RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Thyroid tumours are a common condition and open surgery is a conventional method for treating benign thyroid tumours when surgery is indicated. In this study, we evaluate the outcomes of benign thyroid tumour treatment using transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy via vestibular approach (TOETVA) and compare the results with those of conventional open thyroidectomy (COT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study between 100 patients who underwent TOETVA and 100 who underwent COT surgery for benign diseases from June 2018 to December 2021 in our hospital. Outcomes between the two groups, including post-operative complications, operative time and length of stay, were compared. RESULTS: The surgical time in the TOETVA group was significantly longer than in the COT group. The operative time of lobectomy in the TOETVA and COT groups was 77.5 ± 13.3 and 51.5 ± 4.2 min, respectively, with a P < 0.001. The operative time of total thyroidectomy in the TOETVA and COT groups was 108.1 ± 7.0 and 65.0 ± 4.1 min, respectively, with a P < 0.001. There was no difference in post-operative length of stay between the two groups. In TOETVA group, there were no patients who converted to open surgery. Amongst all 200 patients in the study, there were no cases of post-operative bleeding. The transient hypoparathyroidism rate after surgery in the TOETVA and COT groups was 3% and 2%, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (P = 0.651). Similarly, the transient recurrent laryngeal nerve injury rate showed no difference between the two groups, with rates of 5% and 4% in the TOETVA and COT groups, respectively (P = 0.733). There were no cases of post-operative infection in either group in our study. At 3 months postoperatively, the cosmetic satisfaction were significantly higher in the endoscopic groups than in the conventional group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: TOETVA is a safe and effective method, with a low complication rate and optimal aesthetic results compared to traditional surgery to treat benign thyroid tumours.
RESUMEN
Introduction: Ovarian metastatic squamous carcinoma of the cervix is rare, accounting for about 0.4%. This study reports a single case of metastatic recurrent cervical cancer in the ovary. Case presentation: A 46-year-old patient with a history of cervical cancer T1b2N0M0 underwent a radical hysterectomy, bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection, and ovarian preservation. One year later, the patient was admitted to the hospital because of abdominal pain in the left iliac fossa; the abdominal computed tomography image showed a left ovarian tumour. The patient underwent laparoscopic left oophorectomy. Postoperative histopathology confirmed ovarian squamous cell carcinoma. From this case, we would like to review the literature on epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. Clinical discussion: Ovarian preservation during surgery in patients with cervical cancer offers many benefits, but careful patient selection is required. However, it should be selected carefully and closely monitored. Conclusions: Clinicians should be aware of this situation of ovarian metastasis in patients with early cervical cancer undergoing ovarian-conserving surgery.