Descriptive Analysis of Amputation-Free Survival After First Time Infra-Inguinal Bypass Occlusion.

INTRODUCTION: Occlusion after infra-inguinal bypass surgery for peripheral artery disease is a major complication with potentially devastating consequences. In this descriptive analysis, we sought to describe the natural history and explore factors associated with long-term major amputation-free survival following occlusion of a first-time infra-inguinal bypass. METHODS: Using a prospective database from a tertiary care vascular center, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of all patients with peripheral artery disease who underwent a first-time infra-inguinal bypass and subsequently suffered a graft occlusion (1997-2021). The primary outcome was longitudinal rate of major amputation-free survival after bypass occlusion. Cox proportional hazard models were used to generate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to explore predictors of outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 1318 first-time infra-inguinal bypass surgeries performed over the study period, 255 bypasses occluded and were included in our analysis. Mean age was 66.7 (12.6) years, 40.4% were female, and indication for index bypass was chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI) in 89.8% (n = 229). 48.2% (n = 123) of index bypass conduits used great saphenous vein, 29.0% (n = 74) prosthetic graft, and 22.8% (n = 58) an alternative conduit. Median (interquartile range) time to bypass occlusion was 6.8 (2.3-19.0) months, and patients were followed for median of 4.3 (1.7-8.1) years after bypass occlusion. Following occlusion, 38.04% underwent no revascularization, 32.94% graft salvage procedure, 25.1% new bypass, and 3.92% native artery recanalization. Major amputation-free survival following occlusion was 56.9% (50.6%-62.8%) at 1 y, 37.1% (31%-43.3%) at 5 y, and 17.2% (11.9%-23.2%) at 10 y. In multivariable analysis, factors associated with lower amputation-free survival were older age, female sex, advanced cardiorenal comorbidities, CLTI at index procedure, CLTI at time of occlusion, and distal index bypass outflow. Initial treatment after occlusion with both a new surgical bypass (HR 0.44, CI: 0.29-0.67) or a graft salvage procedure (HR 0.56, CI: 0.38-0.82) showed improved amputation-free survival. One-year rate of major amputation or death were 59.8% (50.0%-69.6%) for those who underwent no revascularization, 37.9% (28.7%-49.0%) for graft salvage, and 26.7% (17.6%-39.5%) for new bypass. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term major amputation-free survival is low after occlusion of a first-time infra-inguinal bypass. While several nonmodifiable risk factors were associated with lower amputation-free survival, treatment after graft occlusion with either a new bypass or a graft salvage procedure may improve longitudinal outcomes.

Utility of automated data-adaptive propensity score method for confounding by indication in comparative effectiveness study in real world Medicare and registry data.

BACKGROUND: Confounding by indication is a serious threat to comparative studies using real world data. We assessed the utility of automated data-adaptive analytic approach for confounding adjustment when both claims and clinical registry data are available. METHODS: We used a comparative study example of carotid artery stenting (CAS) vs. carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in 2005-2008 when CAS was only indicated for patients with high surgical risk. We included Medicare beneficiaries linked to the Society for Vascular Surgery's Vascular Registry >65 years old undergoing CAS/CEA. We compared hazard ratios (HRs) for death while adjusting for confounding by combining various 1) Propensity score (PS) modeling strategies (investigator-specified [IS-PS] vs. automated data-adaptive [ada-PS]); 2) data sources (claims-only, registry-only and claims-plus-registry); and 3) PS adjustment approaches (matching vs. quintiles-adjustment with/without trimming). An HR of 1.0 was used as a benchmark effect estimate based on CREST trial. RESULTS: The cohort included 1,999 CAS and 3,255 CEA patients (mean age 76). CAS patients were more likely symptomatic and at high surgical risk, and experienced higher mortality (crude HR = 1.82 for CAS vs. CEA). HRs from PS-quintile adjustment without trimming were 1.48 and 1.52 for claims-only IS-PS and ada-PS, 1.51 and 1.42 for registry-only IS-PS and ada-PS, and 1.34 and 1.23 for claims-plus-registry IS-PS and ada-PS, respectively. Estimates from other PS adjustment approaches showed similar patterns. CONCLUSIONS: In a comparative effectiveness study of CAS vs. CEA with strong confounding by indication, ada-PS performed better than IS-PS in general, but both claims and registry data were needed to adequately control for bias.

Association of Outpatient Oral Macrolide Use With Sensorineural Hearing Loss in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults.

Importance: Prior publications have reported the sporadic development of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) after intravenous or high-dose macrolide therapy for adults with comorbid conditions, but investigations of the auditory effect of oral outpatient dosing for children, adolescents, and young adults have been limited. Objective: To determine whether broad-based outpatient use of oral macrolide therapy is associated with increased risk of pediatric SNHL through nationally representative analyses. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective case-control study of 875 matched pairs of children, adolescents, and young adults was performed, matching on age, sex, and the time elapsed since prescription date. All eligible pediatric patients were included, with matched control participants from the TRICARE US military health insurance system who were evaluated between October 1, 2009, and September 30, 2014. Exposures: Oral outpatient macrolide treatment compared with penicillin use among pediatric patients. Main Outcomes and Measures: The clinical outcome of interest was SNHL in children, adolescents, and young adults. Multivariable conditional logistic regression was used to compare the risk of prior macrolide exposure with penicillin exposure, adjusted for other risk factors and potential confounders. Four time frames between exposure and diagnosis were additionally assessed. Results: There were 875 eligible matched pairs of children, adolescents, and young adults included. The mean (SD) age of the participants was 5.7 (4.9) years; 1082 participants were male (62%), 58 were Asian (3%), 254 were Black (15%), 1152 were White (66%), and 286 were of Native American and other (no further breakdown was available in the TRICARE database) race and ethnicity (16%). In multivariable analysis, participants who had SNHL had increased odds of having received a macrolide prescription compared with a penicillin prescription when all time frames from exposure were included (adjusted odds ratio, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.05-1.64). There were significantly higher odds of macrolide exposure than penicillin exposure when diagnosis and testing occurred more than 180 days after antibiotic exposure (adjusted odds ratio, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.23-2.60). Conclusions and Relevance: In this case-control study of a nationally representative patient population, findings suggest that children, adolescents, and young adults with SNHL had increased odds of outpatient oral macrolide use compared with penicillin use, particularly when having received a diagnosis more than 180 days after exposure. Further study of the association of macrolides with SNHL in children, adolescents, and young adults is warranted.

Contemporary indications for open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the endovascular era.

OBJECTIVE: Despite the emergence of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) as the most common approach to abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, open aneurysm repair (OAR) remains an important option. This study seeks to define the indications for OAR in the EVAR era and how these indicatioxns effect outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed of all OAR at a single institution from 2004 to 2019. Preoperative computed tomography scans and operative records were assessed to determine the indication for OAR. These reasons were categorized into anatomical contraindications, systemic factors (connective tissue disorders, contraindication to contrast dye), and patient or surgeon preference (patients who were candidates for both EVAR and OAR). Perioperative and long-term outcomes were compared between the groups. RESULTS: We included 370 patients in the analysis; 71.6% (265/370) had at least one anatomic contraindication to EVAR and 36% had two or more contraindications. The most common anatomic contraindications were short aortic neck length (51.6%), inadequate distal seal zone (19.2%), and inadequate access vessels (15.7%). The major perioperative complication rate was 18.1% and the 30-day mortality was 3.0%. No single anatomic factor was identified as a predictor of perioperative complications. Sixty-one patients (16.5%) underwent OAR based on patient or surgeon preference; these patients were younger, had lower incidences of coronary artery disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and were less likely to require suprarenal cross-clamping compared with patients who had anatomic and/or systemic contraindications to EVAR. The patient or surgeon preference group had a lower incidence of perioperative major complications (8.2% vs 20.1%; P = .034), shorter length of stay (6 days vs 8 days; P < .001) and no 30-day mortalities. The multivariable adjusted risk for 15-year mortality was lower for patient or surgeon preference patients (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.44; 95% confidence interval, 0.24-0.80; P = .007) compared with those anatomic or systemic contraindications. CONCLUSIONS: Within a population of patients who did not meet instruction for use criteria for EVAR, no single anatomic contraindication was a marker for worse outcomes with OAR. Patients who were candidates for both aortic repair approaches but elected to undergo OAR owing to patient or surgeon preference have very low 30-day mortality and morbidity, and superior long-term survival rates compared with those patients who underwent OAR owing to anatomic and/or systemic contraindications to EVAR.

Demographic Disparity in Use of Telemedicine for Ambulatory General Surgical Consultation During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Analysis of the Initial Public Health Emergency and Second Phase Periods.

BACKGROUND: Surgical patients with limited digital literacy may experience reduced telemedicine access. We investigated racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in telemedicine compared with in-person surgical consultation during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of new visits within the Division of General & Gastrointestinal Surgery at an academic medical center occurring between March 24 through June 23, 2020 (Phase I, Massachusetts Public Health Emergency) and June 24 through December 31, 2020 (Phase II, relaxation of restrictions on healthcare operations) was performed. Visit modality (telemedicine/phone vs in-person) and demographic data were extracted. Bivariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression were performed to evaluate associations between patient characteristics and visit modality. RESULTS: During Phase I, 347 in-person and 638 virtual visits were completed. Multivariable modeling demonstrated no significant differences in virtual compared with in-person visit use across racial/ethnic or insurance groups. Among patients using virtual visits, Latinx patients were less likely to have video compared with audio-only visits than White patients (OR, 0.46; 95% CI 0.22-0.96). Black race and insurance type were not significant predictors of video use. During Phase II, 2,922 in-person and 1,001 virtual visits were completed. Multivariable modeling demonstrated that Black patients (OR, 1.52; 95% CI 1.12-2.06) were more likely to have virtual visits than White patients. No significant differences were observed across insurance types. Among patients using virtual visits, race/ethnicity and insurance type were not significant predictors of video use. CONCLUSION: Black patients used telemedicine platforms more often than White patients during the second phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. Virtual consultation may help increase access to surgical care among traditionally under-resourced populations.

Patient perspectives on the need for implanted device information: Implications for a post-procedural communication framework.

BACKGROUND: Shared decision making and patient-centred communication have become part of pre-procedural decisions and perioperative care across medical specialties. However, gaps exist in patient communication about the implanted device received and the benefits in sharing information about their procedure and device. OBJECTIVE: To understand the patients' knowledge of identifying information for their implanted devices and perspectives on sharing their implanted device information. METHODS: Four focus groups were conducted with patients who had received a cardiac or vascular implanted device from one of the study sites within the previous 6 months. Data were transcribed and thematically analysed. RESULTS: Five themes emerged: lack of awareness of identifying information on implanted devices; value of information on implanted devices; varying trust with sharing device information; perceived risk with sharing device information; and lack of consensus on a systematic process for tracking implanted devices. DISCUSSION: Patients desire post-procedural information on their implanted device and a designated plan for longitudinal follow-up, but lack trust and perceive risk with broadly sharing their implanted device information. CONCLUSION: After receiving an implanted device, post-procedural patient communication needs to be expanded to include identifying information on the device including the unique device identifier, how long-term tracking will be supported and the process for notification in case of a problem with the device. This communication should also include education on how sharing device information supports patients' long-term health care, post-market safety surveillance and research. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The research team included members who were also patients with implanted devices.

Transmitting Device Identifiers of Implants From the Point of Care to Insurers: A Demonstration Project.

BACKGROUND: For implanted devices, an effective postmarket surveillance system does not exist. For medications, the Food and Drug Administration's Sentinel Initiative plays that role, relying mainly on drug codes in insurance claims. Unique device identifiers (UDIs) could play an analogous role for implants, but there is no mandate for providers to include UDIs in claims or for payers to record them. Objections have been raised to incorporating UDIs into claims based on a potential burden on providers. METHODS: To assess this purported barrier, we modified information systems at 2 provider-payer dyads to allow for the transmission of UDI data from provider to payer. In addition, to illustrate the potential benefit of including device data in claims, we used our data to compare rates of 90-day adverse events after implantation using the electronic health record (EHR) alone with the EHR plus claims. RESULTS: The software system modifications were modest and performed as designed. Moreover, the level of difficulty of their development and implementation was comparable to that associated with a typical new release of an existing system. In addition, our data demonstrated the ability of claims-based data plus EHR data to reveal a larger percentage of postprocedure adverse events than data from EHRs alone. CONCLUSIONS: Modifying information systems to allow for the transmission of UDI data from providers to payers should not impose a substantial burden on either. Implementation of a postmarket surveillance system based on such data in claims will require, however, the development of a system analogous to Sentinel.

Empowering Surgeons, Anesthesiologists, and Obstetricians to Incorporate Environmental Sustainability in the Operating Room.

OBJECTIVE: We review the existing research on environmentally sustainable surgical practices to enable SAO to advocate for improved environmental sustainability in operating rooms across the country. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Climate change refers to the impact of greenhouse gases emitted as a byproduct of human activities, trapped within our atmosphere and resulting in hotter and more variable climate patterns.1 As of 2013, the US healthcare industry was responsible for 9.8% of the country's emissions2; if it were itself a nation, US healthcare would rank 13th globally in emissions.3 As one of the most energy-intensive and wasteful areas of the hospital, ORs drive this trend. ORs are 3 to 6 times more energy intensive than clinical wards.4 Further, ORs and labor/delivery suites produce 50%-70% of waste across the hospital.5,6 Due to the adverse health impacts of climate change, the Lancet Climate Change Commission (2009) declared climate change "the biggest global health threat of the 21st century" and predicted it would exacerbate existing health disparities for minority groups, children and low socioeconomic patients.7. METHODS/RESULTS: We provide a comprehensive narrative review of published efforts to improve environmental sustainability in the OR while simultaneously achieving cost-savings, and highlight resources for clinicians interested in pursuing this work. CONCLUSION: Climate change adversely impacts patient health, and disproportionately impacts the most vulnerable patients. SAO contribute to the problem through their resource-intensive work in the OR and are uniquely positioned to lead efforts to improve the environmental sustainability of the OR.

UDI2Claims: Planning a Pilot Project to Transmit Identifiers for Implanted Devices to the Insurance Claim.

BACKGROUND: In response to problems with the current postmarket surveillance of medical devices, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration mandated device labelers to include a unique device identifier (UDI), composed of a device identifier (DI) and production identifier. Including the DI in insurance claims could be a potent method to monitor implanted devices, yet implementation has lagged because of questions of benefit and operational concerns. METHODS: To illustrate the potential benefit of including DIs in claims, rates of 90-day adverse events after implantation using an electronic health record (EHR) were compared with the EHR plus claims, which capture utilization outside that EHR's health system. To explore operations, we planned a pilot project to transmit the DI of implanted devices from the point of care to the claim at two provider/payer pairs. RESULTS: By querying claims plus EHR, estimated rates of patients with potential adverse events were as much as 3.75 times higher. For our pilot, our multistakeholder team identified and resolved the following five challenges: (1) capturing the DI at the point of care; (2) selecting a location for the DI on the claim form; (3) transmitting the DI to the claim form; (4) analyzing the claim forms received by the payer; and (5) verifying the quality of the transmitted information. CONCLUSIONS: Including DIs on claims could allow more complete data capture of adverse events for implanted devices than the EHR data. We overcame challenges in transmitting the DI to the claim with attention to planning and multistakeholder involvement.

Evaluation and Management of Arterial Thoracic Outlet Syndrome.

Arterial thoracic outlet syndrome is rare and may be associated with a bony anomaly. Patient presentation can range from mild arm discoloration and claudication to severe limb-threatening ischemia. For patients with subclavian artery dilation without secondary complications, thoracic outlet decompression and arterial surveillance is sufficient. Patients with subclavian artery aneurysms or distal embolization require decompression with reconstruction or thromboembolectomy and distal bypass respectively.

Non-clinical Drivers of Variation in Preoperative MRI Utilization for Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) utilization in breast cancer treatment has increased significantly over the past 2 decades, but its use continues to have interprovider variability and disputed clinical indications. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate non-clinical factors associated with preoperative breast MRI utilization. METHODS: This study utilized TRICARE claims data from 2006 to 2015. TRICARE provides health benefits for active duty service members, retirees, and their dependents at both military (direct care with salaried physicians) and civilian (purchased care under fee-for-service structure) facilities. We studied patients aged 25-64 years with a breast cancer diagnosis who had undergone mammogram/ultrasound (MMG/US) alone or with subsequent breast MRI prior to surgery. Facility characteristics included urban-rural location according to the National Center for Health Statistics classification. Adjusted multivariable logistic regression tests were used to identify independent factors associated with preoperative breast MRI utilization. RESULTS: Of the 25,392 identified patients, 64.7% (n = 16,428) received preoperative MMG/US alone, while 35.3% (n = 8964) underwent additional MRI. Younger age, Charlson Comorbidity Index score ≥ 2, active duty or retired beneficiary category, officer rank (surrogate for socioeconomic status), Air Force service branch, metropolitan location, and purchased care were associated with an increased likelihood of preoperative MRI utilization. Non-metropolitan location and Navy service branch were associated with decreased MRI use. CONCLUSION: After controlling for expected clinical risk factors, patients were more likely to receive additional MRI when treated at metropolitan facilities or through the fee-for-service system. Both associations may point toward non-clinical incentives to perform MRI in the treatment of breast cancer.

Emergency intraoperative vascular surgery consultations at a tertiary academic center.

OBJECTIVE: Vascular surgeons are frequently called on to provide emergency assistance to surgical colleagues. Whereas previous studies have included elective preoperative vascular consultations, we sought to characterize the breadth of assistance provided during unplanned intraoperative consultations at a single tertiary academic center. METHODS: We queried our institutional billing department during a 15-year period and reviewed the records (January 1, 2002-December 31, 2016) and identified unanticipated unplanned vascular surgery intraoperative consultations from all surgical services. Patients' demographics and comorbidities were recorded along with the consulting services, type of index operation, reasons for vascular consultation, regions of anatomic interventions, type of vascular interventions performed, and outcomes achieved. RESULTS: There were 419 emergency intraoperative consultations identified. Patients were 51% male, with an average age of 57 years and body mass index of 28.3 kg/m2. The most frequently consulting subspecialties included surgical oncology (n = 139 [33.2%]), cardiac surgery (n = 82 [19.6%]), and orthopedics (n = 44 [10.5%]). Index cases were elective/nonurgent (n = 324 [77.3%]), urgent (n = 27 [6.4%]), and emergent (n = 68 [16.2%]), with a majority involving tumor resection (n = 240 [57.3%]). The primary reasons for vascular consultation were revascularization (n = 213 [50.8%]), control of bleeding (n = 132 [31.5%]), assistance with dissection or exposure (n = 46 [11%]), embolic protection (n = 24 [5.7%]), and other (n = 4 [1.1%]). The primary blood vessel and anatomic field of intervention were categorized. Most cases (n = 264 [63%]) included preservation of blood flow, including primary arterial repair (n = 181 [43.2%]), patch angioplasty (n = 83 [19.8%]), bypass (n = 63 [15%]), and thrombectomy (n = 38 [9.1%]). Postoperative mean length of stay was 15 days, with 30-day and 1-year mortality of 7.2% and 26.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Vascular surgeons are called on to provide unplanned open surgical consultations for a wide variety of specialties over wide-ranging anatomic regions, employing a variety of skills and techniques. This study testifies to the essential services supplied to hospitals and our surgical colleagues along with the broad skills and training necessary for modern vascular surgeons.

The Impact of Epidural Analgesia on Perioperative Morbidity or Mortality after Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.

BACKGROUND: Epidural analgesia (EA) is frequently used as an adjuvant to general anesthesia (GA) for improved postoperative analgesia and reduced rates of cardiac, pulmonary, and renal complications. However, only a few studies have examined EA-GA specifically during open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. The effects of EA-GA specifically during open AAA repair regarding postoperative outcomes are unknown. This study was performed to evaluate postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing open AAA repair with EA-GA versus GA alone. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis for patients undergoing surgery between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2016 using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Propensity score matching was used to establish cohorts for analysis. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine significant perioperative outcomes for each anesthesia type. A total of 2,171 patients underwent open AAA repair in our date range; we excluded emergent and ruptured AAA. A total of 2,145 patients were included in our analysis, of whom 653 patients received EA-GA and 1,492 patients received GA only. RESULTS: Major postoperative outcomes included mortality, pulmonary cardiac and renal complications, infections, thrombosis, and blood transfusion requirement (including Cell-Saver usage). Additional overall outcomes included hospital length of stay, return to the operating room, and readmission. Patients in EA + GA and GA alone groups were comparable regarding demographics, functional status, and comorbidities. Decreased odds of readmission was observed in EA + GA compared with GA (0.49, 95% CI [0.28-0.86]; P = 0.014); and increased odds of receiving a blood transfusion was observed in those who underwent EA + GA (1.63, 95% CI [1.23-2.14]; P = 0.001). No difference was observed between patients who had an AAA repair with EA + GA versus GA alone with regard to mortality, return to operating room, major pulmonary, cardiac, renal, or infectious complications. CONCLUSIONS: EA + GA was not associated with decreased mortality or decreased rates of major postoperative pulmonary, cardiac, or renal complications. EA + GA was associated with increased transfusion requirements and decreased rates of hospital readmission.

The impact of combined iliac occlusive disease and aortic aneurysm on open surgical repair.

OBJECTIVE: Severe aortoiliac occlusive disease is a relative contraindication for endovascular aneurysm repair, owing to an association with high stent graft-related complication and reintervention rates in this population. Open AAA repair requiring aortofemoral bypass (AFB), however, may represent a unique population with differing outcomes from standard open repair. We sought to compare the demographic and procedural characteristics, as well as outcomes of patients undergoing standard intra-abdominal repairs (STD) versus those requiring AFB. METHODS: Using a prospectively maintained database, we retrospectively identified patients who underwent open AAA repair from 1994 to 2017. A total of 1087 consecutive cases were performed consisting of 981 STD (681 tube graft, 300 aortoiliac) and 106 AFB cases. Demographics, procedural data, postoperative complications, and long-term survival were analyzed. RESULTS: The AFB cohort had more women (39.0 vs 22.8%; P = .001) and higher rates of hypertension (81.1 vs 69.8%; P = .015), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (28.3 vs 17.4%; P = .006), and smoking (50.9 vs 36%; P = .002). The AFB group had smaller mean aortic (5.22 vs 5.77 cm; P = .001) and graft (17.08 vs 18.2 mm; P = .001) diameters. Proximal clamp position and blood loss were equivalent, although total anesthesia time was longer (295 vs 234 minutes; P = .001) in the AFB cohort. Overall 30-day postoperative morbidity (38.7 vs 24.8%; P = .002) was higher in the AFB group. Specifically, postoperative renal insufficiency (8.2 vs 3.4%; P = .032), wound infection (5.7 vs 1.2%; P = .005), and hematoma/seroma (5.7 vs 1.2%; P = .003) were more likely. Hospital length of stay was longer for AFB (11.9 vs 9.9 days; P = .007). The 30-day mortality (0.9% AFB vs 1.8% STD; P = .50) and major morbidity (17 vs 11.5%; P = .10) did not differ. Reintervention rate within 30 days of the initial surgery (12.3 vs 4.6; P = .001) and overall (33 vs 18.9%; P = .001) was higher in the AFB group. Long-term survival was lower in the AFB group (5-year survival: 63.1% AFB vs 71.9% STD; hazard ratio 0.76, log-rank P = .047). Multivariate regression analysis identified age, comorbid conditions, and aneurysm characteristics-rather than repair type-as independent predictors of 30-day reintervention and mortality at 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Patients requiring AFB for AAA owing to associated iliac occlusive disease have more preoperative comorbidities, postoperative complications, a longer length of stay, reintervention rates and shorter 5-year survival. Patient and aneurysm characteristics rather than surgical repair type appear to be responsible for these differences. Nevertheless, 30-day mortality and major morbidity were comparable, making AFB an attractive alternative to endovascular aneurysm repair in patients with advanced iliac occlusive disease.

Saturday multidisciplinary hemodialysis access clinics to enhance patient care.

Fragmentation of outpatient care is a substantial barrier to creation and maintenance of hemodialysis access. To improve patient accessibility, satisfaction, and multidisciplinary provider communication, we created a monthly Saturday multidisciplinary vascular surgery and interventional nephrology access clinic at a tertiary care hospital in a major urban area for the complicated hemodialysis patient population. The study included patients presenting for new access creation as well as those who had previously undergone access surgery. Staffing included two to three interventional nephrologists, two to three vascular surgeons, one medical assistant, one research assistant, and one practice assistant. Patient satisfaction and perception of the clinic was measured using surveys during six of the monthly Saturday hemodialysis clinics. A total of 675 patient encounters were completed (18.2 average/clinic ±6.3 standard deviation) from August 2016 to August 2019. All patients were seen by both disciplines. The average no-show rate was 19.9% throughout the study period. Patient satisfaction in all measures was consistently high with the Saturday clinic. Providers were also assayed, and they generally valued the real-time, multidisciplinary care plan generation, and its subsequent efficient execution. Saturday multidisciplinary hemodialysis access clinics offer high provider and patient satisfaction and streamlined patient care. However, no-show rates remain relatively high for this challenging patient population.

The Optimal Length of Stay Associated With the Lowest Readmission Risk Following Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Index length of stay (LOS) and readmissions are viewed as important quality measures. However, these metrics represent competing demands as an inordinate reduction in LOS may lead to unplanned readmissions. We sought to assess the optimal LOS associated with the lowest 90-d readmission rate following discharge after common surgical procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study relying on Tricare claims. We identified all eligible adult patients (18-64 y) receiving a series of common surgical procedures between 2006 and 2014. We used a generalized additive model with spline regression to determine the optimal LOS associated with the lowest 90-d risk of readmission. RESULTS: Ninety-day readmission rates varied from 6.03% to 34.69%. Most procedures exhibited a logit linear relationship, with the lowest risk of readmission evident on postoperative day-1 and increasing thereafter. Among the more invasive procedures (e.g., esophagectomy and radical cystectomy), a U-shaped relationship was realized, indicating that expedited discharge would increase the potential for readmission as would any extended hospital LOS. For these procedures, the ideal index LOS appeared to be 6-7 d for radical cystectomy and 12-13 d for esophagectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the practice of discharging patients as soon as clinically feasible after hip and knee arthroplasty, lumbar spine surgery, hernia repair, appendectomy, nephrectomy, and colectomy. Among esophagectomy or radical cystectomy, there is a well-defined optimal index admission period and discharge outside this window appears to be detrimental. Our results suggest that invasive procedures appear to possess a unique "signature" when it comes to optimal LOS.

Effect of an equal-access military health system on racial disparities in colorectal cancer screening.

BACKGROUND: Racial disparities in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening are frequently attributed to variations in insurance status. The objective of this study was to ascertain whether universal insurance would lead to more equitable utilization of CRC screening for black patients in comparison with white patients. METHODS: Claims data from TRICARE (insurance coverage for active, reserve, and retired members of the US Armed Services and their dependents) for 2007-2010 were queried for adults aged 50 years in 2007, and they were followed forward in time for 4 years (ages, 50-53 years) to identify their first lower endoscopy and/or fecal occult blood test (FOBT). Variations in CRC screening were compared with descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Among the 24,944 patients studied, 69.2% were white, 20.3% were black, 4.9% were Asian, and 5.6% were other. Overall, 54.0% received any screening: 83.7% received endoscopy, and 16.3% received FOBT alone. Compared with whites, black patients had higher screening rates (56.5%) and had 20% higher risk-adjusted odds of being screened (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-1.29). Asian patients had a likelihood of screening similar to that of white patients (odds ratio [OR], 1.06; 95% CI, 0.92-1.23). Females (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.10-1.33), active-duty personnel (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.06-1.25), and officers (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.18-1.37) were also more likely to be screened. CONCLUSION: Within an equal-access, universal health care system, black patients had higher rates of CRC screening in comparison with prior reports and even in comparison with white patients within the population. These findings highlight the need to understand and develop meaningful approaches for promoting more equitable access to preventative care. Moreover, equal-access, universal health insurance for both the military and civilian populations can be presumed to improve access for underserved minorities.

Association of Treatment for Critical Limb Ischemia with Gender and Hospital Volume.

Critical limb ischemia (CLI) is a frequent and major vascular problem and can lead to amputation and death despite surgical revascularization. Women have been shown to have 3 to 4 per cent lower revascularization rates for CLI compared with men as well as inferior outcomes. We hypothesize that this difference is a result of women being more likely admitted to low-volume hospitals, which in turn perform fewer revascularizations. Prospective cohort study. Data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample 2007 to 2010 were used to identify admissions with primary International Classification of Diseases-9 codes for CLI (International Classification of Diseases-9 codes: 440.22, 440.23, 440.24, 707.1, 707.10-707.15, or 707.19). Hospitals were grouped in quintiles by annual revascularization procedures. Bivariate analyses were performed and multivariable logistic regression was used to analyze the odds of revascularization, amputation, and mortality while controlling for patient and hospital-level factors. Of 113,631 admissions, 54,370 (47.8%) were women, who were more likely admitted to low-volume hospitals (very low: 49.6% vs very high: 47.1%; P < 0.001). Revascularization rates were lower in women (31.6% vs 35.1%, P < 0.001) across all volume quintiles, whereas the difference was greatest in the use of open surgical revascularization (12.5% vs 16.0%, P < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, female gender [odds ratio (OR) 0.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83-0.92, P < 0.001] and very-low hospital volume (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.17-0.26, P < 0.001) were both significantly associated with lower rates of revascularization. Women had lower odds of major amputation compared with men (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.69-0.82, P < 0.001), whereas treatment in a very high-volume hospital was associated with increased odds for amputation (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.09-1.73, P = 0.008). Neither gender nor hospital volume were independently associated with in-hospital mortality in the multivariable regression model. Women are more likely to be admitted to low-volume hospitals for treatment of CLI. Because of this, they are less likely to undergo revascularization, although they also had lower rates of major amputation.