A home-based, multidisciplinary liver optimisation programme for the first 28 days after an admission for acute-on-chronic liver failure (LivR well): a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) represents a rising global healthcare burden, characterised by increasing prevalence among patients with decompensated cirrhosis who have a 28-day transplantation-free mortality of 33.9%. Due to disease complexity and a high prevalence of socio-economic disadvantage, there are deficits in quality of care and adherence to guideline-based treatment in this cohort. Compared to other chronic conditions such as heart failure, those with liver disease have reduced access to integrated ambulatory care services. The LivR Well programme is a multidisciplinary intervention aimed at improving 28-day mortality and reducing 30-day readmission through a home-based, liver optimisation programme implemented in the first 28 days after an admission with either ACLF or hepatic decompensation. Outcomes from our feasibility study suggest that the intervention is safe and acceptable to patients and carers. METHODS: We will recruit adult patients with chronic liver disease from the emergency departments, in-patient admissions, and an ambulatory liver clinic of a multi-site quaternary health service in Melbourne, Australia. A total of 120 patients meeting EF-Clif criteria will be recruited to the ACLF arm, and 320 patients to the hepatic decompensation arm. Participants in each cohort will be randomised to the intervention arm, a 28-day multidisciplinary programme or to standard ambulatory care in a 1:1 ratio. The intervention arm includes access to nursing, pharmacy, physiotherapy, dietetics, social work, and neuropsychiatry clinicians. For the ACLF cohort, the primary outcome is 28-day mortality. For the hepatic decompensation cohort, the primary outcome is 30-day re-admission. Secondary outcomes assess changes in liver disease severity and quality of life. An interim analysis will be performed at 50% recruitment to consider early cessation of the trial if the intervention is superior to the control, as suggested in our feasibility study. A cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed. Patients will be followed up for 12 weeks from randomisation. Three exploratory subgroup analyses will be conducted by (a) source of referral, (b) unplanned hospitalisation, and (c) concurrent COVID-19. The trial has been registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry. DISCUSSION: This study implements a multidisciplinary intervention for ACLF patients with proven benefits in other chronic diseases with the addition of novel digital health tools to enable remote patient monitoring during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our feasibility study demonstrates safety and acceptability and suggests clinical improvement in a small sample size. An RCT is required to generate robust outcomes in this frail, high healthcare resource utilisation cohort with high readmission and mortality risk. Interventions such as LivR Well are urgently required but also need to be evaluated to ensure feasibility, replicability, and scalability across different healthcare systems. The implications of this trial include the generalisability of the programme for implementation across regional and urban centres. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) ACTRN12621001703897 . Registered on 13 December 2021. WHO Trial Registration Data Set. See Appendix 1.

Short-term intraperitoneal catheters: An ambulatory care intervention for refractory ascites secondary to cirrhosis during COVID-19.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Patients with refractory ascites have frequent hospital admissions, which pose exposure risks in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of a novel 12-week, multidisciplinary ambulatory care program allowing frequent low-volume ascitic drainage through a tunneled, intraperitoneal catheter (IPC). METHODS: Adult patients with cirrhosis complicated by refractory ascites were recruited through a liver clinic in a tertiary health service in Melbourne, Australia from April to December 2020. All patients were enrolled in a 12-week multidisciplinary program including medical, nursing, dietetics, and pharmacy support. A Rocket Medical IPC was inserted on day 1 with 1-2 L of ascitic fluid drained over 1-3 sessions per week either at the patients' homes or at the hospital day ward. Patients' demographics, death, complications, and self-reported outcomes were recorded. RESULTS: Twelve patients were enrolled with a median of 65-day (interquartile range [IQR]: 16.5-93) IPC duration between April and December 2020 across two periods of COVID-related lockdown in Melbourne, Australia. There were no IPC-related deaths. Early removal was necessitated in three patients due to leakage, nonadherence, and bacteremia. On day 30, the median self-reported health score increased from 50 (IQR: 50-70) to 78 (IQR: 50-85), attributable to a reduction in symptom burden. CONCLUSION: A multidisciplinary IPC program including the use of short-term IPC was safe and associated with a self-reported improvement in perceptions of health. In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, the program aimed to reduce patient and clinician exposure, which is maintaining engagement and management of decompensated cirrhosis.

A retrospective cost analysis of angioplasty compared to bypass surgery for lower limb arterial disease in an Australian tertiary health service.

INTRODUCTION: Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and surgical bypass (BYP) are treatment options for symptomatic peripheral arterial disease (PAD). PTA and BYP have different clinical outcomes and cost implications. This paper aims to compare hospital-related costs of PTA and BYP for PAD of the lower limbs in an Australian health service. METHODS: A retrospective cost analysis using clinical and financial data from an urban, tertiary hospital was performed. Patient cohorts were matched to existing published studies and 3-year findings were calculated. Outcomes measured were mean initial admission cost; mean bed stay; mean complication rate; mean cost of re-intervention at 12 months and extrapolated mean cost at 3 years. RESULTS: The mean total admission costs for PTA compared to BYP were $8758 vs. $27,849 (P < 0.001). Patients undergoing BYP were admitted for 10.25 vs. 3.77 nights (P < 0.001). The complication rate was greater in the BYP group for infection only. Re-intervention was required by 13% of the PTA group and 16% of the BYP group, at a mean cost of $11,798 and $14,728, respectively (P = 0.453). The extrapolated total mean cost at 3 years was higher in the BYP group for patients with both intermittent claudication ($26,764 vs. $11,402) and critical limb ischaemia ($27,719 vs. $12,655). CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, PTA is a favourable alternative to BYP for PAD of the lower limbs as it is less costly, does not result in a greater re-intervention rate at 1 year and has been previously demonstrated to have comparable clinical outcomes. Given the limitations of this retrospective analysis, a prospective cost-effectiveness analysis is recommended.

Environmental tobacco smoke and peripheral arterial disease: A review.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Despite worldwide reductions in active smoking, non-smokers continue to be exposed to environmental tobacco smoke, especially at home or workplace. There is a well-recognised association between active smoking and peripheral arterial disease, however, a relationship to environmental tobacco smoke exposure is less substantiated. The aims of this paper are to review the literature regarding the association between environmental tobacco smoke and peripheral arterial disease and identify the public health implications of the findings. METHODS: Selected electronic databases (Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsychINFO and Scopus) were searched for studies published up to August 2017. Key words and inclusion/exclusion criteria applied. A manual search of reference lists of studies selected for review was also performed. RESULTS: Of the initial 150 studies identified, 12 met inclusion criteria for review. Three studies showed a positive association between environmental tobacco smoke exposure and definitive diagnosis of peripheral arterial disease, 6 studies demonstrated a positive association with features of vascular injury, and 3 studies found no significant positive or negative association. CONCLUSIONS: An association between exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and development of peripheral arterial disease or clinically significant arterial injury in non-smokers is supported by moderate quality evidence in the literature. Larger, longitudinal observational studies addressing current limitations, including sources of bias, inconsistency and imprecision, are needed to provide more robust and consistent evidence. Regardless, evidence of potential detrimental impacts supports ongoing restrictions on freedom to smoke in public areas, including the workplace, and has implications for those exposed in the home environment.