Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
2.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg ; 196: 105972, 2020 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32512407

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Establishing an overall survival prognosis for resected glioblastoma during routine postoperative management remains a challenge. The aim of our single-center study was to assess the usefulness of basing survival analyses on preradiotherapy MRI (PRMR) rather than on postoperative MRI (POMR). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was undertaken of 75 patients with glioblastoma treated at our institute. We collected overall survival and MRI volumetric data. We analyzed two types of volumetric data: residual tumor volume and extent of resection. Overall survival rates were compared according to these two types of volumetric data, calculated on either POMR or PRMR and according to the presence or absence of residual enhancement. RESULTS: Analysis of volumetric data revealed progression of some residual tumors between POMR and PRMR. Kaplan-Meier analysis of the correlations between extent of resection, residual tumor volume, and overall survival revealed significant differences between POMR and PRMR data. Both MRI scans indicated a difference between the complete resection subgroup and the incomplete resection subgroup, as median overall survival was longer in patients with complete resection. However, differences were significant for PRMR (25.3 vs. 15.5, p =  0.012), but not for POMR (21.3 vs. 15.8 months, p =  0.145). With a residual tumor volume cut-off value of 3 cm3, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed non-significant differences on POMR (p =  0.323) compared with PRMR (p =  0.007). CONCLUSION: Survival in patients with resected glioblastoma was more accurately predicted by volumetric data acquired with PRMR. Differences in predicted survival between the POMR and PRMR groups can be attributed to changes in tumor behavior before adjuvant therapy.


Asunto(s)
Irradiación Craneana , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción , Glioblastoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Neuroimagen , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos , Neoplasias Supratentoriales/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Quimioradioterapia , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Glioblastoma/mortalidad , Glioblastoma/cirugía , Glioblastoma/terapia , Humanos , Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Neoplasia Residual , Cuidados Posoperatorios , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Supratentoriales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Supratentoriales/cirugía , Neoplasias Supratentoriales/terapia , Carga Tumoral
3.
J Neurooncol ; 142(3): 489-497, 2019 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30783874

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Systematic pre-radiotherapy MRI in patients with newly resected glioblastoma (OMS 2016) sometimes reveals tumor growth in the period between surgery and radiotherapy. We evaluated the relation between early tumor growth and overall survival (OS) with the aim of finding predictors of regrowth. METHODS: Seventy-five patients from 25 to 84 years old (Median age 62 years) with preoperative, immediate postoperative, and preradiotherapy MRI were included. Volumetric measurements were made on each of the three MRI scans and clinical and molecular parameters were collected for each case. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients (72%) had an early regrowth with a median contrast enhancement volume of 3.61 cm3-range 0.12-71.93 cm3. The median OS was 24 months in patients with no early tumor growth and 17.1 months in those with early tumor regrowth (p = 0.0024). In the population with initial complete resection (27 patients), the median OS was 25.3 months (19 patients) in those with no early tumor growth between surgery and radiotherapy compared to 16.3 months (8 patients) in those with tumor regrowth. In multivariate analysis, the initial extent of resection (p < 0.001) and the delay between postoperative MRI and preradiotherapy MRI (p < 0.001) were significant independent prognostic factors of regrowth and of poorer outcome. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that, in addition to the well known issue of incomplete resection, longer delays between surgery and adjuvant treatment is an independent factors of tumor regrowth and a risk factor of poorer outcomes for the patients. To overcome the delay factor, we suggest shortening the usual time between surgery and radiotherapy.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Encefálicas/patología , Glioblastoma/mortalidad , Glioblastoma/patología , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/mortalidad , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias Encefálicas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirugía , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Glioblastoma/radioterapia , Glioblastoma/cirugía , Humanos , Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...