treatment is common. The effectiveness of antibiotics in the outpatient setting for children diagnosed with pneumonia is not known. Objective: To compare outcomes among children diagnosed with pneumonia who were and were not treated with oral antibiotics. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study identified Medicaid-insured children and adolescents 17 years or younger diagnosed with pneumonia and discharged from ambulatory settings in a multistate claims database from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2019. Propensity score matching was used to mitigate confounding. Data were analyzed from August 31, 2023, to August 16, 2024. Exposures: Antibiotic receipt, defined as an oral antibiotic dispensed from a pharmacy on the day of the index visit or on the subsequent day. Children who did not receive antibiotics included those who were not prescribed antibiotics and those who were prescribed antibiotics but did not fill the prescription. Main Outcomes and Measures: Treatment failure and severe outcomes within 2 to 14 days after the index visit. Treatment failure included hospitalization or ambulatory revisits for pneumonia, new antibiotic dispensation with a same-day ambulatory visit, or complicated pneumonia. Severe outcomes included hospitalization for pneumonia or complicated pneumonia. Results: Among the 103 854 children with pneumonia included in the analysis, the median age was 5 (IQR, 2-9) years, and 54 665 (52.6%) were male. Overall, 20 435 children (19.7%) did not receive an antibiotic within 1 day. The propensity score-matched analysis included 40 454 children (20 227 per group). Treatment failure occurred in 2167 children (10.7%) who did not receive antibiotics and 1766 (8.7%) who received antibiotics (risk difference, 1.98 [95% CI, 1.41-2.56] percentage points). Severe outcomes occurred in 234 of 20 435 children (1.1%) who did not receive antibiotics and in 133 of 83 419 (0.7%) who did (risk difference, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.28-0.64] percentage points). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of children diagnosed with pneumonia in ambulatory settings, almost 20% did not receive antibiotics within a day of diagnosis. Although not receiving antibiotics was associated with a small increase in the risk of treatment failure, severe outcomes were uncommon regardless of whether antibiotics were received. These results suggest that some children diagnosed with pneumonia can likely be managed without antibiotics and highlight the need for prospective studies to identify these children.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Neumonía , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Niño , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Preescolar , Neumonía/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Estados Unidos , Lactante , Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Pacientes Ambulatorios/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Puntaje de Propensión
4.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(10): e2442207, 2024 Oct 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39480422

RESUMEN

Importance: Despite guidelines recommending avoidance of benzodiazepine administration to older patients, many of them now receive benzodiazepines as a part of anesthesia care. The effectiveness of clinician- and patient-facing interventions to discourage such use remains insufficiently characterized. Objective: To evaluate the effect of clinician peer comparison, patient informational mail, or a combination of these interventions compared with usual care on the rate of perioperative benzodiazepine administration to older patients. Design, Setting, and Participants: This 2 × 2 factorial, stepped-wedge, cluster randomized clinical trial of a corporate quality improvement initiative was conducted between August 8, 2022, and May 28, 2023, across 415 hospitals, surgery centers, and physician offices in 8 US states served by anesthesia clinicians from a national anesthesia practice. Participants were adults aged 65 years or older who underwent an elective surgical or endoscopic procedure with general anesthesia. Data analyses followed the intention-to-treat principle. Intervention: Patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 groups-clinician peer comparison (wherein clinicians received feedback regarding their performance compared with other clinicians in the practice), patient informational mail (wherein patients received an informational letter encouraging them to have a discussion regarding medication selection with their clinician on the day of surgery), both interventions, or usual care (no intervention). Main Outcomes and Measures: Rate of benzodiazepine administration during anesthesia care and patient satisfaction with anesthesia care (measured by the Anesthesia Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire, version 2). Results: Among the 509 269 enrolled participants (255 871 females [50.2%]; mean [SD] age, 74 [7] years), 81 363 (16.0%) were assigned to clinician peer comparison, 98 520 (19.3%) to patient informational mail, 169 712 (33.3%) to both interventions, and 159 674 (31.4%) to usual care. Among patients who received benzodiazepine during anesthesia care, 24.5% were in the usual care group compared with 19.7% in the clinician peer comparison group, 20.0% in the patient informational mail group, and 19.7% in the combination group. After adjustment for time, none of the study interventions were associated with lower odds of benzodiazepine administration compared with usual care (odds ratio [OR], 1.02 [95% CI, 0.98-1.07]; P = .35 for clinician peer comparison; OR, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.96-1.05]; P = .81 for patient informational mail; and OR, 1.11 [95% CI, 1.05-1.16]; P < .001 for combined interventions). Satisfaction scores were high in all groups and did not vary by treatment assignment. Conclusions and Relevance: This randomized clinical trial found that clinician peer comparison, patient informational mail, or a combination of both interventions did not reduce benzodiazepine administration to older patients compared with usual care; patient satisfaction remained high throughout the study. Overall, the findings suggest a need to explore other patient-targeted interventions to improve anesthesia care. Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT05436392.


Asunto(s)
Benzodiazepinas , Humanos , Anciano , Femenino , Masculino , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapéutico , Benzodiazepinas/administración & dosificación , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estados Unidos , Anestesia/métodos
5.
J Hosp Med ; 2024 Oct 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39404149

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of information around whether hospital length of stay and readmission rates differ based upon hospital type for adolescents and young adults (AYA) with complex chronic diseases (CCDs). OBJECTIVE: To measure the association between hospital type and readmission rates and index admission LOS among AYA with CCDs. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cross-sectional study of 2017 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Databases, including patients 12-25 years old with cystic fibrosis (CF), sickle cell disease (SCD), spina bifida (SB), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and diabetes mellitus (DM). Index hospitalizations were categorized by hospital type (pediatric hospitals [PHs], adult hospitals with pediatric services [AHPSs], and adult hospitals without pediatric services [AHs]), CCD, and age group. We compared case-mix adjusted 30-day readmission rates and differences in index admission LOS between hospital types. RESULTS: Adult hospitals without pediatric services exhibited higher readmission rates (25.4%) than AHPS (22.9%) and PH (15.1%). Compared to patients with CF admitted to AH, lower readmission rates were associated with longer LOS at both AHPS (relative ratio [RR]: 1.25, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-1.55) and PH (RR: 1.59, 95% CI: 1.28-1.97). Patients with DM admitted to AHPS (odds ratio [OR]: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.62-0.91) and PH (OR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.31-0.71) also demonstrated lower readmission rates than those admitted to AH. CONCLUSIONS: For AYA with CCD, hospital type is associated with differences in readmission rates and LOS. Lower readmission rates at hospitals with pediatric services compared to adult hospitals without pediatric services suggest hospital type has a significant impact on outcomes.

7.
Implement Sci Commun ; 5(1): 97, 2024 Sep 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39267183

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hip fracture surgery under general or spinal anesthesia is a common procedure for older adults in the United States (US). Although spinal or general anesthesia can be appropriate for many patients, and the choice between anesthesia types is preference-sensitive, shared decision-making is not consistently used by anesthesiologists counseling patients on anesthesia for this procedure. We designed an Option Grid™-style conversation aid, My Anesthesia Choice─Hip Fracture, to promote shared decision making in this interaction. This study will refine the aid and evaluate its implementation and effectiveness in clinical practice. METHODS: The study will be conducted over 2 phases: qualitative interviews with relevant clinicians and patients to refine the aid, followed by a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial of the intervention at 6 settings in the US. Primary outcomes will include the percentage of eligible patients who receive the intervention (intervention reach) and the change in quality of patient/clinician communication (intervention effectiveness). Secondary outcomes addressing other RE-AIM (reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance) domains will also be collected. Outcomes will be compared between baseline data and an active implementation period and then compared between the active implementation period and a sustainment period. Implementation strategies are guided by three constructs from the Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM): intervention, recipients, and implementation and sustainability infrastructure. DISCUSSION: This is a novel, large-scale trial evaluating and implementing a shared decision-making conversation aid for anesthesia choices. Strong buy-in from site leads and expert advisors will support both the success of implementation and the future dissemination of results and the intervention. Results from this study will inform the broader implementation of this aid for patients with hip fractures and can lead to the development and implementation of similar conversation aids for other anesthesia choices. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06438640.

8.
Res Sq ; 2024 Aug 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39257975

RESUMEN

Background: There is a lack of evidence on the importance of pain or other aspects of clinical care in the overall patient experience and patient-centered outcomes in cesarean delivery. The purpose of this study was to discover patient priorities in cesarean delivery anesthesia experience, to compare patient and provider perspectives, and to explore attitudes on shared decision-making around anesthesia choices for cesarean delivery. Methods: Patients with recent cesarean deliveries and clinical care providers were approached using a purposeful sampling strategy for this prospective observational qualitative study. Patients were included if they were in the hospital within 72 hours of a cesarean delivery (scheduled or unscheduled), spoke English fluently, and had term gestation. Providers were included if they currently provide regular clinical care to patients having cesarean deliveries and have at least 3 years of practice experience. Semi-structured interviews were conducted using an interview guide. Interview transcripts were independently coded by three coders and qualitatively analyzed for major themes until thematic saturation was achieved. Results: A total of 42 participants (20 patients and 22 providers) completed interviews. Five major themes emerged reflecting patient attitudes and beliefs toward cesarean delivery experience: 1) effective communication, education, and respect; 2) emotional support by care team; 3) intraoperative pain or discomfort; 4) varying acceptability around pain therapies; 5) stigma surrounding cesarean delivery. Five major themes emerged reflecting provider attitudes and beliefs toward cesarean delivery priorities: 1) complexity of pain responses; 2) multiple pain control strategies; 3) effective communication during emergency cesarean delivery; 4) patient psychological well-being during cesarean delivery; 5) barriers to observing the patients' birth plans. Conclusions: Patients and providers alike prioritize pain management, psychological well-being, and effective communication during cesarean delivery experiences. Patients emphasize relationships and trust in their cesarean experience, while clinicians emphasize clinical complexities and physical treatments. Our results guide future research in patient perspectives in cesarean deliveries.

9.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(8): e2430906, 2024 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39207752

RESUMEN

Importance: Treating low back pain (LBP) often involves a combination of pharmacologic, nonpharmacologic, and interventional treatments; one approach is acupuncture therapy, which is safe, effective, and cost-effective. How acupuncture is used within pain care regimens for LBP has not been widely studied. Objective: To document trends in reimbursed acupuncture between 2010 and 2019 among a large sample of patients with LBP, focusing on demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical characteristics associated with acupuncture use and the nonpharmacologic, pharmacologic, and interventional treatments used by patients who utilize acupuncture. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study included insurance claims of US adults in a deidentified database. The study sample included patients diagnosed with LBP between 2010 and 2019. Data were analyzed between September 2023 and June 2024. Main Outcomes and Measures: Changes in rates of reimbursed acupuncture utilization between 2010 and 2019, including electroacupuncture use, which involves the electrical stimulation of acupuncture needles. Covariates included age, sex, race and ethnicity, income, educational attainment, region, and a chronic LBP indicator. Secondary analyses tracked other nonpharmacologic treatments (eg, physical therapy, chiropractic care), pharmacologic treatments (eg, opioids, gabapentinoids), and interventional treatments (eg, epidural steroid injections). Results: The total sample included 6 840 497 adults with LBP (mean [SD] age, 54.6 [17.8] years; 3 916 766 female [57.3%]; 802 579 Hispanic [11.7%], 258 087 non-Hispanic Asian [3.8%], 804 975 non-Hispanic Black [11.8%], 4 974 856 non-Hispanic White [72.7%]). Overall, 106 485 (1.6%) had 1 or more acupuncture claim, while 61 503 (0.9%) had 1 or more electroacupuncture claim. The rate of acupuncture utilization increased consistently, from 0.9% in 2010 to 1.6% in 2019; electroacupuncture rates were relatively stable. Patients who were female (male: odds ratio [OR], 0.68; 99% CI, 0.67-0.70), Asian (OR, 3.26; 99% CI, 3.18-3.35), residing in the Pacific region (New England: OR, 0.26; 99% CI, 0.25-0.28), earning incomes of over $100 000 (incomes less than $40 000: OR, 0.59; 99% CI, 0.57-0.61), college educated (high school or less: OR, 0.32; 99% CI, 0.27-0.35), and with chronic LBP (OR, 2.39; 99% CI, 2.35-2.43) were more likely to utilize acupuncture. Acupuncture users were more likely to engage in other nonpharmacologic pain care like physical therapy (39.2%; 99% CI, 38.9%-39.5% vs 29.3%; 99% CI, 29.3%-29.3%) and less likely to utilize prescription drugs, including opioids (41.4%; 99% CI, 41.1%-41.8% vs 52.5%; 99% CI, 52.4%-52.5%), compared with nonusers. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, we found that acupuncture utilization among patients with LBP was rare but increased over time. Demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical characteristics were associated with acupuncture utilization, and acupuncture users were more likely to utilize other nonpharmacologic treatments and less likely to utilize pharmacologic treatments.


Asunto(s)
Terapia por Acupuntura , Dolor de la Región Lumbar , Humanos , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/terapia , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/economía , Femenino , Masculino , Terapia por Acupuntura/estadística & datos numéricos , Terapia por Acupuntura/economía , Estudios Transversales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Estados Unidos , Anciano
11.
Acad Emerg Med ; 2024 Aug 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39189186

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic uncertainty exists surrounding the identification of radiographic pneumonia in children with wheeze. It is important to determine the prevalence and clinical predictors of pneumonia in this population to limit chest radiography (CXR) and promote judicious antibiotic use. OBJECTIVES: The objectives were to (1) estimate the prevalence of radiographic pneumonia in children with wheeze and (2) systematically review the diagnostic accuracy of clinical findings for the identification of radiographic pneumonia. METHODS: Data sources were MEDLINE, PubMed Central, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and Web of Science (January 1995 to September 2023). For study selection, two reviewers identified high-quality studies reporting on clinical characteristics associated with radiographic pneumonia in wheezing children (age 0-21 years). Using Covidence software, data regarding study characteristics, methodologic quality, and results were extracted. Data were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 8333 unique titles and abstracts were reviewed. Twelve studies, representing 7398 patients, were included. Fifteen percent of children with wheeze undergoing CXR had pneumonia. Findings associated with radiographic pneumonia included temperature ≥ 38.4°C (positive likelihood ratio [LR+] 2.1, 95% CI 1.2-3.6, specificity 85%), oxygen saturation < 92% (LR+ 3.6, 95% CI 1.4-8.9, specificity 89%), and grunting (LR+ 2.7, 95% CI 1.6-4.4, pooled specificity 91%). Factors associated with the absence of radiographic pneumonia included lack of fever (negative likelihood ratio [LR-] 0.67, 95% CI 0.52-0.85) and oxygen saturation ≥ 95% (LR- 0.64, 95% CI 0.42-0.98). Tachypnea and auscultatory findings were not associated with radiographic pneumonia. DISCUSSION: Heterogeneity across studies limits generalizability. Additionally, all included studies overestimate the rate of radiographic pneumonia given the fact that all subjects had a CXR performed due to clinical suspicion of pneumonia. CONCLUSIONS: Radiographic pneumonia occurs in 15% of wheezing children undergoing CXR for pneumonia. Auscultatory findings and tachypnea do not differentiate children with and without pneumonia, and the rate of radiographic pneumonia is very low in the absence of fever and hypoxemia.

12.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(7): e2420370, 2024 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38967924

RESUMEN

Importance: High-risk practices, including dispensing an opioid prescription before surgery when not recommended, remain poorly characterized among US youths and may contribute to new persistent opioid use. Objective: To characterize changes in preoperative, postoperative, and refill opioid prescriptions up to 180 days after surgery. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study was performed using national claims data to determine opioid prescribing practices among a cohort of opioid-naive youths aged 11 to 20 years undergoing 22 inpatient and outpatient surgical procedures between 2015 and 2020. Statistical analysis was performed from June 2023 to April 2024. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the percentage of initial opioid prescriptions filled up to 14 days prior to vs 7 days after a procedure. Secondary outcomes included the likelihood of a refill up to 180 days after surgery, including refills at 91 to 180 days, as a proxy for new persistent opioid use, and the opioid quantity dispensed in the initial and refill prescriptions in morphine milligram equivalents (MME). Exposures included patient and prescriber characteristics. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate the association between prescription timing and prolonged refills. Results: Among 100 026 opioid-naive youths (median [IQR] age, 16.0 [14.0-18.0] years) undergoing a surgical procedure, 46 951 (46.9%) filled an initial prescription, of which 7587 (16.2%) were dispensed 1 to 14 days before surgery. The mean quantity dispensed was 227 (95% CI, 225-229) MME; 6467 youths (13.8%) filled a second prescription (mean MME, 239 [95% CI, 231-246]) up to 30 days after surgery, and 1216 (3.0%) refilled a prescription 91 to 180 days after surgery. Preoperative prescriptions, increasing age, and procedures not typically associated with severe pain were most strongly associated with new persistent opioid use. Conclusions and Relevance: In this retrospective study of youths undergoing surgical procedures, of which, many are typically not painful enough to require opioid use, opioid dispensing declined, but approximately 1 in 6 prescriptions were filled before surgery, and 1 in 33 adolescents filled prescriptions 91 to 180 days after surgery, consistent with new persistent opioid use. These findings should be addressed by policymakers and communicated by professional societies to clinicians who prescribe opioids.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides , Prescripciones de Medicamentos , Dolor Postoperatorio , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Humanos , Adolescente , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Niño , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven , Periodo Preoperatorio , Periodo Posoperatorio , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/tratamiento farmacológico
13.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 2024 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38950412

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: It is unknown which factors are associated with chest radiograph (CXR) and antibiotic use for suspected community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in children. We evaluated factors associated with CXR and antibiotic preferences among clinicians for children with suspected CAP using case scenarios generated through artificial intelligence (AI). METHODS: We performed a survey of general pediatric, pediatric emergency medicine, and emergency medicine attending physicians employed by a private physician contractor. Respondents were given 5 unique, AI-generated case scenarios. We used generalized estimating equations to identify factors associated with CXR and antibiotic use. We evaluated the cluster-weighted correlation between clinician suspicion and clinical prediction model risk estimates for CAP using 2 predictive models. RESULTS: A total of 172 respondents provided responses to 839 scenarios. Factors associated with CXR acquisition (OR, [95% CI]) included presence of crackles (4.17 [2.19, 7.95]), prior pneumonia (2.38 [1.32, 4.20]), chest pain (1.90 [1.18, 3.05]) and fever (1.82 [1.32, 2.52]). The decision to use antibiotics before knowledge of CXR results included past hospitalization for pneumonia (4.24 [1.88, 9.57]), focal decreased breath sounds (3.86 [1.98, 7.52]), and crackles (3.45 [2.15, 5.53]). After revealing CXR results to clinicians, these results were the sole predictor associated with antibiotic decision-making. Suspicion for CAP correlated with one of 2 prediction models for CAP (Spearman's rho = 0.25). Factors associated with a greater suspicion of pneumonia included prior pneumonia, duration of illness, worsening course of illness, shortness of breath, vomiting, decreased oral intake or urinary output, respiratory distress, head nodding, focal decreased breath sounds, focal rhonchi, fever, and crackles, and lower pulse oximetry. CONCLUSIONS: Ordering preferences for CXRs demonstrated similarities and differences with evidence-based risk models for CAP. Clinicians relied heavily on CXR findings to guide antibiotic ordering. These findings can be used within decision support systems to promote evidence-based management practices for pediatric CAP.

15.
Pediatrics ; 154(1)2024 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38867705

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Multiple viral respiratory epidemics occurred concurrently in 2022 but their true extent is unclear. To aid future surge planning efforts, we compared epidemiology and resource utilization with prepandemic viral respiratory seasons in 38 US children's hospitals. METHODS: We performed a serial cross-sectional study from October 2017 to March 2023. We counted daily emergency department (ED), inpatient, and ICU volumes; daily surgeries; viral tests performed; the proportion of ED visits resulting in revisit within 3 days; and proportion of hospitalizations with a 30-day readmission. We evaluated seasonal resource utilization peaks using hierarchical Poisson models. RESULTS: Peak volumes in the 2022 season were 4% lower (95% confidence interval [CI] -6 to -2) in the ED, not significantly different in the inpatient unit (-1%, 95% CI -4 to 2), and 8% lower in the ICU (95% CI -14 to -3) compared with each hospital's previous peak season. However, for 18 of 38 hospitals, their highest ED and inpatient volumes occurred in 2022. The 2022 season was longer in duration than previous seasons (P < .02). Peak daily surgeries decreased by 15% (95% CI -20 to -9) in 2022 compared with previous peaks. Viral tests increased 75% (95% CI 69-82) in 2022 from previous peaks. Revisits and readmissions were lowest in 2022. CONCLUSIONS: Peak ED, inpatient, and ICU volumes were not significantly different in the 2022 viral respiratory season compared with earlier seasons, but half of hospitals reached their highest volumes. Research on how surges impact boarding, transfer refusals, and patient outcomes is needed as regionalization reduces pediatric capacity.


Asunto(s)
Hospitales Pediátricos , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Hospitales Pediátricos/estadística & datos numéricos , Niño , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/epidemiología , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Estaciones del Año , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Readmisión del Paciente/tendencias , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Recursos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Capacidad de Reacción , Preescolar
16.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(6): e2417107, 2024 Jun 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38916893

RESUMEN

Importance: Centralizing deceased organ donor management and organ recovery into donor care units (DCUs) may mitigate the critical organ shortage by positively impacting donation and recipient outcomes. Objective: To compare donation and lung transplant outcomes between 2 common DCU models: independent (outside of acute-care hospitals) and hospital-based. Design, Setting, and Participants: This is a retrospective cohort study of Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network deceased donor registry and lung transplant recipient files from 21 US donor service areas with an operating DCU. Characteristics and lung donation rates among deceased donors cared for in independent vs hospital-based DCUs were compared. Eligible participants included deceased organ donors (aged 16 years and older) after brain death, who underwent organ recovery procedures between April 26, 2017, and June 30, 2022, and patients who received lung transplants from those donors. Data analysis was conducted from May 2023 to March 2024. Exposure: Organ recovery in an independent DCU (vs hospital-based DCU). Main Outcome and Measures: The primary outcome was duration of transplanted lung survival (through December 31, 2023) among recipients of lung(s) transplanted from cohort donors. A Cox proportional hazards model stratified by transplant year and program, adjusting for donor and recipient characteristics was used to compare graft survival. Results: Of 10 856 donors in the starting sample (mean [SD] age, 42.8 [15.2] years; 6625 male [61.0%] and 4231 female [39.0%]), 5149 (primary comparison group) underwent recovery procedures in DCUs including 1466 (28.4%) in 11 hospital-based DCUs and 3683 (71.5%) in 10 independent DCUs. Unadjusted lung donation rates were higher in DCUs than local hospitals, but lower in hospital-based vs independent DCUs (418 donors [28.5%] vs 1233 donors [33.5%]; P < .001). Among 1657 transplant recipients, 1250 (74.5%) received lung(s) from independent DCUs. Median (range) duration of follow-up after transplant was 734 (0-2292) days. Grafts recovered from independent DCUs had shorter restricted mean (SE) survival times than grafts from hospital-based DCUs (1548 [27] days vs 1665 [50] days; P = .04). After adjustment, graft failure remained higher among lungs recovered from independent DCUs than hospital-based DCUs (hazard ratio, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.28-2.65). Conclusions and Relevance: In this retrospective analysis of national donor and transplant recipient data, although lung donation rates were higher from deceased organ donors after brain death cared for in independent DCUs, lungs recovered from donors in hospital-based DCUs survived longer. These findings suggest that further work is necessary to understand which factors (eg, donor transfer, management, or lung evaluation and acceptance practices) differ between DCU models and may contribute to these differences.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Pulmón , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos , Humanos , Trasplante de Pulmón/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/estadística & datos numéricos , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/métodos , Donantes de Tejidos/estadística & datos numéricos , Donantes de Tejidos/provisión & distribución , Receptores de Trasplantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos , Sistema de Registros , Supervivencia de Injerto
17.
Clin Pediatr (Phila) ; : 99228241254153, 2024 May 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38757645

RESUMEN

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is often considered for children presenting to the emergency department (ED) with respiratory symptoms. It is unclear how often children are diagnosed with CAP following an ED visit for respiratory illness. We performed a retrospective case-control study to evaluate 7-day CAP diagnosis among children 3 months to 18 years discharged from the ED with respiratory illness from 2011 to 2021 and who receive care at 4 hospital-affiliated primary care clinics. Logistic regression was performed to assess for predictors of 7-day CAP diagnosis. Seventy-four (0.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.6%, 0.9%) of 10 329 children were diagnosed with CAP within 7 days, and fever at the index visit was associated with increased odds of diagnosis (odds ratio [OR] = 3.32, 95% CI = 1.75-6.28). Community-acquired pneumonia diagnosis after discharge from the ED with respiratory illness is rare, even among children who are febrile at time of initial evaluation.

18.
BMC Anesthesiol ; 24(1): 165, 2024 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38693498

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients often desire involvement in anesthesia decisions, yet clinicians rarely explain anesthesia options or elicit preferences. We developed My Anesthesia Choice-Hip Fracture, a conversation aid about anesthesia options for hip fracture surgery and tested its preliminary efficacy and acceptability. METHODS: We developed a 1-page, tabular format, plain-language conversation aid with feedback from anesthesiologists, decision scientists, and community advisors. We conducted an online survey of English-speaking adults aged 50 and older. Participants imagined choosing between spinal and general anesthesia for hip fracture surgery. Before and after viewing the aid, participants answered a series of questions regarding key outcomes, including decisional conflict, knowledge about anesthesia options, and acceptability of the aid. RESULTS: Of 364/409 valid respondents, mean age was 64 (SD 8.9) and 59% were female. The proportion indicating decisional conflict decreased after reviewing the aid (63-34%, P < 0.001). Median knowledge scores increased from 50% correct to 67% correct (P < 0.001). 83% agreed that the aid would help them discuss options and preferences. 76.4% would approve of doctors using it. CONCLUSION: My Anesthesia Choice-Hip Fracture decreased decisional conflict and increased knowledge about anesthesia choices for hip fracture surgery. Respondents assessed it as acceptable for use in clinical settings. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Use of clinical decision aids may increase shared decision-making; further testing is warranted.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas de Cadera , Humanos , Fracturas de Cadera/cirugía , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anestesia General/métodos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Anestesia Raquidea/métodos , Participación del Paciente/métodos , Toma de Decisiones , Conducta de Elección
19.
J Hosp Med ; 19(8): 693-701, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38678444

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Emerging evidence suggests that initial oral and intravenous (IV) antibiotics have similar efficacy in pediatric community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), but further data are needed. OBJECTIVE: We determined the association between hospital-level initial oral antibiotic rates and outcomes in pediatric CAP. DESIGNS, SETTINGS, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study included children hospitalized with CAP at 43 hospitals in the Pediatric Health Information System (2016-2022). Hospitals were grouped by whether initial antibiotics were given orally in a high, moderate, or low proportion of patients. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES: Regression models examined associations between high versus low oral-utilizing hospitals and length of stay (LOS, primary outcome), intensive care unit (ICU) transfers, escalated respiratory care, complicated CAP, cost, readmissions, and emergency department (ED) revisits. RESULTS: Initial oral antibiotics were used in 16% (interquartile range: 10%-20%) of 30,207 encounters, ranging from 1% to 68% across hospitals. Comparing high versus low oral-utilizing hospitals (oral rate: 32% [27%-47%] and 10% [9%-11%], respectively), there were no differences in LOS, intensive care unit, complicated CAP, cost, or ED revisits. Escalated respiratory care occurred in 1.3% and 0.5% of high and low oral-utilizing hospitals, respectively (relative ratio [RR]: 2.96 [1.12, 7.81]), and readmissions occurred in 1.5% and 0.8% (RR: 1.68 [1.31, 2.17]). Initial oral antibiotics varied across hospitals without a difference in LOS. While high oral-utilizing hospitals had higher escalated respiratory care and readmission rates, these were rare, the clinical significance of these small differences is uncertain, and there were no differences in other clinically relevant outcomes. This suggests some children may benefit from initial IV antibiotics, but most would probably do well with oral antibiotics.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas , Tiempo de Internación , Neumonía , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Niño , Preescolar , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Oral , Lactante , Administración Intravenosa , Hospitalización , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Resultado del Tratamiento
20.
Acad Emerg Med ; 31(7): 667-674, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38426635

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to describe the incidence of brief resolved unexplained events (BRUEs) and compare the impact of a national clinical practice guideline (CPG) on admission and diagnostic testing practices between general and pediatric emergency departments (EDs). METHODS: Using the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample for 2012-2019, we conducted a cross-sectional study of children <1 year of age with an International Classification of Diseases diagnostic code for BRUE. Population incidence rate was estimated using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention birth data. ED incidence rate was estimated for all ED encounters. We used interrupted time series to evaluate the associated impact of the CPG publication on the outcomes of ED disposition (discharge, admission, and transfer) and electrocardiogram (ECG) use. RESULTS: Of 133,972 encounters for BRUE, 80.0% occurred in general EDs. BRUE population incidence was 4.28 per 1000 live births and the annual incidence remained stable (p = 0.19). BRUE ED incidence was 5.06 per 1000 infant ED encounters (p = 0.14). The impact of the BRUE CPG on admission rates was limited to pediatric EDs (level shift -23.3%, p = 0.002). Transfers from general EDs did not change with the CPG (level shift 2.2%, p = 0.17). After the CPG was published, ECGs increased by 13.7% in pediatric EDs (p = 0.005) but did not change in general EDs (level shift -0.2%, p = 0.82). CONCLUSIONS: BRUEs remain a common pediatric problem at a population level and in EDs. Although a disproportionate number of infants present to general EDs, there is differential uptake of the CPG recommendations between pediatric and general EDs. These findings may support quality improvement opportunities aimed at improving care for these infants and decreasing unnecessary hospital admissions or transfers.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Humanos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/normas , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Masculino , Lactante , Incidencia , Recién Nacido , Evento Inexplicable, Breve y Resuelto/diagnóstico , Evento Inexplicable, Breve y Resuelto/terapia , Evento Inexplicable, Breve y Resuelto/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Electrocardiografía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...