Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38889969

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Intracranial vessel wall imaging is technically challenging to implement, given the simultaneous requirements of high spatial resolution, excellent blood and CSF signal suppression, and clinically acceptable gradient times. Herein, we present our preliminary findings on the evaluation of a deep learning-optimized sequence using T1-weighted imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical and optimized deep learning-based image reconstruction T1 3D Sampling Perfection with Application optimized Contrast using different flip angle Evolution (SPACE) were evaluated, comparing noncontrast sequences in 10 healthy controls and postcontrast sequences in 5 consecutive patients. Images were reviewed on a Likert-like scale by 4 fellowship-trained neuroradiologists. Scores (range, 1-4) were separately assigned for 11 vessel segments in terms of vessel wall and lumen delineation. Additionally, images were evaluated in terms of overall background noise, image sharpness, and homogeneous CSF signal. Segment-wise scores were compared using paired samples t tests. RESULTS: The scan time for the clinical and deep learning-based image reconstruction sequences were 7:26 minutes and 5:23 minutes respectively. Deep learning-based image reconstruction images showed consistently higher wall signal and lumen visualization scores, with the differences being statistically significant in most vessel segments on both pre- and postcontrast images. Deep learning-based image reconstruction had lower background noise, higher image sharpness, and uniform CSF signal. Depiction of intracranial pathologies was better or similar on the deep learning-based image reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary findings suggest that deep learning-based image reconstruction-optimized intracranial vessel wall imaging sequences may be helpful in achieving shorter gradient times with improved vessel wall visualization and overall image quality. These improvements may help with wider adoption of intracranial vessel wall imaging in clinical practice and should be further validated on a larger cohort.

2.
Magn Reson Med Sci ; 2024 May 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38763758

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate how the relationship between respiratory interval (RI) and temporal resolution (TR) impacts image quality in free-breathing abdominal MRI (FB-aMRI) using golden-angle radial sparse parallel (GRASP). METHODS: Ten healthy volunteers (25.9 ± 2.5 years, four women) underwent 2 mins free-breathing fat-suppression T1-weighted imaging using GRASP at RIs of 3 and 5s (RI3 and RI5, respectively) and retrospectively reconstructed at TR of 1.8, 2.9, 4.8, and 7.7s (TR1.8, TR2.9, TR4.8, and TR7.7, respectively) in each patient. The standard deviation (SD) under the diaphragm was measured using SD maps showing the discrepancy for each horizontal section at all TRs. Two radiologists evaluated image quality (visualization of the right hepatic vein at the confluence of the inferior vena cava, posterior segment branch of portal vein, pancreas, left kidney, and artifacts) at all TRs using a 5-point scale. RESULTS: The SD was significantly higher at TR1.8 compared to TR4.8 (P < 0.01) and TR7.7 (P < 0.001), as well as at TR2.9 compared to TR7.7 (P < 0.01) for both RIs. The SD between TR4.8 and TR7.7 did not differ for both RIs. For all visual assessment metrics, the TR1.8 scores were significantly lower than the TR4.8 and TR7.7 scores for both RIs. The pancreas and left kidney scores at TR2.9 were significantly lower than those at TR7.7 (P < 0.05) for RI5. Additionally, the left kidney score at TR1.8 was lower than that at TR2.9 (P < 0.05) for RI3. All scores at TR2.9, TR4.8, and TR7.7 were similar for RI3, while those at TR4.8 and TR7.7 were similar for RI5. CONCLUSION: Prolonging the TRs compared to RIs enhances image quality in FB-aMRI using GRASP.

3.
Magn Reson Med ; 92(3): 1149-1161, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38650444

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To improve image quality, mitigate quantification biases and variations for free-breathing liver proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and R 2 * $$ {\mathrm{R}}_2^{\ast } $$ quantification accelerated by radial k-space undersampling. METHODS: A free-breathing multi-echo stack-of-radial MRI method was developed with compressed sensing with multidimensional regularization. It was validated in motion phantoms with reference acquisitions without motion and in 11 subjects (6 patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease) with reference breath-hold Cartesian acquisitions. Images, PDFF, and R 2 * $$ {\mathrm{R}}_2^{\ast } $$ maps were reconstructed using different radial view k-space sampling factors and reconstruction settings. Results were compared with reference-standard results using Bland-Altman analysis. Using linear mixed-effects model fitting (p < 0.05 considered significant), mean and SD were evaluated for biases and variations of PDFF and R 2 * $$ {\mathrm{R}}_2^{\ast } $$ , respectively, and coefficient of variation on the first echo image was evaluated as a surrogate for image quality. RESULTS: Using the empirically determined optimal sampling factor of 0.25 in the accelerated in vivo protocols, mean differences and limits of agreement for the proposed method were [-0.5; -33.6, 32.7] s-1 for R 2 * $$ {\mathrm{R}}_2^{\ast } $$ and [-1.0%; -5.8%, 3.8%] for PDFF, close to those of a previous self-gating method using fully sampled radial views: [-0.1; -27.1, 27.0] s-1 for R 2 * $$ {\mathrm{R}}_2^{\ast } $$ and [-0.4%; -4.5%, 3.7%] for PDFF. The proposed method had significantly lower coefficient of variation than other methods (p < 0.001). Effective acquisition time of 64 s or 59 s was achieved, compared with 171 s or 153 s for two baseline protocols with different radial views corresponding to sampling factor of 1.0. CONCLUSION: This proposed method may allow accelerated free-breathing liver PDFF and R 2 * $$ {\mathrm{R}}_2^{\ast } $$ mapping with reduced biases and variations.


Asunto(s)
Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador , Hígado , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Fantasmas de Imagen , Humanos , Hígado/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Masculino , Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Respiración , Algoritmos , Adulto , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/diagnóstico por imagen , Movimiento (Física) , Tejido Adiposo/diagnóstico por imagen , Interpretación de Imagen Asistida por Computador/métodos , Anciano
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...