Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 72
Filtrar
1.
Can Urol Assoc J ; 2024 Mar 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38466864

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to describe the incidence, microbiology, and risk factors related to infectious complications after transrectal prostate biopsies. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing prostate biopsies. Throughout the study period, the institutional standard for antibiotic prophylaxis was cephalexin and ciprofloxacin. Due to the desire to limit fluoroquinolone use, the ciprofloxacin duration of therapy was reduced from 48 to 24 hours in the middle of the study period. The primary outcome was the incidence of infection-related complications, defined as a urinary tract infection or bacteremia within 30 days post-procedure. RESULTS: A total of 1471 transrectal prostate biopsies were included. All patients received antibiotic prophylaxis, with 86.1% (1268/1472) of patients receiving both ciprofloxacin and cephalexin. The incidence of infection-related complications was 1.6% (24/1471). Four patients experienced bacteremia, all of which were due to E. coli and all of these patients had received antibiotic prophylaxis with an active antibiotic. The use of ciprofloxacin was associated with a lower risk of infection-related complications (odds ratio [OR] 0.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.07, 0.55). Bacteriuria within one year prior to the procedure was associated with increased risk of infection-related complications (OR 4.77, 95% CI 1.34, 16.93). Four (0.3%) patients experienced an antibiotic-related adverse event. CONCLUSIONS: We observed a low rate of infection-related complications and antibiotic-related adverse events in the setting of antibiotic prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin and cephalexin for 24 hours, without pre-procedure rectal culture screening. Investigation into procedural or host factors may uncover opportunities to further reduce infection-related complications.

2.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38415081

RESUMEN

Background: The 2022 SHEA/IDSA/APIC guidance for surgical site infection (SSI) prevention recommends reserving vancomycin prophylaxis to patients who are methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonized. Unfortunately, vancomycin prophylaxis remains common due to the overestimation of MRSA risk and the desire to cover MRSA in patients with certain healthcare-associated characteristics. To optimize vancomycin prophylaxis, we sought to identify risk factors for MRSA SSI. Methods: This was a single-center, case-control study of patients with a postoperative SSI after undergoing a National Healthcare Safety Network operative procedure over eight years. MRSA SSI cases were compared to non-MRSA SSI controls. Forty-two demographic, medical, and surgical characteristics were evaluated. Results: Of the 441 patients included, 23 developed MRSA SSIs (rate = 5.2 per 100 SSIs). In the multivariable model, we identified two independent risk factors for MRSA SSI: a history of MRSA colonization or infection (OR, 9.0 [95% CI, 1.9-29.6]) and hip or knee replacement surgery (OR, 3.8 [95% CI, 1.3-9.9]). Hemodialysis, previous hospitalization, and prolonged hospitalization prior to the procedure had no measurable association with odds of MRSA SSI. Conclusions: Patients with prior MRSA colonization or infection had 9-10 times greater odds of MRSA SSI and patients undergoing hip and knee replacement had 3-4 times greater odds of MRSA SSI. Healthcare-associated characteristics, such as previous hospitalization or hemodialysis, were not associated with MRSA SSI. Our findings support national recommendations to reserve vancomycin prophylaxis for patients who are MRSA colonized, as well as those undergoing hip and knee replacement, in the absence of routine MRSA colonization surveillance.

3.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol ; 133(4): 458-461, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38183237

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: For true clean-contaminated head and neck procedures, the literature supports ≤24 hours of perioperative antibiotics. However, there are certain otolaryngology procedures with low surgical site infection (SSI) risk for which there is negligible benefit from antibiotic prophylaxis. The objective of this evaluation was to describe antibiotic use and adherence to evidence-based institutional guidelines in low-risk head and neck procedures. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing low-risk clean-contaminated head and neck procedures wherein antibiotic prophylaxis was not indicated, based on evidence-based institutional guidelines. RESULTS: Among the 291 included patients, perioperative antibiotics were unnecessarily administered in 29% of patients. Among patients who received antibiotics, 76% received preoperative antibiotics and 41% received postoperative antibiotics, for a median duration of 7 days. There were no significant differences in SSIs, mortality, and length of stay for those receiving perioperative antibiotics versus those not receiving perioperative antibiotics. CONCLUSION: These data highlight the need for antibiotic stewardship interventions and partnerships between antibiotic stewardship teams and surgical services.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Humanos , Profilaxis Antibiótica/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control
4.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 45(2): 196-200, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37702044

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Vancomycin is often initiated in hospitalized patients; however, it may be unnecessary or continued for longer durations than needed. Oversight of all vancomycin orders may not be feasible with widespread prescribing and strategies to enlist other clinicians to serve as stewards of vancomycin use are needed. We implemented 2 sequential interventions: a protocol in which the pharmacist orders MRSA nasal swab followed by a protocol requiring approval from pharmacists to continue vancomycin for >72 hours. METHODS: In this single-center, retrospective, quasi-experimental study, we evaluated vancomycin use after implementation of a pharmacy-driven MRSA nasal-swab ordering protocol and a vancomycin 72-hour restriction protocol. The primary outcome was the change in the standardized antibiotic administration ratio (SAAR) for antibacterial agents for resistant gram-positive infections. We also evaluated the impact on antibiotic utilization. RESULTS: Following the MRSA swab protocol, the SAAR decreased from 1.26 to 1.13 (P < .001; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16-1.25). After the 72-hour approval process, the SAAR was 0.96 (P < .001; 95% CI, 1.0-1.12). Vancomycin utilization decreased from 138.9 to 125.3 days of therapy per 1,000 patient days following the MRSA swab protocol (P < .001) and to 112.7 (P < .001) following the 72-hour approval protocol. Interrupted time-series analysis identified a similar rate of decline in utilization following the 2 interventions (-0.3 and -0.5; P = .16). Both interventions combined resulted in a significant reduction (-1.5; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Implementation of a pharmacist-driven MRSA nasal-swab ordering protocol, followed by a 72-hour approval protocol, was associated with a significant reduction in the SAAR for antibiotics used in the treatment of resistant gram-positive infections and a reduction in vancomycin utilization. Leveraging the oversight of primary service clinical pharmacists through these protocols proved to be an effective strategy.


Asunto(s)
Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Farmacia , Infecciones Estafilocócicas , Humanos , Vancomicina/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología
6.
J Pediatr Orthop ; 43(9): 555-559, 2023 Oct 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37522477

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures are commonly evaluated using the anterior humeral line (AHL) on a lateral radiograph. Rotational variations in radiographic projection are common due to child discomfort and could lead to changes in management based on where the AHL intersects the capitellum. The purpose of this study was to establish whether rotational variations in elbow rotation leads to significant changes in AHL position and whether drawing the AHL based on the distal humerus versus shaft is more tolerant to rotation. METHODS: Fifty children with nonoperative supracondylar humerus fractures were identified with sub optimally positioned injury and well positioned follow-up lateral radiographs. The proportion of the bone anterior to the intersection of the AHL and the capitellum was measured using the humeral shaft versus distal humerus to guide position of the AHL. This process was repeated on ten pediatric humerus dry cadaveric specimens which were imaged in 5-degree rotational increments along the axis of the humeral shaft from -20 to +20 degrees. RESULTS: AHL position correlated poorly when measured on rotated lateral radiographs of clinical patients versus non-rotated lateral radiographs when using the distal humerus as a guide (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.14), compared with when using the humeral shaft as a guide (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.81). When assessing the pediatric humerus dry cadavers between the 2 techniques, there was greater statistically significant variation in rotated positions compared with the neutral position in the distal humerus AHL measurement approach compared with the humeral shaft AHL measurement approach, with the mean AHL within the central third of the capitellum for more rotational positions when using the shaft compared with the distal humerus. CONCLUSIONS: With rotated lateral elbow radiographs in supracondylar humerus fractures, utilizing the humeral shaft provides more consistent AHL measurements than utilizing the distal humerus, and thus drawing the line starting at the shaft of the humerus is recommended for surgical decision making.


Asunto(s)
Articulación del Codo , Fracturas del Húmero , Niño , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Húmero/diagnóstico por imagen , Húmero/cirugía , Fracturas del Húmero/cirugía , Codo , Articulación del Codo/diagnóstico por imagen
7.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37444113

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to use the RE-AIM framework to evaluate the implementation of a mental health app designed for undergraduate and medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic. PARTICIPANTS: Medical (n = 270) and undergraduate students (n = 1386) from five universities in the Appalachian region in the United States participated in this study. METHODS: Universities from the United States were recruited to deploy the Sharpen app for medical and undergraduate students. The Sharpen app provided psychoeducational modules in mental health literacy, social-emotional learning, mindfulness-based stress reduction, and suicide prevention to promote protective factors for students. The utilization of the Sharpen app was analyzed using the RE-AIM framework using a retrospective, cross-sectional design. RESULTS: Reach: A total of 12.72% of medical students and 6.00% of undergraduate students participated in the study. EFFICACY: Medical students viewed significantly more pages, had a significantly higher unique page view average, and a statistically significant exit percentage when compared to undergraduate students. Adoption: A total of 100% of the universities that were recruited participated in the study. IMPLEMENTATION: Five out of six implementation criteria were included, indicating high implementation. Maintenance: All of the universities continued using the Sharpen app following the end of data collection, resulting in a 100% maintenance rate. CONCLUSIONS: The RE-AIM framework indicated usability and maintenance by medical and undergraduate students. Future research needs to implement a more rigorous design to determine the impact of the Sharpen app on mental health outcomes in medical and undergraduate students.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Aplicaciones Móviles , Estudiantes de Medicina , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Estudiantes de Medicina/psicología , Estudios Transversales , Salud Mental , Pandemias , Estudios Retrospectivos
8.
J Clin Med Res ; 15(3): 148-160, 2023 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37035851

RESUMEN

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia with a growing prevalence worldwide, especially in the elderly population. Patients with AF are at higher risk of serious life-threatening events and complications that may lead to long-term sequelae and reduce quality of life. The aim of our study was to examine the association of additional risk factors and comorbid medical conditions with AF in patients 65 years, or older. Methods: We performed a retrospective electronic medical record review of patients aged 65 years and older, who visited our internal medicine office between July 1, 2020 and June 30, 2021. Results: Among 2,433 patients, 418 patients (17.2%) had AF. Our analysis showed that for each unit increased in age, there was a 4.5% increase in the odds of AF (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.2-6.9%; P < 0.001). Compared to patients of Caucasian descent, African-American patients had significantly decreased odds of AF (odds ratio (OR) 0.274, 95% CI 0.141 - 0.531; P < 0.001). Patients with hypertension had 2.241 greater odds of AF (95% CI 1.421 - 3.534; P = 0.001). Additional comorbidities with significantly greater odds of AF included other cardiac arrhythmias (OR 2.523, 95% CI 1.720 - 3.720; P < 0.001), congestive heart failure (OR 3.111, 95% CI 1.674 - 5.784; P < 0.001), osteoarthritis (OR 3.014, 95% CI 2.138 - 4.247; P < 0.001), liver disease (OR 2.129, 95% CI 1.164 - 3.893; P = 0.014), and colorectal disease (OR 1.500 95% CI 1.003 - 2.243; P = 0.048). Comorbidities with significantly decreased odds of AF included other rheumatological disorder (OR 0.144, 95% CI 0.086 - 0.243; P < 0.001), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) use (OR 0.206, 95% CI 0.125 - 0.338; P < 0.001), and corticosteroid use (OR 0.553, 95% CI 0.374 - 0.819; P = 0.003). Conclusions: Increasing age, hypertension, presence of other cardiac arrhythmias, congestive heart failure, osteoarthritis, liver disease, and colorectal disease are associated with increased odds of having AF.

9.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 48(12): E188-E195, 2023 Jun 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36745423

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective matched cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether females with idiopathic scoliosis (IS), both with and without spine fusion, experience different rates of cesarean section (CS) and epidural anesthesia (EA) than females without scoliosis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: IS is a common spine condition with a higher prevalence in females. It is unclear whether females with scoliosis, treated nonoperatively or operatively, have different rates of cesarean delivery or EA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with IS who delivered in our integrated health care system during a 6-year period were identified (N = 1810). They were matched with a group without scoliosis who delivered during the same period (N = 1810). Rates and relative risk (RR) of CS and EA between cohorts and subgroups were calculated. RESULTS: The scoliosis cohort had significantly higher rates and RR of EA ( P = 0.002 and P = 0.004, respectively). Scoliosis patients treated nonoperatively had an 8% greater RR of EA ( P = 0.004) and had a significantly lower rate of CS (23.2% vs . 26%, P = 0.048) compared with the control group. Among only scoliosis patients, those treated with spine fusion had a 38% decreased RR of EA ( P < 0.001). Distal fusion level did not seem to influence the RR of EA or CS. CONCLUSIONS: Females with scoliosis were significantly more likely to receive EA at delivery compared with females without scoliosis. Rates and RR of cesarean delivery were not significantly lower among women with scoliosis, but females treated nonoperatively for scoliosis had a significantly lower CS rate than those without scoliosis. Females treated with spine fusion for scoliosis were far less likely to receive EA than both females without scoliosis and females with scoliosis treated nonoperatively.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia Epidural , Cifosis , Escoliosis , Fusión Vertebral , Humanos , Femenino , Adolescente , Embarazo , Estudios de Cohortes , Escoliosis/terapia , Escoliosis/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cesárea
10.
Glycobiology ; 33(1): 2-16, 2023 01 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36345209

RESUMEN

A multi-glycomic method for characterizing the glycocalyx was employed to identify the difference between 2-dimensional (2D) and 3-dimensional (3D) culture models with two human colorectal cancer cell lines, HCT116 and HT29. 3D cell cultures are considered more representative of cancer due to their ability to mimic the microenvironment found in tumors. For this reason, they have become an important tool in cancer research. Cell-cell interactions increase in 3D models compared to 2D, indeed significant glycomic changes were observed for each cell line. Analyses included the N-glycome, O-glycome, glycolipidome, glycoproteome, and proteome providing the most extensive characterization of the glycocalyx between 3D and 2D thus far. The different glycoconjugates were affected in different ways. In the N-glycome, the 3D cells increased in high-mannose glycosylation and in core fucosylation. Glycolipids increased in sialylation. Specific glycoproteins were found to increase in the 3D cell, elucidating the pathways that are affected between the two models. The results show large structural and biological changes between the 2 models suggesting that the 2 are indeed very different potentially affecting individual outcomes in the study of diseases.


Asunto(s)
Glicocálix , Glicómica , Humanos , Glicocálix/metabolismo , Glicómica/métodos , Glicoproteínas/metabolismo , Glicosilación , Línea Celular , Polisacáridos/química
11.
Synapse ; 77(2): e22258, 2023 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36352528

RESUMEN

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery (RYGB) remains an effective weight-loss method used to treat obesity. While it is successful in combating obesity, there are many lingering questions related to the changes in the brain following RYGB surgery, one of them being its effects on neuroinflammation. While it is known that chronic high-fat diet (HFD) contributes to obesity and neuroinflammation, it remains to be understood whether bariatric surgery can ameliorate diet-induced inflammatory responses. To examine this, rats were assigned to either a normal diet (ND) or a HFD for 8 weeks. Rats fed a HFD were split into the following groups: sham surgery with ad libitum access to HFD (sham-HF); sham surgery with calorie-restricted HFD (sham-FR); RYGB surgery with ad libitum access to HFD (RYGB). Following sham or RYGB surgeries, rats were maintained on their diets for 9 weeks before being euthanized. [3 H] PK11195 autoradiography was then performed on fresh-frozen brain tissue in order to measure activated microglia. Sham-FR rats showed increased [3 H] PK11195 binding in the amygdala (63%), perirhinal (60%), and ectorhinal cortex (53%) compared with the ND rats. Obese rats who had the RYGB surgery did not show this increased inflammatory effect. Since the sham-FR and RYGB rats were fed the same amount of HFD, the surgery itself seems responsible for this attenuation in [3 H] PK11195 binding. We speculate that calorie restriction following obese conditions may be seen as a stressor and contribute to inflammation in the brain. Further research is needed to verify this mechanism.


Asunto(s)
Derivación Gástrica , Ratas , Animales , Derivación Gástrica/métodos , Restricción Calórica , Enfermedades Neuroinflamatorias , Obesidad/cirugía
13.
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol Nurs ; 39(6): 366-378, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35759365

RESUMEN

Background: There is a lack of self-management tools for adolescents with cancer (AWC). This study evaluated the feasibility of Teens Taking Charge Cancer, a web-based self-management program. Methods: A pilot randomized control trial (RCT) was conducted across 4 pediatric oncology clinics. AWC (12-18 years) and their caregivers were randomized to either the intervention or control group. All were asked to complete 12 website modules over 12 weeks (at their own pace) and received monthly calls from health coaches. The intervention website was based on cognitive behavioral principals, designed as an interactive self-guided online program, while the control consisted of education and included links to 12 general cancer websites. Outcome assessments occurred at enrollment and 12 weeks post-intervention. The primary outcomes included rate of accrual and retention, adherence to the protocol, acceptability and satisfaction with intervention using questionnaire and semi-structured interviews, adverse events and engagement with the intervention. Results: Eighty-one teen-caregiver dyads were enrolled with a retention rate of 33%. In the intervention group 46% (n = 18) logged in at least once over the 12-week period. A mean of 2.4 of 12 modules (SD 3.0) were completed; and no one completed the program. Thirty-three percent of caregivers in the intervention logged into the website at least once and none completed the full program. Discussion: The results from this pilot study suggest that the current design of the Teens Taking Charge Cancer RCT lacks feasiblity. Future web-based interventions for this group should include additional features to promote uptake and engagement with the program.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Automanejo , Niño , Adolescente , Humanos , Proyectos Piloto , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Neoplasias/terapia , Internet
16.
Ann Pharmacother ; 56(9): 973-980, 2022 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35021924

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Currently, there is limited literature on the impact of the COVID-19 infection on medications and medical conditions in COVID-19 intensive care unit (ICU) survivors. Our study is, to our knowledge, the first multicenter study to describe the prevalence of new medical conditions and medication changes at hospital discharge in COVID-19 ICU survivors. OBJECTIVE: To determine the number of medical conditions and medications at hospital admission compared to at hospital discharge in COVID-19 ICU survivors. METHODS: Retrospective multicenter observational study (7 ICUs) evaluated new medical conditions and medication changes at hospital discharge in patients with COVID-19 infection admitted to an ICU between March 1, 2020, to March 1, 2021. Patient and hospital characteristics, baseline and hospital discharge medication and medical conditions, ICU and hospital length of stay, and Charlson comorbidity index were collected. Descriptive statistics were used to describe patient characteristics and number and type of medical conditions and medications. Paired t-test was used to compare number of medical conditions and medications from hospital discharge to admission. RESULTS: Of the 973 COVID-19 ICU survivors, 67.4% had at least one new medical condition and 88.2% had at least one medication change. Median number of medical conditions (increased from 3 to 4, P < .0001) and medications (increased from 5 to 8, P < .0001) increased from admission to discharge. Most common new medical conditions at discharge were pulmonary disorders, venous thromboembolism, psychiatric disorders, infection, and diabetes. Most common therapeutic categories associated with medication change were cardiology, gastroenterology, pain, hematology, and endocrinology. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Our study found that the number of medical conditions and medications increased from hospital admission to discharge. Our results provide additional data to help guide providers on using targeted approaches to manage medications and diseases in COVID-19 ICU survivors after hospital discharge.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , COVID-19/epidemiología , Enfermedad Crónica , Hospitalización , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sobrevivientes
18.
Pediatr Rheumatol Online J ; 19(1): 83, 2021 Jun 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34090474

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Current evidence suggests that many adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) do not successfully transfer to adult care, which can result in adverse health outcomes. Although a growing number of clinical programs have been designed to support healthcare transition, there is a lack of psychometrically sound instruments to evaluate their impact on development of transition-related knowledge and skills in youth with JIA. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate RACER (Readiness for Adult Care in Rheumatology), a self-administered instrument designed to measure stages of readiness for key transition-related skills in adolescents with JIA. METHODS: A phased approach was used to develop and evaluate the validity and reliability of RACER. Phase 1 A was a consensus conference with 19 key stakeholders to inform instrument domains and items. Phase 1B determined initial content validity using a sample of 30 adolescents with JIA and 15 clinical and research experts. Finally, Phase 2 was a prospective cohort study with repeated measures to evaluate the internal consistency, test-retest reliability, construct validity and responsiveness of the instrument within a sample of adolescents with JIA. RESULTS: In Phase 1 A, initial item generation yielded a total of 242 items across six domains from the consensus conference, which was subsequently reduced to a 32-item instrument. Phase 1B established the content validity of the instrument in adolescents with JIA. In the Phase 2 study, with a sample of 96 adolescents, the RACER instrument exhibited good internal consistency in five of its six subscales (Cronbach's α > 0.7), and strong test-retest reliability between the first two administrations (ICC = 0.83). It also showed robust convergent validity by highly correlating with measures of self-management (SMSAG, rho = 0.73) and transition (TRANSITION-Q, rho = 0.76). The RACER was not correlated with unrelated measures (discriminant validity; PedsQL, rho = 0.14). The RACER scores increased significantly over time as expected, supporting measure responsiveness. CONCLUSIONS: The RACER is a reliable and valid instrument which is sensitive to change for assessing transition readiness in adolescents with JIA.


Asunto(s)
Artritis Juvenil/terapia , Autoinforme , Transición a la Atención de Adultos , Adolescente , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Reumatología , Adulto Joven
19.
BMC Infect Dis ; 21(1): 516, 2021 Jun 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34078301

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Empiric antibiotics for community acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) are often prescribed to patients with COVID-19, despite a low reported incidence of co-infections. Stewardship interventions targeted at facilitating appropriate antibiotic prescribing for CABP among COVID-19 patients are needed. We developed a guideline for antibiotic initiation and discontinuation for CABP in COVID-19 patients. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of this intervention on the duration of empiric CABP antibiotic therapy among patients with COVID-19. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective, quasi-experimental study of adult patients admitted between 3/1/2020 to 4/25/2020 with COVID-19 pneumonia, who were initiated on empiric CABP antibiotics. Patients were excluded if they were initiated on antibiotics > 48 h following admission or if another source of infection was identified. The primary outcome was the duration of antibiotic therapy (DOT) prior to the guideline (March 1 to March27, 2020) and after guideline implementation (March 28 to April 25, 2020). We also evaluated the clinical outcomes (mortality, readmissions, length of stay) among those initiated on empiric CABP antibiotics. RESULTS: A total of 506 patients with COVID-19 were evaluated, 102 pre-intervention and 404 post-intervention. Prior to the intervention, 74.5% (n = 76) of patients with COVID-19 received empiric antibiotics compared to only 42% of patients post-intervention (n = 170), p < 0.001. The median DOT in the post-intervention group was 1.3 days shorter (p < 0.001) than the pre-intervention group, and antibiotics directed at atypical bacteria DOT was reduced by 2.8 days (p < 0.001). More patients in the post-intervention group were initiated on antibiotics based on criteria consistent with our guideline (68% versus 87%, p = 0.001). There were no differences between groups in terms of clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION: Following the implementation of a guideline outlining recommendations for initiating and discontinuing antibiotics for CABP among COVID-19 inpatients, we observed a reduction in antibiotic prescribing and DOT. The guideline also resulted in a significant increase in the rate of guideline-congruent empiric antibiotic initiation.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Adulto , Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos , Coinfección/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/tratamiento farmacológico , Hospitalización , Humanos , Pacientes Internos , Neumonía Bacteriana/tratamiento farmacológico , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Estudios Retrospectivos
20.
Spine Deform ; 9(5): 1333-1339, 2021 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33725327

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Decreasing radiation exposure is important for scoliosis patients who require serial imaging. Microdose protocol stereoradiography is now increasingly utilized. Previous studies have reported similar reliability of concurrent Sanders skeletal maturity staging based on standard low-dose stereoradiography and standard hand radiographs. The purpose of our study was to investigate the reliability and radiation exposure of concurrent Sanders staging using microdose protocol compared to a standard protocol for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. We hypothesized that surgeon-performed Sanders staging would have similar reliability when comparing microdose and standard-dose imaging protocols. METHODS: A randomized survey of 30 hand images using standard protocol spinal stereoradiography and an equal number from microdose protocol were distributed to six experienced pediatric orthopaedic spine surgeons. Images were graded by each surgeon according to the Sanders skeletal maturity grading system. Items were again randomized and graded after a 2-week interval. Fleiss' weighted kappa for inter and intraobserver reliability was calculated and an unpaired t test was used to test for significance. RESULTS: Interobserver reliability for all modalities was in the strong to almost perfect agreement (average weighted κ > 0.8) range. For the microdose protocol, κ was 0.82 and 0.84 for each separate round of grading. Standard low-dose protocol κ was 0.83 and 0.79. Intraobserver κ was 0.86 for microdose and 0.82 for standard. Average radiation for microdose was significantly less radiation (82.6%) than standard stereoradiography (0.3 ± 0.1 mGy vs. 1.9 ± 0.4 mGy, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Sanders staging reliability of a well-positioned hand during scoliosis stereoradiography was similarly excellent for both microdose and standard low-dose protocol. Microdose protocol used less radiation while still preserving the reliability of Sanders staging.


Asunto(s)
Ortopedia , Escoliosis , Adolescente , Niño , Humanos , Radiografía , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Escoliosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagen
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA