Miniaturized versus conventional cardiopulmonary bypass and acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a serious complication after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). There are conflicting reports whether a miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass (MCPB) system is associated with a lower AKI incidence compared with conventional cardiopulmonary bypass (CCPB). It is unknown if AKI risk factors differ between the two groups. We assessed if MCPB decreases AKI after CABG and compared the risk factors between both groups. METHODS: Sixty-eight Asian patients presenting for elective CABG at a tertiary heart centre were enrolled. They were randomly assigned to MCPB (n=34) or CCPB group (n=34) and followed up in a single-blinded, prospective, randomized, controlled trial. The primary outcome was Acute Kidney Injury Network stage 1 AKI. RESULTS: The AKI incidence was 21.5% and was not significantly different between patients undergoing MCPB versus CCPB (21.9% versus 21.2%, p=0.948). The first CPB haematocrit was independently associated with AKI in the MCPB group (Relative Risk [RR]=0.484, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]=0.268-0.876, p=0.016); post-operative blood loss and inflammation were independently associated with AKI in the CCPB group (RR=1.005, 95%CI=1.003-1.007, p<0.001; RR=1.018, 95%CI=1.010-1.028, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The MCPB system is not associated with a lower incidence of AKI in Asian patients undergoing CABG. Risk factors for AKI differed between patients using the MCPB and CCPB systems.

The inflammatory response between miniaturised and conventional cardiopulmonary bypass after cardiac surgery in an Asian population.

INTRODUCTION: We compared the systemic inflammatory response of the MCPB system to the CCPB system with cell salvage and phosphorylcholine-coated tubing amongst Asian patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. METHODS: Seventy-eight patients were randomly assigned to the MCPB or the CCPB groups equally and followed up in a prospective, single-blinded, randomised, controlled trial. Levels of TNF-α, IL-6, CRP and LDH were measured peri-operatively. RESULTS: The systemic inflammatory response was similar in both groups (TNF-α: p=0.222; IL-6: p=0.991; CRP: p=0.258). Only haemolysis was significantly higher in the CCPB group (LDH: p=0.011). The MCPB system was twice more expensive, but had a near 4-fold cost saving in tranfusions. Overall, the MCPB system cost 20% more than the modified CCPB system. CONCLUSION: These results corroborate with studies that demonstrated the avoidance of cardiotomy suction rather than the MCPB system, itself, leads to an attenuated inflammatory response. The absence of obvious clinical benefit and the higher costs involved with the MCPB system would preclude its routine use.