RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: In the surgical treatment of cervical carcinoma the conservation of ovaries in premenopausal women is a common procedure. To date, however, there have been no controlled studies to prove that the risk of recurrence or death from disease is not elevated among women who do not undergo oophorectomy. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a matched pairs analysis according to the tumor volume, comparing the outcomes of patients with in situ conservation of >/=1 ovary with those of control subjects who underwent bilateral oophorectomy. From among 658 patients, 150 pairs with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage I disease were matched. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were compared with the log rank test. RESULTS: Among patients who retained their ovaries 5- and 10-year overall survival rates were 98% and 96%, respectively, versus 97% and 97% for the oophorectomy control group. The corresponding figures for progression-free survival were 95% and 94%, respectively, versus 97% and 93%. Outcomes were equal with sufficient power to detect a 10% difference. Three of 214 patients with conservation of ovaries (1.3%) subsequently required oophorectomy, all because of benign ovarian diseases. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm that ovarian conservation is safe in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage I disease and that the occurrence of subsequent complications in ovaries retained in situ is rare.