Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Heliyon ; 9(5): e15823, 2023 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37305473

RESUMEN

Remodeling of the thoracic aorta is commonly seen and viewed as a precursor to an aortic aneurysm. However, while aneurysms have been shown to expand at a rate of approximately 1 mm annually, the expansion of the pre-aneurysmal aorta is poorly characterized, especially in relation to age, gender, and aortic size per se. We identified patients that had undergone echocardiography at least twice at a large university medical center. Diagnosis codes, medications, and blood test results were obtained from hospital records. Syndromic patients were excluded (e.g., Marfan's syndrome, bicuspid aortic valve). Final population comprised n = 24,928 patients (median age 61.2 years (inter-quartile range (IQR): 50.6-71.5); 55.8% males) that had undergone a median of 3 echocardiograms (2-4; range 2-27) during a median of 4.0 years (IQR: 2.3-6.2). Hypertension was present in 39.6% of patients and diabetes in 20.7%, median LV ejection fraction was 56.0% (IQR: 41.0-62.0). Aortic size measurements were analyzed in mixed models while clustering on individual patients. Mean expansion was determined for sinus of Valsalva as 1.93 (95% confidence interval; CI95: 1.87-1.99) mm per decade, and for ascending aorta as 1.76 (CI95: 1.70-1.82) mm per decade. Faster expansion was found in males, with larger aortic size, and younger age (p for interaction <0.05 for all). In conclusion, expansion of the thoracic aorta, in real world, non-syndromic patients, is slow and averages <2 mm per decade. This will help to inform management of this large patient group.

2.
J Vasc Surg ; 77(4): 1264-1273.e3, 2023 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36183989

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to analyze the efficacy and safety of sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) in the treatment of below-the-knee (BTK) arterial disease. METHODS: An electronic literature search was conducted from inception to July 24, 2021. Retrospective, prospective, and randomized studies that had used SESs to treat BTK arterial disease and had reported the primary patency, technical success, target lesion revascularization, and/or mortality were included. Meta-analyses of the proportions were conducted to derive pooled summary statistics of the outcomes. Where Kaplan-Meier curves were provided for primary patency, a meta-analysis of the individual patient data was conducted via a graphic reconstruction tool to estimate primary patency at various follow-up points. For studies comparing SESs and bare metal stents (BMSs), a two-stage meta-analysis was performed to compare the 6-month primary patency of SESs vs BMSs. RESULTS: Ten studies across 13 publications, including 995 patients, were retrieved for analysis. In the meta-analysis of proportions, across six studies (n = 339 patients), the pooled 6-month primary patency was 87.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 81.6%-92.1%). Across seven studies (n = 283 patients), the pooled 6-month mortality was 5.4% (95% CI, 1.4%-11.2%). An individual patient data analysis of three studies (n = 282 patients) yielded a primary patency rate of 95.2% (95% CI, 92.7%-97.8%), 82.8% (95% CI, 78.3%-87.6%), 79.8% (95% CI, 75.0%-85.0%), and 79.8% (95% CI, 75.0%-85.0%) at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months, respectively. The 12-month target lesion revascularization rate across four studies (n = 324 patients) was 9.6% (95% CI, 6.4%-13.4%). In the two-stage meta-analysis of 6-month primary patency across three studies (n = 168 patients), the use of SESs was significantly favored over BMSs (risk ratio, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.12-1.46; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The overall evidence suggests that the use of SESs appears to be safe and offers favorable outcomes for BTK arterial disease compared with BMSs.


Asunto(s)
Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Sirolimus , Enfermedades Vasculares , Humanos , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sirolimus/administración & dosificación , Sirolimus/uso terapéutico , Stents/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Enfermedades Vasculares/terapia
3.
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 70(3): 217-232, 2022 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34062599

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes of lobectomy versus sublobar resection in elderly patients (≥65) with stage 1 nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). METHODS: We searched for relevant articles using a set of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Meta-analytic techniques were applied. RESULTS: Twelve studies (n = 5834) were chosen. Our results indicate that in the elderly, lobectomy for stage 1 NSCLC confers a survival advantage over sublobar resection. Lobectomy patients had a lower risk of death within 5 years and lower odds of local cancer recurrence. Our results show that lobectomy had a better 5-year cancer-specific survival and 5-year disease-free survival that trended toward significance. The sublobar resection group showed better 30-day operative mortality that trended toward significance. Subgroup analysis of stage 1A cancer demonstrated no difference in 5-year overall survival rates. However, for stage 1B tumors 5-year overall survival favored lobectomy. CONCLUSION: Lobectomy for stage 1 NSCLC in elderly patients is superior to sublobar resection in terms of survival and cancer recurrence and should be afforded where possible. For stage 1A tumors, sublobar resection is noninferior and may be considered. Further randomized controlled trials in this topic is required.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Anciano , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/etiología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neumonectomía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
ANZ J Surg ; 91(6): 1251-1259, 2021 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33928739

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate the efficacy of antifibrinolytics in non-cardiac thoracic surgery. METHODS: We searched for all randomized controlled trials on this topic. A set of strict inclusion and exclusion criteria was developed. Six studies were meta-analysed together then in subgroups of topical tranexamic acid and intravenous aprotinin. We compared postoperative chest drain output, transfusions requirements and duration of hospital stay where available to determine the efficacy of topical tranexamic acid or intravenous aprotinin in reducing blood loss. RESULTS: The use of antifibrinolytics reduces 24-h chest drain output (-290.21 mL [-524.75, -55.66], P = 0.02, I2  = 98%), red blood cell transfusion requirements (-1.27 units [-2.24, -0.30], P = 0.01, I2  = 100%) and shortened duration of hospital stay (-1.81 days [-3.25, -0.36], P = 0.01, I2  = 96%). The subgroup analysis also supported this trend. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the use of antifibrinolytics appears to reduce postoperative blood loss by reducing chest drain output, transfusion requirements and length of stay after thoracic surgery.


Asunto(s)
Antifibrinolíticos , Cirugía Torácica , Ácido Tranexámico , Antifibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Aprotinina/uso terapéutico , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Humanos , Ácido Tranexámico/uso terapéutico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...